For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
MingSubu
You can hear the 4, atleast, on the 2009 mix.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
MingSubu
You can hear the 4, atleast, on the 2009 mix.
OK, but what would be the 4's function, the way the opening riff starts?
Quote
keefgotsoul
He clearly says 4. What would be it’s function? Do you really think 1970 Jagger could answer that?
Quote
StonedRambler
The tempo of Sway is so slow with 72bpm that the 'four' surely helps to get them all together on the first beat.
Usually you only don't say four if there is a fill in before the first beat.
Why? There is no fill in at the beginning of Sway. The whole band starts together on 1 and the into is exactly two bars long.Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StonedRambler
The tempo of Sway is so slow with 72bpm that the 'four' surely helps to get them all together on the first beat.
Usually you only don't say four if there is a fill in before the first beat.
Indeed. That's why 1, 2, 3 would be better here, imo. The first chord would be "the 4".
Quote
StonedRamblerWhy? There is no fill in at the beginning of Sway. The whole band starts together on 1 and the into is exactly two bars long.Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StonedRambler
The tempo of Sway is so slow with 72bpm that the 'four' surely helps to get them all together on the first beat.
Usually you only don't say four if there is a fill in before the first beat.
Indeed. That's why 1, 2, 3 would be better here, imo. The first chord would be "the 4".
Ah, I understand how you hear it. Kinda the first three notes as a prelude. But then you have one and a half bars until the verse starts which is a bit odd. I think two whole bars with the first beat on the '1' is how they thought of it. Hence the counting. That they're not exactly tight on the first beat. Well, I guess that's because they are the Rolling Stones. On the live versions like Fonda it starts exactly on the one though. And they also repeat the into and the second repetition is also exactly on the one.Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StonedRamblerWhy? There is no fill in at the beginning of Sway. The whole band starts together on 1 and the into is exactly two bars long.Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StonedRambler
The tempo of Sway is so slow with 72bpm that the 'four' surely helps to get them all together on the first beat.
Usually you only don't say four if there is a fill in before the first beat.
Indeed. That's why 1, 2, 3 would be better here, imo. The first chord would be "the 4".
I (almost) hear a 5 before the first chord appears. There is a slight wait before the first chord. It's not on the beat. Hence, 1,2,3 and the chord right on the 4th would have suited me better, if I should have counted in.
But I guess we hear it differently
Quote
StonedRamblerAh, I understand how you hear it. Kinda the first three notes as a prelude. But then you have one and a half bars until the verse starts which is a bit odd. I think two whole bars with the first beat on the '1' is how they thought of it. Hence the counting. That they're not exactly tight on the first beat. Well, I guess that's because they are the Rolling Stones. On the live versions like Fonda it starts exactly on the one though. And they also repeat the into and the second repetition is also exactly on the one.Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StonedRamblerWhy? There is no fill in at the beginning of Sway. The whole band starts together on 1 and the into is exactly two bars long.Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StonedRambler
The tempo of Sway is so slow with 72bpm that the 'four' surely helps to get them all together on the first beat.
Usually you only don't say four if there is a fill in before the first beat.
Indeed. That's why 1, 2, 3 would be better here, imo. The first chord would be "the 4".
I (almost) hear a 5 before the first chord appears. There is a slight wait before the first chord. It's not on the beat. Hence, 1,2,3 and the chord right on the 4th would have suited me better, if I should have counted in.
But I guess we hear it differently
Quote
terraplane
It's 4/4 time. They come in after the four in the count in but a little earlier than the first beat of the first bar.
Quote
mattstones
Such a great song.
I love Charlie's drumming, it almost is too slow at times but it works perfectly with the song.
Almost like it could fall apart at any stage but doesn't!
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
keefgotsoul
He clearly says 4. What would be it’s function? Do you really think 1970 Jagger could answer that?
Hehe, probably not
For a count-in the 4 is worthless.
Keith's scream ("Yeah!") that ends Brown Sugar is a good one, too
Quote
KRiffhardQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
keefgotsoul
He clearly says 4. What would be it’s function? Do you really think 1970 Jagger could answer that?
Hehe, probably not
For a count-in the 4 is worthless.
Keith's scream ("Yeah!") that ends Brown Sugar is a good one, too
I prefer his "Irieee" on Cherry oh Baby!
Quote
GasLightStreet
It's simply a count-in. That's all it is. What's not heard is why it's that way.
Quote
PaddyQuote
GasLightStreet
It's simply a count-in. That's all it is. What's not heard is why it's that way.
Coming From the amateur end of garage and bar bands, someone counts in like this when the song starts with everyone together, the entire band is coming in on a count like that. It’s a 4/4 count but not a tempo count. A count in like at the start of sway is like the key in the ignition, then all gets turned on at once.
I always loved how the ramones OneTooFreeFour counts between tunes had zero to do with tempo EVER!
Anyways, that’s been my experience, but like I said, amateur hour.
Quote
LuxuryStones
Indeed. Mick Taylors' solo is medicine to me.