For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Amsterdamned
<Well in all fairness, I can only judge you by WHAT YOU WRITE ... if you don't wish to be thought of or referred to in a certain light, then perhaps don't post some of your more morose thoughts or comments. I'm all for freedom of speech n' all that, but you really do open yourself up for it. By any standards, some of your comments are extremely negative indeed, so much so that people are given to wondering what the hell you even bother to post for. If you've got that much of a downer on the Stones in their current form, and in your mind they are 'has beens' to such an extent, then take your leave of them .... and that would include taking your leave of this board too. Your comments otherwise are just unecessarily inflammatory.
[ I want to shout, but I can't hardly speak ]>
So there's no room for Jones and Taylor era Stones lovers,that consider the Wood era as a flop,musically spoken, without bashing, but musical statements???
"Has beens" yes, you say it,and I'am not the only one.
Pfff, yes sir. Mission impossible.
Ask BV to ban me. I don't blame you.
Quote
WeLoveYou
Yeah....... I'm glad I was there, it was a fantastic night, one of the best gigs I've ever been to.
Now - I'd like to preserve the concert for prosperity. We know the BBC have recorded the concert as the below link has some concert sound clips. Also note the pic on the site shows them rehearsing (they're wearing different clothes). The BBC had exclusive access to record the show and do interviews.
[www.bbc.co.uk]
So when are we going to hear this on the radio? Or better still, when will there be a TV program? (It was filmed).
Please - everyone - keep your eyes / ears out for this!
Cheers,
WLY
Quote
paulywaulQuote
Amsterdamned
<Well in all fairness, I can only judge you by WHAT YOU WRITE ... if you don't wish to be thought of or referred to in a certain light, then perhaps don't post some of your more morose thoughts or comments. I'm all for freedom of speech n' all that, but you really do open yourself up for it. By any standards, some of your comments are extremely negative indeed, so much so that people are given to wondering what the hell you even bother to post for. If you've got that much of a downer on the Stones in their current form, and in your mind they are 'has beens' to such an extent, then take your leave of them .... and that would include taking your leave of this board too. Your comments otherwise are just unecessarily inflammatory.
[ I want to shout, but I can't hardly speak ]>
So there's no room for Jones and Taylor era Stones lovers,that consider the Wood era as a flop,musically spoken, without bashing, but musical statements???
"Has beens" yes, you say it,and I'am not the only one.
Pfff, yes sir. Mission impossible.
Ask BV to ban me. I don't blame you.
<<< So there's no room for Jones and Taylor era Stones lovers,that consider the Wood era as a flop,musically spoken, without bashing, but musical statements ??? >>>
Well, seeing as the Jones era ended 40 odd years ago, and the Taylor era 35 odd years ago, presumably not a lot has been of interest to you over the last three and a half decades ? That being so, wouldn't it be easier if you just banned yourself, and then you could post away merrily on a board dedicated specifically to 'pre Wood era' Rolling Stones ?
Alternatively, you could stay, but perhaps just 'temper your language' a little and try being a little less scathing and dismissive in your criticisms, you might not sound like quite the a**hole that you presently do. Just a suggestion, you don't have to take it .........
Quote
AmsterdamnedQuote
paulywaulQuote
Amsterdamned
<Well in all fairness, I can only judge you by WHAT YOU WRITE ... if you don't wish to be thought of or referred to in a certain light, then perhaps don't post some of your more morose thoughts or comments. I'm all for freedom of speech n' all that, but you really do open yourself up for it. By any standards, some of your comments are extremely negative indeed, so much so that people are given to wondering what the hell you even bother to post for. If you've got that much of a downer on the Stones in their current form, and in your mind they are 'has beens' to such an extent, then take your leave of them .... and that would include taking your leave of this board too. Your comments otherwise are just unecessarily inflammatory.
[ I want to shout, but I can't hardly speak ]>
So there's no room for Jones and Taylor era Stones lovers,that consider the Wood era as a flop,musically spoken, without bashing, but musical statements???
"Has beens" yes, you say it,and I'am not the only one.
Pfff, yes sir. Mission impossible.
Ask BV to ban me. I don't blame you.
<<< So there's no room for Jones and Taylor era Stones lovers,that consider the Wood era as a flop,musically spoken, without bashing, but musical statements ??? >>>
Well, seeing as the Jones era ended 40 odd years ago, and the Taylor era 35 odd years ago, presumably not a lot has been of interest to you over the last three and a half decades ? That being so, wouldn't it be easier if you just banned yourself, and then you could post away merrily on a board dedicated specifically to 'pre Wood era' Rolling Stones ?
Alternatively, you could stay, but perhaps just 'temper your language' a little and try being a little less scathing and dismissive in your criticisms, you might not sound like quite the a**hole that you presently do. Just a suggestion, you don't have to take it .........
Piss off.
Quote
paulywaulQuote
AmsterdamnedQuote
paulywaulQuote
Amsterdamned
<Well in all fairness, I can only judge you by WHAT YOU WRITE ... if you don't wish to be thought of or referred to in a certain light, then perhaps don't post some of your more morose thoughts or comments. I'm all for freedom of speech n' all that, but you really do open yourself up for it. By any standards, some of your comments are extremely negative indeed, so much so that people are given to wondering what the hell you even bother to post for. If you've got that much of a downer on the Stones in their current form, and in your mind they are 'has beens' to such an extent, then take your leave of them .... and that would include taking your leave of this board too. Your comments otherwise are just unecessarily inflammatory.
[ I want to shout, but I can't hardly speak ]>
So there's no room for Jones and Taylor era Stones lovers,that consider the Wood era as a flop,musically spoken, without bashing, but musical statements???
"Has beens" yes, you say it,and I'am not the only one.
Pfff, yes sir. Mission impossible.
Ask BV to ban me. I don't blame you.
<<< So there's no room for Jones and Taylor era Stones lovers,that consider the Wood era as a flop,musically spoken, without bashing, but musical statements ??? >>>
Well, seeing as the Jones era ended 40 odd years ago, and the Taylor era 35 odd years ago, presumably not a lot has been of interest to you over the last three and a half decades ? That being so, wouldn't it be easier if you just banned yourself, and then you could post away merrily on a board dedicated specifically to 'pre Wood era' Rolling Stones ?
Alternatively, you could stay, but perhaps just 'temper your language' a little and try being a little less scathing and dismissive in your criticisms, you might not sound like quite the a**hole that you presently do. Just a suggestion, you don't have to take it .........
Piss off.
Sounds like you won't be taking up the suggestion then ... ?
I guess we can all now look forward to the next 'Wood bash' then !
Quote
BradleyJennas
Some great pictures up of the night!
I guess the next step is to ensure the club stays open and to keep supporting it.
These are all the places I managed to find SDP's charity single; "Need Your Love So Bad (Save The 100 Club)"
iTunes [itunes.apple.com]
HMV Digital [www.hmvdigital.com]
7Digital [www.7digital.com]
Amazon [www.amazon.co.uk]
Play [www.play.com]
Would be great if we could just get it into the charts, the higher the better! Imagine the amount of publicity and awareness the club would get!!!
Quote
PaulineCarrQuote
BradleyJennas
Some great pictures up of the night!
I guess the next step is to ensure the club stays open and to keep supporting it.
These are all the places I managed to find SDP's charity single; "Need Your Love So Bad (Save The 100 Club)"
iTunes [itunes.apple.com]
HMV Digital [www.hmvdigital.com]
7Digital [www.7digital.com]
Amazon [www.amazon.co.uk]
Play [www.play.com]
Would be great if we could just get it into the charts, the higher the better! Imagine the amount of publicity and awareness the club would get!!!
Yeah I went to this gig and heard about this charity single? (In fact it was the same guy who told me about this site!)
I assume all the profits go to the club then?
Quote
Brue
Mick Taylor solo from 3:05 - 3:35
MT, Ronnie and Keef on tour. Think about it. I know I am. Talk about greatness>
Quote
BradleyJennas
It will be available from SDP's website. But at the moment its only available as a download. Even when it is available from his site, it wont count towards the OCC (Official Charts Company) singles chart, as it isn't recognized.I think the aim is to get the song into the charts now, so its best to get it online.
Quote
Amsterdamned
Imo without Jagger the Stones were burried 30 years ago.
And Jaggers solowork and Taylor's '79 make more sense to me than Keith's let alone Ron's.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Amsterdamned
Imo without Jagger the Stones were burried 30 years ago.
And Jaggers solowork and Taylor's '79 make more sense to me than Keith's let alone Ron's.
Now that's sad, imo. I sincerely hope you'll get Keith's solo stuff one day, let alone music with heart.
Quote
Green LadyQuote
BradleyJennas
It will be available from SDP's website. But at the moment its only available as a download. Even when it is available from his site, it wont count towards the OCC (Official Charts Company) singles chart, as it isn't recognized.I think the aim is to get the song into the charts now, so its best to get it online.
Well, if you don't fancy the SDP download, you could always get this one...
[www.bbc.co.uk]
An anti-X Factor "supergroup" has recorded its entry in the race for this year's Christmas number one - the sound of silence.
Madness star Suggs and dance acts Orbital and Pendulum were among those who did nothing in a recording studio.
They were recreating composer John Cage's experimental work 4'33" - the sound of musicians not playing.
They hope to emulate Rage Against the Machine, who beat X Factor winner Joe McElderry to number one last year.
Dozens of musicians were present and the campaign - dubbed Cage Against the Machine - currently has 62,000 Facebook fans.
Guillemots frontman Fyfe Dangerfield, Unkle's James Lavelle, Scroobius Pip and Dan Le Sac also took part in the unconventional session.
They were joined by members of The Kooks and Heaven 17 at Dean Street Studios in London.
Paul Epworth, who won the Brit Award for best producer this year, was at the controls to record the four-minute, 33-second "performance".
Rage Against the Machine caused a major chart upset last Christmas
Xfm DJ Eddy Temple-Morris, who helped organise the event, said: "You could hear the odd click of a camera shutter or a creak.
"There were people who were seriously into it, like Matty from The Infadels, who had his guitar and was poised to do a massive power chord, but it just never happened.
"There were people swaying, or putting their lighters up in the air, or headbanging and pretending that they could hear some music and really getting into it.
"It was an emotional, unusual, quite beautiful thing to have so many people in a room and be silent."
Pete Doherty was among those previously named on the line-up who did not turn up.
According to Mr Temple-Morris, Billy Bragg participated on speaker phone from his tour bus while singer-songwriter Imogen Heap recorded her part earlier in the day.
The single will raise money for five charities, including Calm, a service for young men at risk of suicide, and the British Tinnitus Association.
Youth Music, Nordoff Robbins music therapy and Sound & Music, a charity promoting challenging new music and sound art, will also benefit from the proceeds.
The song is 5/1 to be Christmas number one, according to bookmaker William Hill.
But it is still a relative outsider compared with the eventual X Factor winner, who is 4/7 favourite.
Quote
Amsterdamned
Preferring technical ability(jazz/jazzrock/fusion) and being a Stones fan is a bad marriage