Tell Me :
Talk
Don't limit yourself. There are loads more gripes to be had....
You forgot: "Keith can't play any more!", "It's not the Stones without Bill!", "They're just going through the motions!" and my personal favorite "Paul McCartney puts on a much better show!"
Don't forget that they're old and ugly as sin and shouldn't be allowed in public. And, there are dozens of bar bands downtown who can play circles around them, too. No lie.
Keith is bald
Ouch, that's way harsh...poor Keith, he's not one of those men who look good bald.
The point is that they can make more money doing one two-hour show than they can from spending six months in the studio to make a new album.
Ahh Telly, now there's a man who looked good without hair. I don't know, maybe Keith could carry it off, we need someone to do a quick photoshop.
Don't forget all thoose who love to hate the Rolling Stones!
Another much morse important thing: do you think all fans from all over Europe will get tickets to one or two London shows?
Actually better than I expected, just needs to tape down those ears. Nice job, Max.
You forgot the protruding forehead.
No.......some fans somewhere will be left out this time round.
Keith can join Midnight Oil
Very poetic and lovely sentiment kahoosier, I'd kiss your cheek right now if I could.
YES!! The tour will begin in early May, 2013. The RS will give a formal announcement soon.
I remember watching news reports on television of shows for the '81 U.S. tour. Teenagers who attended the show were being interviewed. One girl commented that their older stuff was better and that Mick Jagger moved pretty good for an old guy--and he was only 38!
Won't see too many teenagers at the shows this year ....
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-03-10 23:29 by tatters.
Quite true. Ageism is timeless, and kids never choose heroes from their grandparents' generation, particularly where music is concerned.
However, there will be a lot of folks in middle age and older who will be behaving like teenagers at these upcoming shows.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-03-11 03:12 by stonehearted.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
GRNRBITW
()
Date: March 10, 2013 16:20
Quote
Cocaine Eyes
Now we have the big three gripes:
1. No New Songs!
2. We Hate The Warhorses!
3. IT'S TOO EXPENSIVE......THEY'RE GREEDY!
Don't limit yourself. There are loads more gripes to be had....
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
drbryant
()
Date: March 10, 2013 16:39
Quote
Cocaine Eyes
Now we have the big three gripes:
1. No New Songs!
2. We Hate The Warhorses!
3. IT'S TOO EXPENSIVE......THEY'RE GREEDY!
Uhhhmmmm......where are the people who still LOVE the Rolling Stones for the music, all of it.
For those who are expecting a "new album", well......I wouldn't hold your breath for that. Maybe we could be happy that they're still putting on some shows!
There, rant over.
You forgot: "Keith can't play any more!", "It's not the Stones without Bill!", "They're just going through the motions!" and my personal favorite "Paul McCartney puts on a much better show!"
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
GRNRBITW
()
Date: March 10, 2013 16:43
Quote
drbryantQuote
Cocaine Eyes
Now we have the big three gripes:
1. No New Songs!
2. We Hate The Warhorses!
3. IT'S TOO EXPENSIVE......THEY'RE GREEDY!
Uhhhmmmm......where are the people who still LOVE the Rolling Stones for the music, all of it.
For those who are expecting a "new album", well......I wouldn't hold your breath for that. Maybe we could be happy that they're still putting on some shows!
There, rant over.
You forgot: "Keith can't play any more!", "It's not the Stones without Bill!", "They're just going through the motions!" and my personal favorite "Paul McCartney puts on a much better show!"
Don't forget that they're old and ugly as sin and shouldn't be allowed in public. And, there are dozens of bar bands downtown who can play circles around them, too. No lie.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
Cocaine Eyes
()
Date: March 10, 2013 16:55
I also forgot these:
I HATE ARENA SHOWS!
I HATE SMALL VENUES!
WHY DID I HAVE TO WAIT IN LINE FOR 100 HOURS FOR TICKETS TO THE SMALL VENUE(S)!
THEY SHOULD HAVE HUNG IT UP AFTER 'EXILE ON MAIN STREET'!
THEY HAVEN'T PLAYED A DECENT SHOW SINCE THEY WERE LIVING IN EDITH GROVE!
I MISS BRIAN!
I HATE CHUCK LEAVELL!
I HATE BLONDIE CHAPLIN!
I HATE THE BACK-UP SINGERS!
I HATE THE ENTIRE THING!
I HATE LIFE IN GENERAL!
MOST OF ALL.......I HATE LOVING THE ROLLING STONES!
Did I cover it now?
I HATE ARENA SHOWS!
I HATE SMALL VENUES!
WHY DID I HAVE TO WAIT IN LINE FOR 100 HOURS FOR TICKETS TO THE SMALL VENUE(S)!
THEY SHOULD HAVE HUNG IT UP AFTER 'EXILE ON MAIN STREET'!
THEY HAVEN'T PLAYED A DECENT SHOW SINCE THEY WERE LIVING IN EDITH GROVE!
I MISS BRIAN!
I HATE CHUCK LEAVELL!
I HATE BLONDIE CHAPLIN!
I HATE THE BACK-UP SINGERS!
I HATE THE ENTIRE THING!
I HATE LIFE IN GENERAL!
MOST OF ALL.......I HATE LOVING THE ROLLING STONES!
Did I cover it now?
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
GRNRBITW
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:04
Quote
Cocaine Eyes
I also forgot these:
I HATE ARENA SHOWS!
I HATE SMALL VENUES!
WHY DID I HAVE TO WAIT IN LINE FOR 100 HOURS FOR TICKETS TO THE SMALL VENUE(S)!
THEY SHOULD HAVE HUNG IT UP AFTER 'EXILE ON MAIN STREET'!
THEY HAVEN'T PLAYED A DECENT SHOW SINCE THEY WERE LIVING IN EDITH GROVE!
I MISS BRIAN!
I HATE CHUCK LEAVELL!
I HATE BLONDIE CHAPLIN!
I HATE THE BACK-UP SINGERS!
I HATE THE ENTIRE THING!
I HATE LIFE IN GENERAL!
MOST OF ALL.......I HATE LOVING THE ROLLING STONES!
Did I cover it now?
Keith is bald
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
latebloomer
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:15
Quote
GRNRBITWQuote
Cocaine Eyes
I also forgot these:
I HATE ARENA SHOWS!
I HATE SMALL VENUES!
WHY DID I HAVE TO WAIT IN LINE FOR 100 HOURS FOR TICKETS TO THE SMALL VENUE(S)!
THEY SHOULD HAVE HUNG IT UP AFTER 'EXILE ON MAIN STREET'!
THEY HAVEN'T PLAYED A DECENT SHOW SINCE THEY WERE LIVING IN EDITH GROVE!
I MISS BRIAN!
I HATE CHUCK LEAVELL!
I HATE BLONDIE CHAPLIN!
I HATE THE BACK-UP SINGERS!
I HATE THE ENTIRE THING!
I HATE LIFE IN GENERAL!
MOST OF ALL.......I HATE LOVING THE ROLLING STONES!
Did I cover it now?
Keith is bald
Ouch, that's way harsh...poor Keith, he's not one of those men who look good bald.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
tatters
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:19
Quote
latebloomerQuote
GRNRBITWQuote
Cocaine Eyes
I also forgot these:
I HATE ARENA SHOWS!
I HATE SMALL VENUES!
WHY DID I HAVE TO WAIT IN LINE FOR 100 HOURS FOR TICKETS TO THE SMALL VENUE(S)!
THEY SHOULD HAVE HUNG IT UP AFTER 'EXILE ON MAIN STREET'!
THEY HAVEN'T PLAYED A DECENT SHOW SINCE THEY WERE LIVING IN EDITH GROVE!
I MISS BRIAN!
I HATE CHUCK LEAVELL!
I HATE BLONDIE CHAPLIN!
I HATE THE BACK-UP SINGERS!
I HATE THE ENTIRE THING!
I HATE LIFE IN GENERAL!
MOST OF ALL.......I HATE LOVING THE ROLLING STONES!
Did I cover it now?
Keith is bald
Ouch, that's way harsh...poor Keith, he's not one of those men who look good bald.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
tatters
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:24
Quote
JumpinJackOLanternQuote
24FPS
In other words, nothing is confirmed. So....the Poll Star article was pointless. And, per usual SOP, we will hear from the Stones when the Stones want us to hear from them.
Of course there will be an announcement, but who cares? A lot of people I suppose, just not me. No new album, then what is the point?
The point is that they can make more money doing one two-hour show than they can from spending six months in the studio to make a new album.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
latebloomer
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:24
Quote
tattersQuote
latebloomerQuote
GRNRBITWQuote
Cocaine Eyes
I also forgot these:
I HATE ARENA SHOWS!
I HATE SMALL VENUES!
WHY DID I HAVE TO WAIT IN LINE FOR 100 HOURS FOR TICKETS TO THE SMALL VENUE(S)!
THEY SHOULD HAVE HUNG IT UP AFTER 'EXILE ON MAIN STREET'!
THEY HAVEN'T PLAYED A DECENT SHOW SINCE THEY WERE LIVING IN EDITH GROVE!
I MISS BRIAN!
I HATE CHUCK LEAVELL!
I HATE BLONDIE CHAPLIN!
I HATE THE BACK-UP SINGERS!
I HATE THE ENTIRE THING!
I HATE LIFE IN GENERAL!
MOST OF ALL.......I HATE LOVING THE ROLLING STONES!
Did I cover it now?
Keith is bald
Ouch, that's way harsh...poor Keith, he's not one of those men who look good bald.
Ahh Telly, now there's a man who looked good without hair. I don't know, maybe Keith could carry it off, we need someone to do a quick photoshop.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
mtaylor
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:29
AND NO @#$%& MACCA AS A GUEST - BECUASE I HATE THAT STUPID GOOFY THING.Quote
Cocaine Eyes
I also forgot these:
I HATE ARENA SHOWS!
I HATE SMALL VENUES!
WHY DID I HAVE TO WAIT IN LINE FOR 100 HOURS FOR TICKETS TO THE SMALL VENUE(S)!
THEY SHOULD HAVE HUNG IT UP AFTER 'EXILE ON MAIN STREET'!
THEY HAVEN'T PLAYED A DECENT SHOW SINCE THEY WERE LIVING IN EDITH GROVE!
I MISS BRIAN!
I HATE CHUCK LEAVELL!
I HATE BLONDIE CHAPLIN!
I HATE THE BACK-UP SINGERS!
I HATE THE ENTIRE THING!
I HATE LIFE IN GENERAL!
MOST OF ALL.......I HATE LOVING THE ROLLING STONES!
Did I cover it now?
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:30
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:30
just kidding....
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-03-11 18:08 by Max'sKansasCity.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-03-11 18:08 by Max'sKansasCity.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
Thommie
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:31
Quote
Cocaine Eyes
I also forgot these:
I HATE ARENA SHOWS!
I HATE SMALL VENUES!
WHY DID I HAVE TO WAIT IN LINE FOR 100 HOURS FOR TICKETS TO THE SMALL VENUE(S)!
THEY SHOULD HAVE HUNG IT UP AFTER 'EXILE ON MAIN STREET'!
THEY HAVEN'T PLAYED A DECENT SHOW SINCE THEY WERE LIVING IN EDITH GROVE!
I MISS BRIAN!
I HATE CHUCK LEAVELL!
I HATE BLONDIE CHAPLIN!
I HATE THE BACK-UP SINGERS!
I HATE THE ENTIRE THING!
I HATE LIFE IN GENERAL!
MOST OF ALL.......I HATE LOVING THE ROLLING STONES!
Did I cover it now?
Don't forget all thoose who love to hate the Rolling Stones!
Another much morse important thing: do you think all fans from all over Europe will get tickets to one or two London shows?
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
latebloomer
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:34
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Actually better than I expected, just needs to tape down those ears. Nice job, Max.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
tatters
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:34
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
You forgot the protruding forehead.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:37
I actually just found that "out there"... lb's wish is my command, so voila!
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:38
Spring forward / fall back.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-03-11 17:56 by Max'sKansasCity.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-03-11 17:56 by Max'sKansasCity.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: March 10, 2013 17:55
I can't help it: That, altered, picture is very funny! With the knife and everything...
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
Cocaine Eyes
()
Date: March 10, 2013 18:16
Quote
ThommieQuote
Cocaine Eyes
I also forgot these:
I HATE ARENA SHOWS!
I HATE SMALL VENUES!
WHY DID I HAVE TO WAIT IN LINE FOR 100 HOURS FOR TICKETS TO THE SMALL VENUE(S)!
THEY SHOULD HAVE HUNG IT UP AFTER 'EXILE ON MAIN STREET'!
THEY HAVEN'T PLAYED A DECENT SHOW SINCE THEY WERE LIVING IN EDITH GROVE!
I MISS BRIAN!
I HATE CHUCK LEAVELL!
I HATE BLONDIE CHAPLIN!
I HATE THE BACK-UP SINGERS!
I HATE THE ENTIRE THING!
I HATE LIFE IN GENERAL!
MOST OF ALL.......I HATE LOVING THE ROLLING STONES!
Did I cover it now?
Don't forget all thoose who love to hate the Rolling Stones!
Another much morse important thing: do you think all fans from all over Europe will get tickets to one or two London shows?
No.......some fans somewhere will be left out this time round.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
uhbuhgullayew
()
Date: March 10, 2013 18:27
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Keith can join Midnight Oil
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
kahoosier
()
Date: March 10, 2013 20:12
I keep reading about gae, Mick, ridiculous VS pushing the envelope , and on and on. These men are Entertainers, it what they do for a living and the life they chose, they love the adoration of the crowds. In one way or another it will continue as long as we do. Turn the lights in the other direction. Who at a some 1975 show could ever have imagined 50 and 60 year olds at the rail at a Stone's concert? Who in the sixties could have imagined being a grandmother tipsy on expensive wine at the O2 screaming and boogieing at those O2 shows last November? Gentle people I think they are our's and we are their's . probably until death do us part.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
latebloomer
()
Date: March 10, 2013 20:28
Quote
kahoosier
I keep reading about gae, Mick, ridiculous VS pushing the envelope , and on and on. These men are Entertainers, it what they do for a living and the life they chose, they love the adoration of the crowds. In one way or another it will continue as long as we do. Turn the lights in the other direction. Who at a some 1975 show could ever have imagined 50 and 60 year olds at the rail at a Stone's concert? Who in the sixties could have imagined being a grandmother tipsy on expensive wine at the O2 screaming and boogieing at those O2 shows last November? Gentle people I think they are our's and we are their's . probably until death do us part.
Very poetic and lovely sentiment kahoosier, I'd kiss your cheek right now if I could.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
backofmyhand
()
Date: March 10, 2013 21:34
hello
in the paper was they launch the show in may
do they mean they start the show then?
or let now when the tour will start?
is there any news
i m begin may in california so it will be great
any other great gigs then?
in the paper was they launch the show in may
do they mean they start the show then?
or let now when the tour will start?
is there any news
i m begin may in california so it will be great
any other great gigs then?
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
Cocaine Eyes
()
Date: March 10, 2013 21:43
Quote
backofmyhand
hello
in the paper was they launch the show in may
do they mean they start the show then?
or let now when the tour will start?
is there any news
i m begin may in california so it will be great
any other great gigs then?
YES!! The tour will begin in early May, 2013. The RS will give a formal announcement soon.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
BluzDude
()
Date: March 10, 2013 21:49
1. No New Songs!
Well, there's 2 and I'm fine with that
2. We Hate The Warhorses!
Sorry, but I can't hate Brown Sugar and Jumpin' Jack Flash
3. IT'S TOO EXPENSIVE......THEY'RE GREEDY!
So be it, I'll go to 1 or 2 shows instead of 3 or 4.
Well, there's 2 and I'm fine with that
2. We Hate The Warhorses!
Sorry, but I can't hate Brown Sugar and Jumpin' Jack Flash
3. IT'S TOO EXPENSIVE......THEY'RE GREEDY!
So be it, I'll go to 1 or 2 shows instead of 3 or 4.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
stonehearted
()
Date: March 10, 2013 23:08
Quote
ThroughTheLonelyNightsQuote
Angus MacBagpipeQuote
stoneheartedQuote
Cocaine Eyes
And about Jagger continuing to leap about and run miles on stage at age 70 - I think we have to recall what Charlie said years ago: "I think we'll look silly doing this at 70".
Now, Charlie (I doubt) meant looking silly playing drums or playing guitars or playing pianos. The "silliest" one could be Jagger.
There's a hige risk in leaping about at age 70......no matter how wonderfully agile and in perfect body he is.
My thoughts only.......
Jagger himself said, around the time of the ABB tour, that he could easily see himself performing well into his 70s, so I doubt this milestone will mean the end of something. Charlie was in his early 50s when he thought they would look silly playing rock music at 70, but there was a time when the thought of such a band continuing into their 50s would have seemed silly to many. Just take it one year at a time, and if they can still get through a 5-hour rehearsal with no trouble, then they can surely get through a 2-hour show.
Good point, Stonehearted. I remember as a kid thinking no rock star could go on past 30 years old. Past 40 was just unimaginable and ridiculous. One year at a time, seeing how far they can take - it's worked so far.
At my first Stones concert in 82 there was a woman standing next to me saying something like: ...."unbelievable, Keith Richards still can do it at HIS AGE".....(not even 40 years old).....
I remember watching news reports on television of shows for the '81 U.S. tour. Teenagers who attended the show were being interviewed. One girl commented that their older stuff was better and that Mick Jagger moved pretty good for an old guy--and he was only 38!
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
tatters
()
Date: March 10, 2013 23:14
Quote
stoneheartedQuote
ThroughTheLonelyNightsQuote
Angus MacBagpipeQuote
stoneheartedQuote
Cocaine Eyes
And about Jagger continuing to leap about and run miles on stage at age 70 - I think we have to recall what Charlie said years ago: "I think we'll look silly doing this at 70".
Now, Charlie (I doubt) meant looking silly playing drums or playing guitars or playing pianos. The "silliest" one could be Jagger.
There's a hige risk in leaping about at age 70......no matter how wonderfully agile and in perfect body he is.
My thoughts only.......
Jagger himself said, around the time of the ABB tour, that he could easily see himself performing well into his 70s, so I doubt this milestone will mean the end of something. Charlie was in his early 50s when he thought they would look silly playing rock music at 70, but there was a time when the thought of such a band continuing into their 50s would have seemed silly to many. Just take it one year at a time, and if they can still get through a 5-hour rehearsal with no trouble, then they can surely get through a 2-hour show.
Good point, Stonehearted. I remember as a kid thinking no rock star could go on past 30 years old. Past 40 was just unimaginable and ridiculous. One year at a time, seeing how far they can take - it's worked so far.
At my first Stones concert in 82 there was a woman standing next to me saying something like: ...."unbelievable, Keith Richards still can do it at HIS AGE".....(not even 40 years old).....
I remember watching news reports on television of shows for the '81 U.S. tour. Teenagers who attended the show were being interviewed. One girl commented that their older stuff was better and that Mick Jagger moved pretty good for an old guy--and he was only 38!
Won't see too many teenagers at the shows this year ....
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-03-10 23:29 by tatters.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
stonehearted
()
Date: March 11, 2013 00:39
Quote
tattersQuote
stoneheartedQuote
ThroughTheLonelyNightsQuote
Angus MacBagpipeQuote
stoneheartedQuote
Cocaine Eyes
And about Jagger continuing to leap about and run miles on stage at age 70 - I think we have to recall what Charlie said years ago: "I think we'll look silly doing this at 70".
Now, Charlie (I doubt) meant looking silly playing drums or playing guitars or playing pianos. The "silliest" one could be Jagger.
There's a hige risk in leaping about at age 70......no matter how wonderfully agile and in perfect body he is.
My thoughts only.......
Jagger himself said, around the time of the ABB tour, that he could easily see himself performing well into his 70s, so I doubt this milestone will mean the end of something. Charlie was in his early 50s when he thought they would look silly playing rock music at 70, but there was a time when the thought of such a band continuing into their 50s would have seemed silly to many. Just take it one year at a time, and if they can still get through a 5-hour rehearsal with no trouble, then they can surely get through a 2-hour show.
Good point, Stonehearted. I remember as a kid thinking no rock star could go on past 30 years old. Past 40 was just unimaginable and ridiculous. One year at a time, seeing how far they can take - it's worked so far.
At my first Stones concert in 82 there was a woman standing next to me saying something like: ...."unbelievable, Keith Richards still can do it at HIS AGE".....(not even 40 years old).....
I remember watching news reports on television of shows for the '81 U.S. tour. Teenagers who attended the show were being interviewed. One girl commented that their older stuff was better and that Mick Jagger moved pretty good for an old guy--and he was only 38!
Won't see too many teenagers at the shows this year ....
Quite true. Ageism is timeless, and kids never choose heroes from their grandparents' generation, particularly where music is concerned.
However, there will be a lot of folks in middle age and older who will be behaving like teenagers at these upcoming shows.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-03-11 03:12 by stonehearted.
Re: Countdown to The Rolling Stones 2013 Tour
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: March 11, 2013 01:39
Every now and then I just have to do this
I LOVE THE ROLLING STONES
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
I LOVE THE ROLLING STONES
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
This Thread has been closed
Online Users
alfstone , Big Al , bob r , ChrisL , DEmerson , djrambler , downagain , drwatts , exilestones , GeirGG , gnillor , IsakSun , makustone , MJAGGER123 , Mr Jimmy , MRAmandaJones , OnlyKeef , peoplewitheyes , rayrad , Roll73 , Rosto , Sandy Beach , SoulSurvivor1990 , spunky , Stoneswolf , tangerinegaz , Topi , Undercover1 , usetobesampeg , welshphil , wiredallnight , ziggenpuss
Guests:
1639
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10