For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
That would be a Frankenstein-album, though
In fairness, the songs on TY were pretty fresh: from 1976-1979, where most of the tracks stemmed from 78/79. Mick did the overdubs in 1980.
The two exceptions: Tops and Waiting On A Friend were great, though.
Apart from that, bring it on indeed!
Quote
DandelionPowderman
That would be a Frankenstein-album, though
In fairness, the songs on TY were pretty fresh: from 1976-1979, where most of the tracks stemmed from 78/79. Mick did the overdubs in 1980.
The two exceptions: Tops and Waiting On A Friend were great, though.
Apart from that, bring it on indeed!
Quote
keithsmanQuote
DandelionPowderman
That would be a Frankenstein-album, though
In fairness, the songs on TY were pretty fresh: from 1976-1979, where most of the tracks stemmed from 78/79. Mick did the overdubs in 1980.
The two exceptions: Tops and Waiting On A Friend were great, though.
Apart from that, bring it on indeed!
IS TOPS NOT THE MOST UNDERRATED STONES SONG EVER.
Seriously, no one ever mentions it, thanks Dande
I'm guessing this is 100 percent Jagger song, if i was Doxa i could make everyone believe its Keith all the way.
Quote
Monsoon RagoonQuote
DandelionPowderman
That would be a Frankenstein-album, though
In fairness, the songs on TY were pretty fresh: from 1976-1979, where most of the tracks stemmed from 78/79. Mick did the overdubs in 1980.
The two exceptions: Tops and Waiting On A Friend were great, though.
Apart from that, bring it on indeed!
I think the recent absurd tours are more Frankenstein-ish. If they choose Fiji Jim or Honest Man, no casual buyer would recognise that the pieces are decades old. The Stones sound hasn't changed a lot since ca. the Some Girls sessions IMHO. They could remix or partly re-record them to make them sound "fresher". Other suggestions?
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
keithsmanQuote
DandelionPowderman
That would be a Frankenstein-album, though
In fairness, the songs on TY were pretty fresh: from 1976-1979, where most of the tracks stemmed from 78/79. Mick did the overdubs in 1980.
The two exceptions: Tops and Waiting On A Friend were great, though.
Apart from that, bring it on indeed!
IS TOPS NOT THE MOST UNDERRATED STONES SONG EVER.
Seriously, no one ever mentions it, thanks Dande
I'm guessing this is 100 percent Jagger song, if i was Doxa i could make everyone believe its Keith all the way.
That Tops-riff is Keith all the way, Riffie
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Monsoon RagoonQuote
DandelionPowderman
That would be a Frankenstein-album, though
In fairness, the songs on TY were pretty fresh: from 1976-1979, where most of the tracks stemmed from 78/79. Mick did the overdubs in 1980.
The two exceptions: Tops and Waiting On A Friend were great, though.
Apart from that, bring it on indeed!
I think the recent absurd tours are more Frankenstein-ish. If they choose Fiji Jim or Honest Man, no casual buyer would recognise that the pieces are decades old. The Stones sound hasn't changed a lot since ca. the Some Girls sessions IMHO. They could remix or partly re-record them to make them sound "fresher". Other suggestions?
Of course they good. They would never touch Honest Man, though, as it is too similar to Sweet Thing. I guess that's why they abandoned it. Otherwise, it's a good tune.
Quote
Monsoon RagoonQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Monsoon RagoonQuote
DandelionPowderman
That would be a Frankenstein-album, though
In fairness, the songs on TY were pretty fresh: from 1976-1979, where most of the tracks stemmed from 78/79. Mick did the overdubs in 1980.
The two exceptions: Tops and Waiting On A Friend were great, though.
Apart from that, bring it on indeed!
I think the recent absurd tours are more Frankenstein-ish. If they choose Fiji Jim or Honest Man, no casual buyer would recognise that the pieces are decades old. The Stones sound hasn't changed a lot since ca. the Some Girls sessions IMHO. They could remix or partly re-record them to make them sound "fresher". Other suggestions?
Of course they good. They would never touch Honest Man, though, as it is too similar to Sweet Thing. I guess that's why they abandoned it. Otherwise, it's a good tune.
I don't see any similarities Honest Man - Sweet Thing at all, but I haven't listened to both for years. I think they maybe didn't use it, because it sounds too much like The Rolling Stones ;-)
Quote
KevinLocksPerm
Bored with all this endless talk and speculation about a new album.
They should take what they've got and mix it up with outtakes from Voodoo Lounge, Bridges to Babylon, 2002 sessions and A Bigger Bang and just release it as an album.
Let's face it apart from a few people on here nobody would really notice or care.
Quote
keithsmanQuote
DandelionPowderman
That would be a Frankenstein-album, though
In fairness, the songs on TY were pretty fresh: from 1976-1979, where most of the tracks stemmed from 78/79. Mick did the overdubs in 1980.
The two exceptions: Tops and Waiting On A Friend were great, though.
Apart from that, bring it on indeed!
IS TOPS NOT THE MOST UNDERRATED STONES SONG EVER.
Seriously, no one ever mentions it, thanks Dande
I'm guessing this is 100 percent Jagger song, if i was Doxa i could make everyone believe its Keith all the way.
Quote
KevinLocksPerm
Bored with all this endless talk and speculation about a new album.
They should take what they've got and mix it up with outtakes from Voodoo Lounge, Bridges to Babylon, 2002 sessions and A Bigger Bang and just release it as an album.
Let's face it apart from a few people on here nobody would really notice or care.
Quote
nickQuote
KevinLocksPerm
Bored with all this endless talk and speculation about a new album.
They should take what they've got and mix it up with outtakes from Voodoo Lounge, Bridges to Babylon, 2002 sessions and A Bigger Bang and just release it as an album.
Let's face it apart from a few people on here nobody would really notice or care.
I have said this many times. I have been openly critical of Jagger's claims of " not commercially viable". For all this talk of him going to the London School of economics, he sure didn't know when to strike on this 20-30 years ago when they could had released dogshit and it would go platinum. He totally killed the Stones during 84-88 when Undercover only went to #4 and thought his solo stuff was all the rage. Damn, he puts out She's The Boss and had to divide time between Primative Cool and Dirty Work? Are you f'ing kidding me Mick? We all see how that turned out. Steel Wheels sessions can be reviewed. VooDoo Lounge sessions have at least another 10-15 in them. There is probably a few Bridges outtakes that can be looked at. Obviously we just saw what happened a few days ago with the Licks stuff. Wandering Spirit "stole" what should have been Stones material. It's very very frustrating to see this happen again and again. Stop being so dismissive of the vaults and this "yeah, i don't want to talk about it" Sir Mick. Keith is no help with this either. He has to be more assertive in getting these released. They are Jagger / Richards songs. The fans are getting older and less interested. The fans are spending on their grandkids. Get it done Glimmer Twins, you're fading and fading fast.
Quote
keithsman
Any chance of links to these new old songs ?
Quote
KevinLocksPerm
Bored with all this endless talk and speculation about a new album.
They should take what they've got and mix it up with outtakes from Voodoo Lounge, Bridges to Babylon, 2002 sessions and A Bigger Bang and just release it as an album.
Let's face it apart from a few people on here nobody would really notice or care.
Quote
Elmo LewisQuote
keithsmanQuote
DandelionPowderman
That would be a Frankenstein-album, though
In fairness, the songs on TY were pretty fresh: from 1976-1979, where most of the tracks stemmed from 78/79. Mick did the overdubs in 1980.
The two exceptions: Tops and Waiting On A Friend were great, though.
Apart from that, bring it on indeed!
IS TOPS NOT THE MOST UNDERRATED STONES SONG EVER.
Seriously, no one ever mentions it, thanks Dande
I'm guessing this is 100 percent Jagger song, if i was Doxa i could make everyone believe its Keith all the way.
Yes. Fantastic
Quote
keithsman
I wonder why the vaults are left alone, is Mick waiting for keith to move on so he can release them and mix them his way.
Quote
35love
*no-one ever mentions ‘Tops’ ?!
Hello my name is 35love and I’ve mentioned ‘Tops’ several times.
All 3 known versions: Alt raw 1972, recorded track official version, and the 1 time live Philly 1981 concert version, which I have confessed ‘this song floats my boat, makes me giddy happy, those guitars, etc’
Quote
35loveQuote
keithsman
I wonder why the vaults are left alone, is Mick waiting for keith to move on so he can release them and mix them his way.
Haven’t we raided them pretty good?
I think so, yes.
umm..they played it in in Boulder Colorado also in 81...on a bootleg called Pave Boulder 81....Quote
35loveQuote
Elmo LewisQuote
keithsmanQuote
DandelionPowderman
That would be a Frankenstein-album, though
In fairness, the songs on TY were pretty fresh: from 1976-1979, where most of the tracks stemmed from 78/79. Mick did the overdubs in 1980.
The two exceptions: Tops and Waiting On A Friend were great, though.
Apart from that, bring it on indeed!
IS TOPS NOT THE MOST UNDERRATED STONES SONG EVER.
Seriously, no one ever mentions it, thanks Dande
I'm guessing this is 100 percent Jagger song, if i was Doxa i could make everyone believe its Keith all the way.
Yes. Fantastic
*no-one ever mentions ‘Tops’ ?!
Hello my name is 35love and I’ve mentioned ‘Tops’ several times.
All 3 known versions: Alt raw 1972, recorded track official version, and the 1 time live Philly 1981 concert version, which I have confessed ‘this song floats my boat, makes me giddy happy, those guitars, etc’
Would probably be a great Stones LP....Quote
KevinLocksPerm
Bored with all this endless talk and speculation about a new album.
They should take what they've got and mix it up with outtakes from Voodoo Lounge, Bridges to Babylon, 2002 sessions and A Bigger Bang and just release it as an album.
Let's face it apart from a few people on here nobody would really notice or care.
Quote
35love
Alt raw 1972 ...
Quote
Monsoon RagoonQuote
DandelionPowderman
That would be a Frankenstein-album, though
In fairness, the songs on TY were pretty fresh: from 1976-1979, where most of the tracks stemmed from 78/79. Mick did the overdubs in 1980.
The two exceptions: Tops and Waiting On A Friend were great, though.
Apart from that, bring it on indeed!
I think the recent absurd "for the money only" tours - with three or four own "new" songs (Steel Wheels onwards) since 2012 - are more Frankenstein-ish. If they choose Fiji Jim or Honest Man, no casual buyer would recognise that the pieces are decades old. The Stones sound hasn't changed a lot since ca. the Some Girls sessions IMHO. They could remix or partly re-record them to make them sound "fresher". Other suggestions? - The problem is, if they do Tattoo You II (which is in fact Tattoo You IV) they probably don't play the or most of the stuff then. There's no place for "old new" songs in a 19 or 20 songs shows with 14-15 warhorses.