For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Spud
Are some things a bit more perfect than others then ?...and some things just a bit perfect
Quote
His Majesty
There's too much filler and crap lyrics on LIB.
Sounds a bit empty, overly contrived and clinical too. Shelter and rambler are ace, as is the music of Monkey Man, but it's really let down by the stupid lyrics.
Beggars just has a more natural flow and ease about it.
Quote
His Majesty
15
Quote
duke richardson
it sort of sounds like because Beggar's Banquet is so rootsy and not so rock and roll, that's better somehow...?
Quote
muffie
Rolling Stone Magazine's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time
The RS 500 was assembled by the editors of Rolling Stone, based on the results of two extensive polls. In 2003, Rolling Stone asked a panel of 271 artists, producers, industry executives and journalists to pick the greatest albums of all time. In 2009, we asked a similar group of 100 experts to pick the best albums of the 2000s. From those results, Rolling Stone created this new list of the greatest albums of all time.
The Rolling Stones band has these entries:
7: Exile On Main Street
32: Let It Bleed
58: Beggar's Banquet
64: Sticky Fingers
109: Aftermath
116: Out Of Our Heads
180: The Rolling Stones Now!
213: Tattoo You
270: Some Girls
357: Between The Buttons
Quote
Edward Twining
BEGGARS BANQUET is long before the Stones fell into the rock 'n' roll type cliche, where riffs are simply there by habit, rather than because of some true artistic necessity. In a sense, because the album is less heavy, listening from the perspective of today, and knowing the Stones later, more formulaic approach, one can appreciate all the more the subtle little touches of the acoustic and slide playing, which add so greatly to the freshness and effectiveness of the songs...
...if there is a case to be put forward with regard to the pre 1969 output, having an edge over what came after, it is that the music was perhaps a little less predictable.
Quote
Edward TwiningQuote
duke richardson
it sort of sounds like because Beggar's Banquet is so rootsy and not so rock and roll, that's better somehow...?
No, not quite, duke. Just that BEGGARS BANQUET is long before the Stones fell into the rock 'n' roll type cliche, where riffs are simply there by habit, rather than because of some true artistic necessity. In a sense, because the album is less heavy, listening from the perspective of today, and knowing the Stones later, more formulaic approach, one can appreciate all the more the subtle little touches of the acoustic and slide playing, which add so greatly to the freshness and effectiveness of the songs. One could argue that a more formulaic approach may have started a little with 'Monkey Man', from LET IT BLEED, although i admit that may seem a little unfair. However, if there is a case to be put forward with regard to the pre 1969 output, having an edge over what came after, it is that the music was perhaps a little less predictable. The true recycling of riffs didn't really come into play until perhaps 73-74, although a certain style of riffing was becoming pretty much the norm by 71-72. I just think with BEGGARS BANQUET it is nice to hear the group approach the songs from a slightly different angle. Even the iconic 'Street Fighting Man' is played primarily using an acoustic, rather than an electric guitar.
Quote
LieB
I agree that Beggars Banquet is better than Let It Bleed, very much because it's more even, unique and inventive in its sound and production. The recordings stand very tall on their own, whereas many of the tracks on Let It Bleed would develop into better songs live.
Like this:
- Sympathy for the Devil -- studio version is the best version ever, with Keith surpassing himself, even though I love the heavy Ya-Ya's version with Keith's and Taylor's solos
- No Expectations -- studio version definite version and BJ's best ever moment
- Dear Doctor -- never done live
- Parachute Woman -- studio version best version
- Jig-Saw Puzzle -- never done live
- Street Fighting Man -- studio version best version, very classic tape-recorder rock 'n' roll
- Prodigal Son -- unique version as well. Great fingerpickin' Keith, fantastic Mick vocal
- Stray Cat Blues -- definitive version
- Factory Girl -- also best version, although rarely played live
- Salt of the Earth -- same as above
- Gimme Shelter -- classic but more powerful live with Mick T. Also many good 90s versions
- Love In Vain -- Ya-Ya's version is better; many great live performances
- Country Honk -- great track but obviously derived from HTW
- Live With Me -- weaker than the great Ya-Ya's version
- Let It Bleed -- never surpassed (no live version even close)
- Midnight Rambler -- live version is more classic for good reason
- You Got the Silver -- definitive version here (could have fit on Beggars)
- Monkey Man -- definitive version here
- YCAGWYW -- better live; my favourites are from '72-73
In the end, I think Sticky Fingers is the Stones most "perfect" album (as someone said) in the "classic rock" sense and as the archetypical Stones album, whereas Exile is their crowning achievement as a wide-spanning masterpiece of different styles glued together with the ultimate Stones sound.
Quote
Edward Twining
I love many of the Stones albums, of course, and especially the big four. However, after reacquainting myself with them once again, i believe BEGGARS BANQUET to be the only one, where i wouldn't choose to change a thing (however small). Whether that's relating to the quality of the songs, the length of the songs, the instrumentation, the sequencing etc. i think with BEGGARS BANQUET the Stones released their most perfect album (or as close to perfection you can possibly get).
Anyone else agree with me?
Quote
StonesCatQuote
Spud
Are some things a bit more perfect than others then ?...and some things just a bit perfect
That's kind of how I look at it. Saying LIB is the weakest of the four, it's like a 9.91 instead of 9.98 or 9.99. When you're talking these albums, though, it's like the Champions League of music, best of the best.
Yes. Everytime. It does not age one minute. It will never ever grow old. Sympathy? Please. I cant stand it and it's ridicolous and childish. Love the 1975 version.Quote
Doxa
Nice thoughts, LieB, but I strongly oppose your take on "Gimme Shelter". Nothing recorded or played ever by anyone is more 'powerful' than that magical original studio version. Shrives everytime I heard it. Everytime.
- Doxa
Quote
Edward TwiningQuote
muffie
Rolling Stone Magazine's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time
The RS 500 was assembled by the editors of Rolling Stone, based on the results of two extensive polls. In 2003, Rolling Stone asked a panel of 271 artists, producers, industry executives and journalists to pick the greatest albums of all time. In 2009, we asked a similar group of 100 experts to pick the best albums of the 2000s. From those results, Rolling Stone created this new list of the greatest albums of all time.
The Rolling Stones band has these entries:
7: Exile On Main Street
32: Let It Bleed
58: Beggar's Banquet
64: Sticky Fingers
109: Aftermath
116: Out Of Our Heads
180: The Rolling Stones Now!
213: Tattoo You
270: Some Girls
357: Between The Buttons
Yes, well i'd rather follow what my ears tell me><
Very nice to see AFTERMATH recognised though !!
Quote
Redhotcarpet
Yes I agree. I understand what you mean. It is a perfect album despite some minor flaws (Salt, Doctor, and though I really love it, objectively speaking Jig Saw is not up to par despite Brians mellotron).
Tracks like Parachute Woman and NE are fillers but they are perfect golden fillers and some of the greatest songs ever recorded.
So yes I agree.
Quote
Doxa
Nice thoughts, LieB, but I strongly oppose your take on "Gimme Shelter". Nothing recorded or played ever by anyone is more 'powerful' than that magical original studio version. Shrives everytime I heard it. Everytime.
- Doxa
Quote
camper88
As others have noted, if you have the opportunity to release an album with a new song called Jumping Jack Flash on it but choose not to, have you made your album more or less perfect?
Quote
camper88Quote
LieB
Jumpin' Jack would have fit on Beggars, IMHO. But it's also a perfectly sequenced album without it.
I understand how songs were sold and marketed in the 60's by some folks (not all)
But let's imagine it's 1968 and you walk into a record store to see a display of the new Stones album, Beggar's Banquet, except there are two versions: one includes JJF and the other doesn't. You've only got enough money to buy one copy of one album. Which one do you buy?
Quote
Edward TwiningQuote
Redhotcarpet
Yes I agree. I understand what you mean. It is a perfect album despite some minor flaws (Salt, Doctor, and though I really love it, objectively speaking Jig Saw is not up to par despite Brians mellotron).
Tracks like Parachute Woman and NE are fillers but they are perfect golden fillers and some of the greatest songs ever recorded.
So yes I agree.
I don't think any of them are fillers, though, Redhotcarpet.