For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
angee
DandelionPowderman, I think VT22 interpreted your use of the word "diet" differently than you meant it.
Just guessing, you meant daily meals, not limited intake to lose weight.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
angee
DandelionPowderman, I think VT22 interpreted your use of the word "diet" differently than you meant it.
Just guessing, you meant daily meals, not limited intake to lose weight.
LOL! I knew there was a misunderstanding in there somewhere. Thanks, angee
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
angee
DandelionPowderman, I think VT22 interpreted your use of the word "diet" differently than you meant it.
Just guessing, you meant daily meals, not limited intake to lose weight.
LOL! I knew there was a misunderstanding in there somewhere. Thanks, angee
Quote
Max'sKansasCityQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
angee
DandelionPowderman, I think VT22 interpreted your use of the word "diet" differently than you meant it.
Just guessing, you meant daily meals, not limited intake to lose weight.
LOL! I knew there was a misunderstanding in there somewhere. Thanks, angee
Misunderstood and/or taken out of context posts happen, but when a poster is as consistantly positive as DPM... and usually always makes great posts like DPM, then anyone jumping the gun might rethink it. In my humble opinion, DPM is one of IORR's best posters and also creates some awesome original music, and he shares it with us.... how much better does someone get than that?
I just want to say Thank You to DandelionPowderman for being a great IORRer, thanks for being here.
HAPPY STONES SEASON!!
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Max'sKansasCityQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
angee
DandelionPowderman, I think VT22 interpreted your use of the word "diet" differently than you meant it.
Just guessing, you meant daily meals, not limited intake to lose weight.
LOL! I knew there was a misunderstanding in there somewhere. Thanks, angee
Misunderstood and/or taken out of context posts happen, but when a poster is as consistantly positive as DPM... and usually always makes great posts like DPM, then anyone jumping the gun might rethink it. In my humble opinion, DPM is one of IORR's best posters and also creates some awesome original music, and he shares it with us.... how much better does someone get than that?
I just want to say Thank You to DandelionPowderman for being a great IORRer, thanks for being here.
HAPPY STONES SEASON!!
Thanks, Max. I really appreciate that
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
treaclefingersQuote
jamesfdouglas
I care more whether or not he'll be given a chance to play more than Midnight Rambler.
Yes, I hope he gets an actual 'mini' set worth of material. I find it odd they only had him out for one song. It was great to have him at all, but I don't understand why they didn't have him on any other 'period' pieces.
He got 12 out of 150 minutes. That's nearly a tenth of the show
Quote
24FPSQuote
scottkeef
I understand having Clapton or others from their time period guest but I wish they would quit wasting time bringing in some just to show Mick "knows who's hip"...real Stones fans dont give a shit about these "guests"...
I'm a REAL Stones fan and I thought Clapton was L-A-M-E. Lady GaGa added a sense of danger to what was otherwise a celebration of old farterdom. Charlie approved of Lady GaGa. Is Charlie being superficial and proving how 'hip' he is, too? The Stones don't belong to any one time period or any one age set of fans. Look at the faces in their audiences. They range from the very young to the very old. The Stones music and stage show stretches over 50 years. They are more than the 60s.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
treaclefingersQuote
jamesfdouglas
I care more whether or not he'll be given a chance to play more than Midnight Rambler.
Yes, I hope he gets an actual 'mini' set worth of material. I find it odd they only had him out for one song. It was great to have him at all, but I don't understand why they didn't have him on any other 'period' pieces.
He got 12 out of 150 minutes. That's nearly a tenth of the show
But those 12 minutes were every time the highlight of the show, for the biggest part thanks to Taylor's presence. Or doesn't that count?
btw: are you on a diet?
Quote
More Hot RocksQuote
24FPSQuote
scottkeef
I understand having Clapton or others from their time period guest but I wish they would quit wasting time bringing in some just to show Mick "knows who's hip"...real Stones fans dont give a shit about these "guests"...
I'm a REAL Stones fan and I thought Clapton was L-A-M-E. Lady GaGa added a sense of danger to what was otherwise a celebration of old farterdom. Charlie approved of Lady GaGa. Is Charlie being superficial and proving how 'hip' he is, too? The Stones don't belong to any one time period or any one age set of fans. Look at the faces in their audiences. They range from the very young to the very old. The Stones music and stage show stretches over 50 years. They are more than the 60s.
If Charlie approved of Lady Gaga I lost alot of respect for him. She's a joke.
Quote
gotdablouse
That can't be right, there must have been some kind of dispute?
Anyway back to Taylor's money...if as some claim here Mick and Keith bailed him out in 2002 after he sent a telegram, it's reasonable to think they had no problem paying him well for these four shows. Sure it raised his profile but they got a couple of press releases out of it and several people I know finally broke down and coughed up the cash when they found out be was onboard. It's also possible that his absence on the 8th was due to some "negotiating" going on.
Anyway it's a win-win situation for them, for him and for us!
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
treaclefingersQuote
jamesfdouglas
I care more whether or not he'll be given a chance to play more than Midnight Rambler.
Yes, I hope he gets an actual 'mini' set worth of material. I find it odd they only had him out for one song. It was great to have him at all, but I don't understand why they didn't have him on any other 'period' pieces.
He got 12 out of 150 minutes. That's nearly a tenth of the show
Quote
Single Malt
Who is Will Taylor and why he receives money from the Stones?
Hahahaha. I apologize for the cheap joke. I just had to do that
But seriously, hopefully Mick pays Mick enough and invites him to join The Stones for the possible forthcoming World Tour.
Quote
24FPSQuote
More Hot RocksQuote
24FPSQuote
scottkeef
I understand having Clapton or others from their time period guest but I wish they would quit wasting time bringing in some just to show Mick "knows who's hip"...real Stones fans dont give a shit about these "guests"...
I'm a REAL Stones fan and I thought Clapton was L-A-M-E. Lady GaGa added a sense of danger to what was otherwise a celebration of old farterdom. Charlie approved of Lady GaGa. Is Charlie being superficial and proving how 'hip' he is, too? The Stones don't belong to any one time period or any one age set of fans. Look at the faces in their audiences. They range from the very young to the very old. The Stones music and stage show stretches over 50 years. They are more than the 60s.
If Charlie approved of Lady Gaga I lost alot of respect for him. She's a joke.
Then you have no respect for Mick Jagger and Charlie Watts. Keith wrote her a message on the jacket they gave her, "Your place or mine?", so that's the end of Keith in your respect world. I saw Ronnie all chummy and smiley with her too. Damn, I hope you enjoy all those Darryl and Chuck shows next year.
Quote
More Hot RocksQuote
24FPSQuote
More Hot RocksQuote
24FPSQuote
scottkeef
I understand having Clapton or others from their time period guest but I wish they would quit wasting time bringing in some just to show Mick "knows who's hip"...real Stones fans dont give a shit about these "guests"...
I'm a REAL Stones fan and I thought Clapton was L-A-M-E. Lady GaGa added a sense of danger to what was otherwise a celebration of old farterdom. Charlie approved of Lady GaGa. Is Charlie being superficial and proving how 'hip' he is, too? The Stones don't belong to any one time period or any one age set of fans. Look at the faces in their audiences. They range from the very young to the very old. The Stones music and stage show stretches over 50 years. They are more than the 60s.
If Charlie approved of Lady Gaga I lost alot of respect for him. She's a joke.
Then you have no respect for Mick Jagger and Charlie Watts. Keith wrote her a message on the jacket they gave her, "Your place or mine?", so that's the end of Keith in your respect world. I saw Ronnie all chummy and smiley with her too. Damn, I hope you enjoy all those Darryl and Chuck shows next year.
If you have that much respect for a no talent freak. You need help.
Quote
71Tele
He was hired on an "all you can eat at the backstage buffet" basis.
Sorry, I couldn't help it.
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
This thread is funny... it makes me laugh... out loud... which is fun....
and fun is a good thing to have.
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
Max'sKansasCity
This thread is funny... it makes me laugh... out loud... which is fun....
and fun is a good thing to have.
Have you been drinking brandy in your coffee all day Max?