For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
RedhotcarpetQuote
Topi
It's easy to do that if you use pre-recorded tracks
They played live.
Quote
stargroover
Hi Gentlemen I realised this might stir up the Kiss bashers.Lol.
The comments about not singing live are rather ludicrous to say the least.Thankfully it’s a small forum here.You make silly comments like that in the real world you get lawyers on your tail.
So forget your troubles and inadequacies and stick Kiss Alive 2 at maximum volume.
Happy new year !
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
RedhotcarpetQuote
Topi
It's easy to do that if you use pre-recorded tracks
They played live.
And Paul's vocals?
Quote
RedhotcarpetQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
RedhotcarpetQuote
Topi
It's easy to do that if you use pre-recorded tracks
They played live.
And Paul's vocals?
Dubai sure sounded live...yup. And yes, Stanley’s voice is shot. During the tour: mostly pre-recorded tracks - not everything though.
And yes, for some reason Paul at least has some pre-recorded guitar tracks. Wchich makes no sense.
Quote
stargroover
How long have you been working for the Kiss organisation Dandelion Powderman?
Quote
stargroover
Hi Dandelion Powderman I thought you had some actual evidence that they are not singing live.
I saw all the UK shows last tour and have bootlegs of those shows.The evidence is quite clearly there.The vocals are different from each show.There are tracks where Paul’s voice is pretty ragged and then pretty decent.The quality varies from show to show on the identical tracks.If they were pre recorded tracks you would have identical vocals at each show.This is simply not the case.
Quote
stargroover
Dandelion Powderman ,yes I had a look at that stuff.
My first ever rock gig was Kiss back in 1980,and even then there were folk saying they are not even playing their instruments let alone singing vocals.Its something that is always there I am afraid.
I have the recordings and was pretty much front row for five shows and I can say they were live for sure.
The internet is also full of clips of Paul’s dreadful vocals from time to time.That is further evidence of singing live.
Glad you like their music anyhow!
Too tough I hear what you are saying about the replacement members.I saw the original four back in 96 and they were pretty shite.Ace and Peter were passed their sell by date.This line up is quality and those recent shows were better than anything I have seen in the past.
Yeah the AC/DC and Kiss camps at school.I loved both of them.Now AC/DC back in 82 were a quality act.
Hopefully will get some live shows with AC/DC in near future!
Quote
RollingFreak
There has never been a band where fans are forced to defend the company line moreso than KISS. And I say that as a huge fan of them. But the way the band spins things, and then fans will run with that to stay on the right side of their idols is truly hysterical. I hope in the long run it works out for them. As for the band itself, I do still, however small the chances are now, hope for a respectful farewell to this once great band.
Its also even funnier the way fans act because of the way Paul Stanley acts. He was one of the best frontmen ever, and was maybe always a dick, but in the last 25 years showed he was a colossal one. All his stuff in the 90s about bands staying too late at the party, lip syncing isn't ever acceptable, and now they do it all. They just change the wording. SOME shouldn't stay too long at the party, but we still have it. The band will never cop to lip syncing but fans have now defended it as necessary and not all that bad. I applaud that they have tried to keep trucking, and if they quit when they said they were going to they wouldn't have gotten caught in a tangle of very funny past lines. KISS was never honest, and it reached a certain point where I feel it just seems so much harder to lie than just tell the truth. You're 70, who the hell even cares anymore?
Quote
stargroover
.I think this last tour has been better than anything previous.
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
RollingFreak
There has never been a band where fans are forced to defend the company line moreso than KISS. And I say that as a huge fan of them. But the way the band spins things, and then fans will run with that to stay on the right side of their idols is truly hysterical. I hope in the long run it works out for them. As for the band itself, I do still, however small the chances are now, hope for a respectful farewell to this once great band.
Its also even funnier the way fans act because of the way Paul Stanley acts. He was one of the best frontmen ever, and was maybe always a dick, but in the last 25 years showed he was a colossal one. All his stuff in the 90s about bands staying too late at the party, lip syncing isn't ever acceptable, and now they do it all. They just change the wording. SOME shouldn't stay too long at the party, but we still have it. The band will never cop to lip syncing but fans have now defended it as necessary and not all that bad. I applaud that they have tried to keep trucking, and if they quit when they said they were going to they wouldn't have gotten caught in a tangle of very funny past lines. KISS was never honest, and it reached a certain point where I feel it just seems so much harder to lie than just tell the truth. You're 70, who the hell even cares anymore?
Wow that's hilarious!
It is fun to bash KISS since they are the epitome of over the top ridiculous - and always have been. That was part of the charm. Which, really, should've never stopped. But the other stuff, eh, somehow they got signed - what garage band hasn't had at least one moment that something sounded good?
That's where the rub is it seems: big spectacle but no actual talent, hence the studio recordings (what are the chances it's not KISS but session musicians?) for their live sound.