For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Hairball
And a funny thing is, GHS was not too long ago maligned by many here as a weak link coming right after Exile, but now it's the latest, greatest thing since the invention of ice cream! I've always liked it since it was released, and am happy to have a Deluxe reissue, but the amount of praise and interest by many of the former critics here shows a sign of desperation for anything new - even if it's from a so-called "average" album from 47 years ago.
Quote
Erik_SnowQuote
Hairball
And a funny thing is, GHS was not too long ago maligned by many here as a weak link coming right after Exile, but now it's the latest, greatest thing since the invention of ice cream! I've always liked it since it was released, and am happy to have a Deluxe reissue, but the amount of praise and interest by many of the former critics here shows a sign of desperation for anything new - even if it's from a so-called "average" album from 47 years ago.
That shouldn't be a surprise. The ones who dislike the album probably don't bother to post or read about the deluxe GHS. The same way I wasn't posting on the Bridges To Argentina, Bridges To Bremen, Live Sticky Fingers, Voodoo Lounge live etc, -threads. You really think people change their minds about an album after 47 years just because a new product is available for purchase? I don't.
Quote
HairballQuote
Erik_SnowQuote
Hairball
And a funny thing is, GHS was not too long ago maligned by many here as a weak link coming right after Exile, but now it's the latest, greatest thing since the invention of ice cream! I've always liked it since it was released, and am happy to have a Deluxe reissue, but the amount of praise and interest by many of the former critics here shows a sign of desperation for anything new - even if it's from a so-called "average" album from 47 years ago.
That shouldn't be a surprise. The ones who dislike the album probably don't bother to post or read about the deluxe GHS. The same way I wasn't posting on the Bridges To Argentina, Bridges To Bremen, Live Sticky Fingers, Voodoo Lounge live etc, -threads. You really think people change their minds about an album after 47 years just because a new product is available for purchase? I don't.
Yeah sure, some of them do - throw in a few extra tracks (demoes, instrumentals, Jimmy Page!, etc), add Brussels live, starve them of anything else that's new and original, and I'm sure some would be willing to give it a second chance, and ultimately ending up liking it....maybe even LOVING it. I know I've had a change of heart about various musicians and albums from 40+ years ago - some I didn't like then, but love now, and vice versa. Time has a way of changing opinions, and as one grows older you see and hear things in a different light...unless you're just stuck in your ways with no hope for evolution.
Quote
Erik_SnowQuote
HairballQuote
Erik_SnowQuote
Hairball
And a funny thing is, GHS was not too long ago maligned by many here as a weak link coming right after Exile, but now it's the latest, greatest thing since the invention of ice cream! I've always liked it since it was released, and am happy to have a Deluxe reissue, but the amount of praise and interest by many of the former critics here shows a sign of desperation for anything new - even if it's from a so-called "average" album from 47 years ago.
That shouldn't be a surprise. The ones who dislike the album probably don't bother to post or read about the deluxe GHS. The same way I wasn't posting on the Bridges To Argentina, Bridges To Bremen, Live Sticky Fingers, Voodoo Lounge live etc, -threads. You really think people change their minds about an album after 47 years just because a new product is available for purchase? I don't.
Yeah sure, some of them do - throw in a few extra tracks (demoes, instrumentals, Jimmy Page!, etc), add Brussels live, starve them of anything else that's new and original, and I'm sure some would be willing to give it a second chance, and ultimately ending up liking it....maybe even LOVING it. I know I've had a change of heart about various musicians and albums from 40+ years ago - some I didn't like then, but love now, and vice versa. Time has a way of changing opinions, and as one grows older you see and hear things in a different light...unless you're just stuck in your ways with no hope for evolution.
That's not how you presented these people in the previous post. It was just a bunch of desperate men, willing to grab anything, not out of seeing things in a different light, growing older, etc
I have always appreciated GHS. The only 70s album that has faded for me is IORR.
Quote
Hairball
....but what about all the women? They don't count?
Quote
Hairball
No - I was only joking...thought I'd try and lighten up your serious vibe a bit - evidently not happening....
Quote
IanBillen
They have worked on this thing in multiple places .. in various combinations ..
Band sessions .. one on one .... in isolation etc. etc.
LA- NYC - London (we've also heard they did a little in Paris ... who knows where else?).
Now they need a couple more band sessions to finish it he says. The
Stones have got to have amassed a huge amount of material over the last five years. Not saying it's all good .. or real good .. BUT they have worked on this thing on and off .. in various ways .. at various locations taking their sweeeet old time with it.
I think we can all agree .. they have had (and have taken) >>pleeeeeeeenty<< of time together and apart to work on it.
Hell Charlie remarked they had done so many bloody sessions on it (though he may of been exaggerating a bit ... still that comment was two years ago now lol).
Quote
Erik_SnowQuote
Hairball
No - I was only joking...thought I'd try and lighten up your serious vibe a bit - evidently not happening....
I wasn't too serious either, I'm very seldom too serious, but you didn't notice
Quote
HairballQuote
Erik_SnowQuote
Hairball
No - I was only joking...thought I'd try and lighten up your serious vibe a bit - evidently not happening....
I wasn't too serious either, I'm very seldom too serious, but you didn't notice
Yeah, hard to tell by the "tone" of your various replies towards my posts in this thread - good to know you're seldom too serious.
Quote
Erik_SnowQuote
HairballQuote
Erik_SnowQuote
Hairball
No - I was only joking...thought I'd try and lighten up your serious vibe a bit - evidently not happening....
I wasn't too serious either, I'm very seldom too serious, but you didn't notice
Yeah, hard to tell by the "tone" of your various replies towards my posts in this thread - good to know you're seldom too serious.
I can never be that serious, as deep down inside I never understand what the fuzz is all about.
Now, to answer your question about if "women don't count" seriously: Of course not. We all know, that when it comes to GHS, women love side A track 5, and have never listened to the rest.
Quote
IanBillen
They have worked on this thing in multiple places .. in various combinations ..
Band sessions .. one on one .... in isolation etc. etc.
LA- NYC - London (we've also heard they did a little in Paris ... who knows where else?).
Now they need a couple more band sessions to finish it he says. The
Stones have got to have amassed a huge amount of material over the last five years. Not saying it's all good .. or real good .. BUT they have worked on this thing on and off .. in various ways .. at various locations taking their sweeeet old time with it.
I think we can all agree .. they have had (and have taken) >>pleeeeeeeenty<< of time together and apart to work on it.
Hell Charlie remarked they had done so many bloody sessions on it (though he may of been exaggerating a bit ... still that comment was two years ago now lol).
Quote
Stoneage
I wonder how Don Was' job description looked like when they hired him? Make an album every 15th year and be available two weeks a year for studio work?
Quote
bitusa2012Quote
Erik_SnowQuote
HairballQuote
Erik_SnowQuote
Hairball
No - I was only joking...thought I'd try and lighten up your serious vibe a bit - evidently not happening....
I wasn't too serious either, I'm very seldom too serious, but you didn't notice
Yeah, hard to tell by the "tone" of your various replies towards my posts in this thread - good to know you're seldom too serious.
I can never be that serious, as deep down inside I never understand what the fuzz is all about.
Now, to answer your question about if "women don't count" seriously: Of course not. We all know, that when it comes to GHS, women love side A track 5, and have never listened to the rest.
My wife, a woman, LOVES side B, track 5. The version that has not been destroyed in the last remaster.
Quote
bitusa2012
Why do we bother with this thread. Close it down
Quote
Doxa
Two mainly positive observations based on that UNCUT piece.
1. What Mick says of the creation of "Ghost Town" implies that the music they do is a whole band effort: they are cutting the backing tracks together. So what were missing were Mick's finishing touches. Another scenario would had been that of using Mick's demos as a backing track, the rest just adding their stuff there. now - if we assume that "Ghost Town" initially was a 'Jagger song' - the demo had been only used as a rough guidance. This goes along with Mick's recent remark that there needs to be some more band sessions to finish up the album. (His troubles with the ballad he is working with might assume that he is struggling with the final touches there, who knows if we are talking about a follower to "Ghost Town" there.)
We have talked about the 'method' in creating stuff along the years in this thread, but now it seems that they have a clear chosen policy there - no matter from where the song derives - from Mick or Keith, or of their colloboration - they want to play it 'live' in a studio together to make it a 'proper' Stones song.
2. What is important and making a difference in Keith's talks is that they have shifted the attention from the sessions and 'early stages' into releasing stuff. They sound like wanting the stuff out. I cannot help but interpreting that the corona virus and thereby the lack of tour activity has had a big role there. They don't want to be 'quiet'. Mick's been talking about releasing singles - or actually: singular songs - as a main feature of music business nowadays for sometimes now (he strongly picked up the theme when realesed his solo single a few yaers ago, comparing recent times to the old days of the 60's). Now Keith seemingly has warmed up to the idea as well. The release of the 'new' GOATS HEAD SOUP songs, using all the resources music is distributed/shared now, end even offering varying mixes of old demos ("Scarlet" is something they never had done with archives stuff) indicates that they really are emphasizing individual songs now.
(We have to note out that Dylan people did great with his latest album - starting offering singular songs without further notice one by one - thereby maximizing the interest for individual each of those until finally revealing with the third of them that there is a whole new album coming on. Before that people were guessing, and the songs discussed with a microscope all over the music world, what the hell are these? Some TEMPEST rejects? Especially the chosen PR tactics worked with the Kennedy murder song. Had it relaesed as just an album track among the others, surely it would have been noticed a masterpiece song as well, but now they made sure that people were listening nothing but to it - putting all their concentration and attention into it, with no any other distraction or comparison in their mind. Damn it worked well, the song seemingly already has already an unique place in Dylan canon now, no matter how the whole album is viewed now or in future - sad, by the way, how quickly the album, no matter how much the critics praised it, seems to have gone out of sight, and not much talked anymore.)
- Doxa