For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
71TeleQuote
Rockman
a lot of non stones fans dont seem to realize this.
and a lotta hard-core Stones fans don't seem ta realize this either ....
+1
a lot of other fans feel like they need to disparage The Beatles all the time when they talk about the Stones. If The Beatles were so bad, why were the Stones always trying to follow in their footsteps, and why do we see an adoring Mick Jagger in so many photos of Beatle sessions?
Quote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
Rockman
a lot of non stones fans dont seem to realize this.
and a lotta hard-core Stones fans don't seem ta realize this either ....
+1
a lot of other fans feel like they need to disparage The Beatles all the time when they talk about the Stones. If The Beatles were so bad, why were the Stones always trying to follow in their footsteps, and why do we see an adoring Mick Jagger in so many photos of Beatle sessions?
Actually Jagger has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music. he was frinds with the Beatles though so why would he not hang out with them..
You are not going to start this again?
Quote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
Rockman
a lot of non stones fans dont seem to realize this.
and a lotta hard-core Stones fans don't seem ta realize this either ....
+1
a lot of other fans feel like they need to disparage The Beatles all the time when they talk about the Stones. If The Beatles were so bad, why were the Stones always trying to follow in their footsteps, and why do we see an adoring Mick Jagger in so many photos of Beatle sessions?
Actually Jagger has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music. he was frinds with the Beatles though so why would he not hang out with them..
You are not going to start this again?
I'm not starting anything. I was pointing out how many negative Beatle comments there tend to be here. As for what Jagger said, actions speak louder than (belated) words.
Quote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
Rockman
a lot of non stones fans dont seem to realize this.
and a lotta hard-core Stones fans don't seem ta realize this either ....
+1
a lot of other fans feel like they need to disparage The Beatles all the time when they talk about the Stones. If The Beatles were so bad, why were the Stones always trying to follow in their footsteps, and why do we see an adoring Mick Jagger in so many photos of Beatle sessions?
Actually Jagger has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music. he was frinds with the Beatles though so why would he not hang out with them..
You are not going to start this again?
I'm not starting anything. I was pointing out how many negative Beatle comments there tend to be here. As for what Jagger said, actions speak louder than (belated) words.
So you are starting it again..
Its just really important to you that Jagger likes the Beatles music.
When I see people like you I always think how people like Jagger feel. He has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music but some guy on the internet knows better..
Quote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
Rockman
a lot of non stones fans dont seem to realize this.
and a lotta hard-core Stones fans don't seem ta realize this either ....
+1
a lot of other fans feel like they need to disparage The Beatles all the time when they talk about the Stones. If The Beatles were so bad, why were the Stones always trying to follow in their footsteps, and why do we see an adoring Mick Jagger in so many photos of Beatle sessions?
Actually Jagger has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music. he was frinds with the Beatles though so why would he not hang out with them..
You are not going to start this again?
I'm not starting anything. I was pointing out how many negative Beatle comments there tend to be here. As for what Jagger said, actions speak louder than (belated) words.
So you are starting it again..
Its just really important to you that Jagger likes the Beatles music.
When I see people like you I always think how people like Jagger feel. He has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music but some guy on the internet knows better..
And you are a genius who knows what Jagger likes and what he doesn't, where one comment he made cancels out history. I was merely pointing out what is in the historical record, not claiming I know Jagger's mind, which is in fact what you seem to be doing. What's "important" to me is that The Beatles and Stones admired each other's music, attended each other's sessions, and even sang on each other's records, and that a few people here think that liking the Stones means hating The Beatles. Maybe you're one of them. How old are you, anyway?
Quote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
Rockman
a lot of non stones fans dont seem to realize this.
and a lotta hard-core Stones fans don't seem ta realize this either ....
+1
a lot of other fans feel like they need to disparage The Beatles all the time when they talk about the Stones. If The Beatles were so bad, why were the Stones always trying to follow in their footsteps, and why do we see an adoring Mick Jagger in so many photos of Beatle sessions?
Actually Jagger has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music. he was frinds with the Beatles though so why would he not hang out with them..
You are not going to start this again?
I'm not starting anything. I was pointing out how many negative Beatle comments there tend to be here. As for what Jagger said, actions speak louder than (belated) words.
So you are starting it again..
Its just really important to you that Jagger likes the Beatles music.
When I see people like you I always think how people like Jagger feel. He has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music but some guy on the internet knows better..
And you are a genius who knows what Jagger likes and what he doesn't, where one comment he made cancels out history. I was merely pointing out what is in the historical record, not claiming I know Jagger's mind, which is in fact what you seem to be doing. What's "important" to me is that The Beatles and Stones admired each other's music, attended each other's sessions, and even sang on each other's records, and that a few people here think that liking the Stones means hating The Beatles. Maybe you're one of them. How old are you, anyway?
Quote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
Rockman
a lot of non stones fans dont seem to realize this.
and a lotta hard-core Stones fans don't seem ta realize this either ....
+1
a lot of other fans feel like they need to disparage The Beatles all the time when they talk about the Stones. If The Beatles were so bad, why were the Stones always trying to follow in their footsteps, and why do we see an adoring Mick Jagger in so many photos of Beatle sessions?
Actually Jagger has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music. he was frinds with the Beatles though so why would he not hang out with them..
You are not going to start this again?
I'm not starting anything. I was pointing out how many negative Beatle comments there tend to be here. As for what Jagger said, actions speak louder than (belated) words.
So you are starting it again..
Its just really important to you that Jagger likes the Beatles music.
When I see people like you I always think how people like Jagger feel. He has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music but some guy on the internet knows better..
And you are a genius who knows what Jagger likes and what he doesn't, where one comment he made cancels out history. I was merely pointing out what is in the historical record, not claiming I know Jagger's mind, which is in fact what you seem to be doing. What's "important" to me is that The Beatles and Stones admired each other's music, attended each other's sessions, and even sang on each other's records, and that a few people here think that liking the Stones means hating The Beatles. Maybe you're one of them. How old are you, anyway?
I am genius enough to go with what jagger himself said about how he feels about the Beatles music. I am a stickler for accuracy and you are not being accurate.
Jagger said he didn't really admire the Beatles music, I believe Watts said the same thing. the others I believe we're fans of the Beatles music. So saying the Stones admired the Beatles music is not exactly correct.
So if you are asked to sing on a friends song you say no unless you are a big fan of of thier music..You are joking right.
If some here hate the Beatles music that's fine. Not sure why you would think everyone has to like the Beatles music. I have been on a Beatles site and YouTube videos where beatles fans are ripping the Stones music. Who cares..why are you so concerned that not everyone likes all music.
Quote
mickschix
DIRTY WORK, UNDERCOVER, EMOTIONAL RESCUE, SOME GIRLS & METAMORPHOSIS.
Quote
71TeleQuote
Stoneage
Should Dirty Work even be considered a Stones album? As I understand it it's Keith, Ronnie ans some session musicians with overlayd Jagger vocals on it.
By that measure I don't consider any album after Steel Wheels a true Stones album.
Quote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
Rockman
a lot of non stones fans dont seem to realize this.
and a lotta hard-core Stones fans don't seem ta realize this either ....
+1
a lot of other fans feel like they need to disparage The Beatles all the time when they talk about the Stones. If The Beatles were so bad, why were the Stones always trying to follow in their footsteps, and why do we see an adoring Mick Jagger in so many photos of Beatle sessions?
Actually Jagger has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music. he was frinds with the Beatles though so why would he not hang out with them..
You are not going to start this again?
I'm not starting anything. I was pointing out how many negative Beatle comments there tend to be here. As for what Jagger said, actions speak louder than (belated) words.
So you are starting it again..
Its just really important to you that Jagger likes the Beatles music.
When I see people like you I always think how people like Jagger feel. He has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music but some guy on the internet knows better..
And you are a genius who knows what Jagger likes and what he doesn't, where one comment he made cancels out history. I was merely pointing out what is in the historical record, not claiming I know Jagger's mind, which is in fact what you seem to be doing. What's "important" to me is that The Beatles and Stones admired each other's music, attended each other's sessions, and even sang on each other's records, and that a few people here think that liking the Stones means hating The Beatles. Maybe you're one of them. How old are you, anyway?
I am genius enough to go with what jagger himself said about how he feels about the Beatles music. I am a stickler for accuracy and you are not being accurate.
Jagger said he didn't really admire the Beatles music, I believe Watts said the same thing. the others I believe we're fans of the Beatles music. So saying the Stones admired the Beatles music is not exactly correct.
So if you are asked to sing on a friends song you say no unless you are a big fan of of thier music..You are joking right.
If some here hate the Beatles music that's fine. Not sure why you would think everyone has to like the Beatles music. I have been on a Beatles site and YouTube videos where beatles fans are ripping the Stones music. Who cares..why are you so concerned that not everyone likes all music.
The funny thing is the fight you picked with me about this has nothing to do with anything I actually said or believe. But I'll leave you to it. It is a waste of time to argue with you.
Quote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
Rockman
a lot of non stones fans dont seem to realize this.
and a lotta hard-core Stones fans don't seem ta realize this either ....
+1
a lot of other fans feel like they need to disparage The Beatles all the time when they talk about the Stones. If The Beatles were so bad, why were the Stones always trying to follow in their footsteps, and why do we see an adoring Mick Jagger in so many photos of Beatle sessions?
Actually Jagger has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music. he was frinds with the Beatles though so why would he not hang out with them..
You are not going to start this again?
I'm not starting anything. I was pointing out how many negative Beatle comments there tend to be here. As for what Jagger said, actions speak louder than (belated) words.
So you are starting it again..
Its just really important to you that Jagger likes the Beatles music.
When I see people like you I always think how people like Jagger feel. He has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music but some guy on the internet knows better..
And you are a genius who knows what Jagger likes and what he doesn't, where one comment he made cancels out history. I was merely pointing out what is in the historical record, not claiming I know Jagger's mind, which is in fact what you seem to be doing. What's "important" to me is that The Beatles and Stones admired each other's music, attended each other's sessions, and even sang on each other's records, and that a few people here think that liking the Stones means hating The Beatles. Maybe you're one of them. How old are you, anyway?
I am genius enough to go with what jagger himself said about how he feels about the Beatles music. I am a stickler for accuracy and you are not being accurate.
Jagger said he didn't really admire the Beatles music, I believe Watts said the same thing. the others I believe we're fans of the Beatles music. So saying the Stones admired the Beatles music is not exactly correct.
So if you are asked to sing on a friends song you say no unless you are a big fan of of thier music..You are joking right.
If some here hate the Beatles music that's fine. Not sure why you would think everyone has to like the Beatles music. I have been on a Beatles site and YouTube videos where beatles fans are ripping the Stones music. Who cares..why are you so concerned that not everyone likes all music.
The funny thing is the fight you picked with me about this has nothing to do with anything I actually said or believe. But I'll leave you to it. It is a waste of time to argue with you.
I didn't pick a fight with anyone. You just one more time tried to say that Jagger was a fan of the Beatles music..
Quote
Stoneage
What did we say about these pyramidical posts?
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
71TeleQuote
Stoneage
Should Dirty Work even be considered a Stones album? As I understand it it's Keith, Ronnie ans some session musicians with overlayd Jagger vocals on it.
By that measure I don't consider any album after Steel Wheels a true Stones album.
Same with Exile, GHS, Black And Blue etc. Lots of session musicians, and many band members are not playing their instruments on quite a few vital songs...
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
71TeleQuote
Stoneage
Should Dirty Work even be considered a Stones album? As I understand it it's Keith, Ronnie ans some session musicians with overlayd Jagger vocals on it.
By that measure I don't consider any album after Steel Wheels a true Stones album.
Same with Exile, GHS, Black And Blue etc. Lots of session musicians, and many band members are not playing their instruments on quite a few vital songs...
I know. What BULLSHIT man! "The Rolling Stones" my ass! They even named an album after a song that Keith had ZERO to do with, while on the following album not one Rolling Stone plays any of the guitar on a track... just... a sham!
Quote
Blueranger
The title says it all.
5. December's Children (not the songs at such, but as an album it doesn't work)
4. Bridges To Babylon (quite simply, too long. Too many by-numbers rockers)
3. Steel Wheels (badly 80's production, uninspired songwriting)
2. Emotional Rescue (lazy songwriting)
1. Dirty Work (bottom of it all. Horrible)
Honorable mentions: A Bigger Bang (again too long), It's Only Rock 'N' Roll (the first time they did an album that didn't sound nescessary).
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
GasLightStreetQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
71TeleQuote
Stoneage
Should Dirty Work even be considered a Stones album? As I understand it it's Keith, Ronnie ans some session musicians with overlayd Jagger vocals on it.
By that measure I don't consider any album after Steel Wheels a true Stones album.
Same with Exile, GHS, Black And Blue etc. Lots of session musicians, and many band members are not playing their instruments on quite a few vital songs...
I know. What BULLSHIT man! "The Rolling Stones" my ass! They even named an album after a song that Keith had ZERO to do with, while on the following album not one Rolling Stone plays any of the guitar on a track... just... a sham!
Hey! This was in the beginning of the disco era... In fairness, they both played keyboards on that tune
Quote
24FPS
Undercover
Undercover
Undercover
Undercover
Undercover
Quote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
Rockman
a lot of non stones fans dont seem to realize this.
and a lotta hard-core Stones fans don't seem ta realize this either ....
+1
a lot of other fans feel like they need to disparage The Beatles all the time when they talk about the Stones. If The Beatles were so bad, why were the Stones always trying to follow in their footsteps, and why do we see an adoring Mick Jagger in so many photos of Beatle sessions?
Actually Jagger has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music. he was frinds with the Beatles though so why would he not hang out with them..
You are not going to start this again?
I'm not starting anything. I was pointing out how many negative Beatle comments there tend to be here. As for what Jagger said, actions speak louder than (belated) words.
Quote
More Hot RocksQuote
mickschix
DIRTY WORK, UNDERCOVER, EMOTIONAL RESCUE, SOME GIRLS & METAMORPHOSIS.
Perfect
Quote
alhavu1Quote
71TeleQuote
stanloveQuote
71TeleQuote
Rockman
a lot of non stones fans dont seem to realize this.
and a lotta hard-core Stones fans don't seem ta realize this either ....
+1
a lot of other fans feel like they need to disparage The Beatles all the time when they talk about the Stones. If The Beatles were so bad, why were the Stones always trying to follow in their footsteps, and why do we see an adoring Mick Jagger in so many photos of Beatle sessions?
Actually Jagger has made it clear that he is not really a fan of the Beatles music. he was frinds with the Beatles though so why would he not hang out with them..
You are not going to start this again?
I'm not starting anything. I was pointing out how many negative Beatle comments there tend to be here. As for what Jagger said, actions speak louder than (belated) words.
This IS a Stones site