Tell Me :
Talk
Now I´m really confused, lol, i hope you are being sarcastic here.[/quote]
Nope, I'm not being sarcastic at all
"Richards’s currently recording solo tracks with Steve Jordan for an upcoming album. Here's hoping he'll promote it by touring theaters, doing exactly what he did last night – singing center-stage, sitting while playing country blues and plugging in when he feels like it – especially if the Stones don't tour immediately".
[www.rollingstone.com][/quote]
Well, I don´t care about that. But I hope you were sarcastic about the "author of all Stones songs"
If I get what you're saying, what we need to do is increase the 'space between the music' with KR. I guess that's kind of what we've had over the last 5 years...LOTS of space between the music!
mercy - you keep misreading this. the article you're quoting doesn't say Keith is planning to tour.
it says the author hopes Keith will tour if the Stones don't.
you see the difference, right?
I think your point is valid...there was high pressure on MJ, considering the audience, he's 68, and he's jumpin' around like a madman and singing and then needs to speak coherently 2 seconds after the song is over.
I'd bet NONE of us on this board could have performed better (obviously not the vocal, the aerobic recovery and 'banter') in those circumstances.
I would make that ... in any circumstances
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Make that 2 albums...
I think there is more to this story than just the author's hopes, but we'll see what happens in the near future. In any case, I hope that after these forced celebrations of what is long gone, Mick and KR each go their own ways. And why not?
Richards wants - as correctly noted by the RS journalist - to sing center-stage and Mick needs a sane and professionally adequate guitar player.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-02-27 15:05 by proudmary.
you're misreading again. the snippet you're quoting says the author hopes Keith will sing center-stage if he tours
Hey, you're teaching at the University ot smth. like this, right? I like it when you explain to me how to understand the studied text))
I believe -as well as a respected journalist from the RS - that Richards truly enjoys to be in the center of the stage and do what he wants. And he deserves it as much as Mick deserves to be free from Keith Richards.
At this stage of their lives the Rolling Stones really stifle creativity in them. They only hold together by paranoid reluctance of their fans to leave the past.
I understand that you agree with my second conclusion. Great!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-02-27 17:53 by proudmary.
I do not want to seem impolite - you're a nice guy - but are you sure that you understand the meaning of the abbreviation LOL?
There are too many of your post consisting exclusively from those three letters. Come on, tell us what you really think about the discussed issues,not about other people's posts.
And if you have nothing to say - better to keep silent, but do not print for the hundredth time LOL
Yes I do
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Is that so ?
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
I have done that many times in the past years.
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
LOL Nobody on this board tells me what to do, except for Bjornulf
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
And last but not least, thanks for the compliment
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Sorry, but you are mistaken. Basically you comment on other people posts.
Really? Do you see the irony of that?
Sorry, I forgot you do not understand the irony
By the way it is friendly advice - you are too repetitive. You don't want to be really boring, right?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-02-27 18:11 by proudmary.
I feel flattered. You actually went through all my 5800 posts ? Really cool.
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
LOL, no, I will leave that up to you.
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
You still do not understand the irony of what you say. It is you who don't miss almost any of my posts. Get real!
You're stalking me and you can't resist it. That's compulsive behavior
But I'm ok. You have to apoligize to all IORR board members fot your endless LOLs
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-02-27 18:25 by proudmary.
God forbid! I can imagine there are 5800 LOLs!
i think what this promo shows is that the video editing and sound will indeed be
an improvement over what we got from the live stream. the only worry is
the one-hour length. what gets left out is gonna be sad.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
rooster
()
Date: February 26, 2012 21:40
one more time....Jagger was out of breath...66/67...also..and it was magic!
I was worried about micks voice..for some years...e ven the studio...recordings...were weak....his last great moments were on abb...he was good on that album...but i dont hear the band...as a unit
i also really liked his solo output
god gave me.......that would have been a great single for tha stones
Hide away......so underrated....awesome tune
Jaggers latest performance...made my bad heart beating again
Why shouldnt they sing together like the E brothers! I always missed Keiths voice...that rough sound from 78/81....and the fab N bar tour....i want to hear it again!
And About Mr Beck....he was the eye of the sparrow in 1976
it was a long time ago....i saw mick so lively
I was worried about micks voice..for some years...e ven the studio...recordings...were weak....his last great moments were on abb...he was good on that album...but i dont hear the band...as a unit
i also really liked his solo output
god gave me.......that would have been a great single for tha stones
Hide away......so underrated....awesome tune
Jaggers latest performance...made my bad heart beating again
Why shouldnt they sing together like the E brothers! I always missed Keiths voice...that rough sound from 78/81....and the fab N bar tour....i want to hear it again!
And About Mr Beck....he was the eye of the sparrow in 1976
it was a long time ago....i saw mick so lively
Re: Mick Jagger to perform at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
elunsi
()
Date: February 26, 2012 21:50
Quote
proudmary
[ while the famous author of all the Stones songs records a solo album and plans to tour without Jagger
Now I´m really confused, lol, i hope you are being sarcastic here.[/quote]
Nope, I'm not being sarcastic at all
"Richards’s currently recording solo tracks with Steve Jordan for an upcoming album. Here's hoping he'll promote it by touring theaters, doing exactly what he did last night – singing center-stage, sitting while playing country blues and plugging in when he feels like it – especially if the Stones don't tour immediately".
[www.rollingstone.com][/quote]
Well, I don´t care about that. But I hope you were sarcastic about the "author of all Stones songs"
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: February 26, 2012 22:17
Quote
paulm
I really don't get the comments dissing Keith's skill now. Keith's understated playing has just become more understated in his old age. Look how he lets "space" between the music talk. That concept might be hard for some to grasp, but that is so much the essence of who KR is as a musician anyway. I think his phrasing at the Sumlin gig was great. Keith lets his music fly when his hands are not even on the fretboard. He's always gotten off on that. So if you're looking for something different, you're gonna be real disappointed from here on out.
If I get what you're saying, what we need to do is increase the 'space between the music' with KR. I guess that's kind of what we've had over the last 5 years...LOTS of space between the music!
Re: Mick Jagger to perform at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
with sssoul
()
Date: February 26, 2012 22:26
Quote
proudmary
while the famous author of all the Stones songs records a solo album and plans to tour without Jagger
Nope, I'm not being sarcastic at all
"Richards’s currently recording solo tracks with Steve Jordan for an upcoming album. Here's hoping he'll promote it by touring theaters, doing exactly what he did last night – singing center-stage, sitting while playing country blues and plugging in when he feels like it – especially if the Stones don't tour immediately".
[www.rollingstone.com]
mercy - you keep misreading this. the article you're quoting doesn't say Keith is planning to tour.
it says the author hopes Keith will tour if the Stones don't.
you see the difference, right?
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
ryanpow
()
Date: February 27, 2012 05:31
Re: Mick Being out of breath, I think this is much ado about nothing. At a stone's concert, Mick Keeps the energy level and volume of his voice up in between songs and says "How you doing tonight? Feeling Goood???". Here he's playing in a relatively small room with the President. Its probably a pretty sober event. And he's also there to talk about the blues. He needs to take it way down after each song if he's gunna talk. In that situation there's not enough time for your breathing to adjust.
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 2012-02-27 05:38 by ryanpow.
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 2012-02-27 05:38 by ryanpow.
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: February 27, 2012 08:18
Quote
ryanpow
Re: Mick Being out of breath, I think this is much ado about nothing. At a stone's concert, Mick Keeps the energy level and volume of his voice up in between songs and says "How you doing tonight? Feeling Goood???". Here he's playing in a relatively small room with the President. Its probably a pretty sober event. And he's also there to talk about the blues. He needs to take it way down after each song if he's gunna talk. In that situation there's not enough time for your breathing to adjust.
I think your point is valid...there was high pressure on MJ, considering the audience, he's 68, and he's jumpin' around like a madman and singing and then needs to speak coherently 2 seconds after the song is over.
I'd bet NONE of us on this board could have performed better (obviously not the vocal, the aerobic recovery and 'banter') in those circumstances.
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
lem motlow
()
Date: February 27, 2012 09:34
that was the strangest performance i've ever seen.i thought mick would play a couple of sort of laid back blues numbers,talk a bit about the music and then on to cocktail hour.
instead he brings friggin jeff beck with him and blows the doors off the place.
if you've never seen jeff up close believe me the president and first lady went to bed with their ears ringing that night.
mick was great as usual.a perfectly rehearsed band,his moves and delivery all running like a rolex.everyone needs to stop worrying about him being out of breath,mick trains for months before a tour.
instead he brings friggin jeff beck with him and blows the doors off the place.
if you've never seen jeff up close believe me the president and first lady went to bed with their ears ringing that night.
mick was great as usual.a perfectly rehearsed band,his moves and delivery all running like a rolex.everyone needs to stop worrying about him being out of breath,mick trains for months before a tour.
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: February 27, 2012 11:11
Quote
treaclefingers
I'd bet NONE of us on this board could have performed better ... in those circumstances.
I would make that ... in any circumstances
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Mick Jagger to perform at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: February 27, 2012 12:53
Quote
seitanQuote
proudmaryQuote
Rolling HansieQuote
proudmary
I'd like to see Jagger in a gig with a good guitar player with whom he has a normal, harmonious relationship
LOL, and who would that be ?
What is your irony about exactly? Why - LOL?
I've read an interview with Jagger recently - somebody posted it here on this board - and Mick says it is impossible to be on stage and make music with someone you do not have a harmonious relationship.
Who could be that guitar player - dunno the choice is great, I think many would like to play with Jagger. But why not to start with Beck, they did good at WH
I think I clearly said - after the Stones anniversary in whatever form this anniversary will take place. So you have no reason to feel offended by my disrespect and antipathy to Richards (I know, you see it in all my posts)
Jaggers second solo album "Primadonna Crap"..eh sorry Primitive Cool with Jeff Becky already speaks for itself. - Let´s Work, huh ? - Now that´s another Gimme Shelter, right ??
Instead of Jerky Becky - I would like to see Brenda Jagger on stage with a dirty old white blues man who wrote "Gimme Shelter" and who can still kick Micks ass, instead of having some slick metal hard rock guitars like Biff Jeck who already has done one crappy album with him. He needs Keef -real songwriter to work with. You have no reason to feel offended by my disrespect and antipathy to Keef bashers. For Keith is the guy who wrote Satisfaction, Gimme Shelter and more than half of the greatest rock roll songs of all time. I mean what has Jeff Becky written - oh yeah crap, that´s it.
Make that 2 albums...
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: February 27, 2012 13:04
Quote
Rolling Hansie
I loved both gigs.
I loved both Mick's and Keith's performances.
Is it still possible on this board to like Keith without bashing Mick ?
Is it still possible on this board to like Mick without bashing Keith ?
MICK AND KEITH WERE GREAT
Re: Mick Jagger to perform at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
proudmary
()
Date: February 27, 2012 14:55
Quote
with sssoulQuote
proudmary
while the famous author of all the Stones songs records a solo album and plans to tour without Jagger
Nope, I'm not being sarcastic at all
"Richards’s currently recording solo tracks with Steve Jordan for an upcoming album. Here's hoping he'll promote it by touring theaters, doing exactly what he did last night – singing center-stage, sitting while playing country blues and plugging in when he feels like it – especially if the Stones don't tour immediately".
[www.rollingstone.com]
mercy - you keep misreading this. the article you're quoting doesn't say Keith is planning to tour.
it says the author hopes Keith will tour if the Stones don't.
you see the difference, right?
I think there is more to this story than just the author's hopes, but we'll see what happens in the near future. In any case, I hope that after these forced celebrations of what is long gone, Mick and KR each go their own ways. And why not?
Richards wants - as correctly noted by the RS journalist - to sing center-stage and Mick needs a sane and professionally adequate guitar player.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-02-27 15:05 by proudmary.
Re: Mick Jagger to perform at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
with sssoul
()
Date: February 27, 2012 16:27
Quote
proudmary
Richards wants - as correctly noted by the RS journalist - to sing center-stage
you're misreading again. the snippet you're quoting says the author hopes Keith will sing center-stage if he tours
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: February 27, 2012 17:06
LOL withsssoul, I really admire your perseverance .
Keep up the good work.
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Keep up the good work.
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Mick Jagger to perform at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
proudmary
()
Date: February 27, 2012 17:36
Quote
with sssoulQuote
proudmary
Richards wants - as correctly noted by the RS journalist - to sing center-stage
you're misreading again. the snippet you're quoting says the author hopes Keith will sing center-stage if he tours
Hey, you're teaching at the University ot smth. like this, right? I like it when you explain to me how to understand the studied text))
I believe -as well as a respected journalist from the RS - that Richards truly enjoys to be in the center of the stage and do what he wants. And he deserves it as much as Mick deserves to be free from Keith Richards.
At this stage of their lives the Rolling Stones really stifle creativity in them. They only hold together by paranoid reluctance of their fans to leave the past.
I understand that you agree with my second conclusion. Great!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-02-27 17:53 by proudmary.
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
proudmary
()
Date: February 27, 2012 17:49
Quote
Rolling Hansie
LOL withsssoul, I really admire your perseverance .
Keep up the good work.
I do not want to seem impolite - you're a nice guy - but are you sure that you understand the meaning of the abbreviation LOL?
There are too many of your post consisting exclusively from those three letters. Come on, tell us what you really think about the discussed issues,not about other people's posts.
And if you have nothing to say - better to keep silent, but do not print for the hundredth time LOL
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: February 27, 2012 17:51
Quote
proudmary
you understand the meaning of the abbreviation LOL?
Yes I do
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: February 27, 2012 17:52
Quote
proudmary
There are too many of your post consisting exclusively from those three letters.
Is that so ?
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: February 27, 2012 17:53
Quote
proudmary
tell us what you really think about the discussed issues
I have done that many times in the past years.
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: February 27, 2012 17:54
Quote
proudmary
better to keep silent, but do not print for the hundredth time LOL
LOL Nobody on this board tells me what to do, except for Bjornulf
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: February 27, 2012 17:55
Quote
proudmary
you're a nice guy
And last but not least, thanks for the compliment
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
proudmary
()
Date: February 27, 2012 18:00
Quote
Rolling HansieQuote
proudmary
tell us what you really think about the discussed issues
I have done that many times in the past years.
Sorry, but you are mistaken. Basically you comment on other people posts.
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
proudmary
()
Date: February 27, 2012 18:04
Quote
Rolling HansieQuote
proudmary
better to keep silent, but do not print for the hundredth time LOL
LOL Nobody on this board tells me what to do, except for Bjornulf
Really? Do you see the irony of that?
Sorry, I forgot you do not understand the irony
By the way it is friendly advice - you are too repetitive. You don't want to be really boring, right?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-02-27 18:11 by proudmary.
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: February 27, 2012 18:13
Quote
proudmary
Basically you comment on other people posts.
I feel flattered. You actually went through all my 5800 posts ? Really cool.
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: February 27, 2012 18:14
Quote
proudmary
You don't want to be really boring, right?
LOL, no, I will leave that up to you.
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: February 27, 2012 18:16
I apoligize to all the other IORR board members for taking so much posts to reply to personal questions. But some things ... Sorry, I just couldn't resist
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
proudmary
()
Date: February 27, 2012 18:19
Quote
Rolling HansieQuote
proudmary
You don't want to be really boring, right?
LOL, no, I will leave that up to you.
You still do not understand the irony of what you say. It is you who don't miss almost any of my posts. Get real!
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
proudmary
()
Date: February 27, 2012 18:21
Quote
Rolling Hansie
I apoligize to all the other IORR board members for taking so much posts to reply to personal questions. But some things ... Sorry, I just couldn't resist
You're stalking me and you can't resist it. That's compulsive behavior
But I'm ok. You have to apoligize to all IORR board members fot your endless LOLs
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-02-27 18:25 by proudmary.
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
superrevvy
()
Date: February 27, 2012 18:22
hey kids, stop your squabbling. get over here and watch uncle buddy do
his promo for the pbs broascast tonite!
his promo for the pbs broascast tonite!
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
proudmary
()
Date: February 27, 2012 18:28
Quote
Rolling HansieQuote
proudmary
Basically you comment on other people posts.
I feel flattered. You actually went through all my 5800 posts ? Really cool.
God forbid! I can imagine there are 5800 LOLs!
Re: Mick Jagger live at The White House Feb 21
Posted by:
superrevvy
()
Date: February 27, 2012 18:34
Quote
superrevvy
hey kids, stop your squabbling. get over here and watch uncle buddy do
his promo for the pbs broascast tonite!
i think what this promo shows is that the video editing and sound will indeed be
an improvement over what we got from the live stream. the only worry is
the one-hour length. what gets left out is gonna be sad.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
5strings , Broesel2404 , drwatts , einte , falo01 , flottmann1 , J-J-Flash , kickit , Kurt , liddas , Martin90 , MichaelLassen , nbutton , Nobbi82 , rayrad , rebelrebel , RollstoDRSC , rsvp2000 , rubyeveryday , Shotaway2 , sonnystitt , stonesmuziekfan , StonyRoad , Tate , TW2019 , wolundamo , Zoner13
Guests:
1702
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10