For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
LuxuryStonesQuote
Mathijs
I never liked I'm Free for example: that song drags, and I don't like Taylor's approach to it.
Mathijs
One has to be rather cold blooded not to feel or at least not to understand the musical warmth / melodic romance Taylor is adding here.
Quote
RobertJohnson
In fact ... One of MT's very ingenious contributions ... But also I like Keith's heavy rhythm-guitar on this track during the 69 tour (San Diego, Boston, if I remember right), that contrasts the brilliance of Taylor's lead in a specific way.
Quote
His Majesty
For me there are no great Ronnie Wood solos
Quote
LuxuryStonesQuote
RobertJohnson
In fact ... One of MT's very ingenious contributions ... But also I like Keith's heavy rhythm-guitar on this track during the 69 tour (San Diego, Boston, if I remember right), that contrasts the brilliance of Taylor's lead in a specific way.
Agreed, they were about the best guitar duo in their chosen field at that time, imo.
Quote
His Majesty
I now feel there is quite a musical lineage between Jones and Taylor in that Taylor is almost the kind of guitarist Jones could have been had Jones applied his thirst for adventure and his musicality to just the guitar.
Quote
LuxuryStonesQuote
His Majesty
For me there are no great Ronnie Wood solos
Breaking news coming from a lost son!! Welcome back, HM
Quote
His Majesty
I now feel there is quite a musical lineage between Jones and Taylor in that Taylor is almost the kind of guitarist Jones could have been had Jones applied his thirst for adventure and his musicality to just the guitar
Quote
StoneburstQuote
His Majesty
I now feel there is quite a musical lineage between Jones and Taylor in that Taylor is almost the kind of guitarist Jones could have been had Jones applied his thirst for adventure and his musicality to just the guitar
Welcome back, HM! This is OT, but what do you think of Taylor's version of No Expectations? I'm guessing you're not a fan, but I always found it interesting that of all the Stones songs he could have reworked as a tribute to the band, he picked that one, a song so closely associated with Jones (and specifically with Jones the slide guitarist as opposed to the avant-garde Jones that in some ways predominated towards the end of his life).
Quote
His Majesty
As for Rolling Stones guitar solos, Brian showed how it should/could be done back in 1963...
Excitingly racous, positively distinctive... it is melodic, to the point, has a beginning and an end.
Elmore James doing a Beatles melody, the old and the new brought together in new and exciting way.
It some what has a partner in 1969... It's almost as if it's the same player as he developed a few years later.
So good, they spliced it on again.
I now feel there is quite a musical lineage between Jones and Taylor in that Taylor is almost the kind of guitarist Jones could have been had Jones applied his thirst for adventure and his musicality to just the guitar.
Quote
71Tele
True, they started slow in '69, but so what? This was the first time ever on the road in the "modern era" of concerts. New amps, new PA rigs, new audiences, new guitarist. So they took a little time to gell and people find this something to criticize? I wish we had the evolution in playing on the tours from 1975-on, but of course we don't. As for Keith peaking in '75, the only thing that peaked for him then was his heroin use.
Quote
LuxuryStonesQuote
His Majesty
For me there are no great Ronnie Wood solos
Breaking news coming from a lost son!! Welcome back, HM
Quote
RobertJohnsonQuote
LuxuryStonesQuote
Mathijs
I never liked I'm Free for example: that song drags, and I don't like Taylor's approach to it.
Mathijs
One has to be rather cold blooded not to feel or at least not to understand the musical warmth / melodic romance Taylor is adding here.
In fact ... One of MT's very ingenious contributions ... But also I like Keith's heavy rhythm-guitar on this track during the 69 tour (San Diego, Boston, if I remember right), that contrasts the brilliance of Taylor's lead in a specific way.
Quote
71Tele
True, they started slow in '69, but so what? This was the first time ever on the road in the "modern era" of concerts. New amps, new PA rigs, new audiences, new guitarist. So they took a little time to gell and people find this something to criticize? I wish we had the evolution in playing on the tours from 1975-on, but of course we don't. As for Keith peaking in '75, the only thing that peaked for him then was his heroin use.
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000Quote
71Tele
True, they started slow in '69, but so what? This was the first time ever on the road in the "modern era" of concerts. New amps, new PA rigs, new audiences, new guitarist. So they took a little time to gell and people find this something to criticize? I wish we had the evolution in playing on the tours from 1975-on, but of course we don't. As for Keith peaking in '75, the only thing that peaked for him then was his heroin use.
But we do - have the evolution in playing on other tours.
in 72 and 78 it is plain to see. In 75 also, but differently because it was the first RW tour, also Preston and Ollie had to find their place. Honestly - I never thought Ollie Brown brought much to the game. Matter of fact, I think he was almost a liability.
Quote
TonyMo
Below, Ron Wood is playing what's known as a twelve bar blues ('twelve bar blues', for those who don't know, is musical parlance for a blues song with twelve bars). You'll notice Ron Wood has an arm around the scantily clad and obviously flirty Lisa Fischer who is nearly sitting on his lap while her hand is on his leg. Even though Ron Wood is a faux 'blues' player who mostly lacks focus and musicality, one notices his loopy approach to this song pleases Lisa Fisher to what degree I'm not sure. Either she finds Ron Wood's jittery pentatonic (meaning five musical notes) technique amusing (like an adult who finds a toddler's imitation of a cow amusing) or she's incapable of realizing that Ron Wood is an un-schooled poseur (unlike his predecessors).
The only concession to be made is that Wood's performance is borderline acceptable here given (one assumes) that the condition of his 'member' during the 'performance' doubtless contributes to his jitteriness.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
71Tele
True, they started slow in '69, but so what? This was the first time ever on the road in the "modern era" of concerts. New amps, new PA rigs, new audiences, new guitarist. So they took a little time to gell and people find this something to criticize? I wish we had the evolution in playing on the tours from 1975-on, but of course we don't. As for Keith peaking in '75, the only thing that peaked for him then was his heroin use.
It wasn't criticism, just pointing out that you can't judge an entire tour by its best show only.
I love this tour myself, and find it among the three best tours they ever did.
PS: I think Keith peaked in 77, heroin-wise He had big problems in 73.
Quote
RobertJohnsonQuote
His Majesty
As for Rolling Stones guitar solos, Brian showed how it should/could be done back in 1963...
Excitingly racous, positively distinctive... it is melodic, to the point, has a beginning and an end.
Elmore James doing a Beatles melody, the old and the new brought together in new and exciting way.
It some what has a partner in 1969... It's almost as if it's the same player as he developed a few years later.
So good, they spliced it on again.
I now feel there is quite a musical lineage between Jones and Taylor in that Taylor is almost the kind of guitarist Jones could have been had Jones applied his thirst for adventure and his musicality to just the guitar.
A really intelligent and distinctive observation ...
Quote
71TeleQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
71Tele
True, they started slow in '69, but so what? This was the first time ever on the road in the "modern era" of concerts. New amps, new PA rigs, new audiences, new guitarist. So they took a little time to gell and people find this something to criticize? I wish we had the evolution in playing on the tours from 1975-on, but of course we don't. As for Keith peaking in '75, the only thing that peaked for him then was his heroin use.
It wasn't criticism, just pointing out that you can't judge an entire tour by its best show only.
I love this tour myself, and find it among the three best tours they ever did.
PS: I think Keith peaked in 77, heroin-wise He had big problems in 73.
Perhaps you sometimes focus on the details of what I say rather than the larger point, or perhaps I don't communicate as well as I think. I should have said that the heroin use affected his playing more in '75 than in '73, because I think it's obvious it did. You are likely right that his "use" peaked in '77.
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000Quote
71Tele
True, they started slow in '69, but so what? This was the first time ever on the road in the "modern era" of concerts. New amps, new PA rigs, new audiences, new guitarist. So they took a little time to gell and people find this something to criticize? I wish we had the evolution in playing on the tours from 1975-on, but of course we don't. As for Keith peaking in '75, the only thing that peaked for him then was his heroin use.
But we do - have the evolution in playing on other tours.
in 72 and 78 it is plain to see. In 75 also, but differently because it was the first RW tour, also Preston and Ollie had to find their place. Honestly - I never thought Ollie Brown brought much to the game. Matter of fact, I think he was almost a liability.
Quote
Redhotcarpet
I was thinking the e x a c t same thing just the other day and downloaded some versions of that song just to compare (Wonder 1986, Jackson Five, Stones). HM, welcome back. Not kidding, I replayed that solo and thought about how this is what Brian very well could have developed into.
Quote
71TeleQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
71Tele
True, they started slow in '69, but so what? This was the first time ever on the road in the "modern era" of concerts. New amps, new PA rigs, new audiences, new guitarist. So they took a little time to gell and people find this something to criticize? I wish we had the evolution in playing on the tours from 1975-on, but of course we don't. As for Keith peaking in '75, the only thing that peaked for him then was his heroin use.
It wasn't criticism, just pointing out that you can't judge an entire tour by its best show only.
I love this tour myself, and find it among the three best tours they ever did.
PS: I think Keith peaked in 77, heroin-wise He had big problems in 73.
Perhaps you sometimes focus on the details of what I say rather than the larger point, or perhaps I don't communicate as well as I think. I should have said that the heroin use affected his playing more in '75 than in '73, because I think it's obvious it did. You are likely right that his "use" peaked in '77.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
71TeleQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
71Tele
True, they started slow in '69, but so what? This was the first time ever on the road in the "modern era" of concerts. New amps, new PA rigs, new audiences, new guitarist. So they took a little time to gell and people find this something to criticize? I wish we had the evolution in playing on the tours from 1975-on, but of course we don't. As for Keith peaking in '75, the only thing that peaked for him then was his heroin use.
It wasn't criticism, just pointing out that you can't judge an entire tour by its best show only.
I love this tour myself, and find it among the three best tours they ever did.
PS: I think Keith peaked in 77, heroin-wise He had big problems in 73.
Perhaps you sometimes focus on the details of what I say rather than the larger point, or perhaps I don't communicate as well as I think. I should have said that the heroin use affected his playing more in '75 than in '73, because I think it's obvious it did. You are likely right that his "use" peaked in '77.
He played more, better and more adventurous in 75, imo, so it's hard for me to see that. Loved his sound as well.
Quote
His Majesty
Taylors parts on that song are quite early Jones like, the chordal picking ala Jones parts on Time Is on My Side, Pain In My Heart and then the solo which has similarities to Jones I Wanna Be Your Man solo.
Intentional or otherwise, for this listener it feels like a nod and a wink from one third man to another. That the track ties in, alledgedly, so closely with Brian dying just adds to it all.
Or maybe it just shows how naturally similar their approaches could be, similarities which extend in to the essentials of their chordal rhythm guitars and Berry rhythms...
Quote
RobertJohnsonQuote
LuxuryStonesQuote
Mathijs
I never liked I'm Free for example: that song drags, and I don't like Taylor's approach to it.
Mathijs
One has to be rather cold blooded not to feel or at least not to understand the musical warmth / melodic romance Taylor is adding here.
In fact ... One of MT's very ingenious contributions ... But also I like Keith's heavy rhythm-guitar on this track during the 69 tour (San Diego, Boston, if I remember right), that contrasts the brilliance of Taylor's lead in a specific way.