For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
donvis
James Kirk, question my motives???
Quote
GADAWG
With due respect all the posts seem to be on the demand side of the equation. I work for a publically traded company and all of our business is generated through a public RFP bidding process.
Many of our contracts are in excess of $50 million annually. Once we win an award there is usually a substantial startup cost for implementation. In many cases 10% to 20% of the first year gross. This doesn’t include a performance bond equal to one year of our cost of goods. Meaning what we would pay our sub-contractors.
If you plug those factors in what is obviously a first class run tour. I don't think the ticket prices are that far off the mark. You also have to factor in seats that don’t sell.
Multiplying the ticket cost by the number of seats and then dividing it by the band member is just stupid.
As I see it, the cat bird seat is having the ability of being over 50. Smoking dope all your life and bitching about ticket cost and corporate bonuses. When in actuality you haven’t a clue of economics and how the real world works.
If someone is offended they should stay home. Voice their opinion by not buying a seat rather than going on some diatribe when the only thing being accomplished is showing ignorance.
Quote
GADAWG
With due respect all the posts seem to be on the demand side of the equation. I work for a publically traded company and all of our business is generated through a public RFP bidding process.
Many of our contracts are in excess of $50 million annually. Once we win an award there is usually a substantial startup cost for implementation. In many cases 10% to 20% of the first year gross. This doesn’t include a performance bond equal to one year of our cost of goods. Meaning what we would pay our sub-contractors.
If you plug those factors in what is obviously a first class run tour. I don't think the ticket prices are that far off the mark. You also have to factor in seats that don’t sell.
Multiplying the ticket cost by the number of seats and then dividing it by the band member is just stupid.
As I see it, the cat bird seat is having the ability of being over 50. Smoking dope all your life and bitching about ticket cost and corporate bonuses. When in actuality you haven’t a clue of economics and how the real world works.
If someone is offended they should stay home. Voice their opinion by not buying a seat rather than going on some diatribe when the only thing being accomplished is showing ignorance.
Quote
andrewtQuote
GADAWG
With due respect all the posts seem to be on the demand side of the equation. I work for a publically traded company and all of our business is generated through a public RFP bidding process.
Many of our contracts are in excess of $50 million annually. Once we win an award there is usually a substantial startup cost for implementation. In many cases 10% to 20% of the first year gross. This doesn’t include a performance bond equal to one year of our cost of goods. Meaning what we would pay our sub-contractors.
If you plug those factors in what is obviously a first class run tour. I don't think the ticket prices are that far off the mark. You also have to factor in seats that don’t sell.
Multiplying the ticket cost by the number of seats and then dividing it by the band member is just stupid.
As I see it, the cat bird seat is having the ability of being over 50. Smoking dope all your life and bitching about ticket cost and corporate bonuses. When in actuality you haven’t a clue of economics and how the real world works.
If someone is offended they should stay home. Voice their opinion by not buying a seat rather than going on some diatribe when the only thing being accomplished is showing ignorance.
Folks are staying home in droves. The value is lacking and therefore demand is anemic.
Quote
flacnvinyl
"You just need to work harder/save a bit more, and cough it up" <--WRONG.
I DO NOT WORK FOR THE STONES. THE STONES WORK FOR ME.
[/size]
Quote
flacnvinyl
I DO NOT WORK FOR THE STONES. THE STONES WORK FOR ME.
Quote
uhbuhgullayewQuote
flacnvinyl
I DO NOT WORK FOR THE STONES. THE STONES WORK FOR ME.
Fascinating, do you send Mick, Keith and everyone else a W-2 every year?
Quote
TeddyB1018
There seems to be a significant percentage of the handful of people who post here who wish that to be true. There was a significant percentage of posters who said they would never play again after 2007. The Stones will play if they are having a better time than if they didn't play. If the tour is a drag, there is less incentive for them to do it again. But the idea that the tour will force them to retire at Hyde Park and never play another gig rogether is ridiculous. The only thing that will cause their permanent retirement is mortality.
Quote
TeddyB1018
There seems to be a significant percentage of the handful of people who post here who wish that to be true.
Quote
tatters
I don't think so. I don't think they'd think .....