maumau Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> toomuchforme Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > see this
> > [
ggalmiche.free.fr]
>
> first thank for the link
> second of course those 20 or so 1 minute clips
> from the concert are a small portion of the show
> so that one cannot honestly make a steady opinion
> on that (expecially because some "core issue
> moments" are missing...)
> BUT
> 1 the clips are very good quality (better than
> most of the cell clips found on youtube - werchet,
> nijmengen)
> 2 the angle is very good to have a glimpse to what
> happen on stage
> 3 the sound is pretty good
> SO
> i am baffled
> I hear keith is having trouble with the first
> chords of CYHMK and it takes a while to get the
> song going. Mick, on his part, enters with the
> wrong line.
> The rest of the clips for me show a pretty damn
> good band on stage (given that i cant stand
> anymore the way HTW and SFTD are performed). Also
> he has a "strange way" to intro SWH, but i dont
> know how much you can say it is "f+++ up")
> MORE
> Someone hear posted that Keith has barely played
> last night
> So the person who took these clips must have been
> very lucky, because Keith is driving thru (CYHMK
> is interesting in that Keith screws the intro but
> is clearly the man in charge and they all wait for
> him to get it going so at the same time a bad and
> a good sign, but to me more good because it seems
> he is not so carried along as i thought by
> reports)
> I literally have shivers on the intro of happy
> which i cant describe other than "more than
> nailed" (and make sme wonder again why some people
> here quotes the f+++ up intros and then dont quote
> something like this, makes me wonder if they take
> for granted or if they can be "shivered" anymore).
> I like to be shivered by the stones and that 1-2-3
> riff did that to me.
> Someone hear will tell me that I am in denial now
> but what I am talking about here is my perception
> of those clips (strictly)
> so i hear Chuck enter the intro of LSTNT a little
> shy and keith coming in to sustain and support
> with a good riff (not hampton 82 but still, i
> think is good)
> i hear keith leading hard Rough Justice and IORR
> also It's all over now seems very good and rhythm
> guitar driven.
> SMU seems good as usual (i.e. IOW "official"
> clip)
> LAST BUT NOT LEAST
> Blondie
> i see him playing acoustic on rough justice and
> she was hot (which is fine with me as it just add
> something in the back of the songs, in most of the
> other clips is on stage doing BV or playing
> maracas (actually is backing mick in that during
> CYHMK). of course i havent seen/heard the rest but
> these 20mins of the concert makes me wonder and
> have a "reasonable doubt" about the "keith as
> disaster" sentence of some eyewitnesses.
>
> hope none is offended by this, nor will offend me
> for this
I agree with you, the Band seems to be very good that evening and Keith looks and played way better than in Frankfurt and I'm really glad about it. The only thing i want to point out is that that may be a selection of clips where everything was fine, just look at the numbering of the clips. The songs (or the parts of it) where people reported something went wrong are left out of this selection. I know people will start bashing me now but if you want to come to a objective judgement about the show you have to take that into consideration.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-06-17 18:01 by firebird.