For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Back to 48.73 EUR.Quote
hockenheim95
They corrected the price now to 64€
Quote
ironbellyBack to 48.73 EUR.Quote
hockenheim95
They corrected the price now to 64€
Quote
UKRod
So, looking at the 6 Disc version, I already have the Stones in Tokyo 1990 CDs and DVD issued as a Vaults version back in 2012. What is the difference with the new Tokyo 1990 disc on the Steel Wheels package? Are there extra songs? Does anybody know?
Quote
UKRod
So, looking at the 6 Disc version, I already have the Stones in Tokyo 1990 CDs and DVD issued as a Vaults version back in 2012. What is the difference with the new Tokyo 1990 disc on the Steel Wheels package? Are there extra songs? Does anybody know?
Quote
Taylor1
The 1989 tour was fantastic.It is the most underrated Stones tour IMO. The band and especially Keith were great. It was not a Vegas act.It had great energy and musianship
Quote
Taylor1
The 1989 tour was fantastic.It is the most underrated Stones tour IMO. The band and especially Keith were great. It was not a Vegas act.It had great energy and musianship
They are marginally different. Probably, 24th was mixed a bit better (guitars are louder) but it is brickwalled to death (DR=5-6) for Japanese WARD release.Quote
timbernardis
Which one was the better show, the 24th or the 26th?
plexi
It was also the first tour for me, I too was too young in 81-82, it was a great concert for me, I saw them in Turin and it was a great emotion, my first time .... but if I have to analyze it today, there is no comparison with the VL tour. The VL tour was great for me, they played free from technicalities. But in 89.90 they hadn't played together for a few years, there was new technology and they were a little Pink Floyd style, however they did fantastic concerts, but too perfect for my taste.Quote
vertigojoeQuote
Taylor1
The 1989 tour was fantastic.It is the most underrated Stones tour IMO. The band and especially Keith were great. It was not a Vegas act.It had great energy and musianship
I can’t agree. Two shows at Manchester on the urban jungle tour was my introduction to Live Stones, I was too young for ‘82. The disappointment of the muted guitars, parpy keyboards, shocking clothes and lack of any danger/spontaneity I remember to this day. Set the template for all tours since then. Essentially it marked Keith’s demotion from band leader to cartoon character OMG HES STILL ALIVE caricature. A role I’m disappointed he was happy to take, but understand as he’d tasted life outside the gilded cage and clearly didn’t fancy it long term. So no I won’t be joining in this celebrations but good luck to anybody who enjoys it. At least there’s Bill.
Quote
Taylor1
The 1989 tour was fantastic.It is the most underrated Stones tour IMO. The band and especially Keith were great. It was not a Vegas act.It had great energy and musianship
Quote
24FPSQuote
Taylor1
The 1989 tour was fantastic.It is the most underrated Stones tour IMO. The band and especially Keith were great. It was not a Vegas act.It had great energy and musianship
Saw them twice. Slow and creaky opening night. Fantastic closing night. They were regal. It was their crowning achievement. If would have made sense to end the Stones after the 1990 tour. But...........................there was all that money to make playing the hits into the ground.
Quote
liddas
DP
I'm uite sure IORR was played in 1989/90 ...
Plus I'd say that Shelter, Angie and Street Fighting man by then could be considered wars horses too
C
Quote
liddas
DP
I'm uite sure IORR was played in 1989/90 ...
Plus I'd say that Shelter, Angie and Street Fighting man by then could be considered wars horses too
C
Quote
Dandy
The "hits"-setlists started on the stadium-gigs in 2002. VL and B2B had great setlist, just like SW/UJ.
I believe the template for the set list (minus Miss You and Start Me Up) was already set for 1975 tour. Look at the set list for LA Friday. They played the second disc of Hot Rocks 1964-1971 entirely + IORR, TD, Happy and a couple of oddities. Pretty much Las Vegas set list .Quote
StoneageQuote
Dandy
The "hits"-setlists started on the stadium-gigs in 2002. VL and B2B had great setlist, just like SW/UJ.
Sure, they still played some new songs on those tours. But I think the template for the second part of the show started already in 1994/95. You know, Miss You, two Keith songs and then the usual suspects...
Quote
ironbellyI believe the template for the set list (minus Miss You and Start Me Up) was already set for 1975 tour. Look at the set list for LA Friday. They played the second disc of Hot Rocks 1964-1971 entirely + IORR, TD, Happy and a couple of oddities. Pretty much Las Vegas set list .Quote
StoneageQuote
Dandy
The "hits"-setlists started on the stadium-gigs in 2002. VL and B2B had great setlist, just like SW/UJ.
Sure, they still played some new songs on those tours. But I think the template for the second part of the show started already in 1994/95. You know, Miss You, two Keith songs and then the usual suspects...
Quote
StoneageQuote
Dandy
The "hits"-setlists started on the stadium-gigs in 2002. VL and B2B had great setlist, just like SW/UJ.
Sure, they still played some new songs on those tours. But I think the template for the second part of the show started already in 1994/95. You know, Miss You, two Keith songs and then the usual suspects...
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
liddas
DP
I'm uite sure IORR was played in 1989/90 ...
Plus I'd say that Shelter, Angie and Street Fighting man by then could be considered wars horses too
C
You're right about IORR, of course
But my point was that songs, like IORR, SFM and Angie, not yet had become warhorses by 1995. Not even GS.
Yeah, they were played in 1989/90, but before that? Angie a few times in 1982, SFM a few times in 1978. IORR in 1976. Hardly warhorses?