As the famous Swedish writer August Strindberg once said in a public quarrel with his first wife: "Don´t blame the screw if the nut´s too big".

Well, here's another side of Keith.
[www.rttnews.com]

Harmless PR.

I have not read the article, but saying that a man has a "small cock" can be a euphemism for a man with no guts, courage, etc.

Suppose this could be what Keith was talking about?

Quote
Edith Grove
saying that a man has a "small cock" can be a euphemism for a man with no guts, courage, etc.

Thanks for the language lesson. I didn't know that. So it is the opposite of "that guy has balls" ?

-------------------
Keep On Rolling

Quote
Rolling Hansie

Quote
Edith Grove
saying that a man has a "small cock" can be a euphemism for a man with no guts, courage, etc.

Thanks for the language lesson. I didn't know that. So it is the opposite of "that guy has balls" ?

Yeah, you got it !

Uhhmm, why are we talking & reading trash about KEITH RICHARDS? If someone doesn't like him (for whatever reason) then maybe "those people" shouldn't read the 'interviews' nor his book. I'm only sayin'....

Now it's official. Some of us believe everything that's printed. Cool

-------------------
Keep On Rolling

It is better to have a small hard one than to have a big soft one.

(.. and I am not talking about mine...)

And it's also official - the title to this thread ain't cool.

I agree, this thread should be deleted (according to me).

In dutch it used to be

b e t e r e e n k l e i n e d i e s t e i g e r t d a n e e n g r o t e d i e w e i g e r t, ha, ha

UW

'Doo doo doo Heartbreaker'

he was 'forced' to publicly apologise? Oh, for f**ks sake.

I predict that the avalanche of ludicrous 'sensational' extracts from the tabloids of stuff we already know but which theyve chosen to take out of context and distort over the next couple of weeks will have this forum in meltdown.

Even today, the Daily Mail have published an extract from Tony Sanchez's new book 'Up and Down with the Rolling Stones' and made it look like it's just been written - without even bothering to mention the fact that a) it was written in the late 70's and b) the author has been dead for about 20 years.

I'd really have thought that by now all Stones fans should know better than to take everything that appears in a tabloid at face value. I mean, we've only had about 47 years to get used to the way they operate.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010-10-15 14:28 by Gazza.

Any publicity is good publicity Isn't there a new tour in 2011?

I bet Taylor has a bigger one than Ron .

Keith is now officially a jerk?...
That is maybe one of the funniestfkingthings I have ever read on iorr..... lmbo.....

so... just to be clear ......
Is this really an iorr discussion about what is considered to be a
big penis and what is considered to be a small penis? Has that ever
been clinically determined??.... and if it has been determined.... and
if we apply this clinical data comparing numbers to "anyone's" "memeber"
and if someone indeed have a small wiener.... and it was indeed small in size......
would saying that make one "offically a jerk"?

I know Steve Martin is a Jerk........
but not Keith Richards...come on.... stop kidding around.

I did not think a thread about penis size could exist on iorr....
but beings it does, isnt the best way to judge size, proper size,
to observe the size of the smile on one's partner's lips... but that is another story...

anyway..... as someone said...... 47 years of publicity BS...and people still fall for it?? LMBO!!

my fav BS Stones publicity nonsense????....it is a tie between...
1)
Keith snorted his dad........
2)
Charlie claiming he drew a sketch of every hotel room he has ever stayed in.
cuz all hotel room look the same...it was joke ....get it??

Kieth said Mick's co ck was small???...... and someone starts a thread saying Keth is now offically a jerk???? LOLAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA....that is actually very funny... thanks for the chuckles.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2010-10-15 15:00 by Max'sKansasCity.

Quote
Gazza
he was 'forced' to publicly apologise? Oh, for f**ks sake.

I predict that the avalanche of ludicrous 'sensational' extracts from the tabloids of stuff we already know but which theyve chosen to take out of context and distort over the next couple of weeks will have this forum in meltdown.

Even today, the Daily Mail have published an extract from Tony Sanchez's new book 'Up and Down with the Rolling Stones' and made it look like it's just been written - without even bothering to mention the fact that a) it was written in the late 70's and b) the author has been dead for about 20 years.

I'd really have thought that by now all Stones fans should know better than to take everything that appears in a tabloid at face value. I mean, we've only had about 47 years to get used to the way they operate.

thank you Gazza for being the "voice of reason".i for one take exception to somebody slamming keith.people should know better.

Quote
proudmary
The ROLLING STONES pair fell out in 2005 when the guitarist first said Sir Mick had a "small c**k".
Keith, 66, was forced to publicly apologise. Now he says Sir Mick's ex MARIANNE FAITHFULL "had no fun with Mick's tiny todger".
But he seems ready for a U-turn. "I was told that by others," he says in an interview with Caitlin Moran in The Times today.
His autobiography Life will be serialised in the paper from tomorrow.
Keith also claims that Sir Mick, 67, became "unbearable" in the '80s.


Read more: [www.thesun.co.uk]

Can't imagine what a jerk one can be to discuss the genitals of another person(let alone friend) in public to promote his f---g book! Too bad he hasn't more exciting topics than Mick's penis to sell himself

it´s been quite a long time now that my hero is getting on my nerves.

he´s become a joke on and off stage.

i bet it´s keith who was most propably impotent for most of his life first due to the usage of drugs now because of the consequential damages of drugs.

and wait the girls told him he were better? i am curious what they told the other side when keith was not around. but i don´t think mick would talk about that.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010-10-15 15:27 by stoneswashed77.

keith is not a jerk !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'd read the book not the tabloids and make your own mind up.

Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Is this really an iorr discussion about what is considered to be a
big penis and what is considered to be a small penis? Has that ever
been clinically determined??.... ..

Is this really an iorr discussion
I agree,that's the reason why I was ironic -that's not easy for me to make irony since English isn't my langage -when I posted my answer (3d post )
Especially when I got only 18 answers for "Jagger & China "

Miss proudmary,aren't there more interested discussions than to know if Keith said or didn't say Jagger has a small c*** ?
this might interest you I bet :
[www.average-penis-size-chart.com]

There is so much wrong with this... (most already mentioned)

A senior citizen dwelling on such juvenile bullsh*t?

Commenting on physical size etc... is like commenting on someone's race.
No control of such things.

Apparently Keith thinks this stuff is important......even though he might be
bigger than Mick, seems like he's insecure about a few other things.


IORR............but I like it!

He said this 5 years ago and it was much talked about then. Why is it being discussed as if he said it yesterday?

Slow news day.

Quote
Gazza
He said this 5 years ago and it was much talked about then. Why is it being discussed as if he said it yesterday?

Slow news day.

yep. Altamont happened 40 yrs ago and we still talk about that.


IORR............but I like it!

Keith has all the talent in the world,yet his claim to fame lately seems to be to attack Mick at any opportunity. It doesn't make sense,but l guess that in his mind he will get more press by attacking Mick,than by actually talking about his music,or other subjects that we really care about. Mick's c--k size is not one of them..

"No dope smoking no beer sold after 12 o'clock"

Quote
Cocaine Eyes
I'm only sayin'....

...a bunch of nothing is what you're "only sayin'". Keith being an ass hole has nothing do to with reading his book or not as we know he's been like this over the eons anyway. Keith being an ass hole to provide "good" tidbits to promote the selling of his book?

More world wide ass hole.

IF that is the case. Mick made it clear years ago that Keith is this way.

I've never heard anyone say 'small cock' in place of 'no balls'.

Perhaps it is all taken out of context for the sake of hype. Maybe Keith talking about being onstage or working in a studio just isn't interesting as Mick's supposed small cock.

Every day more I respect and appreciate mick jagger.
Without him the stones would have stopped playing since 30 years.

the other band members are great musicians but they should thank Jagger
for their high lifestyle level.

Ironic, innit? Mick never says anything bad about anyone. Keith is always running his mouth about anyone. Yet they plow on...

SwayStones
Miss proudmary,aren't there more interested discussions than to know if Keith said or didn't say Jagger has a small c*** ?
this might interest you I bet :
[www.average-penis-size-chart.com]

First of all, thanks for link, SwayStones, I'll check it in my spare time.
And no, I don't think there is more interesting discussion right now , because for me Keith dwelling on this topic - it's his choice to talk about sizes, not mine - is the limit. One can't go any lower

Quote
andrea66
Every day more I respect and appreciate mick jagger.
Without him the stones would have stopped playing since 30 years.

the other band members are great musicians but they should thank Jagger
for their high lifestyle level.

they are a band (the stones)after all .google mick jagger's solo career and you will see what i am talking about .