For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StoneburstQuote
DandelionPowderman
Nobody here thought Keith made this up, either.
We can agree that Keith's comments in the RS interview weren't him going rogue: a decision had clearly been taken to spread rumours about Taylor's health through several channels, and Keith was just one part of that. But this doesn't get him a free pass on saying what he did.
He played his part, obviously.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StoneburstQuote
DandelionPowderman
Nobody here thought Keith made this up, either.
We can agree that Keith's comments in the RS interview weren't him going rogue: a decision had clearly been taken to spread rumours about Taylor's health through several channels, and Keith was just one part of that. But this doesn't get him a free pass on saying what he did.
He played his part, obviously.
When I said (concluding based on logic only) that the rumour was spread intentionally by the Stones camp (Keith included), some people here thought that was an outrageous accusation. But in the end it is not.
Quote
DoomandGloom
Keno
is a tool
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
LuxuryStones
To me the most comforting part to read is that MT has people that (I assume) seem to represent him. Very good, we'll see him playing very soon then, with or without the Stones.
Like you didn't know
Quote
LuxuryStonesQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
LuxuryStones
To me the most comforting part to read is that MT has people that (I assume) seem to represent him. Very good, we'll see him playing very soon then, with or without the Stones.
Like you didn't know
No, I don't. Only Taylor does, and he doesn't post here.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
LuxuryStonesQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
LuxuryStones
To me the most comforting part to read is that MT has people that (I assume) seem to represent him. Very good, we'll see him playing very soon then, with or without the Stones.
Like you didn't know
No, I don't. Only Taylor does, and he doesn't post here.
Is Taylor the only one who knows he has people representing him - what about those people?
Quote
LuxuryStonesQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
LuxuryStonesQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
LuxuryStones
To me the most comforting part to read is that MT has people that (I assume) seem to represent him. Very good, we'll see him playing very soon then, with or without the Stones.
Like you didn't know
No, I don't. Only Taylor does, and he doesn't post here.
Is Taylor the only one who knows he has people representing him - what about those people?
Taylor is ultimate responsible for the things that happen in his life: with whom he his playing, how he is playing and eventually people that represent him. Even the things he did with Ron Wood and the Rolling Stones this decade. I think he could have done better.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StoneburstQuote
DandelionPowderman
Nobody here thought Keith made this up, either.
We can agree that Keith's comments in the RS interview weren't him going rogue: a decision had clearly been taken to spread rumours about Taylor's health through several channels, and Keith was just one part of that. But this doesn't get him a free pass on saying what he did.
He played his part, obviously.
When I said (concluding based on logic only) that the rumour was spread intentionally by the Stones camp (Keith included), some people here thought that was an outrageous accusation. But in the end it is not.
We don't have any more information now than we had when you jumped to that conclusion. Let's not forget that.
If Keith was told Taylor couldn't tour because he was sick, it wouldn't be intentionally to spread a rumour, would it?
Quote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StoneburstQuote
DandelionPowderman
Nobody here thought Keith made this up, either.
We can agree that Keith's comments in the RS interview weren't him going rogue: a decision had clearly been taken to spread rumours about Taylor's health through several channels, and Keith was just one part of that. But this doesn't get him a free pass on saying what he did.
He played his part, obviously.
When I said (concluding based on logic only) that the rumour was spread intentionally by the Stones camp (Keith included), some people here thought that was an outrageous accusation. But in the end it is not.
We don't have any more information now than we had when you jumped to that conclusion. Let's not forget that.
If Keith was told Taylor couldn't tour because he was sick, it wouldn't be intentionally to spread a rumour, would it?
Well I guess Keith isn't mentally ill and that means he should have shut up instead of telling other peoples tales without verifying. You may be his fan, but your position towards Keith here tends to fanboyship, which we hate, don't we?
Quote
DoomandGloom
Keno
is a tool
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StoneburstQuote
DandelionPowderman
Nobody here thought Keith made this up, either.
We can agree that Keith's comments in the RS interview weren't him going rogue: a decision had clearly been taken to spread rumours about Taylor's health through several channels, and Keith was just one part of that. But this doesn't get him a free pass on saying what he did.
He played his part, obviously.
When I said (concluding based on logic only) that the rumour was spread intentionally by the Stones camp (Keith included), some people here thought that was an outrageous accusation. But in the end it is not.
We don't have any more information now than we had when you jumped to that conclusion. Let's not forget that.
If Keith was told Taylor couldn't tour because he was sick, it wouldn't be intentionally to spread a rumour, would it?
Well I guess Keith isn't mentally ill and that means he should have shut up instead of telling other peoples tales without verifying. You may be his fan, but your position towards Keith here tends to fanboyship, which we hate, don't we?
Nothing to do with that, but if you think a little further you'll find that Mick first hinted it, and then Keith said it. Why do you think that happened?
I suspect they acted like planned, and I have serious doubts about Keith being the "brain" behind this "masterplan".
So you can believe what you want, but if you indeed listened to both those interviews I'm sure you're able to add two and two together.
BTW, do we "hate" being fans of the Rolling Stones? When did that happen? I'm a HUGE fan of both Mick's and Keith's. Proudly so.
But I don't particularly like any side of this supposed conflict. They didn't have to say anything. They could have just said "No, he's not with us this time round". No need to explain anything, as he isn't in the band.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StoneburstQuote
DandelionPowderman
Nobody here thought Keith made this up, either.
We can agree that Keith's comments in the RS interview weren't him going rogue: a decision had clearly been taken to spread rumours about Taylor's health through several channels, and Keith was just one part of that. But this doesn't get him a free pass on saying what he did.
He played his part, obviously.
When I said (concluding based on logic only) that the rumour was spread intentionally by the Stones camp (Keith included), some people here thought that was an outrageous accusation. But in the end it is not.
We don't have any more information now than we had when you jumped to that conclusion. Let's not forget that.
If Keith was told Taylor couldn't tour because he was sick, it wouldn't be intentionally to spread a rumour, would it?
Well I guess Keith isn't mentally ill and that means he should have shut up instead of telling other peoples tales without verifying. You may be his fan, but your position towards Keith here tends to fanboyship, which we hate, don't we?
Nothing to do with that, but if you think a little further you'll find that Mick first hinted it, and then Keith said it. Why do you think that happened?
I suspect they acted like planned, and I have serious doubts about Keith being the "brain" behind this "masterplan".
So you can believe what you want, but if you indeed listened to both those interviews I'm sure you're able to add two and two together.
BTW, do we "hate" being fans of the Rolling Stones? When did that happen? I'm a HUGE fan of both Mick's and Keith's. Proudly so.
But I don't particularly like any side of this supposed conflict. They didn't have to say anything. They could have just said "No, he's not with us this time round". No need to explain anything, as he isn't in the band.
Of course Keith is not the brain behind this Stones rumour campaign concerning Taylor, but he is just as responsible as Jagger and whoever runs the company.
btw: I was talking about fanboyship, not about being a fan. I also think it's kinda childish to be a fan of a person. So I'm not a fan of Taylor. My goodness, that would be ridiculous! I'm a fan of much of his music, that's a different story. I don't take fans of persons serious. They're prejudiced per se.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StoneburstQuote
DandelionPowderman
Nobody here thought Keith made this up, either.
We can agree that Keith's comments in the RS interview weren't him going rogue: a decision had clearly been taken to spread rumours about Taylor's health through several channels, and Keith was just one part of that. But this doesn't get him a free pass on saying what he did.
He played his part, obviously.
When I said (concluding based on logic only) that the rumour was spread intentionally by the Stones camp (Keith included), some people here thought that was an outrageous accusation. But in the end it is not.
We don't have any more information now than we had when you jumped to that conclusion. Let's not forget that.
If Keith was told Taylor couldn't tour because he was sick, it wouldn't be intentionally to spread a rumour, would it?
Well I guess Keith isn't mentally ill and that means he should have shut up instead of telling other peoples tales without verifying. You may be his fan, but your position towards Keith here tends to fanboyship, which we hate, don't we?
Nothing to do with that, but if you think a little further you'll find that Mick first hinted it, and then Keith said it. Why do you think that happened?
I suspect they acted like planned, and I have serious doubts about Keith being the "brain" behind this "masterplan".
So you can believe what you want, but if you indeed listened to both those interviews I'm sure you're able to add two and two together.
BTW, do we "hate" being fans of the Rolling Stones? When did that happen? I'm a HUGE fan of both Mick's and Keith's. Proudly so.
But I don't particularly like any side of this supposed conflict. They didn't have to say anything. They could have just said "No, he's not with us this time round". No need to explain anything, as he isn't in the band.
Of course Keith is not the brain behind this Stones rumour campaign concerning Taylor, but he is just as responsible as Jagger and whoever runs the company.
btw: I was talking about fanboyship, not about being a fan. I also think it's kinda childish to be a fan of a person. So I'm not a fan of Taylor. My goodness, that would be ridiculous! I'm a fan of much of his music, that's a different story. I don't take fans of persons serious. They're prejudiced per se.
LOL!
Quote
DandelionPowderman
He seems to have posted on FB that he "unfortunately" wasn't invited for the next tour. We should accept that just like he said it.
Quote
LuxuryStonesQuote
DandelionPowderman
He seems to have posted on FB that he "unfortunately" wasn't invited for the next tour. We should accept that just like he said it.
Are you sure it was Taylor himself who wrote like that on a MT FB fanpage? He must have lost his pride then, imo.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StoneburstQuote
DandelionPowderman
Nobody here thought Keith made this up, either.
We can agree that Keith's comments in the RS interview weren't him going rogue: a decision had clearly been taken to spread rumours about Taylor's health through several channels, and Keith was just one part of that. But this doesn't get him a free pass on saying what he did.
He played his part, obviously.
When I said (concluding based on logic only) that the rumour was spread intentionally by the Stones camp (Keith included), some people here thought that was an outrageous accusation. But in the end it is not.
We don't have any more information now than we had when you jumped to that conclusion. Let's not forget that.
If Keith was told Taylor couldn't tour because he was sick, it wouldn't be intentionally to spread a rumour, would it?
Well I guess Keith isn't mentally ill and that means he should have shut up instead of telling other peoples tales without verifying. You may be his fan, but your position towards Keith here tends to fanboyship, which we hate, don't we?
Nothing to do with that, but if you think a little further you'll find that Mick first hinted it, and then Keith said it. Why do you think that happened?
I suspect they acted like planned, and I have serious doubts about Keith being the "brain" behind this "masterplan".
So you can believe what you want, but if you indeed listened to both those interviews I'm sure you're able to add two and two together.
BTW, do we "hate" being fans of the Rolling Stones? When did that happen? I'm a HUGE fan of both Mick's and Keith's. Proudly so.
But I don't particularly like any side of this supposed conflict. They didn't have to say anything. They could have just said "No, he's not with us this time round". No need to explain anything, as he isn't in the band.
Of course Keith is not the brain behind this Stones rumour campaign concerning Taylor, but he is just as responsible as Jagger and whoever runs the company.
btw: I was talking about fanboyship, not about being a fan. I also think it's kinda childish to be a fan of a person. So I'm not a fan of Taylor. My goodness, that would be ridiculous! I'm a fan of much of his music, that's a different story. I don't take fans of persons serious. They're prejudiced per se.
LOL!
What's to laugh about so loudly Dandy: self mockery perhaps? No I'm not a fan of Taylor as a person, but a fan of much of his guitar playing and music. But obviously you don't see the difference. In fact I rather hate Taylor for leaving the Stones, crippling the band by doing so.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
LuxuryStonesQuote
DandelionPowderman
He seems to have posted on FB that he "unfortunately" wasn't invited for the next tour. We should accept that just like he said it.
Are you sure it was Taylor himself who wrote like that on a MT FB fanpage? He must have lost his pride then, imo.
"He" is in this case just a way of saying that his people did it. I'm sure you also can find one of my posts saying that he doesn't post there himself, right?
Quote
LuxuryStonesQuote
DandelionPowderman
He seems to have posted on FB that he "unfortunately" wasn't invited for the next tour. We should accept that just like he said it.
Are you sure it was Taylor himself who wrote like that on a MT FB fanpage? He must have lost his pride then, imo.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StoneburstQuote
DandelionPowderman
Nobody here thought Keith made this up, either.
We can agree that Keith's comments in the RS interview weren't him going rogue: a decision had clearly been taken to spread rumours about Taylor's health through several channels, and Keith was just one part of that. But this doesn't get him a free pass on saying what he did.
He played his part, obviously.
When I said (concluding based on logic only) that the rumour was spread intentionally by the Stones camp (Keith included), some people here thought that was an outrageous accusation. But in the end it is not.
We don't have any more information now than we had when you jumped to that conclusion. Let's not forget that.
If Keith was told Taylor couldn't tour because he was sick, it wouldn't be intentionally to spread a rumour, would it?
Well I guess Keith isn't mentally ill and that means he should have shut up instead of telling other peoples tales without verifying. You may be his fan, but your position towards Keith here tends to fanboyship, which we hate, don't we?
Nothing to do with that, but if you think a little further you'll find that Mick first hinted it, and then Keith said it. Why do you think that happened?
I suspect they acted like planned, and I have serious doubts about Keith being the "brain" behind this "masterplan".
So you can believe what you want, but if you indeed listened to both those interviews I'm sure you're able to add two and two together.
BTW, do we "hate" being fans of the Rolling Stones? When did that happen? I'm a HUGE fan of both Mick's and Keith's. Proudly so.
But I don't particularly like any side of this supposed conflict. They didn't have to say anything. They could have just said "No, he's not with us this time round". No need to explain anything, as he isn't in the band.
Of course Keith is not the brain behind this Stones rumour campaign concerning Taylor, but he is just as responsible as Jagger and whoever runs the company.
btw: I was talking about fanboyship, not about being a fan. I also think it's kinda childish to be a fan of a person. So I'm not a fan of Taylor. My goodness, that would be ridiculous! I'm a fan of much of his music, that's a different story. I don't take fans of persons serious. They're prejudiced per se.
LOL!
What's to laugh about so loudly Dandy: self mockery perhaps? No I'm not a fan of Taylor as a person, but a fan of much of his guitar playing and music. But obviously you don't see the difference. In fact I rather hate Taylor for leaving the Stones, crippling the band by doing so.
Because you're obsessed with one person, while I'm obsessed with the whole band.
That sentence, coming from you, gave me a great laugh, Thanks a lot!
Quote
DandelionPowderman
"Obsessed" in a good way, kleerie.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
LuxuryStonesQuote
DandelionPowderman
He seems to have posted on FB that he "unfortunately" wasn't invited for the next tour. We should accept that just like he said it.
Are you sure it was Taylor himself who wrote like that on a MT FB fanpage? He must have lost his pride then, imo.
No I'm not sure, neither am I about his pride. But if he had, he could step up and tell his point of view, in order to end all rumours. Agreed?
Quote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowderman
"Obsessed" in a good way, kleerie.
But if so, then by his music and guitar playing, not by the man himself.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowderman
"Obsessed" in a good way, kleerie.
But if so, then by his music and guitar playing, not by the man himself.
Enough musical obsession to qualify as a fanboy. That is beyond any doubt. Be proud.
Quote
kleermaker
No I'm not sure, neither am I about his pride. But if he had, he could step up and tell his point of view, in order to end all rumours. Agreed?
Quote
kleermaker
We still have had no answer from Taylor to our urgent question:
What's on YOUR mind right now ...!
Quote
LuxuryStonesQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
LuxuryStonesQuote
DandelionPowderman
He seems to have posted on FB that he "unfortunately" wasn't invited for the next tour. We should accept that just like he said it.
Are you sure it was Taylor himself who wrote like that on a MT FB fanpage? He must have lost his pride then, imo.
"He" is in this case just a way of saying that his people did it. I'm sure you also can find one of my posts saying that he doesn't post there himself, right?