For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
LeonidPQuote
HMS
Imo, Exile was at some point of time artificially hyped by critics, somebody starts praising and many fall in, that´s the way it goes...
that's because you're obviously clueless about it's history. Exile was not at all praised by the critics, and most of us are old enough that we fell in love w/ Exile before we knew any others felt the same way, i.e. before internet etc.
Quote
keefriffhardsQuote
Maindefender
Yeah I pulled mine out today, so sweet. Time in a bottle…..
Jezz i forgot how out of this world this is, Time in a bottle indeed, timeless
This is the Stones we all want and never get, but i have a feeling that the next Stones album will be Exile revisited, but shit then i wake up
Quote
MaindefenderQuote
keefriffhardsQuote
Maindefender
Yeah I pulled mine out today, so sweet. Time in a bottle…..
Jezz i forgot how out of this world this is, Time in a bottle indeed, timeless
This is the Stones we all want and never get, but i have a feeling that the next Stones album will be Exile revisited, but shit then i wake up
....and it reminds us of Begger's Banquet!!
Quote
keefriffhardsQuote
LeonidPQuote
HMS
Imo, Exile was at some point of time artificially hyped by critics, somebody starts praising and many fall in, that´s the way it goes...
that's because you're obviously clueless about it's history. Exile was not at all praised by the critics, and most of us are old enough that we fell in love w/ Exile before we knew any others felt the same way, i.e. before internet etc.
Correct but Dande is right, CH has so much in common with EOMS because the more you listen, the more you realise and see it has so much going on, so much more music behind the music with each and every play..
Quote
NaturalustQuote
keefriffhardsQuote
LeonidPQuote
HMS
Imo, Exile was at some point of time artificially hyped by critics, somebody starts praising and many fall in, that´s the way it goes...
that's because you're obviously clueless about it's history. Exile was not at all praised by the critics, and most of us are old enough that we fell in love w/ Exile before we knew any others felt the same way, i.e. before internet etc.
Correct but Dande is right, CH has so much in common with EOMS because the more you listen, the more you realise and see it has so much going on, so much more music behind the music with each and every play..
Put the bottle down riffhards and back slowly away from the keyboard.....
You guys want to talk about Exile, here is the proper thread.
[www.iorr.org]
Quote
keefriffhards
Put the bottle down riffhards and back slowly away from the keyboard.....
You guys want to talk about Exile, here is the proper thread.
[www.iorr.org]
Quote
keefriffhardsQuote
NaturalustQuote
keefriffhardsQuote
LeonidPQuote
HMS
Imo, Exile was at some point of time artificially hyped by critics, somebody starts praising and many fall in, that´s the way it goes...
that's because you're obviously clueless about it's history. Exile was not at all praised by the critics, and most of us are old enough that we fell in love w/ Exile before we knew any others felt the same way, i.e. before internet etc.
Correct but Dande is right, CH has so much in common with EOMS because the more you listen, the more you realise and see it has so much going on, so much more music behind the music with each and every play..
Put the bottle down riffhards and back slowly away from the keyboard.....
You guys want to talk about Exile, here is the proper thread.
[www.iorr.org]
The end of Just A gift Just feels my soul.. now i will listen to your link NL
Quote
NaturalustQuote
keefriffhards
Put the bottle down riffhards and back slowly away from the keyboard.....
You guys want to talk about Exile, here is the proper thread.
[www.iorr.org]
The end of Just A gift Just feels my soul.. now i will listen to your link NL
Quote
keefriffhardsQuote
keefriffhards
Thanks for the reminder redHotcarpet i been listening to Exile while postin, you are right in one way EOMS is the dogs bollocks but i notice the same flow of inspiration in CH . Damn now i pissed off 35love lol
Redhot you win, EOMS is better than i remember because i just played it all the songs all the way through, i used to jump bits i thought i didn't like but now i love it all, indeed a master piece . thanks for jogging the memory, the ears get better sounding with age 'Im the man that gives you roses when you an't got none wow what a beauitifull buzz
Quote
Hairball
That's right Bashlets...sometimes these things take time for some people to fully appreciate.
Maybe this Keith sticky thread will go on for 4 more years so we can get a true and honest consensus on Crosseyed Heart.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
IT'S
ONLY
A
GOOD
ALBUM
AND
WE
LIKE
IT
Quote
DoxaQuote
DandelionPowderman
IT'S
ONLY
A
GOOD
ALBUM
AND
WE
LIKE
IT
Yeah, that collective "we" strikes again...
But I guess the term "we" should be interpreted as "those who like me see it as only a good album"... or "We DandelionPowderman"..
- Doxa
Quote
MonkeyMan2000Quote
DoxaQuote
DandelionPowderman
IT'S
ONLY
A
GOOD
ALBUM
AND
WE
LIKE
IT
Yeah, that collective "we" strikes again...
But I guess the term "we" should be interpreted as "those who like me see it as only a good album"... or "We DandelionPowderman"..
- Doxa
We = Los Richardos
Quote
TeddyB1018
I love Crosseyed Heart but there is other genius at work on Exile, not least of which is the writing and performance of Mick Jagger.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
What should we name «The Active Keith Resistance Front», then, the Whinos?
Quote
DandelionPowderman
It's simply a very good and exciting album, and there was a lot of unexpected stuff on it, which really triggered my ears again in a way not even Main Offender did.
The closest to this quality for a Stones-related release the last 20 years is Ronnie's I Feel Like Playing and Slide On This, followed by Wandering Spirit, which was great as well, imo.
Quote
MonkeyMan2000Quote
DoxaQuote
DandelionPowderman
IT'S
ONLY
A
GOOD
ALBUM
AND
WE
LIKE
IT
Yeah, that collective "we" strikes again...
But I guess the term "we" should be interpreted as "those who like me see it as only a good album"... or "We DandelionPowderman"..
- Doxa
We = Los Richardos
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
DoxaQuote
DandelionPowderman
It's simply a very good and exciting album, and there was a lot of unexpected stuff on it, which really triggered my ears again in a way not even Main Offender did.
The closest to this quality for a Stones-related release the last 20 years is Ronnie's I Feel Like Playing and Slide On This, followed by Wandering Spirit, which was great as well, imo.
This is a kind of contextualisation in quality I find approapriate - especially comparison to Ronnie's albums - which I don't think anyone has yet done in this 200 plus page mega thread! - WANDERING SPIRIT and MAIN OFFENDER being natural point of references as well.
You Dandie asked some pages ago people to give reasons why don't they "like" the album (I would say: not being so excited about or so fond of) - I guess you could ask similar question about Ronnie's albums you seem to like very much - which actually aren't stylistically that far more Keith's album - as well. Ronnie's musical world is pretty similar to Keith's, but seemingly manages to reach much smaller section of Rolling Stones fanbase. Probably in both cases there is something missing that makes The Stones so capturing, and playing nice guitar and being rootsy-friendly is not enough...
- Doxa
Maybe you misunderstood my post? I didn't say «the last 20 years» because I find all the work prior to that superior to that of CH, quite the contrary.
However, I find Talk Is Cheap interesting, too, but for different reasons. I think CH is far superior as a coherent piece of work, although there are some killer songs on TIC. It's comparable with Let It Bleed and Exile. There are superior stuff on the former, but Exile as an album trump those shining moments of LIB because of the total experience.
I know I have ranked LIB before Exile in the past, but that's because I had played it to death when I ranked it. The week after it would be different again
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
DoxaQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
DoxaQuote
DandelionPowderman
It's simply a very good and exciting album, and there was a lot of unexpected stuff on it, which really triggered my ears again in a way not even Main Offender did.
The closest to this quality for a Stones-related release the last 20 years is Ronnie's I Feel Like Playing and Slide On This, followed by Wandering Spirit, which was great as well, imo.
This is a kind of contextualisation in quality I find approapriate - especially comparison to Ronnie's albums - which I don't think anyone has yet done in this 200 plus page mega thread! - WANDERING SPIRIT and MAIN OFFENDER being natural point of references as well.
You Dandie asked some pages ago people to give reasons why don't they "like" the album (I would say: not being so excited about or so fond of) - I guess you could ask similar question about Ronnie's albums you seem to like very much - which actually aren't stylistically that far more Keith's album - as well. Ronnie's musical world is pretty similar to Keith's, but seemingly manages to reach much smaller section of Rolling Stones fanbase. Probably in both cases there is something missing that makes The Stones so capturing, and playing nice guitar and being rootsy-friendly is not enough...
- Doxa
Maybe you misunderstood my post? I didn't say «the last 20 years» because I find all the work prior to that superior to that of CH, quite the contrary.
However, I find Talk Is Cheap interesting, too, but for different reasons. I think CH is far superior as a coherent piece of work, although there are some killer songs on TIC. It's comparable with Let It Bleed and Exile. There are superior stuff on the former, but Exile as an album trump those shining moments of LIB because of the total experience.
I know I have ranked LIB before Exile in the past, but that's because I had played it to death when I ranked it. The week after it would be different again
No, I did not. I just took from there something I saw important and also common-sensical - the kind of constext we should rank this album in quality. (I have to admit that I was one of the first who was making comparisons to EXILE by pointing out certain similarities - like you have also done lately - but I thought any similarities in actual quality was such an absurd idea that I didn't even cared to mention it...)
Anyway, I like you analogies between BLEED vs. EXILE and TALK IS CHEAP vs. CROSSEYED HEART (actually is damn apt one!) but we should be careful not implying anything else...
- Doxa
I think the people who supposedly get taken aback by the Exile-comparison are «writing before thinking». Very few have disagreed with me when I have elaborated on what I'm actually basing the comparison on.
Nobody is saying that CH is just as good as Exile. They are saying that the album gives a similar experience, because it's coherent, long and diverse - without hits - and has an incredible flow. These are also important qualities, but in a different way than summing up the works to decide which is the «better one», of course.
At the moment I find CH superior to the albums I mentioned in my earlier post. There are many reasons for that. It's still fresh, it's a more complex piece of work that takes time to fully grasp and it's a more complimenting collection of songs than that of the other solo albums, even Slide On This, Talk is Cheap and Wandering Spirit, imo.
People are saying «the best Stones-related album since Tattoo You». Why not? As a statement / piece of work it's more monumental and impressive, imo, even though TY may have some stronger songs on it.
Quote
Green LadyQuote
MonkeyMan2000Quote
DoxaQuote
DandelionPowderman
IT'S
ONLY
A
GOOD
ALBUM
AND
WE
LIKE
IT
Yeah, that collective "we" strikes again...
But I guess the term "we" should be interpreted as "those who like me see it as only a good album"... or "We DandelionPowderman"..
- Doxa
We = Los Richardos
(Don't forget Las Richardas, too - much nicer than those tacky Keithettes!)