Which show was it early on in the tour where Keith's amp malfunctioned during Jumpin Jack Flash and the band played it without him? I want to say it was in California.
Forum: Tell Me

I dig this show
Forum: Tell Me

QuotePalace Revolution 2000 QuoteTravelinMan QuoteMathijs QuoteTravelinMan QuoteMathijs QuoteGasLightStreet QuoteTravelinMan QuoteMeise QuoteTravelinMan Weirdly the record is in the key of F, but they played it in ‘73 and ‘77 in E. I’m wondering if they sped the tape up to take up less space on the record a la Fingerprint File. The Stones have done that with several song, i.e. they dropped the
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs QuoteTravelinMan QuoteMathijs QuoteGasLightStreet QuoteTravelinMan QuoteMeise QuoteTravelinMan Weirdly the record is in the key of F, but they played it in ‘73 and ‘77 in E. I’m wondering if they sped the tape up to take up less space on the record a la Fingerprint File. The Stones have done that with several song, i.e. they dropped the key down by a half or whole tone. Obviously b
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs QuoteGasLightStreet QuoteTravelinMan QuoteMeise QuoteTravelinMan Weirdly the record is in the key of F, but they played it in ‘73 and ‘77 in E. I’m wondering if they sped the tape up to take up less space on the record a la Fingerprint File. The Stones have done that with several song, i.e. they dropped the key down by a half or whole tone. Obviously better to sing for Mick avoidin
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteGasLightStreet QuoteTravelinMan QuoteMeise QuoteTravelinMan Weirdly the record is in the key of F, but they played it in ‘73 and ‘77 in E. I’m wondering if they sped the tape up to take up less space on the record a la Fingerprint File. The Stones have done that with several song, i.e. they dropped the key down by a half or whole tone. Obviously better to sing for Mick avoiding voice fatig
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMeise QuoteTravelinMan Weirdly the record is in the key of F, but they played it in ‘73 and ‘77 in E. I’m wondering if they sped the tape up to take up less space on the record a la Fingerprint File. The Stones have done that with several song, i.e. they dropped the key down by a half or whole tone. Obviously better to sing for Mick avoiding voice fatigue or even vocal cord problems. Other
Forum: Tell Me

What are the best 1969 soundboards? Obviously nothing from that tour will top Ya Ya's, but I really haven't dug into that tour. What about the best soundboards from 1970? Or are there? '71 Leeds is incredible.
Forum: Tell Me

Weirdly the record is in the key of F, but they played it in ‘73 and ‘77 in E. I’m wondering if they sped the tape up to take up less space on the record a la Fingerprint File.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteGasLightStreet QuoteTravelinMan QuoteProfessorWolf something like maybe lyl with a complete show from 75, 76, and the complete el mocambo shows with whatever tracks are usable from the other show they didn't release already and just a crazy request but if they exist in usable quality maybe a disc of tracks from the 75, 76 tour rehearsals and el mocambo rehearsals Mocambo? That just
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteProfessorWolf something like maybe lyl with a complete show from 75, 76, and the complete el mocambo shows with whatever tracks are usable from the other show they didn't release already and just a crazy request but if they exist in usable quality maybe a disc of tracks from the 75, 76 tour rehearsals and el mocambo rehearsals Mocambo? That just came out two years ago, I doubt they
Forum: Tell Me

Does anyone have the instrumental version now that the official version has been released (for 14 years)?
Forum: Buy/Sell/Trade

Back to Dancing In The Light: are those vintage Keith Richards backing vocals during the choruses?!?! I just heard them for the first time.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs QuoteTravelinMan QuoteMathijs It is Bill Wyman on his old fretless bass 200%. Mathijs I believe the instrumental bootleg version plays back fast, which is why I thought it was more jumpy than it actually is. What about So Divine? Exact same thudding bass sound, Bill on his fretless. What a horrible track by the way. Mathijs Interesting. I need to brush up on my
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs QuoteTravelinMan Then of course there is Moonlight Mile. He contributed heavily to Shine a Light and Winter. Maybe he is using the term "written" looser than we are assuming. Charlie said he played beautifully on Loving Cup: "He gave terrific beauty to the tracks he played on: Loving Cup was a good one." Taylor states the end riff was his, Richards stat
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteGasLightStreet QuoteTravelinMan QuoteGasLightStreet It sounds like the electric had a mike on it and the amp is mixed on top, because there's some strum and the ring of the strum is the amp sound at the same time. The acoustic is completely different. I doubt they would mic the actual electric guitar. Perhaps Jagger was in the room (or playing the acoustic) and it’s bleed from that.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteLeonidP Love the guitars & rhythm section! And the vocals are nice too (although guessing the vocals were added for the deluxe release) This song has definitely grown on me and some of the lyrics are funny.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteRobberBride QuoteTravelinMan QuoteRobberBride I have no specific info regarding who played bass, but according to the "Stones Raw tapes" a memo prepared by Trevor Churchill for the Klein court thingy, it is Bill. You can see the full line up on one of the three pages printed on page 359 in the Nellcote book. However, as Churchill writes, this is the line up "as far as we know,
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteDandelionPowderman QuoteDoxa QuoteTheflyingDutchman QuoteTravelinMan I highly doubt Jagger was playing acoustic on a basic tracking session. My gut tells me it’s Taylor on acoustic and Richards on electric and this was done when Hopkins was in Jamaica. Maybe they overdubbed in LA, but it’s strange that’s Taylor’s memory of this particular song if he had no input. I can imagine that you d
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs QuoteTravelinMan QuoteGasLightStreet It sounds like the electric had a mike on it and the amp is mixed on top, because there's some strum and the ring of the strum is the amp sound at the same time. The acoustic is completely different. Such an interesting aspect, which Time Waits For No One has in similar ways - the IORR tracks are not that far from the GHS tracks in their
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteRobberBride I have no specific info regarding who played bass, but according to the "Stones Raw tapes" a memo prepared by Trevor Churchill for the Klein court thingy, it is Bill. You can see the full line up on one of the three pages printed on page 359 in the Nellcote book. However, as Churchill writes, this is the line up "as far as we know, Mick can probably fill you in on
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs It is Bill Wyman on his old fretless bass 200%. Mathijs I believe the instrumental bootleg version plays back fast, which is why I thought it was more jumpy than it actually is. What about So Divine?
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteGasLightStreet It sounds like the electric had a mike on it and the amp is mixed on top, because there's some strum and the ring of the strum is the amp sound at the same time. The acoustic is completely different. Such an interesting aspect, which Time Waits For No One has in similar ways - the IORR tracks are not that far from the GHS tracks in their overall-ness; if you didn'
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteGasLightStreet QuoteTravelinMan video: I know the Exile reissue says Wyman on bass, but those credits are riddled with mistakes. Are we sure it's Wyman on this one? So Divine is another that doesn't sound like Wyman to me. Light sounds not so much like Keith, who tends to rumble more. It moves a bit too much to be Keith. Yet... it kinda sounds like how Keith plumbs the bas
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteDandelionPowderman QuoteTravelinMan QuoteDandelionPowderman QuoteTheflyingDutchman QuoteGasLightStreet The acoustic was recorded in 1972 apparently. As Keith likes to say, it shadows. "And it is cheap", Keith said. Inaudible to my ears on WOAF. Same here. I'm usually good at cathing stuff like this – even almost inaudible things. Must be age kicking in. I hear a few str
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteDandelionPowderman QuoteTheflyingDutchman QuoteGasLightStreet The acoustic was recorded in 1972 apparently. As Keith likes to say, it shadows. "And it is cheap", Keith said. Inaudible to my ears on WOAF. Same here. I'm usually good at cathing stuff like this – even almost inaudible things. Must be age kicking in. I hear a few string-ish sounds from the piano, though.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs QuoteTaylor1 But why would Mick overdub an acoustic guitar in 1981 and then mix it down so low you can barely hear without a track separation app.And if he did overdub it, and then did not like it, why not just erase it? You ask me! It appears they just tried a bunch of things, and erased what they didn't like. And of course, an acoustic is the first thing you want to add to a
Forum: Tell Me

video: I know the Exile reissue says Wyman on bass, but those credits are riddled with mistakes. Are we sure it's Wyman on this one? So Divine is another that doesn't sound like Wyman to me.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteGasLightStreet The falsetto laden live track, acoustic is low in the mix about 1 oclock in the mix. Why don't the videos show up anymore? Mick had an idea in 1972 lyrically. Yep, that's the one.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs QuoteTravelinMan You’re asking a lot of questions mate, but I can tell you I’ve heard an acoustic guitar on Waiting for years as evidenced by my posts on this site. I’m pretty sure that’s Taylor facilitating Jagger’s basic arrangement just like Brown Sugar. The only guitar I hear at the ending is the acoustic that was overdubbed in 1981, as evidenced by the outtakes. Mathijs
Forum: Tell Me