For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
RollingFreakQuote
GasLightStreet
There's an aspect of anything post-1979 or whenever that was unearthed probably has happened. As with The Beatles and The Rolling Stones, only so much can be shown that is "new". In regard to a timeline, a story, ok, obviously whatever footage will be used.
Presentation is the key and that might get lost in regard to what you've stated. But for perhaps a lot of people that don't know? As interesting as it could be.
I think what was slightly disappointing to me was the first half was actually so good and so well told. Yeah I knew most of the story, but not all of it, and they told it in a very compelling way. They had so many great photos, and they made any lack of video work. Then the second half felt like a crutch with the limited video they had. It felt like they HAD to play the songs people wanted (and so many of them in full), either because they felt like they had to fill the time (only covered the first two albums) or because they thought people would demand it. Whereas I'd have been ok with less full songs and more clips/photos and behind the scenes stories, being told in a similar fashion to the first half. To me it was brilliantly done till it got a little bit more lazy, which was odd. Cause usually the first half is what you'd breeze through. Felt like the second half should have been fleshed out with more stories and pics, or just cut in half if there wasn't enough there. Or, while I understood the ending with Royal Albert Hall cause that was "making it" on their home turf, an arugment could have been made that they included LZIII which could have ended with them being pre-stadium level. Led Zep 4 really seems like when they went to another level and I get that that's for a different movie.
Overall, I do still really recommend though. Its a great look into their early years and its amazing what they banged out in such little time.
Nice.
That makes sense. They did what they did. As you stated, perhaps because of it being expected. Maybe whatever could've been included, to break it up, was just a repeat so it's boring. Who knows.
I think of FOUR FLICKS and THE BIGGEST BANG and how TBB is an extremely poorly done imitation of FF - and they sounded atrocious in comparison.
FOUR FLICKS is tremendous. It makes LIVE LICKS with it's cheap pictures of the video screen terrible quality for artwork (and some horrendous editing, music wise) seem an afterthought (although disc 2 is worth it). But either one is better than any live release from the BANG tour.
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
RollingFreakQuote
GasLightStreet
There's an aspect of anything post-1979 or whenever that was unearthed probably has happened. As with The Beatles and The Rolling Stones, only so much can be shown that is "new". In regard to a timeline, a story, ok, obviously whatever footage will be used.
Presentation is the key and that might get lost in regard to what you've stated. But for perhaps a lot of people that don't know? As interesting as it could be.
I think what was slightly disappointing to me was the first half was actually so good and so well told. Yeah I knew most of the story, but not all of it, and they told it in a very compelling way. They had so many great photos, and they made any lack of video work. Then the second half felt like a crutch with the limited video they had. It felt like they HAD to play the songs people wanted (and so many of them in full), either because they felt like they had to fill the time (only covered the first two albums) or because they thought people would demand it. Whereas I'd have been ok with less full songs and more clips/photos and behind the scenes stories, being told in a similar fashion to the first half. To me it was brilliantly done till it got a little bit more lazy, which was odd. Cause usually the first half is what you'd breeze through. Felt like the second half should have been fleshed out with more stories and pics, or just cut in half if there wasn't enough there. Or, while I understood the ending with Royal Albert Hall cause that was "making it" on their home turf, an arugment could have been made that they included LZIII which could have ended with them being pre-stadium level. Led Zep 4 really seems like when they went to another level and I get that that's for a different movie.
Overall, I do still really recommend though. Its a great look into their early years and its amazing what they banged out in such little time.
Nice.
That makes sense. They did what they did. As you stated, perhaps because of it being expected. Maybe whatever could've been included, to break it up, was just a repeat so it's boring. Who knows.
I think of FOUR FLICKS and THE BIGGEST BANG and how TBB is an extremely poorly done imitation of FF - and they sounded atrocious in comparison.
FOUR FLICKS is tremendous. It makes LIVE LICKS with it's cheap pictures of the video screen terrible quality for artwork (and some horrendous editing, music wise) seem an afterthought (although disc 2 is worth it). But either one is better than any live release from the BANG tour.
Quote
RisingStone
Somewhat old news, but here it is — longer and upgraded/new footage of Led Zeppelin at the Budokan, Tokyo, September 23, 1971, the group’s Japanese debut. Some historic moments there. 2 sources (37:34 and 3:51).
[www.youtube.com]
[www.youtube.com]

Quote
Big AlQuote
RisingStone
Somewhat old news, but here it is — longer and upgraded/new footage of Led Zeppelin at the Budokan, Tokyo, September 23, 1971, the group’s Japanese debut. Some historic moments there. 2 sources (37:34 and 3:51).
[www.youtube.com]
[www.youtube.com]
I wonder if we'll ever get another Zeppelin live release? 'How The West Was Won' is fine, as is the Zeppelin DVD, but I think those Earl Court shows, along with Knebworth, deserve individual releases. It would be interested to know what else Jimmy Page has in his vault. I know there's the Seattle show from 1977, for instance.

Quote
RollingFreak
Guy lived the ultimate life in the 70s and now seems to have a very comfortable life and exactly what he'd want in HIS 70s. Sure, for awhile I wanted a Zeppelin reunion, but at this point I'm just happy that he's happy. At least he does stuff as opposed to Jimmy, who I'd love to just see tour solo.
Quote
Big AlQuote
RollingFreak
Guy lived the ultimate life in the 70s and now seems to have a very comfortable life and exactly what he'd want in HIS 70s. Sure, for awhile I wanted a Zeppelin reunion, but at this point I'm just happy that he's happy. At least he does stuff as opposed to Jimmy, who I'd love to just see tour solo.
Great post; and an accurate observation of Robert Plant as a man in his 70’s. It’s begs the question, though: just where, exactly, is Jimmy Page in 2025? Is he all but retired? He’s seemingly the least ‘active’ amongst those of his generation, whom we fortunately still have with us.
Quote
Big AlQuote
RollingFreak
Guy lived the ultimate life in the 70s and now seems to have a very comfortable life and exactly what he'd want in HIS 70s. Sure, for awhile I wanted a Zeppelin reunion, but at this point I'm just happy that he's happy. At least he does stuff as opposed to Jimmy, who I'd love to just see tour solo.
Great post; and an accurate observation of Robert Plant as a man in his 70’s. It’s begs the question, though: just where, exactly, is Jimmy Page in 2025? Is he all but retired? He’s seemingly the least ‘active’ amongst those of his generation, whom we fortunately still have with us.
Quote
bye bye johnny
EXCLUSIVE
Robert Plant Talks Album, U.S. Tour With New Band Saving Grace: ‘They’ve Saved My Sanity’
The Golden God phoned up Rolling Stone to break down his new LP, look back at his time on the road with Bob Dylan, and explain why he'll never write a manuscript or sign off on a biopic
By Andy Greene
July 16, 2025
Tom Oldham
[www.rollingstone.com]
--
__
Tour dates > [www.robertplant.com]
Quote
RisingStone
What I like Robert in his current state is that he enjoys creating the music he loves and performing it live. There is a genuine sense of dedication there.
I saw Saving Grace in the UK seven times in 2021-24. Most of them happened at a cozy, traditional music hall-type of venue that houses an audience of 1,000-2,500, which greatly enhanced intimacy. And the ticket price was modest, mid price about 30-50 quid. I enjoyed all of them and left the venue, feeling so impressed by the collective musicianship, so touched by the man’s love of music, every time.
To all our North American friends, never miss them if they come near you in their forthcoming proper NA tour. You won’t be disappointed.
Quote
TheBluesHadaBabyQuote
RisingStone
What I like Robert in his current state is that he enjoys creating the music he loves and performing it live. There is a genuine sense of dedication there.
I saw Saving Grace in the UK seven times in 2021-24. Most of them happened at a cozy, traditional music hall-type of venue that houses an audience of 1,000-2,500, which greatly enhanced intimacy. And the ticket price was modest, mid price about 30-50 quid. I enjoyed all of them and left the venue, feeling so impressed by the collective musicianship, so touched by the man’s love of music, every time.
To all our North American friends, never miss them if they come near you in their forthcoming proper NA tour. You won’t be disappointed.
It was the venue size that sold me. Charlottesville Nov 2 is the second show in the tour, the theater is 1930s and 1,041 capacity. I got an email with the presale announcement after 3 pm, looked about 8 pm, and it was clear it would sell out, probably before Friday's general sale. I like your UK prices, C'ville is $80, $114(?), and $142 maybe? I chose $80... cheap seats in a theater that size still being good ones.
From there they go to the 1920s Lincoln Theater in DC, 1,225 capacity, where I imagine the $ is higher. But two days ago I was pricing Nov 2 Atlanta Macca tix so no price complaints about Robert. I'm looking forward to it. Saw him last year with Alison Krause, 3rd bill behind Dylan on Willie's Outlaw Tour (a show Willie couldn't make).
Quote
TheBluesHadaBaby
RisingStone: Any word on how Robert is regarding requests to autograph old Led Zep albums?

.Quote
frankotero
Eventually there will have to be something released, otherwise people will lose interest.
Quote
Big Al
Why this ‘Live LP’? Surely Jimmy has more in his loft than this re-release?
Quote
Big Al
Why this ‘Live LP’? Surely Jimmy has more in his loft than this re-release?