For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
latebloomer
Doxa, take a break if you must, but don't go. We love you!
Quote
JadedFaded
"Why are we fighting? Why are we fighting? We don't want to fight at all. Who wants to fight, who is it? Every other scene has been cool. We gotta stop right now. You know, if we can't there's no point . . ."
I love the Stones. I love Mick. I love Keith. Got all their solo albums too. I like some stuff better than others, but all their music is a gift. Without the Stones, I'd never get through cleaning the house. They make everything easier.
Quote
retired_dog
Be careful, Doxa - the Keithettes camp becomes a little thin-skinned as of lately...some simply get childish, some try to "provoke" comments and feel "persecuted" when you do just that - comment (maybe just not like expected, in praise of "Buddah"). What's next?
Quote
Witness
I am mainly a reader here (and with absenses as well), only sometimes a poster.
Formerly I was "65 against 35" as to balance between Mick and Keith on the question of expanding what Rolling Stones music as a brand may comprise. That balance has since then developed into approaching "95 against 5". I find the two "Mick Jagger songs" (read as the two Keith vetoed out Rolling Stones songs) much interesting and stimulating, while to me CROSSEYED HEART seems clever, but, I have to say once again, quite boring. My expectations to a possible Rolling Stones studio album consequently rather subdued.
It follows that I will much miss your voice here, Doxa, even more than also some of your opponents are going to do. In a still higher degree the Keithette ideology will then prevail on this forum.
Somewhere I would have liked to read your thoughts on Mick Jagger in the TV-film about how the Havana concert came about, referring to somebody's reaction to himself as a reaction to his role model (or some expression like that).
[During one of my absences I fell 30 pages behind in the Mick Jagger solo threead: Now is possibly my last chance to say that I disagree to some extent with your GODDESS IN THE DOORWAY review. In all shortness, remarkably good songs to me are "Hide Away" and especially "Don't Call Me Up".]
Thank you so much for your immense and thought inspiring input, Doxa, whatever you end up doing.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Witness
I am mainly a reader here (and with absenses as well), only sometimes a poster.
Formerly I was "65 against 35" as to balance between Mick and Keith on the question of expanding what Rolling Stones music as a brand may comprise. That balance has since then developed into approaching "95 against 5". I find the two "Mick Jagger songs" (read as the two Keith vetoed out Rolling Stones songs) much interesting and stimulating, while to me CROSSEYED HEART seems clever, but, I have to say once again, quite boring. My expectations to a possible Rolling Stones studio album consequently rather subdued.
It follows that I will much miss your voice here, Doxa, even more than also some of your opponents are going to do. In a still higher degree the Keithette ideology will then prevail on this forum.
Somewhere I would have liked to read your thoughts on Mick Jagger in the TV-film about how the Havana concert came about, referring to somebody's reaction to himself as a reaction to his role model (or some expression like that).
[During one of my absences I fell 30 pages behind in the Mick Jagger solo threead: Now is possibly my last chance to say that I disagree to some extent with your GODDESS IN THE DOORWAY review. In all shortness, remarkably good songs to me are "Hide Away" and especially "Don't Call Me Up".]
Thank you so much for your immense and thought inspiring input, Doxa, whatever you end up doing.
Is it a competition? I love them both, and I think they're at their best when they work together.
Quote
stone4ever
Why did you say Er Dande
Quote
zQuote
stone4ever
Why did you say Er Dande
I think he's trying to say latebloomer is a female, Riffs...
Quote
DandelionPowderman
These remixes are not for me...
Quote
stone4everQuote
DandelionPowderman
These remixes are not for me...
Careful some people will take that as an outrageous personal assault to the very core of their inner sanctum. How very dare you.
Quote
Harlem Shuffler
From what I can tell so far it's not selling well. Is that correct?
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
stone4everQuote
DandelionPowderman
These remixes are not for me...
Careful some people will take that as an outrageous personal assault to the very core of their inner sanctum. How very dare you.
But Mick didn't do the remixes..
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
retired_dog
Be careful, Doxa - the Keithettes camp becomes a little thin-skinned as of lately...some simply get childish, some try to "provoke" comments and feel "persecuted" when you do just that - comment (maybe just not like expected, in praise of "Buddah"). What's next?
Why are you doing this?
Quote
retired_dogQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
retired_dog
Be careful, Doxa - the Keithettes camp becomes a little thin-skinned as of lately...some simply get childish, some try to "provoke" comments and feel "persecuted" when you do just that - comment (maybe just not like expected, in praise of "Buddah"). What's next?
Why are you doing this?
Like I said, case closed. I'm not going to repeat myself. For further investigation, just read.
Quote
wonderboy
This stuff is going over my head. Not sure I understand the animosity or the reason for it.
Looking at that active Keith 'tearing it up' thread, you read a lot of comments about his best work, plus quite a bit of frank talk about his limitations and his foibles and when things weren't so good.
Quote
stone4everQuote
Harlem Shuffler
From what I can tell so far it's not selling well. Is that correct?
Shush you will spoil the party, people here were dead set on this outselling satisfaction