Quote
retired_dog

Quote
MelBelli
Can confirm it’s for thr Stones — and for the reasons we’ve speculated. Keith wants to develop his stuff as far along as he can before he’s in the same room with Mick.

Hope that the new album can still be called a band effort and not just a loose collection of solo recordings released under the Stones moniker.

Quote
kish_stoned
The new stones album is in the can already,will be coming out april or may ,just before the tour for UK will start. START ME UP, OUT OF CONTROL,fans be ready will be rocking to STONES new album.YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

Quote
KRiffhard

Quote
retired_dog

Quote
MelBelli
Can confirm it’s for thr Stones — and for the reasons we’ve speculated. Keith wants to develop his stuff as far along as he can before he’s in the same room with Mick.

Hope that the new album can still be called a band effort and not just a loose collection of solo recordings released under the Stones moniker.

Quote
kish_stoned
YEAAAA KEITH DOES HAVE HIS OWN PROJECTS TO DO TOO, SO WAIT AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS IN APRIL,MAY OR JUNE 2018 WITH HOT SINGLE TOO,GOTTA GET A GRIP.ENJOY AND GET YOUR ROCKS OFF.

Quote
Lorenz
Reading this thread is basically just sorting through every post as fast as possible to see if georgelicks has added something.

Quote
Hairball
No absolute proof (as in a direct quote from Keith), but I think it was georgelicks who stated that to be the case. Or maybe it was Rocky Dijon?
It's buried in this thread somewhere as I remember LongBeach asking the same thing and I had to retrieve the info. in a quote - don't have time to slog through it all now.

Quote
KRiffhard

Quote
Hairball
No absolute proof (as in a direct quote from Keith), but I think it was georgelicks who stated that to be the case. Or maybe it was Rocky Dijon?
It's buried in this thread somewhere as I remember LongBeach asking the same thing and I had to retrieve the info. in a quote - don't have time to slog through it all now.

Are you reffering to MelBelli?

Posted by: MelBelli ()
Date: July 19, 2017 21:26
"Keith was not a fan of this tune. ... I wish they could've come up with this modus operandi a long time ago: Mick putting his pop experiments out on the side, heading off arguments with Keith, and letting the collective work continue"
(...)
"I'm not personally an insider, but I do know one. I'm saying Keith did not like this song (Clifford also involved, natch), and so it became a Mick single"

[iorr.org]

Quote
Hairball

Quote
KRiffhard

Quote
Hairball
No absolute proof (as in a direct quote from Keith), but I think it was georgelicks who stated that to be the case. Or maybe it was Rocky Dijon?
It's buried in this thread somewhere as I remember LongBeach asking the same thing and I had to retrieve the info. in a quote - don't have time to slog through it all now.

Are you reffering to MelBelli?

Posted by: MelBelli ()
Date: July 19, 2017 21:26
"Keith was not a fan of this tune. ... I wish they could've come up with this modus operandi a long time ago: Mick putting his pop experiments out on the side, heading off arguments with Keith, and letting the collective work continue"
(...)
"I'm not personally an insider, but I do know one. I'm saying Keith did not like this song (Clifford also involved, natch), and so it became a Mick single"

[iorr.org]

No not that, but similar to that. I'm pretty sure the word "refused" was involved.
Maybe it was Heniz...or georglicks...or Rocky Dijon...or...?

Quote
KRiffhard

Quote
Hairball

Quote
KRiffhard

Quote
Hairball
No absolute proof (as in a direct quote from Keith), but I think it was georgelicks who stated that to be the case. Or maybe it was Rocky Dijon?
It's buried in this thread somewhere as I remember LongBeach asking the same thing and I had to retrieve the info. in a quote - don't have time to slog through it all now.

Are you reffering to MelBelli?

Posted by: MelBelli ()
Date: July 19, 2017 21:26
"Keith was not a fan of this tune. ... I wish they could've come up with this modus operandi a long time ago: Mick putting his pop experiments out on the side, heading off arguments with Keith, and letting the collective work continue"
(...)
"I'm not personally an insider, but I do know one. I'm saying Keith did not like this song (Clifford also involved, natch), and so it became a Mick single"

[iorr.org]

No not that, but similar to that. I'm pretty sure the word "refused" was involved.
Maybe it was Heniz...or georglicks...or Rocky Dijon...or...?

Georgelicks!!
Posted by: georgelicks ()
Date: August 1, 2017 21:32

I can tell from my source that both songs were from the Stones' sessions for the new album, both Ronnie and Charlie are on it but Keith refused to play, just like he did not play on Saint Of Me.
Both songs were re-worked as Mick Jagger solo songs, Universal wanted something out to test the market and keep the hype about the new album and Mick was happy to put something out.
There are more songs like these from the 15 or so new songs recorded so far, but it looks like Keith wants a classic Rolling Stones sounding album, no dance or experimental stuff on it so there's the fight for the final cut of the new album.
A Bridges To Babylon situation again, but 20 years later.
[iorr.org]

Quote
georgelicks
"You shape your life around making a record, and really, so far, there hasn't really been an appetite for that. So, we've been doing it in a couple of little bursts."
"But I will tell you we’re a ways off yet until we’re done"


Don Was right words.


Also, Ronnie's last words about the whole thing on December 2:
"We have sort of tentatively booked in the near future. But with everybody dealing with Christmas coming up, having a little bit of time to put your feet up because we haven't really stopped - I know Charlie wants the month of March off, which is fine: let's have a holiday, whatever. And I don't blame him! So by the time we've all done a bit of that, we'll get back in the studio and finish up what we've started the new songs-wise. Keith just tried to get us into the studio in New York last week. He said Can't we go in? Can't we find some time? It was Hang on, do us a favour, we've all got Christmas coming up, we've got to spent time with our families!... It's going to pick up steam again."


I was told about booked studio time in London around February 21-22, only for a week. As we see, March is off due to Charlie's request.

Quote
KRiffhard

Quote
Hairball

Quote
KRiffhard

Quote
Hairball
No absolute proof (as in a direct quote from Keith), but I think it was georgelicks who stated that to be the case. Or maybe it was Rocky Dijon?
It's buried in this thread somewhere as I remember LongBeach asking the same thing and I had to retrieve the info. in a quote - don't have time to slog through it all now.

Are you reffering to MelBelli?

Posted by: MelBelli ()
Date: July 19, 2017 21:26
"Keith was not a fan of this tune. ... I wish they could've come up with this modus operandi a long time ago: Mick putting his pop experiments out on the side, heading off arguments with Keith, and letting the collective work continue"
(...)
"I'm not personally an insider, but I do know one. I'm saying Keith did not like this song (Clifford also involved, natch), and so it became a Mick single"

[iorr.org]

No not that, but similar to that. I'm pretty sure the word "refused" was involved.
Maybe it was Heniz...or georglicks...or Rocky Dijon...or...?

Georgelicks!!
Posted by: georgelicks ()
Date: August 1, 2017 21:32

I can tell from my source that both songs were from the Stones' sessions for the new album, both Ronnie and Charlie are on it but Keith refused to play, just like he did not play on Saint Of Me.
Both songs were re-worked as Mick Jagger solo songs, Universal wanted something out to test the market and keep the hype about the new album and Mick was happy to put something out.
There are more songs like these from the 15 or so new songs recorded so far, but it looks like Keith wants a classic Rolling Stones sounding album, no dance or experimental stuff on it so there's the fight for the final cut of the new album.
A Bridges To Babylon situation again, but 20 years later.
[iorr.org]

Quote
MelBelli
Can confirm it’s for thr Stones — and for the reasons we’ve speculated. Keith wants to develop his stuff as far along as he can before he’s in the same room with Mick.

Quote
Cristiano Radtke
I posted this on the "On Air" thread, but this interview with Keith deserves to be pasted here as well:

“I’m really happy with the last album, the blues album,” he said. “It was one of the things we felt we had to do, but it worked out really great.”

Does that mean we might see a sequel one day soon?

“We’re working on some new [material] now,” he said. “There’s a new album in the works. We’re slowly putting it together.”

As for another modern-day collection of their favorite old blues numbers, Richards uttered another lascivious laugh and said, “I’m going to sound like Trump now: ‘Trust me. We’re working on it.’”

[www.latimes.com]

Quote
Cristiano Radtke
Richards uttered another lascivious laugh and said, “I’m going to sound like Trump now: ‘Trust me. We’re working on it.’”

Quote
Cristiano Radtke

[www.latimes.com]

Quote
Rockman
“We’re working on some new [material] now,” he said. “There’s a new album in the works. We’re slowly putting it together.”


Fanks Cristiano that's all we need ta know ....



Nobody knows the Gotta Get A Grip / Keith circumstances
it's all just speculation but remember around that time
Keith would have been dealing with a major family matter ...

Quote
Cristiano Radtke
I posted this on the "On Air" thread, but this interview with Keith deserves to be pasted here as well:

“I’m really happy with the last album, the blues album,” he said. “It was one of the things we felt we had to do, but it worked out really great.”

Does that mean we might see a sequel one day soon?

“We’re working on some new [material] now,” he said. “There’s a new album in the works. We’re slowly putting it together.”

As for another modern-day collection of their favorite old blues numbers, Richards uttered another lascivious laugh and said, “I’m going to sound like Trump now: ‘Trust me. We’re working on it.’”

[www.latimes.com]

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
Rockman
“We’re working on some new [material] now,” he said. “There’s a new album in the works. We’re slowly putting it together.”


Fanks Cristiano that's all we need ta know ....



Nobody knows the Gotta Get A Grip / Keith circumstances
it's all just speculation but remember around that time
Keith would have been dealing with a major family matter ...

Exactly.

Quote
georgelicks
Mick and Keith both work separately on this new album, when they agree on certain songs the whole band is involved.
Mick works with Charlie and Matt Clifford, Keith with Steve Jordan and Don Was.

Gotta Get A Grip and England Lost were songs that Keith rejected and Mick wanted to release on its own.

I've been told that Mick has already written enough songs to fill 3 or 4 new albums.

Quote
georgelicks
Mick and Keith both work separately on this new album, when they agree on certain songs the whole band is involved.
Mick works with Charlie and Matt Clifford, Keith with Steve Jordan and Don Was.

Gotta Get A Grip and England Lost were songs that Keith rejected and Mick wanted to release on its own.

I've been told that Mick has already written enough songs to fill 3 or 4 new albums.

Quote
georgelicks
Mick and Keith both work separately on this new album, when they agree on certain songs the whole band is involved.
Mick works with Charlie and Matt Clifford, Keith with Steve Jordan and Don Was.

Gotta Get A Grip and England Lost were songs that Keith rejected and Mick wanted to release on its own.

I've been told that Mick has already written enough songs to fill 3 or 4 new albums.