i kind of agree with you rocky but mick doesnt really always want to do things with the stones the same way as his solo work.besides goddess in the doorway didnt do very well and im sure he wasnt ready to repeat that little trainwreck. as for keith,who knows with him anymore.you would think he would be the last person to want to record the stones with what is basically a computer program. i
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteTheBoss918 Quotelem motlow 71 Tele-this was my exact point about the beatles.you have millions of people who grew up in the 70s and 80s who would swear zep was the most influencial band ever. you don't agree and thats fine but its not the foregone conclusion about the beatles that the original poster suggests. like i said,to come out and say"we all know the beatles are the #1
Forum: Tell Me

Quoteproudmary Quotelem motlow imagine having these women from decades ago STILL talking about you. cool thing about jagger is how he always sees the humor in life,you'll see alot of pictures of him just cracking up laughing and his attitude seems to be basically,um,o.k. i cheated on you DECADES ago,move on with your freakin life already. cant remember the exact year [2000 maybe?] bu
Forum: Tell Me

71 Tele-this was my exact point about the beatles.you have millions of people who grew up in the 70s and 80s who would swear zep was the most influencial band ever. you don't agree and thats fine but its not the foregone conclusion about the beatles that the original poster suggests. like i said,to come out and say"we all know the beatles are the #1 most influencial band,who"
Forum: Tell Me

imagine having these women from decades ago STILL talking about you. cool thing about jagger is how he always sees the humor in life,you'll see alot of pictures of him just cracking up laughing and his attitude seems to be basically,um,o.k. i cheated on you DECADES ago,move on with your freakin life already. cant remember the exact year [2000 maybe?] but he was asked about marianne a
Forum: Tell Me

next time,show your idea to someone you trust and ask one simple question"does this sound stupid" if they say yes come up with another idea and repeat the process.
Forum: Tell Me

Quote71Tele Quotelem motlow its so funny to me when people just start off by saying- "well,we all know the beatles are the greatest,best,most influential band of all time" uh,no they're not.they are very important to a certain age group.mostly people who grew up in the 60's or people who did too much acid in the 70's.other than that,no one gives a shit. the beatl
Forum: Tell Me

its so funny to me when people just start off by saying- "well,we all know the beatles are the greatest,best,most influential band of all time" uh,no they're not.they are very important to a certain age group.mostly people who grew up in the 60's or people who did too much acid in the 70's.other than that,no one gives a shit. the beatles sold more records than an
Forum: Tell Me

stones78-i've already tried to explain that to him by telling him mick and keith bought stargroves and redlands for cash money when they were 24,he still doesn't get it. alot of fans have a narrative of the stones past that they've gotten from reading books and magazines over the years and they don't quite understand that the band live somewhere different than the world mos
Forum: Tell Me

Quotejamesfdouglas QuoteStoneage Of course you are right, lem motlow. The amateur psychologist in me was just trying to explain the fact that most male RS-fans tended to (at least before Keith's book) show partiality towards Keith rather than Mick. To the average Joe (or Jane), gay or straight, Jagger IS the Stones. The "Keef" worship comes from the more hardcore fan, and/or gui
Forum: Tell Me

micks solo records have a distinct disadvantage in that he always tries to do something out of the norm.the records almost never fall back on the stones blues rock style and he ends up in some really unfamiliar territory. that takes alot of guts.sometimes it makes some really good songs and sometimes not but at least he didnt take the easy open chord stones -like cliche' route. i wonde
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteStoneage Bianca: This may sound stupid, but I think that it has always been safer for a man to favour Keith in this, perpetual, "Keith or Mick" discussion. A man "idolizing" Mick could look a bit silly or be mistaken for not having a normal sexuality. Maybe, all this have changed a bit now when Keith's reputation has fallen a bit? its unimaginable to me that someon
Forum: Tell Me

the book really just brought to the surface alot of things that i had realized about ten years ago. keith is a complete phony...he's mr rock and roll who always put music first-yet he almost destroyed the rolling stones by trying to carry enough drugs across an international border to get himself put away for 25 years. put himself first by attacking jagger in the press for years..it h
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteSam Spade I don't recall Keith ever being arrested for threatening any woman with a knife. Keith's never had a restraining order served on him or his children taken away because of his behavior. Charlie Sheen needs some serious help. thats because back when keith was telling little marlon to be careful where he pointed his squirt gun because of the tray of cocaine sitting on t
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteStonesTod Quotelem motlow mansion paid for,bentley=freakin loaded. actually i think i got that "broke" thing from something bill said,i found it really funny.lets be honest,klein took them for a ride but they always had big money to throw around by any normal standards. anyway,the original poster said"they stopped playing together as a band when they got rich" i saw
Forum: Tell Me

mansion paid for,bentley=freakin loaded. actually i think i got that "broke" thing from something bill said,i found it really funny.lets be honest,klein took them for a ride but they always had big money to throw around by any normal standards. anyway,the original poster said"they stopped playing together as a band when they got rich" i saw them in 78 did they have money
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteKeithNacho MJ is capable of everything just to be and look cool...............big difference with KR. I can't imagine a KR photo with JBieber wow,a postcard from keithland.are you having kool-aid with the nachos? do me a favor,go to wireimage.com.punch -keith richards into the search.now look to your left,see where it says N'SYNC...click oh,look a picture from 2000 with good
Forum: Tell Me

jumpingKentFlash- i think the bulk of that number is from 62-66 when they were playing clubs and short sets to screaming girls.not saying it doesnt count but my point was the stones ARE a working band. europe 73-one of their best tours was 29 shows europe 90-was 40+ shows usa 2005 -first leg was 40+ shows in fact since 81 they've done almost exclusively stadiums,shows that dwarf the
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteStonesTod Quotebianca They stopped playing together as a band when they got rich. Bands gel when they play day in and day out. The Stones ceased being a working band in the mid to late 70s, and that is why there ain't any masterpices since then. Well polished efforts that almost sound like they sounded during the best years...yes. But nothing like before. Alot to be said for what th
Forum: Tell Me

its funny that mick acts like he doesnt care about the past,has no idea what songs are on which record but in "being mick" you can see a huge archive of stones stuff in his house.i would bet he has at least transferred everything they've done audio and video to digital.
Forum: Tell Me

thinks the people he works with are the enemy.... thinks he can somehow handle drugs because he's different than regular people... talks incoherent nonsense in interviews.. spends an inordinate amount of time giving scoops to the press when he should be working behind the scenes... takes the bulk of the credit for his work even though he's part of an ensemble..
Forum: Tell Me

Quotecc Quote71Tele Looks like MT is playing the same Les Paul Junior that Keith has in a different photo. MT? I don't see him in any of the photos... he was absent from the main tracking sessions for this album, one of the reasons his parts aren't so scintillating. re: mick on guitar -- I think he was set up with an amp throughout the session, but I'm not sure if he's au
Forum: Tell Me

JACK WHITE: "i think that pro tools is highly inappropriate to record music...its too easy to correct mistakes.its too easy to fix things.we hear this sort of clean,plastic perfection thats been applied to all the tracks.thats not the kind of music we grew up loving and listening to and wanting to be a part of" contrast this with an entire page of keith talking about how smart he
Forum: Tell Me

do you guys have trouble understanding english? you got the original stuff,there was no "jagger polish in the studio"that was keiths entire point,that they DIDNT GO INTO A PROPER STUDIO. i'm reading how the "gloss and sheen" is jaggers and there are probably rawer versions.he just told you,they used the stuff recorded on pro-tools at micks house. do you just read so
Forum: Tell Me

Quotestoned in washington dc agree with turd's lineup that would have been a good album i might even seriously consider taking one more song out.. all you need is 40-42 minutes.. just make it have impact... i think the problem is don was.. the guy doesn't have a clue anymore... he really sucks.. i mean they need someone they trust to tell them how it is but clearly they don'
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteStoneage I'm sorry for the ugly looking statistics above (earlier post). I tried to make two columns and it went like this when I posted it! Apparently I have much to learn in the IORR forum school yet! looks alright to me....
Forum: Tell Me

rockmans post translated- "we did the demos at micks house and then he wanted to take it into a real recording studio and finish it.i said f/ck it,that would require more work,time and money and i'm too cheap and lazy for that.so there you have it,the public got the half-baked piece of shit we worked on for 2 weeks" that damn jagger,always making problems,we showed him"
Forum: Tell Me

your line-up is perfect.the crap songs are thrown out,it doesn't run too long etc. there is actually a term for what the stones have-studio diarrhea.its an affliction of the compact disc age,musicians get lazy and dont edit. they have too much time on a cd as opposed to a vinyl record and justify it by saying they're giving their fans more content. in the end you have a disc th
Forum: Tell Me

whats funny to me is that most fans use the keith qoute"if me,mick or charlie check out thats it" "ronnie,he's the new boy" as a reference point. truth is if keith bit the dust jagger would replace him in about 2 weeks.you would have either a. ronnie in keiths spot and mick taylor back or b.ronnie in keiths spot and another guitar player stage right. the general pub
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs 1. Jagger sings 'scarred old slaver' to Ike Turner, MSG 27/28-11-69 2. Jagger sings 'scarred old slaver'during the 1970 tour 3. Jagger sings 'scarred old slaver' during the 1971 TOTP's show 4. Jagger sings 'scarred old slaver' during the 1972 tour 5. Richards recited 'scarrrrrrred ooooold slave-ur' in CS Blues I do not thi
Forum: Tell Me