For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
georgelicksQuote
retired_dog
It would be interesting to know how many copies "Plundered My Soul" and "No Sparts" sold in comparison as both were promoted as new Stones singles back in the day.
The US Hot Singles Sales is an outdated chart for about 10+ years now, physical singles are very rare and they sell next to nothing: you need 1,500 copies sold to be #1 there and about 120-150 copies to make the Top 15.
Plundered My Soul debuted at #2 with 2,000 copies sold, No Spare Parts also reached #2 selling 2k, Doom And Gloom reached #11, Brown Sugar's re-issue also #2, Satisfaction's re-issue from 2015 was #1 with 1.3k and Ride Em On Down was #4 selling 900 copies last December.
Plundered My Soul, Doom and Gloom and Ride 'Em On Down were way more pupular on the digital/airplay area than the others releases.
Quote
MonkeyMan2000Quote
stone4everQuote
MonkeyMan2000
Another great one with Mick on slide: [www.youtube.com]
I guess we should just be grateful that these guys play in the same band. I can't understand how someone can be a fan of a band and at the same time completely disregard the abilities the front man has ("find him some maracas"). How can you hate a great musician that plays in your favorite band so much?
Its called having a sense of humor, its not hate is it. How dare you accuse me of hating Mick. How dare Misterddd call me a troll.
I don't think we need Mick playing guitar in this band, the other three guitarists have it covered imho. Mick was a phenomenal showman and singer song writer, i just don't think he shines as a guitar player, always looks a bit
amateurish to me.
Do we have a problem with my opinion again. I am not being offensive to anyone or calling anyone a troll. This is bullying.
I'm sorry for not getting the humor (probably a language barrier thing, English is not my main language). I wouldn't call you a troll and I'm certainly not trying to bully you. But I have to admit the constant Mick bashing gets on my nerves and I'm certainly not the only one. But I guess that's just us having different opinions. Sorry.
Quote
wonderboy
Lennon and McCartney wrote songs by singing them first. Keith wrote that in his book -- said that was one difference between the Stones and the Beatles.
Now McCartney is a great musician and Lennon probably just so-so technically, but each of them could use their voices to come up with melodies and then the music (chords, etc,) just naturally followed.
I can think of many so-so guitarists who were great songwriters -- Dylan, Ray Davies.
I'm not sure exactly how Mick writes his songs, but have the impression he plays around on keyboards and sings over the top of that. I don't think he is a natural musician, but he's definitely a good songwriter and has worked very hard at his craft over the years.
Quote
mr_dja
I believe the name you would be looking for is: Freddie Mercury. I know he played above average piano but I've never heard him being referenced as playing much if any guitar.
Quote
retired_dog
This thread should be renamed "Deconstructing Mick Jagger" by now... it has reached a degree of ridiculousness that could be simply regarded as pure comedy
Quote
stone4ever
I'm with hairball, i want to pin point what went wrong with Mick
Quote
Hairball
Which begs the questions:
1. When was the first guitar playing credit Mick received on a Stones album? And I wonder when he wrote his first song on guitar? I know he came up with the chord structure for Sympathy which is well documented, but was there any other tunes before that?
2. When did he actually start playing guitar? I know in the beginning he played harmonica and sang, but did he ever play the guitar that far back in the bands history? Maybe he started to play when Brian was beginning to lose interest? When Mick and Keith were locked up and forced to write, did Mick have a guitar? Or was he simply writing lyrics and humming melodies?
Quote
MonkeyMan2000
Riffhards, you don't have to blow this last release up, as if it mattered at all. As already pointed out, this was probably just fun. I think you take Mick more seriously, than he does himself. Mick is as loyal to the band as the others, otherwise he wouldn't have signed another touring contract. He just wanted to release something and get his message out there, not unlike Keith with CH (which I agree with you is great, Just a Gift is my favorite too ).
And we have to keep in mind, Mick is the one who makes sure the Stones keep playing shows at a high level, he trains months ahead of a tour, to be able to perform like only he can do, making sure even the people in the last rows have a great time. I guess the ideas of doing things like the Havana show don't come from Ronnie or Keith either, Mick is much more involved in these kind of things. He's very concerned about the critics' reception of performances and recorded music. If that's not loyalty...
Quote
wonderboyQuote
Hairball
Which begs the questions:
1. When was the first guitar playing credit Mick received on a Stones album? And I wonder when he wrote his first song on guitar? I know he came up with the chord structure for Sympathy which is well documented, but was there any other tunes before that?
2. When did he actually start playing guitar? I know in the beginning he played harmonica and sang, but did he ever play the guitar that far back in the bands history? Maybe he started to play when Brian was beginning to lose interest? When Mick and Keith were locked up and forced to write, did Mick have a guitar? Or was he simply writing lyrics and humming melodies?
1. Yesterday's Papers is said to be the first song he wrote by himself.
2. The story I had read is that Keith taught him to play guitar in 1967 after they came back from their tour and were spending a lot of time together. I'm sure he knew how to play before that, but then he learned open tunings and things like that.
...
The thing about Keith as a guitarist is that he has that timing that gives the songs a type of swing. That's pretty rare and saying Mick doesn't meet that standard isn't meant to criticize him. Jimmy Page was a great guitarist but his songs don't have that swing, either. I think maybe that's what is missing in Mick's songs. And it wasn't just Keith, of course; Charlie and Bill gave the songs that stop/start motion and built some tension and release into the songs.
Quote
stone4everQuote
MonkeyMan2000
Riffhards, you don't have to blow this last release up, as if it mattered at all. As already pointed out, this was probably just fun. I think you take Mick more seriously, than he does himself. Mick is as loyal to the band as the others, otherwise he wouldn't have signed another touring contract. He just wanted to release something and get his message out there, not unlike Keith with CH (which I agree with you is great, Just a Gift is my favorite too ).
And we have to keep in mind, Mick is the one who makes sure the Stones keep playing shows at a high level, he trains months ahead of a tour, to be able to perform like only he can do, making sure even the people in the last rows have a great time. I guess the ideas of doing things like the Havana show don't come from Ronnie or Keith either, Mick is much more involved in these kind of things. He's very concerned about the critics' reception of performances and recorded music. If that's not loyalty...
Did you listen to one word i said in my post. Do any of you actually listen to why someone has different opinions than yours. We are talking about a man on
completely different levels here. Things go over peoples heads, its ok, don't worry about it, everything is great
Quote
MonkeyMan2000Quote
stone4everQuote
MonkeyMan2000
Riffhards, you don't have to blow this last release up, as if it mattered at all. As already pointed out, this was probably just fun. I think you take Mick more seriously, than he does himself. Mick is as loyal to the band as the others, otherwise he wouldn't have signed another touring contract. He just wanted to release something and get his message out there, not unlike Keith with CH (which I agree with you is great, Just a Gift is my favorite too ).
And we have to keep in mind, Mick is the one who makes sure the Stones keep playing shows at a high level, he trains months ahead of a tour, to be able to perform like only he can do, making sure even the people in the last rows have a great time. I guess the ideas of doing things like the Havana show don't come from Ronnie or Keith either, Mick is much more involved in these kind of things. He's very concerned about the critics' reception of performances and recorded music. If that's not loyalty...
Did you listen to one word i said in my post. Do any of you actually listen to why someone has different opinions than yours. We are talking about a man on
completely different levels here. Things go over peoples heads, its ok, don't worry about it, everything is great
I did read. But I just don't see Mick's distancing and lack of affection...That's our different opinions, we're gonna leave it at that.
Quote
stone4everQuote
MonkeyMan2000
Riffhards, you don't have to blow this last release up, as if it mattered at all. As already pointed out, this was probably just fun. I think you take Mick more seriously, than he does himself. Mick is as loyal to the band as the others, otherwise he wouldn't have signed another touring contract. He just wanted to release something and get his message out there, not unlike Keith with CH (which I agree with you is great, Just a Gift is my favorite too ).
And we have to keep in mind, Mick is the one who makes sure the Stones keep playing shows at a high level, he trains months ahead of a tour, to be able to perform like only he can do, making sure even the people in the last rows have a great time. I guess the ideas of doing things like the Havana show don't come from Ronnie or Keith either, Mick is much more involved in these kind of things. He's very concerned about the critics' reception of performances and recorded music. If that's not loyalty...
Mick is loyal to money.
Did you listen to one word i said in my post. Do any of you actually listen to why someone has different opinions than yours. We are talking about a man on
completely different levels here. How can you learn anything from life if you can't listen to what a person is saying when he explains himself time and again. Things go over peoples heads, its ok, don't worry about it, everything is great Free Mick.
Quote
jlowe
Checked the latest UK Top 100 Singles chart.
No sign of Mick's new single.
Quote
Socrates1
Mick doesn't say anything negative about "Christianity" in the song. He's "tried it all." He quotes Bob Dylan's "Up To Me," sort of. Two words from it: "enforced insanity." But Mick doesn't say Christianity is bad. Mick never has. Mick completes a thought when he says, "Christianity" in the song. He doesn't follow-up by mentioning the Crusades or anything like that. I'm not Catholic. I've said it before. Doxa, where are you? Mick has probably tried Bible studies. If he's indeed tried it all. And I believe him. Good on Mick. He makes people think!
Quote
hopkins
wow 80,000 views!! That's more people than will buy it methinks.
then again about half the the posts are the same two guys. heh heh...[/quote
Wow who are they??
Quote
stone4ever
Its the lack of tolerance to opposing attitudes that ruins this place.
Doxa may have disagreed with a lot of peoples views on Mick but he was never personal and he never ganged up to attack a poster. The guy has class.
I have learned so much about people here and its not nice.
Think how boring it would be if everyone constantly raved on about how great this new single is. I have been driven out of this place, its unbearable, well done guys you win. I will concentrate on other things now. Cheers and gone.