For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
LeonidPQuote
1963luca0
Honestly, I find the video offensive.
A young blonde woman ‘used’ for what?
Is a young lady excited by the music by people in their 80’s something good? If so, why?
What the sense in non play Brown Sugar live and have this video available to very young kids via accessible media?
Don’t get me wrong, but I don’t have to approve anything the band does, IMO
??? How is it that you ever liked the band to begin with if you find something like that offensive?
Quote
marcovandereijk
Haha, don't get angry with them.
I only think it is the formula that was used on recent videos. Have you watched
Ride em on down, Living in the heart of love, Criss Cross?
Is there even a need for videos these days, when even old chaps like me listen to Spotify?
Quote
SomeGuyQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
steenhorst
the only good things are the video clips from 1972 and 1973
What's wrong with the clips from 1974 to 2023?
That must have been ironically meant, right?
I know a Stones fan who doesn't like anything they did after 1963
Quote
marcovandereijk
Haha, don't get angry with them.
I only think it is the formula that was used on recent videos. Have you watched
Ride em on down, Living in the heart of love, Criss Cross?
Is there even a need for videos these days, when even old chaps like me listen to Spotify?
Thanks. Great quality.Quote
TIRED
Truly an amazing video, honoring so beautifully and nostalgically the Stones' glorious years with video sources so well known and dear to us lifetime loyal fans.
The mp4 file is now downloadable here - for those of us who are not always online:
wetransfer - Angry official video
Quote
1963luca0
Honestly, I find the video offensive.
A young blonde woman ‘used’ for what?
Is a young lady excited by the music by people in their 80’s something good? If so, why?
What the sense in non play Brown Sugar live and have this video available to very young kids via accessible media?
Don’t get me wrong, but I don’t have to approve anything the band does, IMO
Quote
1963luca0
Honestly, I find the video offensive.
A young blonde woman ‘used’ for what?
Is a young lady excited by the music by people in their 80’s something good? If so, why?
What the sense in non play Brown Sugar live and have this video available to very young kids via accessible media?
Don’t get me wrong, but I don’t have to approve anything the band does, IMO
Quote
maumau
Criss Cross was a bit different (an a far superior output imo)
Diane Kunst director for a wider project with model Guindilla Ontanaya that was incidentally used and customized for the Stones song
Quote
MonkeyMan2000
Yes, that one was fantastic! Fresh, funky and no objectivication of a woman's body in any way.
Quote
dcbaQuote
MonkeyMan2000
Yes, that one was fantastic! Fresh, funky and no objectivication of a woman's body in any way.
The girl was ugly, though... skinny, bony, bad hair... yuck.
Quote
welshphil
Loved the billboards and how the footage tied in with what was being played and sung.As someone posted previously many of us have seen these videos before and brought back several memories .If the girl in the car had worn a different Stones t shirt in every shot ,now that would have been cool !!
Quote
MisterDDDDQuote
welshphil
Loved the billboards and how the footage tied in with what was being played and sung.As someone posted previously many of us have seen these videos before and brought back several memories .If the girl in the car had worn a different Stones t shirt in every shot ,now that would have been cool !!
If I could add one billboard clip, it would be Keith hitting the fan who rushed the stage with his guitar in '81... don't be angry with me
Quote
MonkeyMan2000Quote
maumau
Criss Cross was a bit different (an a far superior output imo)
Diane Kunst director for a wider project with model Guindilla Ontanaya that was incidentally used and customized for the Stones song
Yes, that one was fantastic! Fresh, funky and no objectivication of a woman's body in any way. Showing agency and subjectivity. That's the spirit Rolling Stones, giving the finger to monetary and power structures like the one that lead to their new video, which just oozes lazyness, outdatedness and obvious marketing strategics. The thought process behind the new video was probably: "Boobs, cars, nostaglia. Okay, coffee break!"
Quote
Promoman2
I see references to the Hollywood Bowl and the Viper Room. Is there any meaning in this?
Quote
VoodooLounge13Quote
MonkeyMan2000Quote
maumau
Criss Cross was a bit different (an a far superior output imo)
Diane Kunst director for a wider project with model Guindilla Ontanaya that was incidentally used and customized for the Stones song
Yes, that one was fantastic! Fresh, funky and no objectivication of a woman's body in any way. Showing agency and subjectivity. That's the spirit Rolling Stones, giving the finger to monetary and power structures like the one that lead to their new video, which just oozes lazyness, outdatedness and obvious marketing strategics. The thought process behind the new video was probably: "Boobs, cars, nostaglia. Okay, coffee break!"
Wasn't there a super fast clip of a naked woman in the Criss Cross video???!! That's not objectifying? I love that video btw - and the song. I think the video is the freshest thing they'd done at the time in forever! And how that classic song sat in the fault for nearly 50 years is beyond me!!! Unreal!