For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
georgelicksQuote
GasLightStreet
There's really nothing on the other side? That's stupid!
Who cares about a vinyl single nowadays? We're on 2006 not 1966.
Its a collector item, priced very high to collect easy money from vinyl fans.
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
georgelicksQuote
GasLightStreet
There's really nothing on the other side? That's stupid!
Who cares about a vinyl single nowadays? We're on 2006 not 1966.
Its a collector item, priced very high to collect easy money from vinyl fans.
People that by vinyl! What, you don't have any love for the B-side?
Quote
powerage78
"The Stones are more impressive on the fast tracks than on the slower ones, due to the absence of a remarkable soloist in the band".
Quote
powerage78
"The Stones are more impressive on the fast tracks than on the slower ones, due to the absence of a remarkable soloist in the band".Quote
HairballQuote
powerage78
[www.lefigaro.fr]
------------------
Google traduction
September 29, Don Was revealed us , in a world first, the content of the first studio album recorded by British group from A Bigger Bang in 2005. Title Blue and Lonesome, it was etched in the London studio of Mark Knopfler. Since Aftermath, in 1966, the group has devoted itself to building an original repertoire. On Blue and Lonesome, Jagger, Richards and Charlie Watts reconnect with their past blues bands. A side step sketched while the Stones were completing original compositions. The twelve titles of the album originate from the 1950s and 1960s, with particular emphasis on the Chicago scene of the time.
Upon first listen, the quality of harmonica playing of Mick Jagger jumps ears. Keith Richards once said about his enemy brother he was never as sincere as when blowing into the instrument. Present on almost all of the album, the harmonica is the undisputed star of the case.
It is refreshing to hear the seven-year-olds applying to reproduce the music that has so much influenced them in their early days. The relatively small instrumentation (2 guitars, bass, drums and piano) evokes the sound of the Chess label, that of Muddy Waters, Chuck Berry and Howlin 'Wolf in their infancy. The saturation applied on the whole disc spoils quickly listening to the disc, made artificial by this process. The band played this album live, in the same room, which he had not done for a very long time.
A real record of old men
Few standards on this disc with several pearls of Little Walter repertoire, including the title track Blue and Lonesome, from Howlin 'Wolf (two titles, which are among the best of the selection), Magic Sam, Eddie Taylor and Otis Rush between other. The Stones are more impressive on the fast tracks than on the strolls, due to the absence of a soloist scoring in their ranks.
The emergence of Eric Clapton on guitar on two songs propels the slow blues to the spheres that the group never reached since the departure of Mick Taylor in 1974. The guitar hero, near the Stones since the early 1960s, is one of the two guests of the project with drummer Jim Keltner, credited for the first time on one of their records.
Application of the group makes it even nicer drive than anything he has produced since the correct Voodoo Lounge in 1994. Concerned and applied, the musicians found a simplicity that was lacking some of their overproduced albums, on which They seemed to run after the trends. By designing a real old record, Jagger and his accomplices seem to make peace with their inheritance. Who would have said, while paying tribute to their idols in the British Blues Boom, that they would continue to do so largely after the age of their favorite bluesmen ?
Thanks powerage for the google translation!
"It is refreshing to hear the seven-year-olds applying to reproduce the music that has so much influenced them in their early days".
The writer seems to somewhat contradict himself below, maybe due to the translation?
He seems to say the fast tracks are better due to no solos, but then says the slower tunes are the best because of the solos.
"The Stones are more impressive on the fast tracks than on the strolls, due to the absence of a soloist scoring in their ranks".
"The emergence of Eric Clapton on guitar on two songs propels the slow blues to the spheres that the group never reached since the departure of Mick Taylor in 1974".
At any rate, I agree with the Mick Taylor comment.
"...the musicians found a simplicity that was lacking some of their overproduced albums, on which They seemed to run after the trends".
Hallelulujah!
Quote
mpj200
I prefer the slower cuts. And the solos with Clapton are not all him, they are more like weaving, duo solos.
Quote
Spud
Each & every one of these reviews [good & bad alike] is complete drivel !
[Just my opinion & review of the reviews you understand ]
Quote
Cristiano RadtkeQuote
GasLightStreetQuote
georgelicksQuote
GasLightStreet
There's really nothing on the other side? That's stupid!
Who cares about a vinyl single nowadays? We're on 2006 not 1966.
Its a collector item, priced very high to collect easy money from vinyl fans.
People that by vinyl! What, you don't have any love for the B-side?
Oh I Do Like To See Me On The 'B' Side
Thanks, Deltics!
Quote
GasLightStreet
There's really nothing on the other side? That's stupid!
Quote
ThommieQuote
GasLightStreet
There's really nothing on the other side? That's stupid!
That's really something!
Quote
Ross
Thanks for the post, Cristiano. Another great review!
Quote
RokyfanQuote
Ross
Thanks for the post, Cristiano. Another great review!
Wait. I thought all the reviews were complete drivel??
And this one; only 4 out of 5 stars????
And "It’s not a perfect album"???
WTF???
Quote
35love
You guys are killing me reviewing it before the whole release.
It's going to take me a few weeks after Dec. 2nd FULL RELEASE,
Need Full Release! (Full release baby, hmm maybe a new song there w/ phrase)
I am going to then have to come back here and slog thru this,
anyway,
Cheers --
Quote
mpj200
What makes this album unique is not just the fact that it's blues covers, but the way it was recorded. Live. And this created a different vibe and mix than the usual records where Mick and Keith lay the foundation, and everyone else falls in and sprinkles their bit on top.
This is a true band album. And if you are OK that it's all blues covers, it probably is their best since Some Girls.
Quote
KRiffhardQuote
mpj200
What makes this album unique is not just the fact that it's blues covers, but the way it was recorded. Live. And this created a different vibe and mix than the usual records where Mick and Keith lay the foundation, and everyone else falls in and sprinkles their bit on top.
This is a true band album. And if you are OK that it's all blues covers, it probably is their best since Some Girls.
I missed 'their best album since Exile/Some Girls/Tattoo You'!!
Quote
Redhotcarpet
Maybe this album turns out better than I thought. Hm. But the production? Nah. Too much loudness war going on. I really wish theyd done this live like they did but first find the perfect studio, cellar or garage and dont turn up everything to the max. And Mick seriously should try to let himself go and try to express something. He plays a great harmonica though. 3/5.
Quote
HMS
The three songs I´ve heard so far are recorded/mixed/whatever so loud that they are sometimes heavily distorted. That´s most unenjoyable.
I´m afraid all of the songs will turn out to sound that way. Musically the songs are very good and Mick´s singing is amazing. After all that overacted singing-posing on the last couple of albums I didn´t knew that he actually still can sing in a "normal way".
But: Their best album since Some Girls? Never. This is all covers, no originals. It seems to be well done but just like Crosseyed Heart it isn´t Manna from heaven. Maybe it will be boring to listen to it, 12 more or less similar songs in a row. Always the harmonica, always the singing & breathing-at-the-same-time vocal gimmick, always the distorted guitars, I really don´t know.... I like the three songs we´ve heard so far, but basically it´s all just the same... not much variety.
Best album since Some Girls, btw, of course is DW.
Quote
RokyfanQuote
Ross
Thanks for the post, Cristiano. Another great review!
Wait. I thought all the reviews were complete drivel??
And this one; only 4 out of 5 stars????
And "It’s not a perfect album"???
WTF???
Quote
RossQuote
RokyfanQuote
Ross
Thanks for the post, Cristiano. Another great review!
Wait. I thought all the reviews were complete drivel??
And this one; only 4 out of 5 stars????
And "It’s not a perfect album"???
WTF???
I never said the reviews were complete drivel, that was someone else. I am enjoying them.
Quote
HMS
The three songs I´ve heard so far are recorded/mixed/whatever so loud that they are sometimes heavily distorted. That´s most unenjoyable.
I´m afraid all of the songs will turn out to sound that way. Musically the songs are very good and Mick´s singing is amazing. After all that overacted singing-posing on the last couple of albums I didn´t knew that he actually still can sing in a "normal way".
But: Their best album since Some Girls? Never. This is all covers, no originals. It seems to be well done but just like Crosseyed Heart it isn´t Manna from heaven. Maybe it will be boring to listen to it, 12 more or less similar songs in a row. Always the harmonica, always the singing & breathing-at-the-same-time vocal gimmick, always the distorted guitars, I really don´t know.... I like the three songs we´ve heard so far, but basically it´s all just the same... not much variety.
Best album since Some Girls, btw, of course is DW.
Quote
georgelicks
It looks like many journalists are not getting the new album, or they never heard a blues album before, of course that a blues album is repetitive, and doing a blues album in 2016 is so out of time with current times than some people are expecting a new Miss You, time is not on their side anymore for creative purpose since a LONG time ago.