For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
mtaylorBrazilian crapQuote
carlostones10Quote
mtaylorBetter than the crap of Roberto Carlos.Quote
carlostones10
No no so bad how I thought.
hahahah... nothing is worst than Roberto Carlos.
The king is really the big crap.
Se deus quiser blah, blah, blah.....Quote
carlostones10Quote
mtaylorBrazilian crapQuote
carlostones10Quote
mtaylorBetter than the crap of Roberto Carlos.Quote
carlostones10
No no so bad how I thought.
hahahah... nothing is worst than Roberto Carlos.
The king is really the big crap.
The big crap!
"Você foi...
O maior dos meus casos
De todos os abraços
O que eu nunca esqueci"
:-)
Quote
proudmary
The Complaint: SuperHeavy Is Not the Rolling Stones
Of course it's not. But Mick Jagger's new "super group" begs the question: What ever happened to the biggest band in the world?
By Matt Sullivan
Out from under the Tiki-bar bullshit that is SuperHeavy's first single, "Miracle Worker" (listen at the 1:45:15 mark here), right after Damien Marley shouts Well that's your own opinion / You're entitled to it, emerges the growl that can wake up the world. It's Mick Jagger, of course, and he sounds about 67-going-on-35 — better than on his solo album a decade ago, maybe even better than why I saw him croon a medley of Damien's dad's stuff on the last Rolling Stones tour five years back. Which kind of makes you angry. Here we are, approaching the fiftieth anniversary of the Stones, and there is no anniversary tour in site, no summoning of energies for the kings of energy — just the band in exile, and Mick in something like a "super group," which, considering it includes Marley and a Eurythmic and the guy who wrote the music for Slumdog Millionaire, really isn't that super at all.
It says something when the head of the greatest group in the history of groups is struggling to assemble a super group.
Now you could blame everyone from Kurt Cobain and Sublime's Bradley Noel, who died and went to hell and left the door open for Britney Spears and the Backstreet Boys, to Lady Gaga and Justin Bieber, who are to rock-and-roll bands what Bruce Lee was to a circle of ninjas in every direction. But would the biggest band in the world please stand up? Do the Kings of Leon have to suffice, really? Do the Red Hot Chili Peppers, with a record coming out next month that, without their drug-riddled guitar player, is bound to be as bland as the last? And so, we are stuck either with Coldplay or U2 or, (much) better still, with Radiohead — who would just as soon be the smallest band in the world, though they could do none of the things they do without, in fact, being the most influential. Unless, of course, Mick picks up the gang and wakes up the next great rock act — the Black Keys, or whomever — to be suddenly, and energetically, bigger than themselves, and thus anyone.
Read more: [www.esquire.com]
Quote
Gazza
I'd like to hear a great album over a mediocre album regardless of who the artist is...the world wont stop revolving on it's axis in the absence of a new Stones record.
Quote
24FPS
I think the Stones have simply reached the 'What Now?' stage. Voodoo Lounge and A Bigger Bang were mostly retread sounds, echoes of earlier triumphs. Bridges to Babylon was an attempt to modernize but Keith didn't seem into it. They may be facing the studio with dread. There's no 'new' for them to assimilate and still sound like the Stones. Artists need to be inspired. There's nothing inspiring about their last few albums. That's why those goosed up Exile outtakes were such a blessing. I know Bob Dylan has said they're a funk band without Bill Wyman, but man, they sure sounded funkier with him.
That's what I've missed on the last three albums, a good Stones groove.
Quote
GazzaQuote
proudmary
The Complaint: SuperHeavy Is Not the Rolling Stones
Of course it's not. But Mick Jagger's new "super group" begs the question: What ever happened to the biggest band in the world?
By Matt Sullivan
Out from under the Tiki-bar bullshit that is SuperHeavy's first single, "Miracle Worker" (listen at the 1:45:15 mark here), right after Damien Marley shouts Well that's your own opinion / You're entitled to it, emerges the growl that can wake up the world. It's Mick Jagger, of course, and he sounds about 67-going-on-35 — better than on his solo album a decade ago, maybe even better than why I saw him croon a medley of Damien's dad's stuff on the last Rolling Stones tour five years back. Which kind of makes you angry. Here we are, approaching the fiftieth anniversary of the Stones, and there is no anniversary tour in site, no summoning of energies for the kings of energy — just the band in exile, and Mick in something like a "super group," which, considering it includes Marley and a Eurythmic and the guy who wrote the music for Slumdog Millionaire, really isn't that super at all.
It says something when the head of the greatest group in the history of groups is struggling to assemble a super group.
Now you could blame everyone from Kurt Cobain and Sublime's Bradley Noel, who died and went to hell and left the door open for Britney Spears and the Backstreet Boys, to Lady Gaga and Justin Bieber, who are to rock-and-roll bands what Bruce Lee was to a circle of ninjas in every direction. But would the biggest band in the world please stand up? Do the Kings of Leon have to suffice, really? Do the Red Hot Chili Peppers, with a record coming out next month that, without their drug-riddled guitar player, is bound to be as bland as the last? And so, we are stuck either with Coldplay or U2 or, (much) better still, with Radiohead — who would just as soon be the smallest band in the world, though they could do none of the things they do without, in fact, being the most influential. Unless, of course, Mick picks up the gang and wakes up the next great rock act — the Black Keys, or whomever — to be suddenly, and energetically, bigger than themselves, and thus anyone.
Read more: [www.esquire.com]
That's because its only July 2011, you idiot. And what kind of journalist (or even the moron who edits his articles) can't differentiate between the words 'sight' and 'site'?
His dismissal of Rahman proves that he simply shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a typewriter.
Quote
Glam Descendant
>Mick never liked Exile on Mainstreet.
That's a myth. On the RS Fan Club 7" issued in'83, Mick says his favorite Stones albums are EOMS & SF.
How would we know what a kick ass SuperHeavy album is when they've never put one out?Quote
MingSubu
Ok, a Stones/SuperHeavy question.
Which would you rather have. A kickass SuperHeavy album, or a mediocre Stones album?
Quote
Loudei
I think Super Heavy is the answer on why the Stones have struggled creatively for so many years and just stuck with the touring money machine - the one thing they could do together. Super Heavy tells me how tough it must be for Mick and Keith to make an album together. It tells me how Mick just could not wait any longer to have a mainstream act or try to have one. I am sure this is difficult for Keith, and me... but I have to be real - Artists must like what they do... and yet I remind myself, Mick never liked Exile on Mainstreet.
Quote
Gazza
At least on a tour (once the rehearsals are over) they can pretty much get away with avoiding being together apart from the hour and a half or so that they have to share a stage.
Seems it is that bad, and that multi-million dollar paydays buy a degree of tolerance.Quote
Gazza
'Mick hasnt been to my dressing room in 20 years' - Keith.