For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
gotdablouseQuote
treaclefingersQuote
gotdablouse
Banned SINCE the MJ "call" it seems...because he did ask Keith how he was getting along with Mick, which was a potentially "awkward" question. Keith's answer was even "worse" than Mick's, basically he has nothing to say about it.
But yes, like in 2012 Keith doesn't seem to know what's going on, where the rehearsals will take place, which guests will be there, why they wouldn't record a "back to the roots" record, etc...He's just waiting for instructions, like Charlie, Ronnie and all the support players. Mick is running the show with the "Director of Business Affairs"...
and really, who the hell are we to argue considering 50 years on we're getting new tours, and if not new releases, at least new/old music.
Absolutely, the proof is the pudding, still, one would hope that Keith could have as much input as the "Director of Business Affairs", or at least "some" input, but I suppose it's been like that since business resumed in 1989 so no real surprise there.
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
gotdablouseQuote
treaclefingersQuote
gotdablouse
Banned SINCE the MJ "call" it seems...because he did ask Keith how he was getting along with Mick, which was a potentially "awkward" question. Keith's answer was even "worse" than Mick's, basically he has nothing to say about it.
But yes, like in 2012 Keith doesn't seem to know what's going on, where the rehearsals will take place, which guests will be there, why they wouldn't record a "back to the roots" record, etc...He's just waiting for instructions, like Charlie, Ronnie and all the support players. Mick is running the show with the "Director of Business Affairs"...
and really, who the hell are we to argue considering 50 years on we're getting new tours, and if not new releases, at least new/old music.
Absolutely, the proof is the pudding, still, one would hope that Keith could have as much input as the "Director of Business Affairs", or at least "some" input, but I suppose it's been like that since business resumed in 1989 so no real surprise there.
To me, Keith seems like one of those guys that wants to make the decisions, but then won't do the work that's necessary to get the job done. Whereas Mick inserts himself into every aspect.
If you don't have that interest, then the other guy overwhelms your contribution.
As Keith, you're annoyed, you bitch about 'Brenda' to friends, and make him the butt of the joke.
At the end of the day though, you realize that he's paved the path and all you have to do is walk down it.
Quote
rockdoc8885
Sorry if this was already mentioned, but I think the Stones are missing a golden opportunity of expanding and enhancing their live sound by not including Mick Taylor.
Quote
angee
Nerves.
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
gotdablouseQuote
treaclefingersQuote
gotdablouse
Banned SINCE the MJ "call" it seems...because he did ask Keith how he was getting along with Mick, which was a potentially "awkward" question. Keith's answer was even "worse" than Mick's, basically he has nothing to say about it.
But yes, like in 2012 Keith doesn't seem to know what's going on, where the rehearsals will take place, which guests will be there, why they wouldn't record a "back to the roots" record, etc...He's just waiting for instructions, like Charlie, Ronnie and all the support players. Mick is running the show with the "Director of Business Affairs"...
and really, who the hell are we to argue considering 50 years on we're getting new tours, and if not new releases, at least new/old music.
Absolutely, the proof is the pudding, still, one would hope that Keith could have as much input as the "Director of Business Affairs", or at least "some" input, but I suppose it's been like that since business resumed in 1989 so no real surprise there.
To me, Keith seems like one of those guys that wants to make the decisions, but then won't do the work that's necessary to get the job done. Whereas Mick inserts himself into every aspect.
If you don't have that interest, then the other guy overwhelms your contribution.
As Keith, you're annoyed, you bitch about 'Brenda' to friends, and make him the butt of the joke.
At the end of the day though, you realize that he's paved the path and all you have to do is walk down it.
Quote
EJM
What is it about keith that makes him more of a male icon than mick ?
Quote
vertigojoe
Keith has not given a single interesting interview in about 30 years. What were you expecting?
Quote
vertigojoe
Keith has not given a single interesting interview in about 30 years. What were you expecting?
Quote
Stoneage
Didn't we agree on the fact that Mr Maron is not a journalist and that it was PR rather than an "interview"? That is probably why Mr Maron was chosen. Sir Michael wants the PR but not the "interview" bits.
Who can blame him? He has probably done enough interviews in his career.
Quote
with sssoulQuote
vertigojoe
Keith has not given a single interesting interview in about 30 years. What were you expecting?
It depends what you're looking for. The journalist who got him to specify the strangest thing he'd ever snorted
was well pleased with that interview, as were his publishers. :E