For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
TumblinDice76
FrogSugar-years ago when the Some Girls reissue set came out, Jagger said in an interview that they still need to do Tattoo You and few others. So it appears, a special edition TY is planned but who knows when it will surface.
Quote
TumblinDice76
FrogSugar-years ago when the Some Girls reissue set came out, Jagger said in an interview that they still need to do Tattoo You and few others. So it appears, a special edition TY is planned but who knows when it will surface.
Quote
john lomax
It would be ironic though, wouldn't it - I mean, we have had deluxe versions of Exikes and Sone Girls where they have dusted off some old unfinished tracks....and Tattoo You was an album made up largely of previously unfinished tracks that they dusted off...so a deluxe version of Tattoo You would perhaps be scraping the bottom of the barrel (ie they 'd need to find some previously unfinished tracks that weren't good enough to finish first time round, or even second time round...)
Quote
john lomax
It would be ironic though, wouldn't it - I mean, we have had deluxe versions of Exikes and Sone Girls where they have dusted off some old unfinished tracks....and Tattoo You was an album made up largely of previously unfinished tracks that they dusted off...so a deluxe version of Tattoo You would perhaps be scraping the bottom of the barrel (ie they 'd need to find some previously unfinished tracks that weren't good enough to finish first time round, or even second time round...)
Quote
TumblinDice76
I did some digging trying to find the article and I can't. If my memory serves me right (and it may not) the interviewer asked why they followed up the EOMS special edition with Some Girls instead of Sticky Fingers or Let it Bleed. If I remember right Mack's response was-yeah were probably going to do those and Tattoo You. Obviously, TY stuck out im my mind as an odd choice since it pretty much was a left overs album to begin with. With Hamptom '81 and Leeds '82 already issued, not a lot of options for bonus material. Not to get off topic but....how many more Special Editions can we really expect. On the ABCO end we have-Ya-Ya's, Let It Bleed, Beggars Banquet and TSMR already out. With "On Air" and Rock N Roll Circus also released, that really only leaves BTB and Aftermath. Both would be cool with a live disc as a bonus. I can't see a special edition of the first 5 albums. So the post ABCO days, we already have SF, EOMS, SG, and allegedly GHS. Can't see IORR getting a Sekux Edition. Obviously Dirty Work won't get one and I can't see anything from Steel Wheels on getting one. So that leaves Black and Blue, ER, and Undercover. Not sure those warrant Special Editions either.
Quote
TumblinDice76
Mariano, I'm actually in the very small minority that actually likes Dirty Work. Yes, several songs like Back to Zero and Winning Ugly real of 80s production and sound very outdated but I live the Chuck Berry sound of "Had it With you" the very by the Stones sounding title track. Harlem Shuffle is a solid cover and One Hit to the Bottom is a total gem. However, sales for a Dirty Work Special Edition would be quite dismal. I always felt that no supporting tour for ER, Undercover, and Dirty Work really hurt those albums. Just imagine an Undercover support tour.
Quote
GLS
On a lighter note, Kimsey and Mick worked on SUCKING IN THE SEVENTIES that fall and winter of 1980 right after the first big sessions for TY
Quote
StoneageQuote
GLS
On a lighter note, Kimsey and Mick worked on SUCKING IN THE SEVENTIES that fall and winter of 1980 right after the first big sessions for TY
Come to think of it - Sucking in The Seventies should have been the name for Tattoo You. For explanatory reasons. And Sucking in The Seventies should have been named Sucking in The Seventies II.
Or Scattered 70s Leftovers. But I guess that was never in the makings... Sucking in The Seventies reminds me of "Rarities" in a way. Such an aimless collection of songs. Still, I bought them both of course...
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
StoneageQuote
GLS
On a lighter note, Kimsey and Mick worked on SUCKING IN THE SEVENTIES that fall and winter of 1980 right after the first big sessions for TY
Come to think of it - Sucking in The Seventies should have been the name for Tattoo You. For explanatory reasons. And Sucking in The Seventies should have been named Sucking in The Seventies II.
Or Scattered 70s Leftovers. But I guess that was never in the makings... Sucking in The Seventies reminds me of "Rarities" in a way. Such an aimless collection of songs. Still, I bought them both of course...
SITS is a much better compilation than RARITIES - the fantastic live version of Whip, the magnificent If I Was A Dancer, at the time the only place the single edit versions of Beast Of Burden and Fool To Cry were available on an LP; Everything Is Turning To Gold; the edit versions of Hot Stuff, Crazy Mama and Time Waits For No One are awesome.
Quote
Gazza
A deluxe version of an album that was cobbled together from old leftovers?
Highly unlikely.
Saying that, they rewrote history with the 'outtakes' on the Exile and Some Girls reissues that were 'supposed' to be from those sessions, so anything's possible.
They missed a trick by not putting together an expanded release of outtakes from the 1977-81 era (and maybe even 1977-83 at a push) as theres so much overlap.
Maybe they'll start doing era-specific 'Bootleg series' type releases in the coming years after they finally give up trying to make new albums.
Quote
SomeGuy
SITS and Rarities are different types of compilations. Rarities purports to be what the title says: a collection of rare songs (mostly b sides), that only fans would buy, the flaw being that it doesn't quite live up to that principle as it has the occasional song on it that is available on a regular album anyway.
SITS seems to be leaning more to a greatest hits type of compilation to a degree, probably aimed at the larger audiences that only want 'the hits' from that period. As such it is indeed a strange set, only essential for the fans because it has, what, three songs on it that weren't available elsewhere.
This is why I bought Rarities, but not SITS (at the time I already owned the single b side and taped the other two relevant songs and today you have these two on dvd and Rarities). I can't see the need to have versions of songs I already have on albums, but have parts of them cut out. Which is why Honk really isn't such a bad compilation as it has the proper, full versions instead of the aborted ones on previous compilations.
Tattoo You may have been compiled from already existing songs, but to me it sure works as a proper new studio album, more so than some other albums I know, I see it a bit like The Stones' own Abbey Road Let's just see if the expanded GHS will really come out, personally I don't see how TY could get the expanded treatment, except with alternate takes and some live stuff maybe.
Quote
stone66
A re-release adding outtakes from an album that was itself just mostly outtakes