For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
maumau
this is a quote of quote with 3 question marks in the subject
the original piece quoted? i find it rubbish
am i offended by the quoter? no
Subject: Interesting blind item. Mick and L'wren???
Author: CindyC
Date: 2014-03-13 14:01
... She is a C list celebrity but is A list in her own little corner
... of the celebrity world. Her boyfriend is a permanent A lister ...
... They used to be inseparable. Now they are not only separated but
... he is having his way with groupies and celebrities and
... other people taller than him.
this is not a campaign, just an opinion because you ask DO YOU THINK THESE KIND OF POSTS ARE NICE TO A PERSON?
Quote
maumau
this is a quote of quote with 3 question marks in the subject
the original piece quoted? i find it rubbish
am i offended by the quoter? no
Subject: Interesting blind item. Mick and L'wren???
Author: CindyC
Date: 2014-03-13 14:01
... She is a C list celebrity but is A list in her own little corner
... of the celebrity world. Her boyfriend is a permanent A lister ...
... They used to be inseparable. Now they are not only separated but
... he is having his way with groupies and celebrities and
... other people taller than him.
this is not a campaign, just an opinion because you ask DO YOU THINK THESE KIND OF POSTS ARE NICE TO A PERSON?
Quote
Rolling Hansie
The rules on this board are simple and easy. I never had a problem with them.
Bjornulf, thanks for all the work you put into this board.
Quote
TMONTANA
Look BV,its is your place,and as such its your right to let in whoever you please,and nothing wrong with that,but when you ban very long time good contributors such as HB,ROPENI,etc,for the only reason,that they were expressing their beliefs,which were different from yours,is not right and you can justify it all you want,but its clear that lately your board has become nothing more than an advertising place for The Stones,and again nothing wrong with that,its your business,but at least be honest enough and admit to it........and since l will also be banned after this,wish you the best.....
Quote
Torres
We lost StonesTod a long time ago for some stupid reason and the forum became poorer for that in my opinion. BV had his reason and it's the way it is.
These teenage campaigns to bring back banned members are so ridiculous. Grown up men and women concern is to have their little online friends back to a forum because they feel they were treated in an unfair way? Really?
When BV calls it a day and shuts the place for good, there will be a lot of people needding therapy here. And a life too.
Quote
gotdablouseQuote
TMONTANA
Look BV,its is your place,and as such its your right to let in whoever you please,and nothing wrong with that,but when you ban very long time good contributors such as HB,ROPENI,etc,for the only reason,that they were expressing their beliefs,which were different from yours,is not right and you can justify it all you want,but its clear that lately your board has become nothing more than an advertising place for The Stones,and again nothing wrong with that,its your business,but at least be honest enough and admit to it........and since l will also be banned after this,wish you the best.....
How can you seriously write stuff like that, it's unfair and plain ridiculous. IORR is what it's always been, a place for fans to discuss the Stones, ask for help, help others, share their (non commercial) recordings, share tips, etc...Just ask the lucky forum members who got access to an unexpected presale for Oslo thanks to a post on IORR. A place where some people feel they are entitled to say and do whatever they like it isn't, what's so hard to understand about that?
Quote
Cristiano RadtkeQuote
Rolling Hansie
The rules on this board are simple and easy. I never had a problem with them.
Bjornulf, thanks for all the work you put into this board.
I second that. My opinion is: you shouldn't do on internet what you wouldn't do at home or anywhere else. But this is me, and I think it's a shame some people can't understand the written and unwritten rules here, that are simple and easy, like Rolling Hansie wrote above.
Quote
Cristiano RadtkeQuote
Rolling Hansie
The rules on this board are simple and easy. I never had a problem with them.
Bjornulf, thanks for all the work you put into this board.
I second that. My opinion is: you shouldn't do on internet what you wouldn't do at home or anywhere else. But this is me, and I think it's a shame some people can't understand the written and unwritten rules here, that are simple and easy, like Rolling Hansie wrote above.
Quote
Torres
We lost StonesTod a long time ago for some stupid reason and the forum became poorer for that in my opinion. BV had his reason and it's the way it is.
These teenage campaigns to bring back banned members are so ridiculous. Grown up men and women concern is to have their little online friends back to a forum because they feel they were treated in an unfair way? Really?
When BV calls it a day and shuts the place for good, there will be a lot of people needding therapy here. And a life too.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
Cristiano RadtkeQuote
Rolling Hansie
The rules on this board are simple and easy. I never had a problem with them.
Bjornulf, thanks for all the work you put into this board.
I second that. My opinion is: you shouldn't do on internet what you wouldn't do at home or anywhere else. But this is me, and I think it's a shame some people can't understand the written and unwritten rules here, that are simple and easy, like Rolling Hansie wrote above.
The rules may be simple and easy, like Hansie says, but the interpretation of them or, better said, their application to concrete posts isn't always unequivocal as history has shown. So also moderation isn't always simple and easy.
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
kleermakerQuote
Cristiano RadtkeQuote
Rolling Hansie
The rules on this board are simple and easy. I never had a problem with them.
Bjornulf, thanks for all the work you put into this board.
I second that. My opinion is: you shouldn't do on internet what you wouldn't do at home or anywhere else. But this is me, and I think it's a shame some people can't understand the written and unwritten rules here, that are simple and easy, like Rolling Hansie wrote above.
The rules may be simple and easy, like Hansie says, but the interpretation of them or, better said, their application to concrete posts isn't always unequivocal as history has shown. So also moderation isn't always simple and easy.
We're just at the point of getting this to be more black and white and you're introducing interpretations that make it less kleer!
Quote
kleermakerQuote
treaclefingersQuote
kleermakerQuote
Cristiano RadtkeQuote
Rolling Hansie
The rules on this board are simple and easy. I never had a problem with them.
Bjornulf, thanks for all the work you put into this board.
I second that. My opinion is: you shouldn't do on internet what you wouldn't do at home or anywhere else. But this is me, and I think it's a shame some people can't understand the written and unwritten rules here, that are simple and easy, like Rolling Hansie wrote above.
The rules may be simple and easy, like Hansie says, but the interpretation of them or, better said, their application to concrete posts isn't always unequivocal as history has shown. So also moderation isn't always simple and easy.
We're just at the point of getting this to be more black and white and you're introducing interpretations that make it less kleer!
Many things aren't black or white but something in between. Moderation is clearly one of them. Don't blame the messenger for being a bit ambivalent regarding his name.