Quote
steel driving hammer

Quote
Munichhilton
Hope Bill is already rowing his way across or he ain't gonna make it

I told you StonesTod, he's still afraid to fly...

and i told you he's not afraid to fly...he's afraid to crash. there's a difference

Quote
benstones

Quote
71Tele

Quote
benstones
We are two days before the first American show, I don't know why stonesnews.com, very serious by the way, would lie or tell something that he's so sure about that.

Hope you're right, as I am going on Saturday. Just the Stones haven't confirmed anything yet. Maybe today?

For the first London show, they sent a press release two days before the show. I think it will be today or tomorrow. Or maybe they want to maintain the suspense??? But I'm sure both of them will be there.

Wrong, it's easy to look it up too on rs.com
21/11 : Taylor and Wyman confirmed
24/11 : Blige and Beck announced
25/11 : Show

So far we have
04/12 : Blige and Clark announced
08/12 : Show

Quote
gotdablouse

Quote
benstones

Quote
71Tele

Quote
benstones
We are two days before the first American show, I don't know why stonesnews.com, very serious by the way, would lie or tell something that he's so sure about that.

Hope you're right, as I am going on Saturday. Just the Stones haven't confirmed anything yet. Maybe today?

For the first London show, they sent a press release two days before the show. I think it will be today or tomorrow. Or maybe they want to maintain the suspense??? But I'm sure both of them will be there.

Wrong, it's easy to look it up too on rs.com
21/11 : Taylor and Wyman confirmed
24/11 : Blige and Beck announced
25/11 : Show

So far we have
04/12 : Blige and Clark announced
08/12 : Show

So Mick Taylor will only perform in Newark? (He canceled a concert in Aviles for the 15th December to be with the Stones.)

Benjamin.

FYI, the headline about Wyman and Taylor appearing is no longer on the Stonesnews site.

Who knows, I was just stating the facts as they stand and I don't think it was necessary to quote my whole message since it's just above yours ;-)

Why even bother to bring them to the US shows? MT for one song and Bill for two,stupid,they should be on for the whole show,l mean aren't they celebrating 50 years of the Rolling Stones?? MT and BW are Rolling Stones.....Just saying..

"No dope smoking no beer sold after 12 o'clock"

I told ya they were going to be on the ppv!!

Wow, no wonder the prices are so much lower for the 8th and 13th on Stubhub !

maybe because taylor was only with them 5 out of 50 years ropeni.

What is "Stonesnews", a private blog?

Quote
71Tele
FYI, the headline about Wyman and Taylor appearing is no longer on the Stonesnews site.

I suggest you keep your fingers crossed for Taylor -> Brooklyn.

Quote
VT22

Quote
71Tele
FYI, the headline about Wyman and Taylor appearing is no longer on the Stonesnews site.

I suggest you keep your fingers crossed for Taylor -> Brooklyn.

You mean New Jersey?

Well, it WAS advertised that MT was going to be at the Barclay Center, but he was NOT! NOT HAPPY! Still no reason or explanation offered! I want to know why he bagged Brooklyn!

Quote
mickschix
Well, it WAS advertised that MT was going to be at the Barclay Center, but he was NOT! NOT HAPPY! Still no reason or explanation offered! I want to know why he bagged Brooklyn!

You're not the only one...but was he ever actually advertised for Brooklyn? He supposedly cancelled a show in Spain to be in Newark but is mysteriously missing from the special guests announcement for the PPV show. This sucks.

Quote
71Tele

Quote
mickschix
Well, it WAS advertised that MT was going to be at the Barclay Center, but he was NOT! NOT HAPPY! Still no reason or explanation offered! I want to know why he bagged Brooklyn!

You're not the only one...but was he ever actually advertised for Brooklyn? He supposedly cancelled a show in Spain to be in Newark but is mysteriously missing from the special guests announcement for the PPV show. This sucks.

There will have another announcement for Mick Taylor, I hope... He didn't cancel a show for nothing!

Benjamin.

Seems odd they would have a separate announcement although I guess they could announce the 13/12 guests and his (plus Bill's ?) presence for the remaining shows in the same PR? It's hard to understand why he/they could play on the 13th and/or the 15th and not the 8th...

Quote
mickschix
Well, it WAS advertised that MT was going to be at the Barclay Center, but he was NOT! NOT HAPPY! Still no reason or explanation offered! I want to know why he bagged Brooklyn!

Advertised where?

Unfortunately, that appears NOT to be the case so far.

Quote
StonesTod

Quote
steel driving hammer

Quote
Munichhilton
Hope Bill is already rowing his way across or he ain't gonna make it

I told you StonesTod, he's still afraid to fly...

and i told you he's not afraid to fly...he's afraid to crash. there's a difference

breabking news Elton John plays piano on Honky tonk woman...its confirmed

He overstayed his welcome. He stepped all over Keith in Rambler. He jumped around too much. There was stuff on his web site about appearing with the Stones that they didn't like. He was planning to come to NY but they told him to stay home. That's what I think.

Quote
benstones

Quote
71Tele

Quote
mickschix
Well, it WAS advertised that MT was going to be at the Barclay Center, but he was NOT! NOT HAPPY! Still no reason or explanation offered! I want to know why he bagged Brooklyn!

You're not the only one...but was he ever actually advertised for Brooklyn? He supposedly cancelled a show in Spain to be in Newark but is mysteriously missing from the special guests announcement for the PPV show. This sucks.

There will have another announcement for Mick Taylor, I hope... He didn't cancel a show for nothing!

Once the gig was cancelled "so Mick can go on tour with the Stones," that was enough for them and they said no thanks. They make the announcements. Trying to force their hand was not a good idea.

Quote
Rokyfan

Quote
benstones

Quote
71Tele

Quote
mickschix
Well, it WAS advertised that MT was going to be at the Barclay Center, but he was NOT! NOT HAPPY! Still no reason or explanation offered! I want to know why he bagged Brooklyn!

You're not the only one...but was he ever actually advertised for Brooklyn? He supposedly cancelled a show in Spain to be in Newark but is mysteriously missing from the special guests announcement for the PPV show. This sucks.

There will have another announcement for Mick Taylor, I hope... He didn't cancel a show for nothing!

Once the gig was cancelled "so Mick can go on tour with the Stones," that was enough for them and they said no thanks. They make the announcements. Trying to force their hand was not a good idea.

You know this happened or is this actually just your interpretation?

no, just my guess, like everything else here.

Quote
DandelionPowderman
What is "Stonesnews", a private blog?

An unauthorized, unofficial site that has Stones news and merchandise, with links to other fan sites. As far as I know, it is not a blog forum like this and other sites.

stonesnews.com

Quote
backstreetboy1
maybe because taylor was only with them 5 out of 50 years ropeni.

So acc. to you, Chuck's imput to the band is more important than MT's cos, ya know, he's been in the band for a longer period of time?

Quote
stonesnow

Quote
DandelionPowderman
What is "Stonesnews", a private blog?

An unauthorized, unofficial site that has Stones news and merchandise, with links to other fan sites. As far as I know, it is not a blog forum like this and other sites.

stonesnews.com

Well, we now know what their "news" is worth. After this experience, can we please have a moratorium of people creating thread titles with the word "official" in them which are based on completely NON-official sources? That would be nice.

Quote
dcba

Quote
backstreetboy1
maybe because taylor was only with them 5 out of 50 years ropeni.

So acc. to you, Chuck's imput to the band is more important than MT's cos, ya know, he's been in the band for a longer period of time?

Chuck has never been in the band

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
dcba

Quote
backstreetboy1
maybe because taylor was only with them 5 out of 50 years ropeni.

So acc. to you, Chuck's imput to the band is more important than MT's cos, ya know, he's been in the band for a longer period of time?

Chuck has never been in the band

what???? it's CHUCK's band!

Quote
StonesTod

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
dcba

Quote
backstreetboy1
maybe because taylor was only with them 5 out of 50 years ropeni.

So acc. to you, Chuck's imput to the band is more important than MT's cos, ya know, he's been in the band for a longer period of time?

Chuck has never been in the band

what???? it's CHUCK's band!

Judging from the show I just saw, I would say that you are right.

Quote
71Tele

Quote
StonesTod

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
dcba

Quote
backstreetboy1
maybe because taylor was only with them 5 out of 50 years ropeni.

So acc. to you, Chuck's imput to the band is more important than MT's cos, ya know, he's been in the band for a longer period of time?

Chuck has never been in the band

what???? it's CHUCK's band!

Judging from the show I just saw, I would say that you are right.

Oh he's absolutely right...

Quote
Munichhilton

Quote
71Tele

Quote
StonesTod

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
dcba

Quote
backstreetboy1
maybe because taylor was only with them 5 out of 50 years ropeni.

So acc. to you, Chuck's imput to the band is more important than MT's cos, ya know, he's been in the band for a longer period of time?

Chuck has never been in the band

what???? it's CHUCK's band!

Judging from the show I just saw, I would say that you are right.

Oh he's absolutely right...

phew. dandy had me frightened for a moment there - i won't lie.