For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Rocky DijonQuote
GasLightStreet
I've edited what you said to point out something that, perhaps you were getting at but didn't say, oh, directly enough:
For whatever reason, there hasn't been anything as identifying as Start Me Up since... Start Me Up.
That's not Matt Clifford's fault.
Which is what you were saying as well, without say saying it in that regard.
I wouldn't say it's Matt Clifford's fault (though I am highly critical of his role for the past 18 years), it is Mick's fault. He doesn't want to take the time to challenge himself, his alleged songwriting partner, or their band to really produce something worthwhile. He wants to accomplish as much work in as little time as possible. If you listen to him, he says the same thing about writing with Dave Stewart. The songs come quickly and are finished quickly. He likes that. He says he prefers to come to a Stones session with already written and arranged material. He likes polished demos. There's even a quote from the last decade or so where he talked about being happy to use parts of demos on the finished track. That has nothing to do with Jagger-Richards as songwriters or all material "arranged by The Rolling Stones." It's Mick Jagger finding shortcuts so the creative process isn't hard work. Where possible, he reduces the band (even Keith) to sidemen. "Work for the money" as he once shouted over Jeff Beck's sub-Neal Schon solo on "Throw Away." At the time, as a snotty 16 year old, I thought that's what he wishes he could say when Keith and Ronnie solo. In the last 25 years, it's become the unspoken sentiment.
And no, I don't absolve Keith. Had he not turned into a guy who needs to jam for hours or days or weeks or months before a song comes together, the situation might never have occurred. They may not have grown up much, but they did grow apart. Different circles, different working methods, different inspirations. Keith should have become a cross between Neil Young and Tom Waits, a cult figure making his own art living off the fact that he was the sound of The Rolling Stones for 20 years. Mick, always more disciplined, never lost his work ethic, but did lose his commitment to art. He was content to point his finger and call "Yeah, whoo, livin' the charmed life" a song. It may be the worst example, but sadly, it's not an isolated one. It's his equivalent to Keith's litanies of "baby, baby, baby" and "honey, honey, honey" that clutter his work. Both of them became lazy in their own ways.
The thing is, as they turn 75 this year, I don't expect them to change; I just want them to finish what they started and give us another disc so I can run the gamut of emotions from thinking it's better than I had a reason to expect to satisfying myself that there's about four songs I'll continue to think fondly of a few months later when it's no longer new.
Quote
HairballQuote
IanBillenQuote
Hairball
I was initially poking fun at Keith who has stated in the past he receives signals form the cosmos that give him ideas and helps him write songs.
As for the current status of the new album, not sure how much it's progressing even now. Sure Keith met Mick in New York, but as others have said that could mean a number of things. Since Mick was just in Chicago, maybe he was brushing up on his blues knowledge and they'll end up recording Blue and Lonesome pt.II (ie more blues covers) which Keith said he'd be happy to do. But even Keith himself said that after this "session", it will be a LONG time before they get back to work on it, so we should be careful not to put the cart before the horse. In the meantime, lots of press and interviews followed by a tour. After that, rest and relaxation with family, and maybe they'll get something done after that?
_________________________________________
Yeah I know about Keiths idea of songs coming in from space. As he has said .. he feels he is just a transmitter (though I think he is at least partly joking I'm sure).
There is no B&L part two. This is a brand new studio album of originals. Charlie spilled the beans ... clearly spilled them whenhe stated very candidly that they did a few sessions before B&L sessions and some after.... several ..which amassed for well enough material which is why he wonders where the album is as well. Jagger and Richards are still tweaking what they have at the moment it seems.
Some time after July they will mix it and release it in late fall I believe ... September the earliest. They could come together now once more for some final recordings.
I should start calling you Nostradamus as you seem so sure in your ability to predict the future, but the difference is Nostradamus was somewhat accurate with his predictions.
Truth of the matter is nobody knows about an album of originals with absolute certainty - not even Charlie! Yes they did some preliminary sporadic sessions, but that might have all been scrapped and they plan on recording more blues covers which would only take a couple of days. For all we know, we might even have a Blue and Lonesome pt II before the new tour starts! Keith has stated several times now that's what he would like to do, and as I've said repeatedly that would be better than nothing (and possibly better than some average originals). Either that or another compilation, and if we're lucky maybe one or two new tunes included which could very well be covers themselves.
That said, I trust the words of georgelicks who seems to know more than anyone here, as well as probably knowing more than almost everyone in the band.
"They (Mick and Keith) will be on NY during the next few days hearing some songs recorded on previous sessions and doing some more work but the full band
won't be back again on the studio after the tour is over. That's it for the new album out this year, 2019 is the new date".
Followed by:
"According to Don Was, they spent 3 weeks on the studio since 2015 (including the 3 days for B&L), they will be on the studio again for a couple of days this week
and no more sessions after the tour is over, the next time could be anytime between September/December. The new album is green as a tree".
Dream on all you want Ian, but I'm afraid you might be setting yourself up again for another letdown.
Quote
IanBillen
"Some time after July they will mix it and release it in late fall I believe ... September the earliest"
Quote
Hairball
Everyone believes Charlie when he said they did a few sporadic sessions over the last two years, but the fact is he doesn't know what became of any of it.
And he never once mentioned amassing enough original material for a new album, he only stated they did several sessions.
But maybe you should take it from Keith himself - one of the two head captains who steer the ship. When discussing the progress of the new album just a few days ago prior to his meeting with Mick, Keith said:
"Now that the tour’s coming up we probably won’t get into the studio again until later on this year. Christmas, how about that"?!
And again from georgelicks
"They (Mick and Keith) will be on NY during the next few days hearing some songs recorded on previous sessions and doing some more work but
the full band won't be back again on the studio after the tour is over. That's it for the new album out this year, 2019 is the new date".
To form an opinion based on what Charlie said who admittedly has no clue of what happened with the sessions vs. what Keith is saying a few days ago seems a bit out of touch with reality.Quote
IanBillen
"Some time after July they will mix it and release it in late fall I believe ... September the earliest"
Doesn't fit into the timeline, but if you wish hard enough maybe it will happen?
In the meantime, prepare for the compilation Universal is discussing, and with any luck maybe they'll include a new tune (maybe an outake/leftover cover from the Blue and Lonesome sessions).
Quote
Hairball
Everyone believes Charlie when he said they did a few sporadic sessions over the last two years, but the fact is he doesn't know what became of any of it. And he never once mentioned amassing enough original material for a new album, he only stated they did several sessions.
Quote
doitywoikQuote
GasLightStreet
From the sound of the overdubs, it was about an hour.
In fact I do remember reading an article/interview (but can't remember when/where) in which someone said that it was kind of a one-take-affair, like Keith going in, doing his overdubs each more or less in one take, and going out again.Quote
OpenG
My two cents - Mick Jagger has never matured as a songwriter and never really wrote any mature lyrics in his 40's and thereafter.
That's the good thing about not being a native speaker of English: you don't care so much about the lyrics.
"I was a butcher cutting up meat ..." OK, so what. Apart from that, on the whole I don't find Mick's lyrics so bad. At any rate, they're different from the rest out there (as a recent example, D&G, not your average "Ooooh dawlin'") and certainly several levels above Keith's. And even if some of his lyrics are better (whatever that means) than others, also e.g. Neil's lyrics aren't all masterpieces.Quote
keithsman
Can't help but think we are not getting the full picture here. Even Charlie is saying where is it, what's happened to the album.
We certainly don't, how can we. I guess that after Charlie's drum track is laid down, he's not much involved in the further proeedings and learns that the album is out only when he gets a call to show up at a press conference, or from the media.
As much as Keith would like to do another blues album, I hope they don't do it. What would be next then? Mick sings Dylan, Keith sings Dean Martin?
Quote
corriecas
My guess is, the album will be released, just before the Christmas holidays.
jeroen
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
Hairball
Everyone believes Charlie when he said they did a few sporadic sessions over the last two years, but the fact is he doesn't know what became of any of it. And he never once mentioned amassing enough original material for a new album, he only stated they did several sessions.
There's always this:
Charlie: The classic one on this album is the one Keith's done. I mean, I didn't know what... right up until about 2 months before the album... has now come out.
Mick: Which one are you talking about, Charlie?
Charlie: I mean, I didn't know...
Mick: Which song... ?
Bill: All About You.
Mick: Oh, All About You.
Bill: The "train song".
Mick: Yeah.
Charlie: Yeah.
Ron: Train Song, that's what we knew it as.
Charlie: Yeah, Keith's, yeah... Oh nobody knows...
Bill: It's just a track called Train Song.
Charlie: And I never knew what Keith was going to (put) on it, I never knew what he wanted... But it was a great track to play. That's being a drummer, you know?
Ron: He ended up singing that too, which is quite pleasing.
Charlie: Yeah, it's great. But I mean...
Mick: It's not me singing it (laughs).
Charlie: How he made a song out of it, I don't know.
[timeisonourside.com]
Quote
Maindefender
It would be easier to see some more deluxe package releases......
honest man should have been releasedQuote
corriecas
Maybe they can dig up Honest man and Zip Mouth Angel.
jeroen
Quote
bye bye johnny
“They had a right laugh,” an insider said.
Quote
doitywoikQuote
Maindefender
It would be easier to see some more deluxe package releases......
Would be easier, sure, but would it be worthwhile? EOMS was alright because the outtakes/bonus songs were interesting one way or other, but Some Girls was kind of a let-down to me because listening to the outtakes made it clear why they didn't make it onto the album, and in my oppinion they had better stayed in limbo.
In principle they could even combine the Best Of and the Deluxe thing: how about a 40 Licks Deluxe with all the Paris Sessions outtakes, e.g. a 30 min version of Well Well ...
Quote
doitywoikQuote
bye bye johnny
“They had a right laugh,” an insider said.
At us, I guess.
Quote
Hairball
Lol...they should be working on the album rather than reading this thread!
Quote
doitywoikQuote
Hairball
Lol...they should be working on the album rather than reading this thread!
Perhaps we should rather be working on their album than reading this thread!
I'm sure there are enough gifted musicians among the IORRians to come up with a proper Stones album ...
Quote
Jack Knife
... And I doubt that they would tour again without new material. I also don't think they will wait 8 years to record another album again...
Posted by: Jack Knife ()
Date: August 4, 2005 00:49
Quote
black n bluehonest man should have been releasedQuote
corriecas
Maybe they can dig up Honest man and Zip Mouth Angel.
jeroen
Quote
doitywoikQuote
Hairball
Lol...they should be working on the album rather than reading this thread!
Perhaps we should rather be working on their album than reading this thread!
I'm sure there are enough gifted musicians among the IORRians to come up with a proper Stones album ...
Quote
doitywoik
Careful, Hairball, might happen to us as well when predicting that there will be a new album by the end of / not before the end of 2017/18/1920/21 ...
Some more tribute albums:
40 Clicks (... for the youtube generation)
Wordy Jerk (... the Dylan cover album)
Financial Rescue (... Ronnie daydreaming)
Aftercash (... Mick's reckoning)
Between the Muttons (... the eternal topic of shepherd's pie)
Mine A Blight (... another live album full of definitive versions )
Only Rogue and Droll (... more incarnations of the Glimmer Twins)
Smack and Flu (... diseases of the band)
Some Churls (... by the Rolling Stonesses )