Tell Me :
Talk
Did Ronnie really wear THAT?
It's not like Mick doesn't wear a V-neck sweater and shirt with a sport jacket
[m.i.uol.com.br]
Mick's outfit is stylish. Ronnie looks like a retiree from Phoenix.
Gazza, we're analysing, but not seriously.
Or walking in ?
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Is he walking in......to the Faces or out .....of the Stones ....OMG I CAN'T DECIDE !!!!!!!! He's got a jumper on. Maybe he's cold or .......? OMG !The next Archive release is linked to cold, er maybe She's so Cold - 100 club 82 it's f**king obvious.
Thank you Ronnie for clearing that up ..phew !
sc uk
I thought I was quipping?!
If only...
... or the Ladies
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
And as my Irish is a bit lacking, by 'caught short' you mean...no toilet paper or at least not enough to...do the job?
No. I mean 'touching cloth'.
'Getting the turtle's head', etc.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-04-08 03:30 by Gazza.
Good lord the Irish language can be rude!
Queen's English!
Is this gormless twit seriously trying to twist the Stones' lack of activity into some kind of 'proof' that his nonsensical theory was, in fact, correct?
It may have 'sent Stones fans into a frenzy' (well, some - don't give yourself THAT much credit, Paul) for about 12 hours, but it showed him up to be a misinformed attention-seeking gimp for even longer.
Sometime, when the Stones really call it a day - he'll be the first one to say: "see - I told you so"
does this creep take pride in the fact that he launched a fabricated story on a 'small music web site in Australia' ?
he kept insisting and got a reaction from the Stones camp. is that what's driving him?
that's professional trolling, I think.
Ah...cheerio then!
Wouldn't you have to agree that superdeluxe versions of GYYYO, Exile, Some Girls and the releases of 6 classic concerts as downloads, a new 50th Anniversary documentary and a slew of 50th Anniversary books...all in the last 2-3 years would constitute 'opening the vaults'?
What do they have to do to please you?
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
tkl7
()
Date: April 6, 2012 20:41
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
superrevvy
I think we all missed this March 25 story. Perhaps that's for the best, as it
is quite light on facts...
Ronnie and Mick's Secret Stones Summit
Mar 25 2012 by Nick Dorman, [www.people.co.uk]
SOMETHING wrong, Ron? Rolling Stone Ronnie Wood looks like he didnt get much
satisfaction from a secret summit with bandmate Mick Jagger.
Ronnie had hoped to spend much of the day and finally nail down a reunion
tour for the groups 50th anniversary.
But the guitarist, 64, looked less than happy when he emerged from the
three-hour sitdown with Sir Mick, 68, which Ronnie had exclusively revealed
to The People the night before.
Speaking at a ballet premiere at Londons Coliseum, he excitedly told us: Im
having a great time at the minute. Im not sure what is going on with the
Rolling Stones reunion but Im meeting up with Mick tomorrow. So well see what
happens.
Next day Ronnie looked upbeat as he left his home in a light blue blazer,
yellow V-neck, trainers and trademark shades with a ciggie in his hand.
But when the Stone whose band had a hit with Waiting On A Friend arrived at
Micks home he had to use his mobile to call his pal to let him in. Three
hours later the duo were Out Of Time and Ronnie looked glum as he walked to a
waiting car.
An onlooker said: He seemed a bit downbeat.
Looking at the photo of Ronnie, I would wager Mick told him he looked to 'Ivy League' for a Stones tour, and they were going with Jeff Beck instead.
Did Ronnie really wear THAT?
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
mickijaggeroo
()
Date: April 6, 2012 21:59
Mick: " Sorry Ronnie, we´re going to go with Mick T on this one"
Vilhelm
Nordic Stones Vikings
Vilhelm
Nordic Stones Vikings
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
alimente
()
Date: April 6, 2012 22:03
A video would probably be more revealing than a millisecond snapshot but if this shot indeed tells a story I would say that he looks pissed. Could mean anything - no tour at all, a tour without him or - whatever, but not something Ron exactly expected as an outcome of this meeting. And there's indeed the question why there was a meeting with Mick and just Ronnie! Did Mick give him the boot?
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Sam Spade
()
Date: April 6, 2012 23:16
Quote
tkl7Quote
treaclefingersQuote
superrevvy
I think we all missed this March 25 story. Perhaps that's for the best, as it
is quite light on facts...
Ronnie and Mick's Secret Stones Summit
Mar 25 2012 by Nick Dorman, [www.people.co.uk]
SOMETHING wrong, Ron? Rolling Stone Ronnie Wood looks like he didnt get much
satisfaction from a secret summit with bandmate Mick Jagger.
Ronnie had hoped to spend much of the day and finally nail down a reunion
tour for the groups 50th anniversary.
But the guitarist, 64, looked less than happy when he emerged from the
three-hour sitdown with Sir Mick, 68, which Ronnie had exclusively revealed
to The People the night before.
Speaking at a ballet premiere at Londons Coliseum, he excitedly told us: Im
having a great time at the minute. Im not sure what is going on with the
Rolling Stones reunion but Im meeting up with Mick tomorrow. So well see what
happens.
Next day Ronnie looked upbeat as he left his home in a light blue blazer,
yellow V-neck, trainers and trademark shades with a ciggie in his hand.
But when the Stone whose band had a hit with Waiting On A Friend arrived at
Micks home he had to use his mobile to call his pal to let him in. Three
hours later the duo were Out Of Time and Ronnie looked glum as he walked to a
waiting car.
An onlooker said: He seemed a bit downbeat.
Looking at the photo of Ronnie, I would wager Mick told him he looked to 'Ivy League' for a Stones tour, and they were going with Jeff Beck instead.
Did Ronnie really wear THAT?
It's not like Mick doesn't wear a V-neck sweater and shirt with a sport jacket
[m.i.uol.com.br]
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
tkl7
()
Date: April 6, 2012 23:46
Quote
Sam SpadeQuote
tkl7Quote
treaclefingersQuote
superrevvy
I think we all missed this March 25 story. Perhaps that's for the best, as it
is quite light on facts...
Ronnie and Mick's Secret Stones Summit
Mar 25 2012 by Nick Dorman, [www.people.co.uk]
SOMETHING wrong, Ron? Rolling Stone Ronnie Wood looks like he didnt get much
satisfaction from a secret summit with bandmate Mick Jagger.
Ronnie had hoped to spend much of the day and finally nail down a reunion
tour for the groups 50th anniversary.
But the guitarist, 64, looked less than happy when he emerged from the
three-hour sitdown with Sir Mick, 68, which Ronnie had exclusively revealed
to The People the night before.
Speaking at a ballet premiere at Londons Coliseum, he excitedly told us: Im
having a great time at the minute. Im not sure what is going on with the
Rolling Stones reunion but Im meeting up with Mick tomorrow. So well see what
happens.
Next day Ronnie looked upbeat as he left his home in a light blue blazer,
yellow V-neck, trainers and trademark shades with a ciggie in his hand.
But when the Stone whose band had a hit with Waiting On A Friend arrived at
Micks home he had to use his mobile to call his pal to let him in. Three
hours later the duo were Out Of Time and Ronnie looked glum as he walked to a
waiting car.
An onlooker said: He seemed a bit downbeat.
Looking at the photo of Ronnie, I would wager Mick told him he looked to 'Ivy League' for a Stones tour, and they were going with Jeff Beck instead.
Did Ronnie really wear THAT?
It's not like Mick doesn't wear a V-neck sweater and shirt with a sport jacket
[m.i.uol.com.br]
Mick's outfit is stylish. Ronnie looks like a retiree from Phoenix.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
melillo
()
Date: April 7, 2012 02:07
Quote
tkl7Quote
treaclefingersQuote
superrevvy
I think we all missed this March 25 story. Perhaps that's for the best, as it
is quite light on facts...
Ronnie and Mick's Secret Stones Summit
Mar 25 2012 by Nick Dorman, [www.people.co.uk]
SOMETHING wrong, Ron? Rolling Stone Ronnie Wood looks like he didnt get much
satisfaction from a secret summit with bandmate Mick Jagger.
Ronnie had hoped to spend much of the day and finally nail down a reunion
tour for the groups 50th anniversary.
But the guitarist, 64, looked less than happy when he emerged from the
three-hour sitdown with Sir Mick, 68, which Ronnie had exclusively revealed
to The People the night before.
Speaking at a ballet premiere at Londons Coliseum, he excitedly told us: Im
having a great time at the minute. Im not sure what is going on with the
Rolling Stones reunion but Im meeting up with Mick tomorrow. So well see what
happens.
Next day Ronnie looked upbeat as he left his home in a light blue blazer,
yellow V-neck, trainers and trademark shades with a ciggie in his hand.
But when the Stone whose band had a hit with Waiting On A Friend arrived at
Micks home he had to use his mobile to call his pal to let him in. Three
hours later the duo were Out Of Time and Ronnie looked glum as he walked to a
waiting car.
An onlooker said: He seemed a bit downbeat.
Looking at the photo of Ronnie, I would wager Mick told him he looked to 'Ivy League' for a Stones tour, and they were going with Jeff Beck instead.
Did Ronnie really wear THAT?
just looks like someone walking out of a door IMO
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Gazza
()
Date: April 7, 2012 03:57
People are seriously analysing Ronnie's facial expression (with his eyes hidden by sunglasses) for a clue into his and the band's future?
Jesus H. Christ.
Jesus H. Christ.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
alimente
()
Date: April 7, 2012 05:30
Quote
Gazza
People are seriously analysing Ronnie's facial expression (with his eyes hidden by sunglasses) for a clue into his and the band's future?
Jesus H. Christ.
Gazza, we're analysing, but not seriously.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: April 7, 2012 10:57
Quote
melillo
just looks like someone walking out of a door IMO
Or walking in ?
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
straycatuk
()
Date: April 7, 2012 12:05
Quote
Rolling HansieQuote
melillo
just looks like someone walking out of a door IMO
Or walking in ?
Is he walking in......to the Faces or out .....of the Stones ....OMG I CAN'T DECIDE !!!!!!!! He's got a jumper on. Maybe he's cold or .......? OMG !The next Archive release is linked to cold, er maybe She's so Cold - 100 club 82 it's f**king obvious.
Thank you Ronnie for clearing that up ..phew !
sc uk
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: April 7, 2012 16:09
Quote
alimenteQuote
Gazza
People are seriously analysing Ronnie's facial expression (with his eyes hidden by sunglasses) for a clue into his and the band's future?
Jesus H. Christ.
Gazza, we're analysing, but not seriously.
I thought I was quipping?!
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
71Tele
()
Date: April 7, 2012 20:33
Quote
mickijaggeroo
Mick: " Sorry Ronnie, we´re going to go with Mick T on this one"
If only...
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
mtaylor
()
Date: April 7, 2012 21:11
I guess you're right - yesterday was Holy Friday and tomorrow is Easter ;o)Quote
Gazza
People are seriously analysing Ronnie's facial expression (with his eyes hidden by sunglasses) for a clue into his and the band's future?
Jesus H. Christ.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
flairville
()
Date: April 7, 2012 21:45
They were merely discussing which tracks to do when Mick joins Ronnie for the encore on June 30th.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Gazza
()
Date: April 7, 2012 22:07
My analysis :
Ronnie looks to be in discomfort as he has been 'caught short' and the door behind him is the Gents toilet.
Ronnie looks to be in discomfort as he has been 'caught short' and the door behind him is the Gents toilet.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: April 7, 2012 22:13
Quote
Gazza
the door behind him is the Gents toilet.
... or the Ladies
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: April 8, 2012 02:25
Quote
Gazza
My analysis :
Ronnie looks to be in discomfort as he has been 'caught short' and the door behind him is the Gents toilet.
And as my Irish is a bit lacking, by 'caught short' you mean...no toilet paper or at least not enough to...do the job?
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
open-g
()
Date: April 8, 2012 03:14
Analysing like rainy day women #12 & 35
They'll stone you when you're walking on the street
They'll stone you when you're trying to keep your seat
They'll stone you when your walking on the floor
They'll stone you when your walking to the door
But I would not feel so all alone
Everybody must get stoned
They'll stone you when you're walking on the street
They'll stone you when you're trying to keep your seat
They'll stone you when your walking on the floor
They'll stone you when your walking to the door
But I would not feel so all alone
Everybody must get stoned
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Gazza
()
Date: April 8, 2012 03:29
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
Gazza
My analysis :
Ronnie looks to be in discomfort as he has been 'caught short' and the door behind him is the Gents toilet.
And as my Irish is a bit lacking, by 'caught short' you mean...no toilet paper or at least not enough to...do the job?
No. I mean 'touching cloth'.
'Getting the turtle's head', etc.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-04-08 03:30 by Gazza.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: April 8, 2012 08:06
Quote
GazzaQuote
treaclefingersQuote
Gazza
My analysis :
Ronnie looks to be in discomfort as he has been 'caught short' and the door behind him is the Gents toilet.
And as my Irish is a bit lacking, by 'caught short' you mean...no toilet paper or at least not enough to...do the job?
No. I mean 'touching cloth'.
'Getting the turtle's head', etc.
Good lord the Irish language can be rude!
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
superrevvy
()
Date: April 8, 2012 12:24
Excerpted from here...
[www.noise11.com]
All Quiet As Rolling Stones Turn 50
by Paul Cashmere on April 8, 2012
This month marks the 50th anniversary of the Rolling Stones and while all is
quiet in the Stones camp for a concert, the only official event named to mark
the anniversary is a documentary, currently in production.
The Rolling Stones officially formed in April, 1962 with Mick Jagger
(vocals), Keith Richards (guitar, vocals), Ian Stewart (piano), Brian Jones
(guitar). Dick Taylor (bass) and Tony Chapman (drums).
They played their first gig as The Rolling Stones in London on July 12, 1962.
The nucleus of Jagger, Richards, Wyman, Watts and Jones was in place in
January 1963 when Charlie joined making the anniversary arguably from either
April, 1962 or January, 1963. Keith says January, 1963 is the date they go by.
When I wrote the story that Charlie had left the band in September, 2009, it
sent Stones fans into a frenzy yet with the 50th anniversary on the doorstep
now, the band is doing little to confirm they will even mark the occasion
with shows or new music.
Following the story, Stones spokesperson Fran Curtis issued the following
statement: “Contrary to a fabricated story that ran this morning on a small
music web site in Australia, drummer Charlie Watts has not left The Rolling
Stones.” Regardless of that denial, the 50th anniversary has arrived and it
is all quiet on the Stones front.
To be continued …
(1. I am not Paul Cashmere and don't know who he is. 2. But I do think
Charlie and Mick have entered a silent pact to bring the Stones to a close,
at least with regard to live appearances. 3. Nonetheless I still think there
will be at least one show and some new recorded music relatively soon,
as part of the winding-down.)
Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 2012-04-08 13:02 by superrevvy.
[www.noise11.com]
All Quiet As Rolling Stones Turn 50
by Paul Cashmere on April 8, 2012
This month marks the 50th anniversary of the Rolling Stones and while all is
quiet in the Stones camp for a concert, the only official event named to mark
the anniversary is a documentary, currently in production.
The Rolling Stones officially formed in April, 1962 with Mick Jagger
(vocals), Keith Richards (guitar, vocals), Ian Stewart (piano), Brian Jones
(guitar). Dick Taylor (bass) and Tony Chapman (drums).
They played their first gig as The Rolling Stones in London on July 12, 1962.
The nucleus of Jagger, Richards, Wyman, Watts and Jones was in place in
January 1963 when Charlie joined making the anniversary arguably from either
April, 1962 or January, 1963. Keith says January, 1963 is the date they go by.
When I wrote the story that Charlie had left the band in September, 2009, it
sent Stones fans into a frenzy yet with the 50th anniversary on the doorstep
now, the band is doing little to confirm they will even mark the occasion
with shows or new music.
Following the story, Stones spokesperson Fran Curtis issued the following
statement: “Contrary to a fabricated story that ran this morning on a small
music web site in Australia, drummer Charlie Watts has not left The Rolling
Stones.” Regardless of that denial, the 50th anniversary has arrived and it
is all quiet on the Stones front.
To be continued …
(1. I am not Paul Cashmere and don't know who he is. 2. But I do think
Charlie and Mick have entered a silent pact to bring the Stones to a close,
at least with regard to live appearances. 3. Nonetheless I still think there
will be at least one show and some new recorded music relatively soon,
as part of the winding-down.)
Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 2012-04-08 13:02 by superrevvy.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
sweetcharmedlife
()
Date: April 8, 2012 18:30
Paul Cashmere is the same idiot who said Charlie was leaving the Rolling Stones a couple of years ago. Among other inaccurate stories about the Stones.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Gazza
()
Date: April 8, 2012 18:42
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
GazzaQuote
treaclefingersQuote
Gazza
My analysis :
Ronnie looks to be in discomfort as he has been 'caught short' and the door behind him is the Gents toilet.
And as my Irish is a bit lacking, by 'caught short' you mean...no toilet paper or at least not enough to...do the job?
No. I mean 'touching cloth'.
'Getting the turtle's head', etc.
Good lord the Irish language can be rude!
Queen's English!
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Gazza
()
Date: April 8, 2012 18:46
Quote
superrevvy
Excerpted from here...
[www.noise11.com]
All Quiet As Rolling Stones Turn 50
by Paul Cashmere on April 8, 2012
This month marks the 50th anniversary of the Rolling Stones and while all is
quiet in the Stones camp for a concert, the only official event named to mark
the anniversary is a documentary, currently in production.
The Rolling Stones officially formed in April, 1962 with Mick Jagger
(vocals), Keith Richards (guitar, vocals), Ian Stewart (piano), Brian Jones
(guitar). Dick Taylor (bass) and Tony Chapman (drums).
They played their first gig as The Rolling Stones in London on July 12, 1962.
The nucleus of Jagger, Richards, Wyman, Watts and Jones was in place in
January 1963 when Charlie joined making the anniversary arguably from either
April, 1962 or January, 1963. Keith says January, 1963 is the date they go by.
When I wrote the story that Charlie had left the band in September, 2009, it
sent Stones fans into a frenzy yet with the 50th anniversary on the doorstep
now, the band is doing little to confirm they will even mark the occasion
with shows or new music.
Following the story, Stones spokesperson Fran Curtis issued the following
statement: “Contrary to a fabricated story that ran this morning on a small
music web site in Australia, drummer Charlie Watts has not left The Rolling
Stones.” Regardless of that denial, the 50th anniversary has arrived and it
is all quiet on the Stones front.
Is this gormless twit seriously trying to twist the Stones' lack of activity into some kind of 'proof' that his nonsensical theory was, in fact, correct?
It may have 'sent Stones fans into a frenzy' (well, some - don't give yourself THAT much credit, Paul) for about 12 hours, but it showed him up to be a misinformed attention-seeking gimp for even longer.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
open-g
()
Date: April 8, 2012 20:16
Quote
GazzaQuote
superrevvy
Excerpted from here...
[www.noise11.com]
All Quiet As Rolling Stones Turn 50
by Paul Cashmere on April 8, 2012
This month marks the 50th anniversary of the Rolling Stones and while all is
quiet in the Stones camp for a concert, the only official event named to mark
the anniversary is a documentary, currently in production.
The Rolling Stones officially formed in April, 1962 with Mick Jagger
(vocals), Keith Richards (guitar, vocals), Ian Stewart (piano), Brian Jones
(guitar). Dick Taylor (bass) and Tony Chapman (drums).
They played their first gig as The Rolling Stones in London on July 12, 1962.
The nucleus of Jagger, Richards, Wyman, Watts and Jones was in place in
January 1963 when Charlie joined making the anniversary arguably from either
April, 1962 or January, 1963. Keith says January, 1963 is the date they go by.
When I wrote the story that Charlie had left the band in September, 2009, it
sent Stones fans into a frenzy yet with the 50th anniversary on the doorstep
now, the band is doing little to confirm they will even mark the occasion
with shows or new music.
Following the story, Stones spokesperson Fran Curtis issued the following
statement: “Contrary to a fabricated story that ran this morning on a small
music web site in Australia, drummer Charlie Watts has not left The Rolling
Stones.” Regardless of that denial, the 50th anniversary has arrived and it
is all quiet on the Stones front.
Is this gormless twit seriously trying to twist the Stones' lack of activity into some kind of 'proof' that his nonsensical theory was, in fact, correct?
It may have 'sent Stones fans into a frenzy' (well, some - don't give yourself THAT much credit, Paul) for about 12 hours, but it showed him up to be a misinformed attention-seeking gimp for even longer.
Sometime, when the Stones really call it a day - he'll be the first one to say: "see - I told you so"
does this creep take pride in the fact that he launched a fabricated story on a 'small music web site in Australia' ?
he kept insisting and got a reaction from the Stones camp. is that what's driving him?
that's professional trolling, I think.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: April 8, 2012 21:16
Quote
GazzaQuote
treaclefingersQuote
GazzaQuote
treaclefingersQuote
Gazza
My analysis :
Ronnie looks to be in discomfort as he has been 'caught short' and the door behind him is the Gents toilet.
And as my Irish is a bit lacking, by 'caught short' you mean...no toilet paper or at least not enough to...do the job?
No. I mean 'touching cloth'.
'Getting the turtle's head', etc.
Good lord the Irish language can be rude!
Queen's English!
Ah...cheerio then!
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Midnight Toker
()
Date: April 8, 2012 21:19
No new. The worlds largest can of WD 40 can't remove all of the rust from these guys.
Forget a tour and open the vaults.
Forget a tour and open the vaults.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: April 8, 2012 21:29
Quote
Midnight Toker
No new. The worlds largest can of WD 40 can't remove all of the rust from these guys.
Forget a tour and open the vaults.
Wouldn't you have to agree that superdeluxe versions of GYYYO, Exile, Some Girls and the releases of 6 classic concerts as downloads, a new 50th Anniversary documentary and a slew of 50th Anniversary books...all in the last 2-3 years would constitute 'opening the vaults'?
What do they have to do to please you?
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
superrevvy
()
Date: April 9, 2012 03:02
Ronnie Wood, April 2012, NY Daily News:
“Charlie actually joined in ’63 so it’s kind of a two-year stretch for the
50-year celebration,” Wood reasons. “And we do have lots of projects like a
film celebrating the 50 years, a couple of books.
SupaRevy, Sept 2011
Well, since my imagination has been the most reliable source so far on
what's happening for the 50th, why not consult it again?
FYI: [www.themarqueeclub.co.uk]
Incidentally, if my imagination is right about this too, Gazza has agreed
to appoint me pope of northern ireland and pledge his fealty to me,
which i think is quite a generous offer.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2012-04-14 13:40 by superrevvy.
“Charlie actually joined in ’63 so it’s kind of a two-year stretch for the
50-year celebration,” Wood reasons. “And we do have lots of projects like a
film celebrating the 50 years, a couple of books.
SupaRevy, Sept 2011
Well, since my imagination has been the most reliable source so far on
what's happening for the 50th, why not consult it again?
FYI: [www.themarqueeclub.co.uk]
Incidentally, if my imagination is right about this too, Gazza has agreed
to appoint me pope of northern ireland and pledge his fealty to me,
which i think is quite a generous offer.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2012-04-14 13:40 by superrevvy.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
rogue
()
Date: April 9, 2012 13:12
I believe Charlie effectively leaves the band at the end of every tour since the late 70's. They all do to some extent. No news is no news. Sports jacket or v-neck I thinK Ronnie is trying to clean up his act and look respectable for a change.
A one off photo tells me nothing. A private meeting, however, does say something. Could be a business meeting. Could be Ronnie wants to lobby for a full tour, etc. Most likely, and I have no source or direct evidence of this, Mick told him how he really felt about the future of the band and that he, Mick Jagger, and Charlie Watts were calling the shots and not Richards.
By the way, Ronnie looks appropriate for a day time business meeting in the spring in London.
A one off photo tells me nothing. A private meeting, however, does say something. Could be a business meeting. Could be Ronnie wants to lobby for a full tour, etc. Most likely, and I have no source or direct evidence of this, Mick told him how he really felt about the future of the band and that he, Mick Jagger, and Charlie Watts were calling the shots and not Richards.
By the way, Ronnie looks appropriate for a day time business meeting in the spring in London.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Ali , babyblue , brucepv , daniel t , Elmo Lewis , erbissell , gagiwh , gerritr , henrik87 , Irix , kkhoranstoned , Martin90 , maumau , MonkeyMan2000 , quarkie , rastakeith , rbarnes00 , SimonN , snoopy2 , stonenut356 , Stonesfan2146 , TumblinDice76 , UGK56 , undertheradar , Witness , z
Guests:
1993
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10