For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
GasLightStreet
He'll never be a Rolling Stone.
That's it. It's just the 4 and will remain the 4.
Quote
Rokyfanyou're point is if he was english he would be made a member. wrong. Nationality has nothing to do with it ZERO. Money. They pay him a salary, no reason for them and their families into the future need to share profits with the Leavalls for eternity. Geez. What the @#$%& are you talking about no other nationality should become a Rolling Stone. NOBODY IS BECOMING A ROLLING STONE how @#$%& hard is that to understand.Quote
whitem8
The Rolling Stones are an English band and will always remain so. No American, or other nationality will or should become a Rolling Stone.
Quote
mighty storkQuote
GasLightStreet
He'll never be a Rolling Stone.
That's it. It's just the 4 and will remain the 4.
Mick, Keith, Charlie and.........Mick Taylor?
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
mighty storkQuote
GasLightStreet
He'll never be a Rolling Stone.
That's it. It's just the 4 and will remain the 4.
Mick, Keith, Charlie and.........Mick Taylor?
Taylor isn't a Rolling Stone.
Quote
MKjanQuote
GasLightStreetQuote
mighty storkQuote
GasLightStreet
He'll never be a Rolling Stone.
That's it. It's just the 4 and will remain the 4.
Mick, Keith, Charlie and.........Mick Taylor?
Taylor isn't a Rolling Stone.
Oh yes he is.
Quote
stewedandkeefedQuote
MKjanQuote
GasLightStreetQuote
mighty storkQuote
GasLightStreet
He'll never be a Rolling Stone.
That's it. It's just the 4 and will remain the 4.
Mick, Keith, Charlie and.........Mick Taylor?
Taylor isn't a Rolling Stone.
Oh yes he is.
Agreed. Keith said he was in 2012 when asked if Taylor would be invited to rehearsals.
Quote
thecitadel
If Chuck was rubbish, didn't add to the sound, and wasn't appreciated by Mick, Keith, Charlie and Ronnie he wouldn't have played with them (and be credited as musical director) for the last 24 years.
I do wish people would lay off Chuck - not only a very nice man (the two times I briefly spoke to him, and a couple of brief email exchanges) but clearly a musician who is highly respected and valued by the band that this forum is about.
Not sure he, or anyone else, should be a "full member" of the Band - whatever that means apart from money.
Quote
bv
In order to be a full member of the Rolling Stones you would have to be starving with them at Edith Grove back in the early 60's. Sort of inventing the band... After that it is really "light" membership, remember Ronnie never starved, but he earned it. Same with Mick Taylor, but he quit.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
The 1969-73, 82, 89-2014-Bobby, who also guested in 75, 78 and 81 + played on numerous albums. Did the immortal BS and CYHMK-solos!
Surely, if anyone should be considered getting the offical Stone-status, it's gotta be him, imo.
Won't ever happen, of course.
Quote
drbryant
Black Hat the rabble rouser.
Quote
WuudyQuote
bv
In order to be a full member of the Rolling Stones you would have to be starving with them at Edith Grove back in the early 60's. Sort of inventing the band... After that it is really "light" membership, remember Ronnie never starved, but he earned it. Same with Mick Taylor, but he quit.
I don't think he should be a full member but in that case, you can argue that Chuck has earned it. He's been with them for over 30 years. That's twice as long as Ronnie had to wait before he became a full member.