For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
..........I had no idea how deep the Keef-fan-boy hysteria ran.....What Mick did to Keith? Are you kidding? The man held his junkie ass's career up throughout the 70s....Oh....you mean @#$%& Anita.....? !AND SHE WAS HELPLESS WAIF......GIVE ME @#$%& BREAK. Yuou know...the worst partof this is.....after reading excerpts....it really is so joan collins-esque......Dick talk or no dick talk.....it aint cool Keith....its cheesy.Quote
MKjan
What Keith says about Mick pales in comparison to Mick's betrayal of his friend,fellow artist,business partner. A lot of people would have done a lot worse than what Keith says. Let's not forget why Keith lets him have it from time to time.
Quote
swissQuote
turd
Just to get back to the Mick's 'dick' quote - It's somewhat ominous that no female who has been bedded by Mick in the past however many years, (and I assume that must be more than 4), has come to his defense, to uphold his honour......
Many women over the years have made oblique comments about Mick not living up to their expectations in bed. I always thought: who could live up to "being Mick Jagger" in bed? - but it may also be polite reference to his not being among the guys who're fortunate to be very well-constructed (in the way that Keith is, for example, beer gut or not).
quote]
Many women? I don´t remember one. But one thing is for sure: Mick has never had any sort of problem with what he has or with showing it. And if we think of all the people who saw Mick naked it is only Janice Dickinson and our Keith Richards who seem to be obsessed with Mick´s penis. I also disagree with Keith becoming far more popular than Mick.
Quote
Hairball
Maybe all the women Mick slept with have really big pussies and therefore thought Mick had a small cock because they didn't get 'fulfilled'.
Quote
Cocaine Eyes
Uhhmm, why are we talking & reading trash about KEITH RICHARDS? If someone doesn't like him (for whatever reason) then maybe "those people" shouldn't read the 'interviews' nor his book. I'm only sayin'....
Quote
The SicilianQuote
proudmary
The ROLLING STONES pair fell out in 2005 when the guitarist first said Sir Mick had a "small cock".
Jeez we've been saying that about Gazza for years!
Quote
turd
Trouble is, this penis story has gone global - its not about 'boys will be boys' etc. He has made Mick into a laughing stock, his reputation and ego has been severely bashed, as well as Keiths own integrity.
That's the point.
Quote
Rockman
What/who was that guy doing at Altamont with no pants on ?
.....Not the right place for a penis-pump demonstrator to be hangin' .....
Quote
Lady JayneQuote
Addicted
Please don't pay too much attention to the British tabloid crap that's been quoted here. Keith's "quotes" from the book are out of context and it gives you the wrong picture about what this book is about. I don't think many people on this board have read the entire book, and therefore there are not many of us who can actually have a real opinion about it.
I have read the entire book, and it's a really great read! A source to a greater insight into the band in general and into Keith's life in particular. That's not only my opinion. We actually let the leading man in the litterature business in Norway - read it and he says it's one of the best biographies he's ever read. And certainly the best autobiography. And this from a man who's read "the entire library". And in addition he's a capacity when it comes to knowledge about the Stones - as a devoted fan for many decades.
I'm sorry but I don't understand how the 'context' can improve the fact that these are quotes and in poor taste whatever the rest of the book says. You talk about tabloid crap as if Keith has no responsibility for the syndication of his serial rights in, for eg, the Times. True it's excerpts and not the whole book (thank God if the rest of the content is as puerile and hackneyed as today's dose) but it's put out there with Keith's permission for money. I have been a huge fan of his but I am bound to say this is totally uncool, lacking in class and reflects badly only on him. And they say it's Jagger who thinks only of money!
Quote
with sssoul
>> Trouble is, this penis story has gone global <<
ffs - as has been noted several times already, the story went global five years ago.
the fact that miles of you don't remember that - or weren't even aware of it -
shows how freakin serious this all is NOT.
and for those of you who feel the Mick's reputation rests on his penis size, please be assured:
it's the same size now as it ever was, and the Mick's done just fine with it
turning up Could've Stood You Up way loud ... wanna dance, Rockman? :E
Quote
swiss
Just to get back to the Mick's 'dick' quote - It's somewhat ominous that no female who has been bedded by Mick in the past however many years, (and I assume that must be more than 4), has come to his defense, to uphold his honour......
Quote
71Tele
I think we have officially reached a new low here.
Quote
AddictedQuote
Lady JayneQuote
Addicted
Please don't pay too much attention to the British tabloid crap that's been quoted here. Keith's "quotes" from the book are out of context and it gives you the wrong picture about what this book is about. I don't think many people on this board have read the entire book, and therefore there are not many of us who can actually have a real opinion about it.
I have read the entire book, and it's a really great read! A source to a greater insight into the band in general and into Keith's life in particular. That's not only my opinion. We actually let the leading man in the litterature business in Norway - read it and he says it's one of the best biographies he's ever read. And certainly the best autobiography. And this from a man who's read "the entire library". And in addition he's a capacity when it comes to knowledge about the Stones - as a devoted fan for many decades.
I'm sorry but I don't understand how the 'context' can improve the fact that these are quotes and in poor taste whatever the rest of the book says. You talk about tabloid crap as if Keith has no responsibility for the syndication of his serial rights in, for eg, the Times. True it's excerpts and not the whole book (thank God if the rest of the content is as puerile and hackneyed as today's dose) but it's put out there with Keith's permission for money. I have been a huge fan of his but I am bound to say this is totally uncool, lacking in class and reflects badly only on him. And they say it's Jagger who thinks only of money!
Oh, I don't think you quite understand how things work. When Keith sold the rights to his book to Little, Brown - they bought the rights to publish the book, and to chose whatever PR-channels they wanted to. If they want to serianize it in the Times - Keith has no say in that.
It's sort of a parallell to The Stones selling a tour consisting of a certain number of shows to Michael Cohl.
And if you guys don't understand the importance of context - then I can't help you.
Quote
with sssoul
and for those of you who feel the Mick's reputation rests on his penis size, please be assured:
it's the same size now as it ever was, and the Mick's done just fine with it