Tell Me :
Talk
Then the Stones could have doubled their output since the last ten years.
and sold twice the albums--brilliant!!!....but i admit--yup--i would have bought them...at least they were all new material and nary an ape in sight. sigh.
I still don't get it, but cheers anyway
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Just curious, did you have your hands on your hips and stomp your foot when you said that?
If he would be remotely critical of something to do with Stonesworld--just remotely so, just for once, the way a real and actual fan would--then I would say no, he couldn't after all be an employee on the PR payroll. Not that there's anything wrong with that... it must be a great job, if it's what one loves to do.
I for one won't have "Sweet NeoCon" excluded, even if I do not hold it to be among the very best songs of the album. However, in my view it is an important song. The only way that would be acceptable to me not to include it in the album, was if it had been made part of a single.
[As to the principle: There are two or three songs that to me make A BIGGER BANG's preceding album less great than it could have been. I would not take those tracks away from others, when the band themselves have found them appropriate. ]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-10 04:03 by Witness.
Only if the 'inside' youre referring to is some kind of asylum.
Always have, always will. And a horrible insider at that. Awful.
Like Mick or like MightyTrollin50?
Your choice.
1969.
Two above average albums are always better than one average one. For starters.
Yes, exactly. Another good reason. Probably would have been much less bitching about output around here if they had released the second one in 2009 for example.
Max's KC, love your sense of humor and your loyalty to the Stones. Sometimes family members give us the most pain but we can never quit on them. Lots of quitters around here. You are not one of them and I am sure the Stones know who you are.
Something like that.
So you see a point after all. Do up a compilation in the order given and it starts to make some sense. One album that was a bit scattered becomes two that have some semblance of cohesiveness. Sweet Neo Con never belonged on that album or any album for that matter. It's by far the worst Stones song ever. Under The Radar is a great song.
Is it starting to make more sense?
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: September 9, 2012 22:01
Album #1
#1. Under The Radar
#2. She Saw Me Coming
#3. Ooh No Not You Again
#4. Dangerous Beauty
#5. Driving Too Fast
#6. Look What The Cat Dragged In
#7. Rough Justice
#8. Infamy
Album #2
#1. Back Of My Hand
#2. Let Me Down Slow
#3. It Won't Take Long
#4. Biggest Mistake
#5. This Place Is Empty
#6. Streets Of Love
#7. Laugh I Nearly Died
#8. Rain Fall Down
#1. Under The Radar
#2. She Saw Me Coming
#3. Ooh No Not You Again
#4. Dangerous Beauty
#5. Driving Too Fast
#6. Look What The Cat Dragged In
#7. Rough Justice
#8. Infamy
Album #2
#1. Back Of My Hand
#2. Let Me Down Slow
#3. It Won't Take Long
#4. Biggest Mistake
#5. This Place Is Empty
#6. Streets Of Love
#7. Laugh I Nearly Died
#8. Rain Fall Down
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
BluzDude
()
Date: September 9, 2012 22:10
What's the point?
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
GravityBoy
()
Date: September 9, 2012 22:14
Quote
BluzDude
What's the point?
Then the Stones could have doubled their output since the last ten years.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
lunar!!!
()
Date: September 9, 2012 23:15
Quote
GravityBoyQuote
BluzDude
What's the point?
Then the Stones could have doubled their output since the last ten years.
and sold twice the albums--brilliant!!!....but i admit--yup--i would have bought them...at least they were all new material and nary an ape in sight. sigh.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: September 9, 2012 23:50
Bring dat album over here...
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
stonesrule
()
Date: September 10, 2012 01:24
Deep thinkers at play.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: September 10, 2012 01:34
I really don't get it, but cheers anyway.
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: September 10, 2012 01:38
It is just silly old stonestroll doing her thing, as usual, poor old thing.Quote
stonesrule
Deep thinkers at play.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
Palace Revolution 2000
()
Date: September 10, 2012 01:39
The point is there is no point. It's interesting: the first one is the hard album, the zsecond one the quiet one.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: September 10, 2012 01:48
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000
The point is there is no point.
I still don't get it, but cheers anyway
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
()
Date: September 10, 2012 02:49
It's needs to be LESSENED, not increased. Typical.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: September 10, 2012 02:58
Quote
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
It's needs to be LESSENED, not increased. Typical.
Just curious, did you have your hands on your hips and stomp your foot when you said that?
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
tatters
()
Date: September 10, 2012 03:41
Anyone here still think the author of this thread is some kind of "insider"?
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
stonesnow
()
Date: September 10, 2012 03:46
Quote
tatters
Anyone here still think the author of this thread is some kind of "insider"?
If he would be remotely critical of something to do with Stonesworld--just remotely so, just for once, the way a real and actual fan would--then I would say no, he couldn't after all be an employee on the PR payroll. Not that there's anything wrong with that... it must be a great job, if it's what one loves to do.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
Witness
()
Date: September 10, 2012 04:02
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Album #1
#1. Under The Radar
#2. She Saw Me Coming
#3. Ooh No Not You Again
#4. Dangerous Beauty
#5. Driving Too Fast
#6. Look What The Cat Dragged In
#7. Rough Justice
#8. Infamy
Album #2
#1. Back Of My Hand
#2. Let Me Down Slow
#3. It Won't Take Long
#4. Biggest Mistake
#5. This Place Is Empty
#6. Streets Of Love
#7. Laugh I Nearly Died
#8. Rain Fall Down
I for one won't have "Sweet NeoCon" excluded, even if I do not hold it to be among the very best songs of the album. However, in my view it is an important song. The only way that would be acceptable to me not to include it in the album, was if it had been made part of a single.
[As to the principle: There are two or three songs that to me make A BIGGER BANG's preceding album less great than it could have been. I would not take those tracks away from others, when the band themselves have found them appropriate. ]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-10 04:03 by Witness.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
Gazza
()
Date: September 10, 2012 04:11
Quote
tatters
Anyone here still think the author of this thread is some kind of "insider"?
Only if the 'inside' youre referring to is some kind of asylum.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
fyp933
()
Date: September 10, 2012 04:23
how paring the whole thing down to a 6 song EP ?
side 1
Rough Justice
Oh No Not You Again
Infamy
side 2
Back Of My Hand
Streets Of Love
Rain Fall Down
side 1
Rough Justice
Oh No Not You Again
Infamy
side 2
Back Of My Hand
Streets Of Love
Rain Fall Down
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
()
Date: September 10, 2012 04:49
Quote
tatters
Anyone here still think the author of this thread is some kind of "insider"?
Always have, always will. And a horrible insider at that. Awful.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
()
Date: September 10, 2012 04:50
Quote
Max'sKansasCityQuote
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
It's needs to be LESSENED, not increased. Typical.
Just curious, did you have your hands on your hips and stomp your foot when you said that?
Like Mick or like MightyTrollin50?
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: September 10, 2012 04:52
Quote
WeLoveToPlayTheBluesQuote
Max'sKansasCityQuote
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
It's needs to be LESSENED, not increased. Typical.
Just curious, did you have your hands on your hips and stomp your foot when you said that?
Like Mick or like MightyTrollin50?
Your choice.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
()
Date: September 10, 2012 05:45
Quote
Max'sKansasCityQuote
WeLoveToPlayTheBluesQuote
Max'sKansasCityQuote
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
It's needs to be LESSENED, not increased. Typical.
Just curious, did you have your hands on your hips and stomp your foot when you said that?
Like Mick or like MightyTrollin50?
Your choice.
1969.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
Turner
()
Date: September 10, 2012 06:03
WE DONT WANNA GO HOME
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: September 10, 2012 19:27
Quote
BluzDude
What's the point?
Two above average albums are always better than one average one. For starters.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: September 10, 2012 19:33
Quote
GravityBoyQuote
BluzDude
What's the point?
Then the Stones could have doubled their output since the last ten years.
Yes, exactly. Another good reason. Probably would have been much less bitching about output around here if they had released the second one in 2009 for example.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: September 10, 2012 19:34
Quote
lunar!!!Quote
GravityBoyQuote
BluzDude
What's the point?
Then the Stones could have doubled their output since the last ten years.
and sold twice the albums--brilliant!!!....but i admit--yup--i would have bought them...at least they were all new material and nary an ape in sight. sigh.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: September 10, 2012 19:37
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Bring dat album over here...
Max's KC, love your sense of humor and your loyalty to the Stones. Sometimes family members give us the most pain but we can never quit on them. Lots of quitters around here. You are not one of them and I am sure the Stones know who you are.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: September 10, 2012 19:38
Quote
stonesrule
Deep thinkers at play.
Something like that.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: September 10, 2012 19:43
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000
The point is there is no point. It's interesting: the first one is the hard album, the zsecond one the quiet one.
So you see a point after all. Do up a compilation in the order given and it starts to make some sense. One album that was a bit scattered becomes two that have some semblance of cohesiveness. Sweet Neo Con never belonged on that album or any album for that matter. It's by far the worst Stones song ever. Under The Radar is a great song.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
Kurt
()
Date: September 10, 2012 19:43
I thought it was fine the way it was.
Re: Dividing A Bigger Bang Into Two Albums
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: September 10, 2012 19:44
Quote
Rolling Hansie
I really don't get it, but cheers anyway.
Is it starting to make more sense?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Guests:
1567
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10