For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Woz
It seems to me that it's Concerts West that are pushing for the dates to be booked so soon. First and foremost comes Mick's health.
Quote
CooltopladyQuote
Woz
It seems to me that it's Concerts West that are pushing for the dates to be booked so soon. First and foremost comes Mick's health.
It’s not Concerts West it’s AEG
Quote
bv
I would advice any fan to be more concerned about Mick getting well than private travel logistics issues. Get well Mick!
Hee hee fun to win. Keep drinking paddyQuote
PaddyQuote
potus43Quote
bleedingmanQuote
potus43
Maybe they will do "heartbreaker"
A bit late with that gem. Go back a page or two. So sad, they postponed MSG.
HA HA I always win
@ being a cock.
Quote
bleedingmanQuote
potus43
Maybe they will do "heartbreaker"
A bit late with that gem. Go back a page or two. So sad, they postponed MSG.
Quote
daspyknowsQuote
bv
I would advice any fan to be more concerned about Mick getting well than private travel logistics issues. Get well Mick!
+1 Better to cancel it all and call it a career so they can enjoy the time they have than push forward and have Mick pull a Col. Bruce Hampton.
Quote
keithsman
With all this talk of new venues and shows being rumoured to replace the postponed ones, i got a question, if Mick decides he doesn't want to carry on performing after his surgery for what ever reason, would the remaining Stones be able to fulfill those tour dates with a replacement singer or singers. We have seen it done so many times in recent years with other acts, would that be possible if Mick consented to it.
No disrespect to Mick, but it would be a way of fulfilling their obligations and give something to the fans with tickets instead of a refund.
Quote
keithsman
With all this talk of new venues and shows being rumoured to replace the postponed ones, i got a question, if Mick decides he doesn't want to carry on performing after his surgery for what ever reason, would the remaining Stones be able to fulfill those tour dates with a replacement singer or singers. We have seen it done so many times in recent years with other acts, would that be possible if Mick consented to it.
No disrespect to Mick, but it would be a way of fulfilling their obligations and give something to the fans with tickets instead of a refund.
Quote
keithsman
With all this talk of new venues and shows being rumoured to replace the postponed ones, i got a question, if Mick decides he doesn't want to carry on performing after his surgery for what ever reason, would the remaining Stones be able to fulfill those tour dates with a replacement singer or singers. We have seen it done so many times in recent years with other acts, would that be possible if Mick consented to it.
No disrespect to Mick, but it would be a way of fulfilling their obligations and give something to the fans with tickets instead of a refund.
Quote
keithsman
With all this talk of new venues and shows being rumoured to replace the postponed ones, i got a question, if Mick decides he doesn't want to carry on performing after his surgery for what ever reason, would the remaining Stones be able to fulfill those tour dates with a replacement singer or singers. We have seen it done so many times in recent years with other acts, would that be possible if Mick consented to it.
No disrespect to Mick, but it would be a way of fulfilling their obligations and give something to the fans with tickets instead of a refund.
Quote
NateQuote
keithsman
With all this talk of new venues and shows being rumoured to replace the postponed ones, i got a question, if Mick decides he doesn't want to carry on performing after his surgery for what ever reason, would the remaining Stones be able to fulfill those tour dates with a replacement singer or singers. We have seen it done so many times in recent years with other acts, would that be possible if Mick consented to it.
No disrespect to Mick, but it would be a way of fulfilling their obligations and give something to the fans with tickets instead of a refund.
What planet do you live on.
Nate
Quote
bv
It took me weeks to fine tune all the primary and secondary hotel bookings I had for this tour. I did not want to cancel but today I knew I had to do it. In two hours I canceled 57 hotel reservations on five portals.
Quote
triceratops
Here is a good one by Dr Oz on what Mick will probably get. This is new heart valve insertion through a catheter rather than open heart surgery which takes much longer to recover from
[www.dailymail.co.uk]
It means Jagger should be recovered within two weeks, rather than two months.
Celebrity cardiothoracic surgeon Dr Mehmet Oz, who was part of the team that invented Medtronic's device, told DailyMail.com how it works and what issues patients face
Quote
Jeter1984Quote
triceratops
Here is a good one by Dr Oz on what Mick will probably get. This is new heart valve insertion through a catheter rather than open heart surgery which takes much longer to recover from
[www.dailymail.co.uk]
It means Jagger should be recovered within two weeks, rather than two months.
Celebrity cardiothoracic surgeon Dr Mehmet Oz, who was part of the team that invented Medtronic's device, told DailyMail.com how it works and what issues patients face
Thanks for posting. If that is the procedure, then late summer would be feasible.
Quote
keithsmanQuote
NateQuote
keithsman
With all this talk of new venues and shows being rumoured to replace the postponed ones, i got a question, if Mick decides he doesn't want to carry on performing after his surgery for what ever reason, would the remaining Stones be able to fulfill those tour dates with a replacement singer or singers. We have seen it done so many times in recent years with other acts, would that be possible if Mick consented to it.
No disrespect to Mick, but it would be a way of fulfilling their obligations and give something to the fans with tickets instead of a refund.
What planet do you live on.
Nate
Well i don't think Mick would mind if he could still get his share of the profits.
Let's reverse this and say it was Keith that had an operation and after recovering decided he didn't want to return to the stage, would that still be unthinkable for Mick to carry on with a replacement or replacements.?
Quote
spain73Quote
keithsmanQuote
NateQuote
keithsman
With all this talk of new venues and shows being rumoured to replace the postponed ones, i got a question, if Mick decides he doesn't want to carry on performing after his surgery for what ever reason, would the remaining Stones be able to fulfill those tour dates with a replacement singer or singers. We have seen it done so many times in recent years with other acts, would that be possible if Mick consented to it.
No disrespect to Mick, but it would be a way of fulfilling their obligations and give something to the fans with tickets instead of a refund.
What planet do you live on.
Nate
Well i don't think Mick would mind if he could still get his share of the profits.
Let's reverse this and say it was Keith that had an operation and after recovering decided he didn't want to return to the stage, would that still be unthinkable for Mick to carry on with a replacement or replacements.?
What planet do you live on
Spain 73
Quote
keithsmanQuote
Jeter1984Quote
triceratops
Here is a good one by Dr Oz on what Mick will probably get. This is new heart valve insertion through a catheter rather than open heart surgery which takes much longer to recover from
[www.dailymail.co.uk]
It means Jagger should be recovered within two weeks, rather than two months.
Celebrity cardiothoracic surgeon Dr Mehmet Oz, who was part of the team that invented Medtronic's device, told DailyMail.com how it works and what issues patients face
Thanks for posting. If that is the procedure, then late summer would be feasible.
If the leaked media knowledge of this operation is to be believed, and it is to be believed or this thread would be deleted, Mick needs the open heart surgery as already been explained here.
Quote
keithsmanQuote
NateQuote
keithsman
With all this talk of new venues and shows being rumoured to replace the postponed ones, i got a question, if Mick decides he doesn't want to carry on performing after his surgery for what ever reason, would the remaining Stones be able to fulfill those tour dates with a replacement singer or singers. We have seen it done so many times in recent years with other acts, would that be possible if Mick consented to it.
No disrespect to Mick, but it would be a way of fulfilling their obligations and give something to the fans with tickets instead of a refund.
What planet do you live on.
Nate
Well i don't think Mick would mind if he could still get his share of the profits.
Let's reverse this and say it was Keith that had an operation and after recovering decided he didn't want to return to the stage, would that still be unthinkable for Mick to carry on with a replacement or replacements.?
Quote
Jeter1984Quote
keithsmanQuote
Jeter1984Quote
triceratops
Here is a good one by Dr Oz on what Mick will probably get. This is new heart valve insertion through a catheter rather than open heart surgery which takes much longer to recover from
[www.dailymail.co.uk]
It means Jagger should be recovered within two weeks, rather than two months.
Celebrity cardiothoracic surgeon Dr Mehmet Oz, who was part of the team that invented Medtronic's device, told DailyMail.com how it works and what issues patients face
Thanks for posting. If that is the procedure, then late summer would be feasible.
If the leaked media knowledge of this operation is to be believed, and it is to be believed or this thread would be deleted, Mick needs the open heart surgery as already been explained here.
Sorry, but the idiotic question you posed earlier regarding replacing Mick or Keith prohibits me from interacting with you beyond this point.