For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
RedhotcarpetQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Redhotcarpet
That is a good lead that would have been even better solo with Taylor live like in 1973. I like it but it doesnt really change the song into something bigger.
Does it have to? I don't see the need for comparing. They both did good things with this song - differently.
Yes but i compare because Taylor was so good and Wood replaced him.
Does that mean that Brian Jones was a lousy guitarist, and should be bashed?
Point is, ALL of the three second guitarists in the Stones have done a great job - in different ways.
Quote
RedhotcarpetQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
RedhotcarpetQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Redhotcarpet
That is a good lead that would have been even better solo with Taylor live like in 1973. I like it but it doesnt really change the song into something bigger.
Does it have to? I don't see the need for comparing. They both did good things with this song - differently.
Yes but i compare because Taylor was so good and Wood replaced him.
Does that mean that Brian Jones was a lousy guitarist, and should be bashed?
Point is, ALL of the three second guitarists in the Stones have done a great job - in different ways.
Brian Jones was great but Taylor was the best guitar player in this band.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
RedhotcarpetQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
RedhotcarpetQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Redhotcarpet
That is a good lead that would have been even better solo with Taylor live like in 1973. I like it but it doesnt really change the song into something bigger.
Does it have to? I don't see the need for comparing. They both did good things with this song - differently.
Yes but i compare because Taylor was so good and Wood replaced him.
Does that mean that Brian Jones was a lousy guitarist, and should be bashed?
Point is, ALL of the three second guitarists in the Stones have done a great job - in different ways.
Brian Jones was great but Taylor was the best guitar player in this band.
I'd say Keith Richards was the best guitar player in the band, although very few have inspired me more when it comes to solos than Mick Taylor.
Quote
HonkeyTonkFlashQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
RedhotcarpetQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
RedhotcarpetQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Redhotcarpet
That is a good lead that would have been even better solo with Taylor live like in 1973. I like it but it doesnt really change the song into something bigger.
Does it have to? I don't see the need for comparing. They both did good things with this song - differently.
Yes but i compare because Taylor was so good and Wood replaced him.
Does that mean that Brian Jones was a lousy guitarist, and should be bashed?
Point is, ALL of the three second guitarists in the Stones have done a great job - in different ways.
Brian Jones was great but Taylor was the best guitar player in this band.
I'd say Keith Richards was the best guitar player in the band, although very few have inspired me more when it comes to solos than Mick Taylor.
Agreed. Taylor was technically the best soloist, but when it comes to putting out pure, raw rock and blues feeling and emotion, nobody does it like Keith.
What does it has to do with it M.Taylor & B.Jones with "Your favorite Ronnie Wood solos' ? Why dirty the 3d?Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
HonkeyTonkFlashQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
RedhotcarpetQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
RedhotcarpetQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Redhotcarpet
That is a good lead that would have been even better solo with Taylor live like in 1973. I like it but it doesnt really change the song into something bigger.
Does it have to? I don't see the need for comparing. They both did good things with this song - differently.
Yes but i compare because Taylor was so good and Wood replaced him.
Does that mean that Brian Jones was a lousy guitarist, and should be bashed?
Point is, ALL of the three second guitarists in the Stones have done a great job - in different ways.
Brian Jones was great but Taylor was the best guitar player in this band.
I'd say Keith Richards was the best guitar player in the band, although very few have inspired me more when it comes to solos than Mick Taylor.
Agreed. Taylor was technically the best soloist, but when it comes to putting out pure, raw rock and blues feeling and emotion, nobody does it like Keith.
Not to mention a rather important part of being a great guitar player: Using the guitar as a vehicle to write great songs.
Quote
TheBlockbuster
Mick Taylor played some remarkable solos in 1973, his solo on Angie from the first Brussels show 1973 is among the most beautiful solos I've ever heard. But he was never a team-player. His playing always seemed so self-absorbed and he never really played ''with'' the band like Ronnie does.
For instance Taylor's playing on Dead Flowers from Marquee 1971 is hideous and annoying, it reminds me of a bored 16 year old noodling through his new licks over and over again. Ronnie's playing was never annoying.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
I never understood the need for long fluid solos in Stones songs. It's not like they are all over their albums.
Like Stu said to Chuck: "Don't play too much, but highlight those short golden tiaras" (I wish he had listened...).
Short, biting lead bits have characterised the Stones's sound from the beginning. The other hard rock bands took care of those long, flashy solos. The more the Stones started doing that on stage, the more they begun to sound like those other bands.
IMHO, of course.
Quote
boogaloojef
Taylor's playing is lyrical and Wood's playing is not.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
boogaloojef
Taylor's playing is lyrical and Wood's playing is not.
Indeed, but are Beggars banquet, Exile or SG "lyrical"?
Quote
HonkeyTonkFlashQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
boogaloojef
Taylor's playing is lyrical and Wood's playing is not.
Indeed, but are Beggars banquet, Exile or SG "lyrical"?
Those albums are great examples of the Stones being all about songs rather than musical virtuosity.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
boogaloojef
Taylor's playing is lyrical and Wood's playing is not.
Indeed, but are Beggars banquet, Exile or SG "lyrical"?
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
HonkeyTonkFlashQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
boogaloojef
Taylor's playing is lyrical and Wood's playing is not.
Indeed, but are Beggars banquet, Exile or SG "lyrical"?
Those albums are great examples of the Stones being all about songs rather than musical virtuosity.
Don't get me wrong, I love a brilliant solo when it suits the song (ADTL, for instance).
What I don't get is people bashing Ronnie's playing, while claiming to adore the guitars in the early 60s. There's a discrepancy there, as the style with short biting leads was what was going on back then.
Quote
boogaloojefQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
boogaloojef
Taylor's playing is lyrical and Wood's playing is not.
Indeed, but are Beggars banquet, Exile or SG "lyrical"?
If a solo is going to be played at all, I enjoy it more if it is lyrical.
Quote
TravelinManQuote
TheBlockbuster
Mick Taylor played some remarkable solos in 1973, his solo on Angie from the first Brussels show 1973 is among the most beautiful solos I've ever heard. But he was never a team-player. His playing always seemed so self-absorbed and he never really played ''with'' the band like Ronnie does.
For instance Taylor's playing on Dead Flowers from Marquee 1971 is hideous and annoying, it reminds me of a bored 16 year old noodling through his new licks over and over again. Ronnie's playing was never annoying.
Obviously your opinion, here are mine: I love Taylor's beautiful leads on Dead Flowers. Ron Wood is annoying when he's messing up and choking out notes. I've never been a fan of his tone either. Or when he plays aggressive blues guitar on Angie, it sounds out of place. Also whatever he is doing on the early versions of Jumping Jack Flash isn't working for me either, and I love that song. Both Richards and Wood are extremely annoying on 70's Sympathy too, unbearable.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
HonkeyTonkFlashQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
boogaloojef
Taylor's playing is lyrical and Wood's playing is not.
Indeed, but are Beggars banquet, Exile or SG "lyrical"?
Those albums are great examples of the Stones being all about songs rather than musical virtuosity.
Don't get me wrong, I love a brilliant solo when it suits the song (ADTL, for instance).
What I don't get is people bashing Ronnie's style, while claiming to adore the guitars in the early 60s. There's a discrepancy there, as the style with short biting leads was what was going on back then.
Quote
Stoneage
Does missing a note here and there but making the right facial expressions count as a solo?
Quote
Markdog
I never get tired of listening to JJF from Love You Live. No one has ever flowed guitar solos and licks overtop of Keith's driving rhythm better than this version.
If there is a better 2nd guitar version of JJF please post it.
video: [www.youtube.com]
Quote
RedhotcarpetQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
HonkeyTonkFlashQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
boogaloojef
Taylor's playing is lyrical and Wood's playing is not.
Indeed, but are Beggars banquet, Exile or SG "lyrical"?
Those albums are great examples of the Stones being all about songs rather than musical virtuosity.
Don't get me wrong, I love a brilliant solo when it suits the song (ADTL, for instance).
What I don't get is people bashing Ronnie's style, while claiming to adore the guitars in the early 60s. There's a discrepancy there, as the style with short biting leads was what was going on back then.
I bash Ronnie but I was doing the e x a c t same comparison to the early 60s. Incredible.