For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
It's not bland. It's liking something that you don't, and you always seem to have a hard time understanding that there are no definite truths with this band, and music in general. I have no trouble with somebody voicing an opinion, but to lay it out there, as a definite truth, that the Mick Taylor years was better than anything they did after, is simply wrong, not to mention trollish and... well... stupid.Quote
skipstone
You obviously have bland tastes in The Rolling Stones.
Quote
stoneswashed77
Just listened to "Misty Roads", "Munich Hilton", "I Can't Help It".
i am not impressed. .
Quote
JumpingKentFlashIt's not bland. It's liking something that you don't, and you always seem to have a hard time understanding that there are no definite truths with this band, and music in general. I have no trouble with somebody voicing an opinion, but to lay it out there, as a definite truth, that the Mick Taylor years was better than anything they did after, is simply wrong, not to mention trollish and... well... stupid.Quote
skipstone
You obviously have bland tastes in The Rolling Stones.
In that case I apologize sincerely.Quote
skipstoneQuote
JumpingKentFlashIt's not bland. It's liking something that you don't, and you always seem to have a hard time understanding that there are no definite truths with this band, and music in general. I have no trouble with somebody voicing an opinion, but to lay it out there, as a definite truth, that the Mick Taylor years was better than anything they did after, is simply wrong, not to mention trollish and... well... stupid.Quote
skipstone
You obviously have bland tastes in The Rolling Stones.
I think you misunderstood. It's partially tongue in cheek but obviously that didn't come across. Mick Taylor years? You lost me there.
Quote
stoneswashed77Quote
skipstone
Stoneswashed77, am I correct in thinking that you'd prefer not to hear/listen to the Stones playing "standard r&b, rock n´roll stuff licks and jams that they could do for days" from the 1970s compared to, oh, I dunno, the 1990s?
The Stones noodlings from the Some Girls (yet alone Black And Blue and Emotional Rescue) sessions that, as far as we know, are not finished are far better than a majority of songs on Dirty Work, Steel Wheels, Voodoo, Bridges and Bang in totality. For example, Misty Roads surpasses anything from any of those albums - unfinished even. Or whatever version of Munich Hilton you prefer. Or I Can't Help It (or whatever it's called, I Need You, the one with Keith and Mick "singing" ).
you are correct i don´t like to hear r&b or R&R music from the stones. i want real songwriting. they released some blues and rock&roll and that´s alright but enouh for me.
i want more than that, r&b and r&r are dead for very long now.
just like punk. :-)
Quote
DoxaQuote
stoneswashed77Quote
skipstone
Stoneswashed77, am I correct in thinking that you'd prefer not to hear/listen to the Stones playing "standard r&b, rock n´roll stuff licks and jams that they could do for days" from the 1970s compared to, oh, I dunno, the 1990s?
The Stones noodlings from the Some Girls (yet alone Black And Blue and Emotional Rescue) sessions that, as far as we know, are not finished are far better than a majority of songs on Dirty Work, Steel Wheels, Voodoo, Bridges and Bang in totality. For example, Misty Roads surpasses anything from any of those albums - unfinished even. Or whatever version of Munich Hilton you prefer. Or I Can't Help It (or whatever it's called, I Need You, the one with Keith and Mick "singing" ).
you are correct i don´t like to hear r&b or R&R music from the stones. i want real songwriting. they released some blues and rock&roll and that´s alright but enouh for me.
i want more than that, r&b and r&r are dead for very long now.
just like punk. :-)
Funny to think of The Rolling Stones without rhythm&blues and rock&roll... What we have then? Calypso? Rap? San Remo ballads? Polka?
The greatest polka band in the world...
- Doxa
They still do that thing in Japan? Always thought it was weird, yet funny. Why do they do it? I never understood.Quote
Rockman
Any word if there'll be Japanese pressing of Exile with exclusive bonus track ???
Quote
ajc68
There's been another price drop on Amazon U.S. for the Super Deluxe Edition... Now $87.99.
Quote
Smokey
Is the DVD going to be broadcast on the BBC or will that be a different program?
Quote
Doxa
Thanks for teh link!
Re EXILE lacking hit singles: It looks like that both Mick and Keith have a bit forgotten the nature of their 60's albums. There is no a single hit at all in LET IT BLEED, and one cannot call "Street Fighting Man" of BEGGARS any big single hit either... In fact, only STICKY FINGERS of the those four big ones (when they were really hitting as Keith recalls) is based around a hit single. And in fact, from a British point of view none of their 60's albums had any single hits on them...
One way to explain EXILE's non-hit nature is that they didn't plan at all to release a hit single a'la "Jumping Jack Flash", "Honky Tonk Women" and "Brown Sugar", and just decided to take one song out of the album... I don't quite believe that: they still worked their asses off for "Tumblin' Dice"... perhaps Mick's remark is the most honest one because the single didn't turned to be such a great hit. Its sales must have felt disappointing after those three HUGE singles.
- Doxa
Quote
Silver DaggerQuote
Doxa
Thanks for teh link!
Re EXILE lacking hit singles: It looks like that both Mick and Keith have a bit forgotten the nature of their 60's albums. There is no a single hit at all in LET IT BLEED, and one cannot call "Street Fighting Man" of BEGGARS any big single hit either... In fact, only STICKY FINGERS of the those four big ones (when they were really hitting as Keith recalls) is based around a hit single. And in fact, from a British point of view none of their 60's albums had any single hits on them...
One way to explain EXILE's non-hit nature is that they didn't plan at all to release a hit single a'la "Jumping Jack Flash", "Honky Tonk Women" and "Brown Sugar", and just decided to take one song out of the album... I don't quite believe that: they still worked their asses off for "Tumblin' Dice"... perhaps Mick's remark is the most honest one because the single didn't turned to be such a great hit. Its sales must have felt disappointing after those three HUGE singles.
- Doxa
Good points once again Doxa. I think the reason they worked their sox off on Tumbling Dice is that Jagger - the one with the business acumen - realised the album was not immediately commercial and they desperately needed to make money on the road in America so needed the radio stations to help them sell out the arenas by plugging a single. It was a question of needs must rather than a departure back to the Loog Oldham factory days of churning out hit after hit. They wanted to get off that treadmill and they did so after Loog Oldham left in 68.
Looking back now they never really tried that hard to break into the singles market again with the odd obvious exception like It's Only Rock'n'Roll and Miss You. These had hit written large all over them.
Quote
Rockman
maybe it's the concrete, or maybe it's the dirt,