For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
MathijsQuote
Eleanor Rigby
Dont forget the great man didnt believe it was Taylor on plunder...haha...our ears can be a problem...or maybe the information we get???
Wot? Where did you get that idea from?
Somebody stated at the time it was Taylor on lead AND rhtyhm guitar, and that I found rediculous as it clearly was Taylor on lead and Richards on rhtyhm. At the time people also thought Taylor's parts where from '72, and I made the case it sounded way too modern to be vintage. And I also thought and still think it was a bad cut and paste job.
Mathijs
As I remember it we discussed whether the Taylor sound could be a 1973 sound, but concluded on his sound being to clean and modern to be vintage Taylor.
I don't know what Eleanor Rigby refers to when he says you doubted it was Taylor, as I can't recall that at all.
Quote
MathijsQuote
Eleanor Rigby
Dont forget the great man didnt believe it was Taylor on plunder...haha...our ears can be a problem...or maybe the information we get???
Wot? Where did you get that idea from?
Somebody stated at the time it was Taylor on lead AND rhtyhm guitar, and that I found rediculous as it clearly was Taylor on lead and Richards on rhtyhm. At the time people also thought Taylor's parts where from '72, and I made the case it sounded way too modern to be vintage. And I also thought and still think it was a bad cut and paste job.
Mathijs
Quote
DandelionPowderman
I'm pretty sure who claimed that Taylor also played the rhythm guitar on PMS.
(And I'm not talking about the one who posted it here on IORR)
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Rigby has a sticky memory
Quote
Eleanor RigbyQuote
MathijsQuote
Eleanor Rigby
Dont forget the great man didnt believe it was Taylor on plunder...haha...our ears can be a problem...or maybe the information we get???
Wot? Where did you get that idea from?
Somebody stated at the time it was Taylor on lead AND rhtyhm guitar, and that I found rediculous as it clearly was Taylor on lead and Richards on rhtyhm. At the time people also thought Taylor's parts where from '72, and I made the case it sounded way too modern to be vintage. And I also thought and still think it was a bad cut and paste job.
Mathijs
[www.iorr.org]
Scroll half way down..
Quote
MathijsQuote
Eleanor RigbyQuote
MathijsQuote
Eleanor Rigby
Dont forget the great man didnt believe it was Taylor on plunder...haha...our ears can be a problem...or maybe the information we get???
Wot? Where did you get that idea from?
Somebody stated at the time it was Taylor on lead AND rhtyhm guitar, and that I found rediculous as it clearly was Taylor on lead and Richards on rhtyhm. At the time people also thought Taylor's parts where from '72, and I made the case it sounded way too modern to be vintage. And I also thought and still think it was a bad cut and paste job.
Mathijs
[www.iorr.org]
Scroll half way down..
Then you should read the entire thread again. We clearly discussed PMS, and my remark was about the remainder of the album.
Btwm I missed Keith's horrible lead guitar overdubs though on those first listens. Forgot which songs he did that on.
Quote
LieBQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Mathijs
Wot? Where did you get that idea from?
Somebody stated at the time it was Taylor on lead AND rhtyhm guitar, and that I found rediculous as it clearly was Taylor on lead and Richards on rhtyhm. At the time people also thought Taylor's parts where from '72, and I made the case it sounded way too modern to be vintage. And I also thought and still think it was a bad cut and paste job.
Mathijs
As I remember it we discussed whether the Taylor sound could be a 1973 sound, but concluded on his sound being to clean and modern to be vintage Taylor.
I don't know what Eleanor Rigby refers to when he says you doubted it was Taylor, as I can't recall that at all.
My recollection is that Mathijs thought Taylor's parts on Plundered where from circa '71. But I probably remember wrong.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Found it! It was 1972, and the GHS-sessions
Quote
MathijsQuote
DandelionPowderman
Found it! It was 1972, and the GHS-sessions
Funny thing is that I still find Keith's guitar sounding very much like his guitar on Tops, which is this fairly heavy and smooth crunch sound. But, Charlie's drums and especially his snare and crash has that distinct Exile sound, that's missed on later recordings.
Mathijs
Quote
TravelinMan
Is Mick Taylor on bass? Richards on rhythm?
Quote
Rocky Dijon
This has been the most interesting thread in ages. This is the sort of scholarship (even if later refuted) that made iorr great for me in years past.
Quote
TravelinManQuote
Rocky Dijon
This has been the most interesting thread in ages. This is the sort of scholarship (even if later refuted) that made iorr great for me in years past.
Because of the Stills discovery?
I think the line-up could be:
Stills: Guitar
Richards: Guitar
Hopkins: Piano
Taylor: Bass
Watts: Drums
Quote
TravelinManQuote
Rocky Dijon
This has been the most interesting thread in ages. This is the sort of scholarship (even if later refuted) that made iorr great for me in years past.
Because of the Stills discovery?
Quote
Rocky DijonQuote
TravelinManQuote
Rocky Dijon
This has been the most interesting thread in ages. This is the sort of scholarship (even if later refuted) that made iorr great for me in years past.
Because of the Stills discovery?
Because it's about The Rolling Stones and their work rather than endless arguments over whether they'll actually finish the new album, whether Mick has writer's block/lost his voice/lost his way, whether Keith can't play/sing/write, whether they're going to play 50 concerts in 2019 and perform 8 songs every night from the new album that takes the entire world by storm, or why a person should leave the forum because they lean right or left in their political thinking.
Quote
Rocky DijonQuote
TravelinManQuote
Rocky Dijon
This has been the most interesting thread in ages. This is the sort of scholarship (even if later refuted) that made iorr great for me in years past.
Because of the Stills discovery?
Because it's about The Rolling Stones and their work rather than endless arguments over whether they'll actually finish the new album, whether Mick has writer's block/lost his voice/lost his way, whether Keith can't play/sing/write, whether they're going to play 50 concerts in 2019 and perform 8 songs every night from the new album that takes the entire world by storm, or why a person should leave the forum because they lean right or left in their political thinking.