For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
mick64
The next one or me will be Paris 1976, nor do we know if they will make it official with more concerts from the 70s
Quote
StonedRamblerQuote
mick64
The next one or me will be Paris 1976, nor do we know if they will make it official with more concerts from the 70s
Lol Paris 1976 was rumored since 2017
Quote
falo01Quote
StonedRamblerQuote
mick64
The next one or me will be Paris 1976, nor do we know if they will make it official with more concerts from the 70s
Lol Paris 1976 was rumored since 2017
There are legal issues with the heirs of Freddy Hausser and nobody knows the state of affairs.
Quote
mick64
The next one or me will be Paris 1976, nor do we know if they will make it official with more concerts from the 70s
Quote
mick64
The next one or me will be Paris 1976, nor do we know if they will make it official with more concerts from the 70s
Quote
AntoineParis
Unfornetly still rights problems (or prices problems) on this Paris 76 Affair.
The Stones only own the TV special from Paris but not the master of all 4 shows
(What a shame, Ive seen the four shows and this is just amazing believe me)
Quote
StonedRambler
I honestly don't get the fuzz about the 2002-2003 tour. Keith is more focused on his moves than on his playing and Ronnie seems drunk and unfocused as well.
Mick and Charlie deliver though - as always.
Quote
MathijsQuote
StonedRambler
I honestly don't get the fuzz about the 2002-2003 tour. Keith is more focused on his moves than on his playing and Ronnie seems drunk and unfocused as well.
Mick and Charlie deliver though - as always.
Well, that's it really. Mick and Charlie delivering great setlists in small venues. It was the last breath of the real Greatest RnR band in the world.
Mathijs
Quote
RobertJohnsonQuote
MathijsQuote
StonedRambler
I honestly don't get the fuzz about the 2002-2003 tour. Keith is more focused on his moves than on his playing and Ronnie seems drunk and unfocused as well.
Mick and Charlie deliver though - as always.
Well, that's it really. Mick and Charlie delivering great setlists in small venues. It was the last breath of the real Greatest RnR band in the world.
Mathijs
Keith doesn't give the impression on "Dance, Part 1" that he knows what to do. It's a pretty boring, uninspired song anyway. Maybe they should try Part 0.
Quote
RobertJohnsonQuote
MathijsQuote
StonedRambler
I honestly don't get the fuzz about the 2002-2003 tour. Keith is more focused on his moves than on his playing and Ronnie seems drunk and unfocused as well.
Mick and Charlie deliver though - as always.
Well, that's it really. Mick and Charlie delivering great setlists in small venues. It was the last breath of the real Greatest RnR band in the world.
Mathijs
Keith doesn't give the impression on "Dance, Part 1" that he knows what to do. It's a pretty boring, uninspired song anyway. Maybe they should try Part 0.
Quote
TumblinDice76
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't something similar happen with a '72 show? Phillips perhaps? It was either completed or close to but got scrapped for either the BTB tour release or another one around that time frame. Just wondering if ownership rights is what keeps more from '72 being released other than the TX shows. For me, keep the live shows coming and I will keep spending $$$ on them.
Quote
MathijsQuote
AntoineParis
Unfornetly still rights problems (or prices problems) on this Paris 76 Affair.
The Stones only own the TV special from Paris but not the master of all 4 shows
(What a shame, Ive seen the four shows and this is just amazing believe me)
The issue is that they could not reach an agreement on royalties and credits with the estate of original Aux Abattoir producer Freddy Hausser.
Also, of the four shows, the master tapes of one show are missing.
Mathijs
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
RobertJohnsonQuote
MathijsQuote
StonedRambler
I honestly don't get the fuzz about the 2002-2003 tour. Keith is more focused on his moves than on his playing and Ronnie seems drunk and unfocused as well.
Mick and Charlie deliver though - as always.
Well, that's it really. Mick and Charlie delivering great setlists in small venues. It was the last breath of the real Greatest RnR band in the world.
Mathijs
Keith doesn't give the impression on "Dance, Part 1" that he knows what to do. It's a pretty boring, uninspired song anyway. Maybe they should try Part 0.
IMO, it's a great song. However, when the singer doesn't even remotely try to sing the lyrics or notes as they are on the album, and the guitar players are constantly playing other licks and chords, it just won't work. Ronnie is trying now and again, though, I'll give him that.
Quote
StonedRambler
I honestly don't get the fuzz about the 2002-2003 tour. Keith is more focused on his moves than on his playing and Ronnie seems drunk and unfocused as well.
Mick and Charlie deliver though - as always.
Naaah. I like old good heavy plastic jewel case.Quote
frankotero
Cool, I prefer paper sleeves. Please let us know how it sounds.
Quote
mjmjrQuote
StonedRambler
I honestly don't get the fuzz about the 2002-2003 tour. Keith is more focused on his moves than on his playing and Ronnie seems drunk and unfocused as well.
Mick and Charlie deliver though - as always.
The First 6 or 7 weeks of this tour was amazing.....when ronnie started
But those september and most of the october shows were sizzling
The Philadelphia, Boston, and NY trilogies were a thing of beauty