For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Stoneage
There are no holy books. I'm not blaming the people. Islam is simply backwards religion. It doesn't contribute to a modern, secular society. I'm not the only one with these beliefs as I mentioned earlier.
Ask Richard Dawkins for example. What do you say about a religion that condemns you to death for leaving it?
Quote
mr_djaQuote
Stoneage
There are no holy books. I'm not blaming the people. Islam is simply backwards religion. It doesn't contribute to a modern, secular society. I'm not the only one with these beliefs as I mentioned earlier.
Ask Richard Dawkins for example. What do you say about a religion that condemns you to death for leaving it?
I say: "It's not supposed to be discussed here at IORR". This isn't the time or place for this discussion. No need getting yourself banned.
Peace,
Mr DJA
Quote
Stoneage
I agree. I'll leave it there.
Quote
Stoneage
There is a distinction between islam and muslims, Treacles. In muslim countries you'll have no choice whether you want to become a muslim or not. And you can't leave your religion. And what good does islam bring to modern societies in the west or even their own countries? To combat the backward religion of islam isn't the same as to combat muslims. It's the religion that is bad, not the vast majority of the people.
Quote
buttons67
its america and its foreign policy that contributes largely to this crap, and britain and others follow.
western governments go into the middle east, and set about changing a countries regime, invading countries and stealing its oil, who gave isis the power in the first place, who gave iraq its weapons in the 80,s only to have to fight against it in the gulf was in the 90,s,who overthrew the iranian government in 1979, who gave pol pots murderous regime the power by flattening its enemy in cambodia during the vietnam war, yes it was america.
and sadly no one seems to learn the obvious historical lesson. if you change a countries regime, and install a replacement, you give that new regime more power than they otherwise would have.
no use blaming islam or muslims all the time, we never had this crap on this scale 30 years ago.
western goverments are to blame, western politicians dont care about the ordinary folk who get killed, and dont care how much security measures get used to combat terrorism. western governments like a few terorists, they create them, gives them something to stir up the ordinary innocent folk, and western governments will darn sure make sure security measues are more than adequate to save themselves.
maybe if all westeners campaigned against mostly american foreign policy and lobbied our governments not to follow suit, we wouldnt need to interfere in middle eastern politics for a change.
theoretically in a democracy we all get the government we deserve eventually, so who said we live in a democracy, cos innocent folk dont deserve to die.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StoneageQuote
DandelionPowderman
You can blame their interpretation of islam, shared by a microscopical part of the Muslims.
I wish it was easy as that, Dandy. But it isn't. Islam isn't a reformed religion like christianity. It still has some very harmful elements in it. I would for one blame islam. I'm no the only one.
Even Napoleon Bonaparte and Churchill was very critical about islam. And people like Richard Dawkins today. And rightfully so. I would even say that today it's even more important to combat the evil of islam.
That's just ignorant, imo.
There are also huge, peaceful Islamic countries (where other religions are allowed as well). Will you blame those countries and their interpretation of the holy book religion as well?
It's a bit like saying all americans are rooting for the Donald. Of course they aren't.
Quote
Stoneage
There are no holy books. I'm not blaming the people. Islam is simply backwards religion. It doesn't contribute to a modern, secular society. I'm not the only one with these beliefs as I mentioned earlier.
Ask Richard Dawkins for example. What do you say about a religion that condemns you to death for leaving it?
Quote
buttons67
its america and its foreign policy that contributes largely to this crap, and britain and others follow.
western governments go into the middle east, and set about changing a countries regime, invading countries and stealing its oil, who gave isis the power in the first place, who gave iraq its weapons in the 80,s only to have to fight against it in the gulf was in the 90,s,who overthrew the iranian government in 1979, who gave pol pots murderous regime the power by flattening its enemy in cambodia during the vietnam war, yes it was america.
and sadly no one seems to learn the obvious historical lesson. if you change a countries regime, and install a replacement, you give that new regime more power than they otherwise would have.
no use blaming islam or muslims all the time, we never had this crap on this scale 30 years ago.
western goverments are to blame, western politicians dont care about the ordinary folk who get killed, and dont care how much security measures get used to combat terrorism. western governments like a few terorists, they create them, gives them something to stir up the ordinary innocent folk, and western governments will darn sure make sure security measues are more than adequate to save themselves.
maybe if all westeners campaigned against mostly american foreign policy and lobbied our governments not to follow suit, we wouldnt need to interfere in middle eastern politics for a change.
theoretically in a democracy we all get the government we deserve eventually, so who said we live in a democracy, cos innocent folk dont deserve to die.
Quote
matxil
@MileHigh. People are supposed to learn from their mistakes. That is why, as you so rightly say, Germany did well after the second world war: because the allies chose not to make the same mistakes as they did after the first world war.
Let's hope the western countries are wise enough now to change their politics in the middle east, instead of blaming everything on refugees, muslims or in trusting ultraright politics. There's a reason for history books.
Quote
stanloveQuote
matxil
@MileHigh. People are supposed to learn from their mistakes. That is why, as you so rightly say, Germany did well after the second world war: because the allies chose not to make the same mistakes as they did after the first world war.
Let's hope the western countries are wise enough now to change their politics in the middle east, instead of blaming everything on refugees, muslims or in trusting ultraright politics. There's a reason for history books.
OK what should the west do now? I would rather someone like you answer this now instead of waiting to see what happens and then finding someway to blame the West.
Quote
MileHighQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
StoneageQuote
DandelionPowderman
You can blame their interpretation of islam, shared by a microscopical part of the Muslims.
I wish it was easy as that, Dandy. But it isn't. Islam isn't a reformed religion like christianity. It still has some very harmful elements in it. I would for one blame islam. I'm no the only one.
Even Napoleon Bonaparte and Churchill was very critical about islam. And people like Richard Dawkins today. And rightfully so. I would even say that today it's even more important to combat the evil of islam.
That's just ignorant, imo.
There are also huge, peaceful Islamic countries (where other religions are allowed as well). Will you blame those countries and their interpretation of the holy book religion as well?
It's a bit like saying all americans are rooting for the Donald. Of course they aren't.
You should look up Brigitte Gabriel on YouTube and elsewhere. If you disagree with her by all means look up people that argue against what she says. Absorb both sides of the debate from her frame of reference.
She says intelligence estimates are that between 15% and 25% of the Muslim population are active or give moral or financial support to radical Islamic fundamentalists. That's hundreds of millions of people that believe that it is ethically and morally right to chop off your hands if you are caught stealing.
My feeling is that your comments are simplistic and naive and politically correct. It's not the majority of good decent Islamic people that we have to worry about, it's the millions that are radicalized or that are sympathetic to radical ideas. They are the ones that can effect change in a bad way.
Quote
matxilQuote
stanloveQuote
matxil
@MileHigh. People are supposed to learn from their mistakes. That is why, as you so rightly say, Germany did well after the second world war: because the allies chose not to make the same mistakes as they did after the first world war.
Let's hope the western countries are wise enough now to change their politics in the middle east, instead of blaming everything on refugees, muslims or in trusting ultraright politics. There's a reason for history books.
OK what should the west do now? I would rather someone like you answer this now instead of waiting to see what happens and then finding someway to blame the West.
I thought I had made that perfectly clear already:
- stop selling arms to Saudi-Arabia
- stop supporting dictators in the middle-east (like we did with Sadam Hussein, like we do now with Egypt and Saudi-Arabia)
- stop training "guerrillas", "freedom-fighters", "jihadi" or any other "allies" in the middle east (like we did with Bin Laden, like we did with Isis).
- stop starting wars in the middle-east (hey, it didn't really work either in Asia or South-America either, remember?)
- support dissidents from these countries who seek refugee in Europe
- support dissident muslim voices (homosexuals, feminists, social-democrats, freedom of speech advocates, all those many muslim people who fight for more liberal governments and are currently tortured in many jails of countries supported by us (did I mention Saudi-Arabia already?))
Quote
buttons67
its america and its foreign policy that contributes largely to this crap, and britain and others follow.
...