For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Come On
Quote
crholmstrom
Good MNF game last night. Nice to see Carolina do well. Another team with really good D. I'm detecting a pattern here. DK about the noncall at the end of the game though. Nice to see the evil Belichick lose on questionable call. I think I saw him in the trailer for the new Hobbit movie as a troll.
Quote
NoCode0680Quote
crholmstrom
Good MNF game last night. Nice to see Carolina do well. Another team with really good D. I'm detecting a pattern here. DK about the noncall at the end of the game though. Nice to see the evil Belichick lose on questionable call. I think I saw him in the trailer for the new Hobbit movie as a troll.
I don't know about that call either, as far as the letter of the rulebook goes, but I think it was the right result to the game. It wasn't as far off as most passes deemed un-catchable, but I don't think there was any chance of Gronk catching it either. At least from the way it looks to me. Had he not been touched at all, I don't think he could have shifted his momentum in the opposite direction and then beat the other defender to the ball. He didn't even try to cut back until he was 5 yards past where Lester intercepted it, and by that time the ball was pretty much already landing in Lester's hands. I think the fact that it was so damn blatant is what is causing all the controversy, but that's neither here nor there. Had it been some regular old contact which would normally draw a flag, I don't think it would have created such controversy.
As for Belichick, I don't understand all the hate for the guy. I think it's just a by-product of his success. Sure he's a little surly, but most football coaches are. I find Jim Harbaugh to be much more irritating than Belichick. Can you imagine how Harbaugh would have handled that? It probably would have made his other temper tantrums look tame. I like the 49ers, but Harbaugh makes it so damn hard to cheer for them.
Quote
crholmstromQuote
NoCode0680Quote
crholmstrom
Good MNF game last night. Nice to see Carolina do well. Another team with really good D. I'm detecting a pattern here. DK about the noncall at the end of the game though. Nice to see the evil Belichick lose on questionable call. I think I saw him in the trailer for the new Hobbit movie as a troll.
I don't know about that call either, as far as the letter of the rulebook goes, but I think it was the right result to the game. It wasn't as far off as most passes deemed un-catchable, but I don't think there was any chance of Gronk catching it either. At least from the way it looks to me. Had he not been touched at all, I don't think he could have shifted his momentum in the opposite direction and then beat the other defender to the ball. He didn't even try to cut back until he was 5 yards past where Lester intercepted it, and by that time the ball was pretty much already landing in Lester's hands. I think the fact that it was so damn blatant is what is causing all the controversy, but that's neither here nor there. Had it been some regular old contact which would normally draw a flag, I don't think it would have created such controversy.
As for Belichick, I don't understand all the hate for the guy. I think it's just a by-product of his success. Sure he's a little surly, but most football coaches are. I find Jim Harbaugh to be much more irritating than Belichick. Can you imagine how Harbaugh would have handled that? It probably would have made his other temper tantrums look tame. I like the 49ers, but Harbaugh makes it so damn hard to cheer for them.
My dislike of Belichick comes from the Super Bowl cheating scandal. Not that I like the Rams but spying on them was totally wrong. He should of been suspended for a season like Sean Payton, IMO. Don't get me wrong, I really dislike Jim Harbaugh, too. He's a jerk. Pete Carroll, although he has some taint from USC scandal, is a breath of fresh air. Very likeable & seems to have a plan that is working. Of course, there was some luck involved too (drafting Russell Wilson) but Pete's policy that you have to earn your playing time has been huge. & he has stuck by it. Most teams would have Matt Flynn starting at this point because they spent the big bucks. Incidentally, the 2 Seahawks (Richard Sherman & Doug Baldwin) who played for Harbaugh @ Stanford both dislike him pretty intensely. Says something.
Quote
tomk
Well, Super Bowl IV was played in pretty crappy weather And as Vince Lombardi said, "The weather doesn't beat you, the other team beats you."
Quote
Chris FountainQuote
tomk
Well, Super Bowl IV was played in pretty crappy weather And as Vince Lombardi said, "The weather doesn't beat you, the other team beats you."
No offense- I simply disagree. Extrinsic factors can beat you. For example, player slips on ice, Referee makes bad call, etc...
Here is my point - Let's play the Superbowl where the playing field is equal and does not affect the outcome.
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
The conspiracy theory for holding this season's Super Bowl in this possibly frigid location is to freeze the mega rich (who pay $1000s for tickets to attend) so much that they will happily go along with any plans to establish a semi permanent location for ALL future Super Bowls, for example holding 5/6 of all future Super Bowls at a shiny new football stadium in Los Angeles, a stadium in a city without an NFL team or any NFL games scheduled... but who knows the real reason.
Quote
NoCode0680Quote
crholmstromQuote
NoCode0680Quote
crholmstrom
Good MNF game last night. Nice to see Carolina do well. Another team with really good D. I'm detecting a pattern here. DK about the noncall at the end of the game though. Nice to see the evil Belichick lose on questionable call. I think I saw him in the trailer for the new Hobbit movie as a troll.
I don't know about that call either, as far as the letter of the rulebook goes, but I think it was the right result to the game. It wasn't as far off as most passes deemed un-catchable, but I don't think there was any chance of Gronk catching it either. At least from the way it looks to me. Had he not been touched at all, I don't think he could have shifted his momentum in the opposite direction and then beat the other defender to the ball. He didn't even try to cut back until he was 5 yards past where Lester intercepted it, and by that time the ball was pretty much already landing in Lester's hands. I think the fact that it was so damn blatant is what is causing all the controversy, but that's neither here nor there. Had it been some regular old contact which would normally draw a flag, I don't think it would have created such controversy.
As for Belichick, I don't understand all the hate for the guy. I think it's just a by-product of his success. Sure he's a little surly, but most football coaches are. I find Jim Harbaugh to be much more irritating than Belichick. Can you imagine how Harbaugh would have handled that? It probably would have made his other temper tantrums look tame. I like the 49ers, but Harbaugh makes it so damn hard to cheer for them.
My dislike of Belichick comes from the Super Bowl cheating scandal. Not that I like the Rams but spying on them was totally wrong. He should of been suspended for a season like Sean Payton, IMO. Don't get me wrong, I really dislike Jim Harbaugh, too. He's a jerk. Pete Carroll, although he has some taint from USC scandal, is a breath of fresh air. Very likeable & seems to have a plan that is working. Of course, there was some luck involved too (drafting Russell Wilson) but Pete's policy that you have to earn your playing time has been huge. & he has stuck by it. Most teams would have Matt Flynn starting at this point because they spent the big bucks. Incidentally, the 2 Seahawks (Richard Sherman & Doug Baldwin) who played for Harbaugh @ Stanford both dislike him pretty intensely. Says something.
That's not a very good reason to hate him, unless you also hate every other football coach, because they ALL did it. And also, there was no Super Bowl taping scandal, they didn't tape the Rams. It's been proven. There was just an allegation made by the Boston Herald, which they later retracted. They did do it in the regular season, like the others did. New England were just the ones who got caught. Denver got busted in 2010, but nobody really cared, because people don't have hate boners for Denver the way they do for New England.
When I was in high school, taping other teams and their signals was common practice, as it is (or was) at every level. At every one of our games there would be a coach from each team in our district, as well as probable playoff opponents, up at the top of the bleachers recording us or our opponent, and the signals. And our coaches went to games and did the same thing. Nobody cared, our coaches would go up there and shoot the breeze with them, it was just common practice. Part of the game. That's why you have multiple coaches giving different signals and only they know which one is legit. In fact, my Junior year I was out for 2 games with a shoulder injury, and I was made a taper. I went with an assistant coach to games at two other schools and he recorded the signals while I recorded the game.
The whole thing was making a mountain out of a molehill. Even Mangini, who turned them in has said so. He says it really gave them no advantage, he just didn't want them doing it at his stadium. He says it's his biggest regret and the one decision he wishes he could take back. Because it essentially made New England pariahs for doing something everybody was doing. Even Jimmy Johnson came out and said everybody, including himself, did it.
Quote
NoCode0680Quote
crholmstromQuote
NoCode0680Quote
crholmstrom
Good MNF game last night. Nice to see Carolina do well. Another team with really good D. I'm detecting a pattern here. DK about the noncall at the end of the game though. Nice to see the evil Belichick lose on questionable call. I think I saw him in the trailer for the new Hobbit movie as a troll.
I don't know about that call either, as far as the letter of the rulebook goes, but I think it was the right result to the game. It wasn't as far off as most passes deemed un-catchable, but I don't think there was any chance of Gronk catching it either. At least from the way it looks to me. Had he not been touched at all, I don't think he could have shifted his momentum in the opposite direction and then beat the other defender to the ball. He didn't even try to cut back until he was 5 yards past where Lester intercepted it, and by that time the ball was pretty much already landing in Lester's hands. I think the fact that it was so damn blatant is what is causing all the controversy, but that's neither here nor there. Had it been some regular old contact which would normally draw a flag, I don't think it would have created such controversy.
As for Belichick, I don't understand all the hate for the guy. I think it's just a by-product of his success. Sure he's a little surly, but most football coaches are. I find Jim Harbaugh to be much more irritating than Belichick. Can you imagine how Harbaugh would have handled that? It probably would have made his other temper tantrums look tame. I like the 49ers, but Harbaugh makes it so damn hard to cheer for them.
My dislike of Belichick comes from the Super Bowl cheating scandal. Not that I like the Rams but spying on them was totally wrong. He should of been suspended for a season like Sean Payton, IMO. Don't get me wrong, I really dislike Jim Harbaugh, too. He's a jerk. Pete Carroll, although he has some taint from USC scandal, is a breath of fresh air. Very likeable & seems to have a plan that is working. Of course, there was some luck involved too (drafting Russell Wilson) but Pete's policy that you have to earn your playing time has been huge. & he has stuck by it. Most teams would have Matt Flynn starting at this point because they spent the big bucks. Incidentally, the 2 Seahawks (Richard Sherman & Doug Baldwin) who played for Harbaugh @ Stanford both dislike him pretty intensely. Says something.
That's not a very good reason to hate him, unless you also hate every other football coach, because they ALL did it. And also, there was no Super Bowl taping scandal, they didn't tape the Rams. It's been proven. There was just an allegation made by the Boston Herald, which they later retracted. They did do it in the regular season, like the others did. New England were just the ones who got caught. Denver got busted in 2010, but nobody really cared, because people don't have hate boners for Denver the way they do for New England.
When I was in high school, taping other teams and their signals was common practice, as it is (or was) at every level. At every one of our games there would be a coach from each team in our district, as well as probable playoff opponents, up at the top of the bleachers recording us or our opponent, and the signals. And our coaches went to games and did the same thing. Nobody cared, our coaches would go up there and shoot the breeze with them, it was just common practice. Part of the game. That's why you have multiple coaches giving different signals and only they know which one is legit. In fact, my Junior year I was out for 2 games with a shoulder injury, and I was made a taper. I went with an assistant coach to games at two other schools and he recorded the signals while I recorded the game.
The whole thing was making a mountain out of a molehill. Even Mangini, who turned them in has said so. He says it really gave them no advantage, he just didn't want them doing it at his stadium. He says it's his biggest regret and the one decision he wishes he could take back. Because it essentially made New England pariahs for doing something everybody was doing. Even Jimmy Johnson came out and said everybody, including himself, did it.
Yes they were. That was the reason they got fined, etc.Quote
keefriffhard4lifeQuote
NoCode0680Quote
crholmstromQuote
NoCode0680Quote
crholmstrom
Good MNF game last night. Nice to see Carolina do well. Another team with really good D. I'm detecting a pattern here. DK about the noncall at the end of the game though. Nice to see the evil Belichick lose on questionable call. I think I saw him in the trailer for the new Hobbit movie as a troll.
I don't know about that call either, as far as the letter of the rulebook goes, but I think it was the right result to the game. It wasn't as far off as most passes deemed un-catchable, but I don't think there was any chance of Gronk catching it either. At least from the way it looks to me. Had he not been touched at all, I don't think he could have shifted his momentum in the opposite direction and then beat the other defender to the ball. He didn't even try to cut back until he was 5 yards past where Lester intercepted it, and by that time the ball was pretty much already landing in Lester's hands. I think the fact that it was so damn blatant is what is causing all the controversy, but that's neither here nor there. Had it been some regular old contact which would normally draw a flag, I don't think it would have created such controversy.
As for Belichick, I don't understand all the hate for the guy. I think it's just a by-product of his success. Sure he's a little surly, but most football coaches are. I find Jim Harbaugh to be much more irritating than Belichick. Can you imagine how Harbaugh would have handled that? It probably would have made his other temper tantrums look tame. I like the 49ers, but Harbaugh makes it so damn hard to cheer for them.
My dislike of Belichick comes from the Super Bowl cheating scandal. Not that I like the Rams but spying on them was totally wrong. He should of been suspended for a season like Sean Payton, IMO. Don't get me wrong, I really dislike Jim Harbaugh, too. He's a jerk. Pete Carroll, although he has some taint from USC scandal, is a breath of fresh air. Very likeable & seems to have a plan that is working. Of course, there was some luck involved too (drafting Russell Wilson) but Pete's policy that you have to earn your playing time has been huge. & he has stuck by it. Most teams would have Matt Flynn starting at this point because they spent the big bucks. Incidentally, the 2 Seahawks (Richard Sherman & Doug Baldwin) who played for Harbaugh @ Stanford both dislike him pretty intensely. Says something.
That's not a very good reason to hate him, unless you also hate every other football coach, because they ALL did it. And also, there was no Super Bowl taping scandal, they didn't tape the Rams. It's been proven. There was just an allegation made by the Boston Herald, which they later retracted. They did do it in the regular season, like the others did. New England were just the ones who got caught. Denver got busted in 2010, but nobody really cared, because people don't have hate boners for Denver the way they do for New England.
When I was in high school, taping other teams and their signals was common practice, as it is (or was) at every level. At every one of our games there would be a coach from each team in our district, as well as probable playoff opponents, up at the top of the bleachers recording us or our opponent, and the signals. And our coaches went to games and did the same thing. Nobody cared, our coaches would go up there and shoot the breeze with them, it was just common practice. Part of the game. That's why you have multiple coaches giving different signals and only they know which one is legit. In fact, my Junior year I was out for 2 games with a shoulder injury, and I was made a taper. I went with an assistant coach to games at two other schools and he recorded the signals while I recorded the game.
The whole thing was making a mountain out of a molehill. Even Mangini, who turned them in has said so. He says it really gave them no advantage, he just didn't want them doing it at his stadium. He says it's his biggest regret and the one decision he wishes he could take back. Because it essentially made New England pariahs for doing something everybody was doing. Even Jimmy Johnson came out and said everybody, including himself, did it.
everyone may do it but weren't the patriots doing it at other teams practices when no filming sessions are supposed to be going on?
Harbaugh like that too. The worm sure has turned this year! Go Hawks! I'm a lost soul with the bye week & all. Putting on rock & roll shoes for Nine Inch Nails tonight as a substitute.Quote
gimmelittledrink
I dislike Belchick because of the way he runs up the score. During their 'perfect' season, it was pretty disgusting. If Brady had blown his knee out while 30 points ahead in meaningless game, it would have served them right.
Quote
crholmstromYes they were. That was the reason they got fined, etc.Quote
keefriffhard4lifeQuote
NoCode0680Quote
crholmstromQuote
NoCode0680Quote
crholmstrom
Good MNF game last night. Nice to see Carolina do well. Another team with really good D. I'm detecting a pattern here. DK about the noncall at the end of the game though. Nice to see the evil Belichick lose on questionable call. I think I saw him in the trailer for the new Hobbit movie as a troll.
I don't know about that call either, as far as the letter of the rulebook goes, but I think it was the right result to the game. It wasn't as far off as most passes deemed un-catchable, but I don't think there was any chance of Gronk catching it either. At least from the way it looks to me. Had he not been touched at all, I don't think he could have shifted his momentum in the opposite direction and then beat the other defender to the ball. He didn't even try to cut back until he was 5 yards past where Lester intercepted it, and by that time the ball was pretty much already landing in Lester's hands. I think the fact that it was so damn blatant is what is causing all the controversy, but that's neither here nor there. Had it been some regular old contact which would normally draw a flag, I don't think it would have created such controversy.
As for Belichick, I don't understand all the hate for the guy. I think it's just a by-product of his success. Sure he's a little surly, but most football coaches are. I find Jim Harbaugh to be much more irritating than Belichick. Can you imagine how Harbaugh would have handled that? It probably would have made his other temper tantrums look tame. I like the 49ers, but Harbaugh makes it so damn hard to cheer for them.
My dislike of Belichick comes from the Super Bowl cheating scandal. Not that I like the Rams but spying on them was totally wrong. He should of been suspended for a season like Sean Payton, IMO. Don't get me wrong, I really dislike Jim Harbaugh, too. He's a jerk. Pete Carroll, although he has some taint from USC scandal, is a breath of fresh air. Very likeable & seems to have a plan that is working. Of course, there was some luck involved too (drafting Russell Wilson) but Pete's policy that you have to earn your playing time has been huge. & he has stuck by it. Most teams would have Matt Flynn starting at this point because they spent the big bucks. Incidentally, the 2 Seahawks (Richard Sherman & Doug Baldwin) who played for Harbaugh @ Stanford both dislike him pretty intensely. Says something.
That's not a very good reason to hate him, unless you also hate every other football coach, because they ALL did it. And also, there was no Super Bowl taping scandal, they didn't tape the Rams. It's been proven. There was just an allegation made by the Boston Herald, which they later retracted. They did do it in the regular season, like the others did. New England were just the ones who got caught. Denver got busted in 2010, but nobody really cared, because people don't have hate boners for Denver the way they do for New England.
When I was in high school, taping other teams and their signals was common practice, as it is (or was) at every level. At every one of our games there would be a coach from each team in our district, as well as probable playoff opponents, up at the top of the bleachers recording us or our opponent, and the signals. And our coaches went to games and did the same thing. Nobody cared, our coaches would go up there and shoot the breeze with them, it was just common practice. Part of the game. That's why you have multiple coaches giving different signals and only they know which one is legit. In fact, my Junior year I was out for 2 games with a shoulder injury, and I was made a taper. I went with an assistant coach to games at two other schools and he recorded the signals while I recorded the game.
The whole thing was making a mountain out of a molehill. Even Mangini, who turned them in has said so. He says it really gave them no advantage, he just didn't want them doing it at his stadium. He says it's his biggest regret and the one decision he wishes he could take back. Because it essentially made New England pariahs for doing something everybody was doing. Even Jimmy Johnson came out and said everybody, including himself, did it.
everyone may do it but weren't the patriots doing it at other teams practices when no filming sessions are supposed to be going on?
Quote
crholmstrom
Even if "everybody" did it (an iffy statement at best) it doesn't make it right. Belichick is still an evil troll. Boston needs to get over itself almost as much as NYC. The rest of the country doesn't think as highly of them as they do themselves. Both are ok cities but IMO not better because they're old & falling apart in spots. I've traveled a lot & I must say that Boston has the rudest cab drivers I've ever dealt with by far. Don't get off the fender of your car to do your job & get me to my hotel. I could go on...
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
The conspiracy theory for holding this season's Super Bowl in this possibly frigid location is to freeze the mega rich (who pay $1000s for tickets to attend) so much that they will happily go along with any plans to establish a semi permanent location for ALL future Super Bowls, for example holding 5/6 of all future Super Bowls at a shiny new football stadium in Los Angeles, a stadium in a city without an NFL team or any NFL games scheduled... but who knows the real reason.
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
Max'sKansasCity
The conspiracy theory for holding this season's Super Bowl in this possibly frigid location is to freeze the mega rich (who pay $1000s for tickets to attend) so much that they will happily go along with any plans to establish a semi permanent location for ALL future Super Bowls, for example holding 5/6 of all future Super Bowls at a shiny new football stadium in Los Angeles, a stadium in a city without an NFL team or any NFL games scheduled... but who knows the real reason.
Bobblehead Goodell is ruining the NFL. Thursday games are ridiculous. London is ridiculous. Yet owners use the 'we'll move to Los Angeles if we don't get what we want' excuse for getting new stadiums: Goodell doesn't want a team in LA.
Yet... and he makes it clear, a city can't have a Super Bowl without having a team.
Quote
crholmstrom
NFL Sunday finally here! I am a lost soul without a Seahawks game though. Looks like I get SD/KC in the morning & Dallas/NYG (yawn) in the afternoon. Denver/NE should be a good one tonight. Wish the NO/Seattle game was happening this weekend. That game will probably decide home field for playoffs in the NFC. Guess I'll have to save my vocal chords this weekend for that!
Quote
Max'sKansasCityQuote
crholmstrom
NFL Sunday finally here! I am a lost soul without a Seahawks game though. Looks like I get SD/KC in the morning & Dallas/NYG (yawn) in the afternoon. Denver/NE should be a good one tonight. Wish the NO/Seattle game was happening this weekend. That game will probably decide home field for playoffs in the NFC. Guess I'll have to save my vocal chords this weekend for that!
Giants/Dallas could be a very exciting game with lots of passing. It is a very meaningful game to the men on both teams, so they will probably be going all out to win. At 4-6 this game is probably a must win for the Giants if they want any hopes of the playoffs, as for Dallas at 5-5 this is a good chance to put some distance on the Giants.
NFC East Team W L
Philadelphia Eagles 6 5
Dallas Cowboys 5 5 COULD BE 6-5... OR 5-6
New York Giants 4 6 COULD BE 4-7... OR 5-6 big differences
Washington Redskins 3 7 deadskins
I think it looks like a big time NFC East game with the Giants being the (home field) favorite by 2.5 points. These two quarterbacks who can throw a for a lot of yardage... so stay awake it could be fun to watch.
As for the Chiefs game, open your window sometime during the game and enjoy watching the folks in KC freeze their buns off. Right now it is 15 degrees and it will only be about 20 degrees at kickofff BUUURRRRRRRR!!! Phyllis Rivers understands the horror of what Arrowhead can be, so he may be ready, but still, I doubt those southern Cal boys will enjoy their Sunday.
I am betting Rivers will try to be braver than Manning was against KC today and may be willing to take more time in the pocket (last Sunday Manning got rid of that ball faster than any QB in NFL history, the longest he had it was 3.2 seconds, with an average of 2.2 seconds, and BANG BANG (HURRY HURRY as Peyton says) it was gone, long before KC (or any defense) could get to him). But if Rivers spends too much time looking, BAM!!! he will be seeing stars. I bet after last weeks drought the KC defense is jonsing to rip off someone's head off and it may be Rivers who will feel the the pain, unless he gets rid of the ball as fast as Manning did.
Anyway, the Dallas/NY game might be more exciting than the Chiefs/Chargers game, unless one is a BIG fan of one of the teams. I think the Chiefs will win... and I bet that Dallas will lose.