For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
GasLightStreet
Ronnie established his Stonesism between the 1978 and 1983 albums in terms of what he does/offers, with some magical playing on each album.
After that, not much.
He had some excellent playing on STEEL WHEELS but since then has essentially been reduced to not much - until HACKNEY DIAMONDS.
Quote
woodyweavingQuote
GasLightStreet
Ronnie established his Stonesism between the 1978 and 1983 albums in terms of what he does/offers, with some magical playing on each album.
After that, not much.
He had some excellent playing on STEEL WHEELS but since then has essentially been reduced to not much - until HACKNEY DIAMONDS.
I've always felt like Ron gets the short end of the stock in some regards. He isn't one of the primary songwriters, and he was present with the band during their (arguably) fall from the top after say '83 or there abouts (I know we can all argue about specifics) but I don't think it's his fault.
I think any other guitarist would have struggled under the same conditions (whatever happened with Mick and Keith duo disagreements & songwriting efforts). Not a lot of successful rock acts (or acts at all) from the seventies had a very good 80s period. Unfortunately for Ron, if the band's songwriting duo aren't working together well and producing good songs that doesn't leave much opportunity to shine.
Quote
MrForeverMusicFanQuote
sf37
I must agree with the comments thus far in that Ronnie is perfect for this band. He is talented and is the ultimate peace-keeper and team player.
I recall an interview with Ronnie sometime in the mid 80's when things were looking darker, and he was asked if the Stones would consider going on yet another tour at some point. His immediate reply was "well, you'll always get a 'yes' from me".
sf37, where you quote the lyric "Ride like the wind at double speed....." from 'Start Me Up' in your signature:
I have to wonder if Mick Jagger was inspired by Christopher Cross's song 'Ride Like The Wind' to write that lyric.
Also Frank Zappa (featuring Al Di Meola) and Saxon have covered the song.
Quote
DoxaQuote
woodyweavingQuote
GasLightStreet
Ronnie established his Stonesism between the 1978 and 1983 albums in terms of what he does/offers, with some magical playing on each album.
After that, not much.
He had some excellent playing on STEEL WHEELS but since then has essentially been reduced to not much - until HACKNEY DIAMONDS.
I've always felt like Ron gets the short end of the stock in some regards. He isn't one of the primary songwriters, and he was present with the band during their (arguably) fall from the top after say '83 or there abouts (I know we can all argue about specifics) but I don't think it's his fault.
I think any other guitarist would have struggled under the same conditions (whatever happened with Mick and Keith duo disagreements & songwriting efforts). Not a lot of successful rock acts (or acts at all) from the seventies had a very good 80s period. Unfortunately for Ron, if the band's songwriting duo aren't working together well and producing good songs that doesn't leave much opportunity to shine.
There are more Ron Wood songs than Mick Jagger songs on DIRTY WORK, so in a way that album was the highlight of Ron as far as being a profilic writer and contributer in the context of the Stones. In a way that was a continuum from the previous albums him being very crucial player in the heart of the band contributing very much how the albums from SOME GIRLS would sound like. He was very close to Mick or Keith (best times with both). For example, teaming up with Mick for SOME GIRLS and UNDERCOVER and then with Keith for DIRTY WORK. That was a great 'Ronnie Wood Era'. (Add there the Ancient Art of Weaving, etc).
Anyway, something happened in the band chemistry after the so called WWIII. Mick and Keith made their peace, but to me Ronnie was the odd man out since then. Like he was a pawn they crucified for the peace: him not teaming up with neither if them since then.
Or it could be that I am too dramatical here. It could've been that both Mick and Keith, after their solo adventures, just naturally drifted apart from Ronnie, both having found new sparring partners to write with/develop their ideas. The Stones from then on was more like a compromise between these two courts with Ronnie having no central role any longer. His songs ideas were not needed, just him like a side player adding his guitar parts here and there.
I don't think that hasn't changed in HACKNEY DIAMONDS either (The Stones is creatively a pure Mick and Keith show, and Ronnie having no access to the creative heart of the band). But what is different is that Ronnie's contributions are more emphasized, and him also playing more distinctively, for ages. Actually it started on BLUE&LONESOME already, but now it truely shines. I pretty much give credit to Andrew Watt here: him knowing what kind of secret weapon the band has in Ronnie Wood.
Another thing to consider is that since Charlie's passing, Ronnie's voice is probably needed more than ever. He with Mick and Keith is all there is left from the original Rolling Stones sound. So there naturally is more room for Ronnie in order the Stones sound like the Stones. Altogether I think all three originals all shine in the new album.
- Doxa
Quote
Silver DaggerQuote
DoxaQuote
woodyweavingQuote
GasLightStreet
Ronnie established his Stonesism between the 1978 and 1983 albums in terms of what he does/offers, with some magical playing on each album.
After that, not much.
He had some excellent playing on STEEL WHEELS but since then has essentially been reduced to not much - until HACKNEY DIAMONDS.
I've always felt like Ron gets the short end of the stock in some regards. He isn't one of the primary songwriters, and he was present with the band during their (arguably) fall from the top after say '83 or there abouts (I know we can all argue about specifics) but I don't think it's his fault.
I think any other guitarist would have struggled under the same conditions (whatever happened with Mick and Keith duo disagreements & songwriting efforts). Not a lot of successful rock acts (or acts at all) from the seventies had a very good 80s period. Unfortunately for Ron, if the band's songwriting duo aren't working together well and producing good songs that doesn't leave much opportunity to shine.
There are more Ron Wood songs than Mick Jagger songs on DIRTY WORK, so in a way that album was the highlight of Ron as far as being a profilic writer and contributer in the context of the Stones. In a way that was a continuum from the previous albums him being very crucial player in the heart of the band contributing very much how the albums from SOME GIRLS would sound like. He was very close to Mick or Keith (best times with both). For example, teaming up with Mick for SOME GIRLS and UNDERCOVER and then with Keith for DIRTY WORK. That was a great 'Ronnie Wood Era'. (Add there the Ancient Art of Weaving, etc).
Anyway, something happened in the band chemistry after the so called WWIII. Mick and Keith made their peace, but to me Ronnie was the odd man out since then. Like he was a pawn they crucified for the peace: him not teaming up with neither if them since then.
Or it could be that I am too dramatical here. It could've been that both Mick and Keith, after their solo adventures, just naturally drifted apart from Ronnie, both having found new sparring partners to write with/develop their ideas. The Stones from then on was more like a compromise between these two courts with Ronnie having no central role any longer. His songs ideas were not needed, just him like a side player adding his guitar parts here and there.
I don't think that hasn't changed in HACKNEY DIAMONDS either (The Stones is creatively a pure Mick and Keith show, and Ronnie having no access to the creative heart of the band). But what is different is that Ronnie's contributions are more emphasized, and him also playing more distinctively, for ages. Actually it started on BLUE&LONESOME already, but now it truely shines. I pretty much give credit to Andrew Watt here: him knowing what kind of secret weapon the band has in Ronnie Wood.
Another thing to consider is that since Charlie's passing, Ronnie's voice is probably needed more than ever. He with Mick and Keith is all there is left from the original Rolling Stones sound. So there naturally is more room for Ronnie in order the Stones sound like the Stones. Altogether I think all three originals all shine in the new album.
- Doxa
And don't forget he's needed even more now that Keith can't play like he used to with his arthritis. The solo he plays on Bite My Head Off after Macca's bass solo is one of the best he's ever played with the Stones. In the past that would have been played by Keith but it's telling that Ronnie stepped in - something we've seen more live on the last couple of tours.
Quote
Taylor1
Mick Taylor and Brian Jones were terrific too
Quote
MrForeverMusicFanQuote
Taylor1
Mick Taylor and Brian Jones were terrific too
This is a thread specifically about Ronnie Wood. Perhaps there should be a separate thread discussion for Brian Jones and one for Mick Taylor.
Quote
Taylor1
Mick Taylor and Brian Jones were terrific too
If this thread is about Ron Wood then why was it started by saying he was the perfect fit, implying Taylor was not.He wasn’t kicked out by Mick and Keith , he quit. I think Wood has contributed a lot of great playing, but they did their 4 best albums with the other guitarists.The1969-1973 tours have never been topped.The way they played with Taylor live set the template for what followed.But yeah Wood was and is terrificQuote
Big AlQuote
MrForeverMusicFanQuote
Taylor1
Mick Taylor and Brian Jones were terrific too
This is a thread specifically about Ronnie Wood. Perhaps there should be a separate thread discussion for Brian Jones and one for Mick Taylor.
There is; and you're right. Here is to discuss Ronnie.
Anyway, here's something that's always puzzled me: Stones fans' inability to distinguish between Keith and Ronnie's playing. I do understand that not everyone is a musician, but their playing is unique enough to differentiate from one another.
Quote
Rockman
...and dont forget Tom ....
Quote
Taylor1If this thread is about Ron Wood then why was it started by saying he was the perfect fit, implying Taylor was not.He wasn’t kicked out by Mick and Keith , he quit. I think Wood has contributed a lot of great playing, but they did their 4 best albums with the other guitarists.The1969-1973 tours have never been topped.The way they played with Taylor live set the template for what followed.But yeah Wood was and is terrificQuote
Big AlQuote
MrForeverMusicFanQuote
Taylor1
Mick Taylor and Brian Jones were terrific too
This is a thread specifically about Ronnie Wood. Perhaps there should be a separate thread discussion for Brian Jones and one for Mick Taylor.
There is; and you're right. Here is to discuss Ronnie.
Anyway, here's something that's always puzzled me: Stones fans' inability to distinguish between Keith and Ronnie's playing. I do understand that not everyone is a musician, but their playing is unique enough to differentiate from one another.
Quote
Taylor1If this thread is about Ron Wood then why was it started by saying he was the perfect fit, implying Taylor was not.He wasn’t kicked out by Mick and Keith , he quit. I think Wood has contributed a lot of great playing, but they did their 4 best albums with the other guitarists.The1969-1973 tours have never been topped.The way they played with Taylor live set the template for what followed.But yeah Wood was and is terrificQuote
Big AlQuote
MrForeverMusicFanQuote
Taylor1
Mick Taylor and Brian Jones were terrific too
This is a thread specifically about Ronnie Wood. Perhaps there should be a separate thread discussion for Brian Jones and one for Mick Taylor.
There is; and you're right. Here is to discuss Ronnie.
Anyway, here's something that's always puzzled me: Stones fans' inability to distinguish between Keith and Ronnie's playing. I do understand that not everyone is a musician, but their playing is unique enough to differentiate from one another.
Quote
Taylor1If this thread is about Ron Wood then why was it started by saying he was the perfect fit, implying Taylor was not.He wasn’t kicked out by Mick and Keith , he quit. I think Wood has contributed a lot of great playing, but they did their 4 best albums with the other guitarists.The1969-1973 tours have never been topped.The way they played with Taylor live set the template for what followed.But yeah Wood was and is terrificQuote
Big AlQuote
MrForeverMusicFanQuote
Taylor1
Mick Taylor and Brian Jones were terrific too
This is a thread specifically about Ronnie Wood. Perhaps there should be a separate thread discussion for Brian Jones and one for Mick Taylor.
There is; and you're right. Here is to discuss Ronnie.
Anyway, here's something that's always puzzled me: Stones fans' inability to distinguish between Keith and Ronnie's playing. I do understand that not everyone is a musician, but their playing is unique enough to differentiate from one another.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanBeggars Banquet, Let it Bleed, Sticky Fingers and Exile.Although you can keep your Emotional Rescue ABigget Bang and Dirty Work on that listQuote
Taylor1If this thread is about Ron Wood then why was it started by saying he was the perfect fit, implying Taylor was not.He wasn’t kicked out by Mick and Keith , he quit. I think Wood has contributed a lot of great playing, but they did their 4 best albums with the other guitarists.The1969-1973 tours have never been topped.The way they played with Taylor live set the template for what followed.But yeah Wood was and is terrificQuote
Big AlQuote
MrForeverMusicFanQuote
Taylor1
Mick Taylor and Brian Jones were terrific too
This is a thread specifically about Ronnie Wood. Perhaps there should be a separate thread discussion for Brian Jones and one for Mick Taylor.
There is; and you're right. Here is to discuss Ronnie.
Anyway, here's something that's always puzzled me: Stones fans' inability to distinguish between Keith and Ronnie's playing. I do understand that not everyone is a musician, but their playing is unique enough to differentiate from one another.
Their four best albums?
Quote
Taylor1Quote
DandelionPowdermanBeggars Banquet, Let it Bleed, Sticky Fingers and Exile.Although you can keep your Emotional Rescue ABigget Bang and Dirty Work on that listQuote
Taylor1If this thread is about Ron Wood then why was it started by saying he was the perfect fit, implying Taylor was not.He wasn’t kicked out by Mick and Keith , he quit. I think Wood has contributed a lot of great playing, but they did their 4 best albums with the other guitarists.The1969-1973 tours have never been topped.The way they played with Taylor live set the template for what followed.But yeah Wood was and is terrificQuote
Big AlQuote
MrForeverMusicFanQuote
Taylor1
Mick Taylor and Brian Jones were terrific too
This is a thread specifically about Ronnie Wood. Perhaps there should be a separate thread discussion for Brian Jones and one for Mick Taylor.
There is; and you're right. Here is to discuss Ronnie.
Anyway, here's something that's always puzzled me: Stones fans' inability to distinguish between Keith and Ronnie's playing. I do understand that not everyone is a musician, but their playing is unique enough to differentiate from one another.
Their four best albums?
Quote
Taylor1
Why do people need to bash Mick Taylor when discussing Ron Wood.
Quote
Testify
I found this burning version by Black Limousine, its Zemaitis sounds amazing!!!
[www.youtube.com]
...by the way...if you are interested in Ronnie's guitars, here is an overview of his guitars. [equipboard.com]