For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
24FPS
In honor of Honk I'm listening to Forty Licks in the car today, a much better compilation, and no crap live cuts.
Quote
schillid
T H A N K S
You do not need headphones to hear itQuote
SomeGuyQuote
ironbellyYeap. It is there. But it was buried for all but 2009 remaster. Actually, it is present on Grrr! and for 25th single from 45x45 box. Somebody just brings it upfront during mastering.Quote
kowalskiQuote
ironbellyThere is very unpleasant sound in the very beginning. Some effect is compressed beyond reasonable. That effect is hidden deep on CBS, Virgin and recent Japanese SHM editions but pops brightly on 2009 remaster. I just checked all those versions. It sounds like a glitch at the end of the very 1st second (0.01) of the track.Quote
frankotero
I don't notice anything unusual with Harlem Shuffle. Maybe you got a bad disc?
Ironbelly, you're absolutely right. There's a annoying glitch at the beginning of Harlem Shuffle. I can't hear it on previous editions. It sounds like a tape glitch to me so maybe it was there from the start. But now it's clearly (and annoyingly) audible.
Is this about the tiny, little, 0.001 seconds of f*rt that is barely audible (took me headphones to even discover it) in the right channel?
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
JumpinJimFQuote
keefriffhard4life
i thought it was always "gimme shelter"
See label above from Let It Bleed 1969 (and on the LP cover too)
The original UK (Decca) and US (London) release as well as the 2002 reissue has it spelled Gimmie. Everywhere else it was spelled Gimme and since then it's been spelled Gimme.
I checked both the Honk version and the Dutch CBS cd from 1986 today. The only thing that strikes me is the fact that the first chords, are more upfront on Honk, whereas they sound more like a softer background tapestry if you will on the CBS disc. But I can't hear an off note or glitch really (but I will keep trying).Quote
ironbellyYou do not need headphones to hear itQuote
SomeGuyQuote
ironbellyYeap. It is there. But it was buried for all but 2009 remaster. Actually, it is present on Grrr! and for 25th single from 45x45 box. Somebody just brings it upfront during mastering.Quote
kowalskiQuote
ironbellyThere is very unpleasant sound in the very beginning. Some effect is compressed beyond reasonable. That effect is hidden deep on CBS, Virgin and recent Japanese SHM editions but pops brightly on 2009 remaster. I just checked all those versions. It sounds like a glitch at the end of the very 1st second (0.01) of the track.Quote
frankotero
I don't notice anything unusual with Harlem Shuffle. Maybe you got a bad disc?
Ironbelly, you're absolutely right. There's a annoying glitch at the beginning of Harlem Shuffle. I can't hear it on previous editions. It sounds like a tape glitch to me so maybe it was there from the start. But now it's clearly (and annoyingly) audible.
Is this about the tiny, little, 0.001 seconds of f*rt that is barely audible (took me headphones to even discover it) in the right channel?
Look, this is Harlem Shuffle from CBS CD Dirty Work, Japan for Europe
And this is Harlem Shuffle from recent EU Honk CD
Red ovals mark problematic zone. In the case of CBS it looks like a sound effect or glitch that does not reach track peak. For Honk everything is compressed and maximized (probably, mechanically, without any care). As a result that effect pops almost to the maximal level. As a matter of fact the whole track sounds like a s^&t. Dynamic range for CBS is 14. For Honk it is 7.
35love
No compression? No lacking depth? Clear sound? Really? How about numbers
Bitch from old Sticky Fingers CBS CD has DR 15 with peak at -2 dB
Bitch from old Sticky Fingers Virgin CD has DR10 with peak at -0.02 dB
Bitch from new Honk CD has DR6 with peak at -0.01 dB
All Honk if flat, lifeless and directly to your face. Earbleeding.
‘Hate To See You Go’ is exactly the same bad overloaded and over compressed recording from Blue and Lonesome. I mean, bad from technological point of view.
Quote
Deltics
Alternatively...
Give him a chance
Quote
EdubertoPalitroke
Why do most people regard 40 Licks as a great compilation and Grrr! as a bad one?
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
EdubertoPalitroke
Why do most people regard 40 Licks as a great compilation and Grrr! as a bad one?
where did you get that statistic? GRRR! is more complete without the 4 'extra' cuts that were unnecessarily on 40 Licks.
Biggest complaint I heard about GRRR! was Gregory on the cover.
40 Licks was criticized at the time of edition because of edits/shortening of some tracks. But in general it was more welcome, I guess. And it came with better mastering i.e. 1971-2002 tracks were still mastered by Bob Ludwig.Quote
EdubertoPalitroke
Why do most people regard 40 Licks as a great compilation and Grrr! as a bad one?
Quote
Hendrik
A little help through the Honk vinyl maze:
Hendrik
Quote
masseywinos
I personally really like the live tracks with the exception of Under My Thumb.
I love Dead Flowers the Paisley guitar is awesome.
One Hit To The Body would have been good. But since I'm not buying this money-grab it makes no difference to me. As for the live cuts....well,..the bootlegs are a-plenty..Quote
HMS
For long time followers this compilation is nothing but GRRR reheated. I wonder why crap like Out Of Tears or Streets Of Love made it onto a Best-Of-Collection and in the same time only one Dirty-Work-song was chosen. After all Honk is a pretty good way to start for people who do not know much of the Stones but absolutely of zero interest for die-hard-fans. The live-CD is a quite nice bonus, but I think I´ve heard better live-versions of most of these songs before.
After all the talk about being in the studio from time to time for years and years it is extremely disappointing that they haven´t got one damn single new song to offer. It seems in fact they got nothing new and a new album is far from reality, only wishful thinking.
Quote
mtaylor
Any sales figures?