For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
slewan
I'm not really sure but I always got the impression that the first CD runs a little bit too fast
Quote
StonesTodQuote
slewan
I'm not really sure but I always got the impression that the first CD runs a little bit too fast
hate it when that happens, but i've learned to just listen more slowly and it works out ok.
Quote
pmk251
After the LA Coliseum show in '81 my waning interest in the band diminished further. I would not see the band again for 18 years. It wasn't just the music or the songs, it was the vibe of the occasion, the whole spectacle of the thing. The artist/audience relationship was completely reversed. The audience was not coming to the band. The band was coming to the audience. It was designed to be exciting. It was meant to please. It was hugely impersonal. If you think it was musically proficient, fine. That sound is not one I embrace. It is too disposable. When Taylor plays his solo on LIV in L&G I am enthralled. Is there a more compelling moment in that movie? In '81 you got a very pedestrian and cynical Black Limosine. For me the vibrancy and immediacy of the playing in '69-'73 is well worth any perceived low points. The moments of absolute brilliance during that time will remain as the band's most enduring music.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
StonesTodQuote
slewan
I'm not really sure but I always got the impression that the first CD runs a little bit too fast
hate it when that happens, but i've learned to just listen more slowly and it works out ok.
If the mountain doesn't come to Moses then Moses has to come to the mountain.
Quote
proudmaryQuote
kleermakerQuote
StonesTodQuote
slewan
I'm not really sure but I always got the impression that the first CD runs a little bit too fast
hate it when that happens, but i've learned to just listen more slowly and it works out ok.
If the mountain doesn't come to Moses then Moses has to come to the mountain.
Muhammad, not Moses. You should start to be afraid for the safety after such not politically correct error
Quote
kleermakerQuote
proudmaryQuote
kleermakerQuote
StonesTodQuote
slewan
I'm not really sure but I always got the impression that the first CD runs a little bit too fast
hate it when that happens, but i've learned to just listen more slowly and it works out ok.
If the mountain doesn't come to Moses then Moses has to come to the mountain.
Muhammad, not Moses. You should start to be afraid for the safety after such not politically correct error
In Dutch it's usually Moses. But let's say M. Must be satisfying for all parties.
Quote
slewan
I'm not really sure but I always got the impression that the first CD runs a little bit too fast (at least on the Swinging Pig release). That might add to the impression of a high energy show
yes yes yes!Quote
MathijsQuote
The Sicilian
IMO this is the best Stones boot that I have heard so far. It is almost the perfect boot.
1. A 25 song setlist
2. An absolutely fantastic board mixing job. The guitars were high in the mix, Bill was heavy in front, singing was blended in beautifully. Only Charlie is slightly muddled.
3. Keith singing backup vocals on many tracks and you can hear him.
4. Ian Stewart on piano, Ernie Watts on sax.
5. The best lead and rhythm guitar playing and sound that I've ever heard.
6. A 10 minute version of "Imagination" and the best I've ever heard.
7. 8 songs from the 60's catalog, 5 songs from "Some Girls" and 6 songs from "Tattoo You".
8. Happy Birthday serenade Keith from Mick and the "T & A" false start.
9. Great versions of many songs including "Shattered", "Neighbors", "LSTNT", "TIOMS" and others.
10. A beautiful flow from beginning to end that sounds just fantastic on a good system. If your not blown away after listening to this ... This may be the Rolling Stones at their peak.
This is one of those shows that would be on the must see list. I saw them in San Diego in 1981. It just gives you chills to hear it. A masterpiece of a show.
I couldn't agree more, it just is a fabulous concert, and indeed probably their best gig ever. You missed on point though: Jagger is at his absolute best, both his vocals and as a frontman.
Mathijs
Quote
StonesTodQuote
pmk251
After the LA Coliseum show in '81 my waning interest in the band diminished further. I would not see the band again for 18 years. It wasn't just the music or the songs, it was the vibe of the occasion, the whole spectacle of the thing. The artist/audience relationship was completely reversed. The audience was not coming to the band. The band was coming to the audience. It was designed to be exciting. It was meant to please. It was hugely impersonal. If you think it was musically proficient, fine. That sound is not one I embrace. It is too disposable. When Taylor plays his solo on LIV in L&G I am enthralled. Is there a more compelling moment in that movie? In '81 you got a very pedestrian and cynical Black Limosine. For me the vibrancy and immediacy of the playing in '69-'73 is well worth any perceived low points. The moments of absolute brilliance during that time will remain as the band's most enduring music.
that's a good post and an interesting and thought-provoking perspective.
Quote
theanchormanQuote
The Sicilian
4. Ian Stewart on piano, Ernie Watts on sax.
I prefer Hopkins & Keys in 72'
Quote
stone-relics
I promised to never post here again, but with this thread, I had to. This show was TERRIBLE..one of the worst of the tour. I saw a bunch of them on that tour. That night was horrible. The next night was a thousand times better...and I have the tape and video to prove it. And NO, you ALLEN KLEIN hating bastards, you cant have it.
Plus, no one in their right mind would EVER compare the 81 tour with the rest of their legacy...heck, on a bad night in mid 2000's blows 18 Dec. 1981 away...You folks need some tapes...
So, to HELL with all of you! I will see you there...
JR
Quote
Stoneage
I'm sorry 71 Tele, but I do just love Ernie's sax-playing: very melodic and fluid and it keeps them on track (in contrast to Keith's clowning about). That's what I like about the 81-82 tour: the swinging rythm-section, the soulful sax of Ernie's and jagger as the obvious center of attention. The bad thing about Hampton is Keith's "solos" that almost destroys a couple of songs. I don't mind the 80´s clothes either; better than the 72´s spandex and glitter.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
proudmaryQuote
kleermakerQuote
StonesTodQuote
slewan
I'm not really sure but I always got the impression that the first CD runs a little bit too fast
hate it when that happens, but i've learned to just listen more slowly and it works out ok.
If the mountain doesn't come to Moses then Moses has to come to the mountain.
Muhammad, not Moses. You should start to be afraid for the safety after such not politically correct error
In Dutch it's usually Moses. But let's say M. Must be satisfying for all parties.
Quote
Stoneage
I'm sorry 71 Tele, but I do just love Ernie's sax-playing: very melodic and fluid and it keeps them on track (in contrast to Keith's clowning about). That's what I like about the 81-82 tour: the swinging rythm-section, the soulful sax of Ernie's and jagger as the obvious center of attention. The bad thing about Hampton is Keith's "solos" that almost destroys a couple of songs. I don't mind the 80´s clothes either; better than the 72´s spandex and glitter.
Quote
Mathijs
What I like about Hampton is that it remains fairly modern and contemporary. The band as is playing here could just have played or toured last week, if you through Jagger's 80's clothing. It's a modern version of the Stones, with modern songs. And as much as I like the Taylor years, the shows they did from '69 to '73 are, in my very humble opinion, typical 70's rock shows and quite dated. The pace of the shows is slow, they're quite moody sounding, Taylor is playing long solo's, it's all very, very early 70's. That was my main feeling after seeing L&G in the cinema -man, this is dated, and it has come 15 years too late for me. It's like seeing Elvis in his jumpsuit and Vegas -great singer, but man it didn't age very well.
Mathijs
Quote
Stoneage
I'm sorry 71 Tele, but I do just love Ernie's sax-playing: very melodic and fluid and it keeps them on track (in contrast to Keith's clowning about). That's what I like about the 81-82 tour: the swinging rythm-section, the soulful sax of Ernie's and jagger as the obvious center of attention.
Quote
Mathijs
That was my main feeling after seeing L&G in the cinema -man, this is dated, and it has come 15 years too late for me. It's like seeing Elvis in his jumpsuit and Vegas -great singer, but man it didn't age very well.
Mathijs