with sssoul Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> >> The front image of Keith is not the best I've
> seen him look on the recent tour,
> but I guess probably got a good representation of
> what he DOES look like <<
>
> better shots of Keith are also a good
> representation of what he looks like.
> i'd vote for using a better one as well.
glad to hear others say it - i was thinking the same thing. he's got too much forehead in that one - maybe wrap a bandana around it? (just kidding)
>
> >> doesn't "fan club" seem kinda cheesey <,
>
> it does to me (i wouldn't feel too good about
> "made in Norway" either)
> i still feel like www.iorr.org is the best
> statement, with or without "on tour 2007".
> i just don't get into overly talkative clothes, i
> guess.
i agree with the fan club statement too - and skip the date
>shidoobee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Since the Stones are again pioneers when it comes
> to environmental issues... (First they played at
> Nader's gig in LA, now they're touring carbon
> neutral)
they're touring carbon neutral? this is news to me - where can i find more about this? they each still travel in their own cars, many of them giant SUVs (and i remember the Hummer from the Licks tour)...and mick in his own plane, right? are they visiting restaurants at night to relieve them of their used cooking oil?
i definitely support it but it surprises me (pleasantly).