For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Rolling Hansie
Of course it will happen
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
corriecas
Maybe the new Ziggo Drome, amsterdam.
Quote
georgelicks
“The word is the concerts are going to be free
Quote
superrevvy
Stonesdoug's latest: "There is supposed to be one show in 2012 and then
a smaller version of a tour in 2013."
I believe the 2012 thing is correct, but not the 2013 thing.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
superrevvy
Stonesdoug's latest: "There is supposed to be one show in 2012 and then
a smaller version of a tour in 2013."
I believe the 2012 thing is correct, but not the 2013 thing.
And why wouldn't that be correct?
Quote
superrevvyQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
superrevvy
Stonesdoug's latest: "There is supposed to be one show in 2012 and then
a smaller version of a tour in 2013."
I believe the 2012 thing is correct, but not the 2013 thing.
And why wouldn't that be correct?
I've explained that on more than one thread, most recently on the "stones are in
NYC" thread, right above your incessant repetitious posts.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
superrevvyQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
superrevvy
Stonesdoug's latest: "There is supposed to be one show in 2012 and then
a smaller version of a tour in 2013."
I believe the 2012 thing is correct, but not the 2013 thing.
And why wouldn't that be correct?
I've explained that on more than one thread, most recently on the "stones are in
NYC" thread, right above your incessant repetitious posts.
Easy now, rev! I just wanted to know why you THINK it's not correct, because you don't KNOW, now do you?
Gazza reported about the studio rehearsals right after it happened, btw. In addition to that, insiders have reported about the one off-gig in 2012 AND the plans next year.
Why are they wrong, and you right? That's the question.
PS: The info Gazza got was saying that the rehearsal in London wasn't filmed at all. Merely a recording for the 50th ann. compilation album? Could be, I dunno. Do you?
Quote
superrevvyQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
superrevvyQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
superrevvy
Stonesdoug's latest: "There is supposed to be one show in 2012 and then
a smaller version of a tour in 2013."
I believe the 2012 thing is correct, but not the 2013 thing.
And why wouldn't that be correct?
I've explained that on more than one thread, most recently on the "stones are in
NYC" thread, right above your incessant repetitious posts.
Easy now, rev! I just wanted to know why you THINK it's not correct, because you don't KNOW, now do you?
Gazza reported about the studio rehearsals right after it happened, btw. In addition to that, insiders have reported about the one off-gig in 2012 AND the plans next year.
Why are they wrong, and you right? That's the question.
PS: The info Gazza got was saying that the rehearsal in London wasn't filmed at all. Merely a recording for the 50th ann. compilation album? Could be, I dunno. Do you?
C'mon, Dandy, you must know my schtick by now. My schtick is that I'm a
complete outsider who lives in a little country town in Australia, and has
no associates or contacts whatsoever inside Jagger's organization. My
schtick is that I do it all by divining it.
I've also stated repeatedly that as much of a kick as I get by being right
time and time again (no, not all the time, but I've got a way higher shooting
percentage, over the course of 18 years, than any of the associates-of-insiders
that post on the various Stones boards), my only goal is to be plausible and
entertaining. I can't help it if I can read things like the back of my hand.
But I don't consider myself as particularly all-knowing or all-seeing. Rather,
the awful truth is awful sad: I do consider y'all as particularly blind. Only
because, there are none so blind that will not see.
stonesrule/GumbootClogeroo has gotten me banned a few times for repeating
myself, even though I do it less than her/him. So I've got to be careful,
and take two steps back sometimes, so the dogs don't bite.
Now, Dandy, regarding your questions. 1) I don't think you're correct about
any insider/associate touting a one-off gig for 2012, until Stonesdoug did it
yesterday. So, given Doug's track record, that was reason enough for me to
crow. I mean, I don't receive any consideration for my participation here,
unlike some others. So "crowing" is my only compensation. 2) I never say
I "know" anything, unless I'm taking the piss. 3) But I have previously
on a number of threads went into Sherlock Holmes-like detail on why there
would be new tracks recorded, why there would be a one-off show on or about
July 12, and why there will never be another Stones tour or even mini-tour.
And should I prove right yet again, sorry, but that would almost surely inspire
a lot more of my schtick. So y'all keep doing what you're doing, and keep
praying that I'm wrong, because its the only thing that might shut me up for
awhile. Kindest regards, revvy
Quote
DandelionPowderman
- Regarding the one-off, I wasn't talking about any touting or "official insider news" posted on fan boards this time. I'm sorry I can't elaborate more, don't wanna put friendships on the line here.
Quote
Limbostone
Frankly I don't give a hoot about what your position in all of this is. Please stop pushing your ego. Nothing in this matter has antything to do with you, not in 2012, nor in 2013.
Quote
tipps
I think they could have done the Olympics if they wanted to, as they are all doing solo stuff now.
Quote
GazzaQuote
tipps
I think they could have done the Olympics if they wanted to, as they are all doing solo stuff now.
Thankfully they didn't.
Quote
superrevvy
If Keith and Stones fans are both generally supportive of Mick's other band, then I can see more Stones shows happening in 2013.
Quote
Rolling HansieQuote
superrevvy
If Keith and Stones fans are both generally supportive of Mick's other band, then I can see more Stones shows happening in 2013.
Now that's a logic I can't follow.
You mean that Stonesfans have to support SuperHeavy in order to get Stonesshows ?
Or am I reading something the wrong way ..... again
Quote
superrevvyQuote
Rolling HansieQuote
superrevvy
If Keith and Stones fans are both generally supportive of Mick's other band, then I can see more Stones shows happening in 2013.
Now that's a logic I can't follow.
You mean that Stonesfans have to support SuperHeavy in order to get Stonesshows ?
Or am I reading something the wrong way ..... again
Well, I wouldn't put it the way you put it, but look at it this way: Mick is
not going to be trashed by Keith and Stones fans and then turn around and be
nice to them. He just isn't, anymore. He proved that in 2012 and he'll re-prove
in 2013 if he's given no other choice.