For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
maumau
song of the day:
Just Like I Treat You
and a praise to the variety of grooves and pace on the album (someone, and me too, was afraid it to be a bore)
today I am all for the "fast" numbers: I Gotta Go could be considered a filler, but it's a damn good filler
Quote
bv
ENJOY!!!
Quote
maumau
so hard to push the stop button once it is playing...
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
mpj200Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
mpj200
This all leads to a Stones album that is very unique.
So it's not unique (1.being the only one of its kind; unlike anything else.) but it's very unique.
That's heavy, man. I don't know how to understand that.
It's actually quite simple. It's unique. It is unlike anything else. Perhaps this clears it all up for you?
Ha ha ha... just making sure you don't qualify something with modifiers that are defeating.
Quote
mpj200Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
mpj200Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
mpj200
This all leads to a Stones album that is very unique.
So it's not unique (1.being the only one of its kind; unlike anything else.) but it's very unique.
That's heavy, man. I don't know how to understand that.
It's actually quite simple. It's unique. It is unlike anything else. Perhaps this clears it all up for you?
Ha ha ha... just making sure you don't qualify something with modifiers that are defeating.
You actually said it was unique yourself, when said that Ronnie is the driver of this album musically
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
HairballQuote
GasLightStreetQuote
Hairball
While I anticipate the initial impression will be a blast of euphoria (when was the last time there was a great Stones album...'81?), not sure how long the bliss will last. Is it one for the ages? Will it stand the test of time? Or is it more of a novelty of blues covers by a great band that we love?
The bliss will last as long as one loves the LP, just like BEGGARS BANQUET, LET IT BLEED, STICKY FINGERS, EXILE ON MAIN STREET, SOME GIRLS and TATTOO YOU (and whatever really good albums like AFTERMATH, GOATS HEAD SOUP, BLACK AND BLUE and their last really good LP, UNDERCOVER).
It's that good.
It is for the ages. It will stand the test of time. It's not a novelty.
It's that good.
Glad you like it that much Gaslight. I'd agree that it will be the best album from the Stones in decades, but will a blues cover album stand alongside masterpieces such as Beggars Banquet, Let it Bleed, Sticky Fingers, and Exile on Main Street? From the three tunes I've heard probably not, but I'm sure it will for many others. It's been a long drought studio-wise for Stones fans, and this seems to have fulfilled the thirst for something listenable.Quote
GasLightStreet
I think if one thinks the Stones' versions of a or any of these song(s) is better than the original(s) well then maybe it is. The original (or whatever cover version they emulate) is not necessarily the best version. Afterall, if you listen to Robert Johnson's Love In Vain or Stop Breaking Down and then say they're better than the Stones' versions of them, well, there's probably something wrong with you.
Fair enough. Keep in mind the two Robert Johnson examples you've given were recorded c.1937 primitively - solo with an acoustic guitar. The Stones reworked them to an almost unrecognizable point with a full band and contemporary recording techniques. Both versions are completely different, and stand on their own for different reasons (acoustic vs. electric w/full band).
On the other hand, the Stones have done a reverse strategy with these new covers. Rather than reworking them in any way, they've opted to mimic and/or copy them even to the point of using some of the same recording techniques as the 'originals'. Perhaps some will enjoy the Stones doing nearly note for note renditions of what came before, but from the three I've heard so far I would argue the 'originals' are better. There's something holy about the older bluesman's versions - something more authentic and sincere about them. With the Stones' new versions it's almost blues by numbers. For example, I've seen nearly exact replica's of Van Gogh's Starry Night painting, but none of them are as real and authentic as the original. The pain and anguish of the original artist comes through with the original, whereas with the copies it all seems a bit diluted. In the end, it comes down to personal opinion about what makes something truly great, and I can appreciate why some might prefer the Stones' versions. Looking forward to hearing the album tomorrow from start to finish, but anticipate it won't be quite as thrilling as when I first heard the classic Stones albums mentioned above. Keeping an open mind, but from what I've heard so far, the results will be predictable. Nice enough for a few listens (and maybe more), but being that they're simply blues covers without much embellishment over the 'originals', nothing truly earth shattering.
Think El Mocambo and how that side still stands up among the best stuff they've ever done
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
mpj200Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
mpj200Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
mpj200
This all leads to a Stones album that is very unique.
So it's not unique (1.being the only one of its kind; unlike anything else.) but it's very unique.
That's heavy, man. I don't know how to understand that.
It's actually quite simple. It's unique. It is unlike anything else. Perhaps this clears it all up for you?
Ha ha ha... just making sure you don't qualify something with modifiers that are defeating.
You actually said it was unique yourself, when said that Ronnie is the driver of this album musically
I think the word "very" is the key here
Quote
KoschiQuote
Rip This
...really??....complaints about the harmonica??...on a blues album??...again...really?
no complaints - love them - but as I said - not on every song
Quote
bleedingmanQuote
KoschiQuote
Rip This
...really??....complaints about the harmonica??...on a blues album??...again...really?
no complaints - love them - but as I said - not on every song
Little Walter would kick your bum if he heard you say that.
Quote
crholmstromQuote
bleedingmanQuote
KoschiQuote
Rip This
...really??....complaints about the harmonica??...on a blues album??...again...really?
no complaints - love them - but as I said - not on every song
Little Walter would kick your bum if he heard you say that.
& then show you the blade!
Quote
drewmaster
My personal fave -- the track I instantly fell in love with:
All Of Your Love
Fantastic!!!
Drew
Quote
drewmaster
My personal fave -- the track I instantly fell in love with:
All Of Your Love
Fantastic!!!
Drew
Quote
mpj200Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
mpj200Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
mpj200Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
mpj200
This all leads to a Stones album that is very unique.
So it's not unique (1.being the only one of its kind; unlike anything else.) but it's very unique.
That's heavy, man. I don't know how to understand that.
It's actually quite simple. It's unique. It is unlike anything else. Perhaps this clears it all up for you?
Ha ha ha... just making sure you don't qualify something with modifiers that are defeating.
You actually said it was unique yourself, when said that Ronnie is the driver of this album musically
I think the word "very" is the key here
"Very" No other Stones album like it. Whatever. It's about as VERY unique as it gets. I'm just repeating their words. And it rocks.