Tell Me :
Talk
Those are muscles whiskey, not arthritis. peace
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-16 21:13 by Naturalust.
I've read the book and I thought he was pretty easy on all concerned and he was as hard on himself as anyone else. Maybe everyone could be a little less of a panty waist about it...
They'll be back on tour 13 stronger than ever...
The fact that you've read it and don't understand, leaves me to believe you don't understand. Understand?
What does he have to apologise to Taylor about?
Besides a few public less than complimentary cuts I would think some money and songwriting credit matters could be content for such. But then again one-on-one relationships fall under a different set of rules when both people are famous. One good smile and a heartfelt hug, in front of say 300,000 people would probably do the trick. peace
Song writing credits? Lol.
I agree More Hot Rocks. 81 did suck.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-17 03:21 by More Hot Rocks.
I agreee also. ER, Undercover and Dirty Work were sure signs of what can happen when things start falling apart. Terrible crap
No Keith....Mick didn't. You screwed it up again as always. How many times are you gonna f*&^ up up the intro to Brown Sugar? And quit pointing at my cymbal. I know what I'm doing.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-17 03:30 by More Hot Rocks.
....I had a similar reaction...good for them both if they have been able to forgive each other and rekindle their friendship...not easy....Mick really stepped up here... as did Keith for admitting what he did.
you've said that "I dont see what needs to be forgiven myself"...IMHO that statement is you saying that you don't understand.
Please leave room for 'other opinions' if you're going to venture that for others to consume on a message board. You have a right to your opinion of course, as I have a right to mine. In my opinion you don't seem to have a full grasp, so I suggested you read the book. A bit surprising that you say you actually have read the book.
I'm perplexed as to your lack of understanding what the issues are between them, but that is your thing.
Has anyone figured out just who or where Keith is looking? He's looking in two places at once.
He's like a slightly whack old uncle...can't help but smile seeing that shot.
Now that's what I call going from bad to worse...
No man, naturalust is right. Taylor got royally ripped off for his great input. He was more than a bit part player during his tenure. It wouldn't have broken Keith's bank to cut Taylor in on the copyright of a few songs he helped shape up.
wow,eagle eye...Keith could be blamed for REM at least.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
Naturalust
()
Date: March 16, 2012 20:02
Quote
whiskey
Look at Keiths fingers, looks like he had problem fingers even that early and still done great things since. Go mate.
Those are muscles whiskey, not arthritis. peace
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-16 21:13 by Naturalust.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
scottkeef
()
Date: March 16, 2012 20:13
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
scottkeef
I dont see what needs to be forgiven myself.
Even Keith sees what needs to be forgiven...maybe you should read the book.
I've read the book and I thought he was pretty easy on all concerned and he was as hard on himself as anyone else. Maybe everyone could be a little less of a panty waist about it...
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
mtaylor
()
Date: March 16, 2012 20:33
Gee, then it's not arthritis - just natural from birth.Quote
whiskey
Look at Keiths fingers, looks like he had problem fingers even that early and still done great things since. Go mate.
They'll be back on tour 13 stronger than ever...
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
Redhotcarpet
()
Date: March 16, 2012 21:53
I dont wanna be that guy but imho you are all reading too much into this. They are business partners not friends. Legendary famous stars who share a past and a career. Mick probably includes Brian among the important figures who helped shape his early career while Keith pretends Mick is his brother and now they are to be friends again. I start to think Mick really is like a father or mother to Keith.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
schillid
()
Date: March 16, 2012 22:43
Quote
Rockman
always thought parts of LIFE were just a thinly disguised love letter to Mick
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
tomcasagranda
()
Date: March 16, 2012 22:54
I think both men, probably since Andrew Loog Oldham locked them in the kitchen together, have had their ups and downs.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
kleermaker
()
Date: March 16, 2012 23:46
O, reading the thread title I thought he apologized to Mick Taylor. But perhaps he does so later. Who knows.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: March 17, 2012 00:30
Quote
scottkeefQuote
treaclefingersQuote
scottkeef
I dont see what needs to be forgiven myself.
Even Keith sees what needs to be forgiven...maybe you should read the book.
I've read the book and I thought he was pretty easy on all concerned and he was as hard on himself as anyone else. Maybe everyone could be a little less of a panty waist about it...
The fact that you've read it and don't understand, leaves me to believe you don't understand. Understand?
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
scottkeef
()
Date: March 17, 2012 01:39
The fact that you don't leave room that someone may have a different opinion than your's ( or others for that matter) leaves me to believe theres is much YOU dont understand. Understand?Quote
treaclefingersQuote
scottkeefQuote
treaclefingersQuote
scottkeef
I dont see what needs to be forgiven myself.
Even Keith sees what needs to be forgiven...maybe you should read the book.
I've read the book and I thought he was pretty easy on all concerned and he was as hard on himself as anyone else. Maybe everyone could be a little less of a panty waist about it...
The fact that you've read it and don't understand, leaves me to believe you don't understand. Understand?
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: March 17, 2012 01:48
Quote
kleermaker
O, reading the thread title I thought he apologized to Mick Taylor. But perhaps he does so later. Who knows.
What does he have to apologise to Taylor about?
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
More Hot Rocks
()
Date: March 17, 2012 02:00
In 1980 Keith and I were not communicating well. Mick says. No wonders 81 sucked so bad.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-17 03:24 by More Hot Rocks.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-17 03:24 by More Hot Rocks.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
Naturalust
()
Date: March 17, 2012 02:01
Quote
His MajestyQuote
kleermaker
O, reading the thread title I thought he apologized to Mick Taylor. But perhaps he does so later. Who knows.
What does he have to apologise to Taylor about?
Besides a few public less than complimentary cuts I would think some money and songwriting credit matters could be content for such. But then again one-on-one relationships fall under a different set of rules when both people are famous. One good smile and a heartfelt hug, in front of say 300,000 people would probably do the trick. peace
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
More Hot Rocks
()
Date: March 17, 2012 02:02
Quote
More Hot Rocks
In 1980 Keith and I were not communicating well. Mick says. No wonders 81 sucked so bad.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: March 17, 2012 02:07
Quote
NaturalustQuote
His MajestyQuote
kleermaker
O, reading the thread title I thought he apologized to Mick Taylor. But perhaps he does so later. Who knows.
What does he have to apologise to Taylor about?
Besides a few public less than complimentary cuts I would think some money and songwriting credit matters could be content for such. But then again one-on-one relationships fall under a different set of rules when both people are famous. One good smile and a heartfelt hug, in front of say 300,000 people would probably do the trick. peace
Song writing credits? Lol.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
More Hot Rocks
()
Date: March 17, 2012 03:20
Quote
More Hot RocksQuote
More Hot Rocks
In 1980 Keith and I were not communicating well. Mick says. No wonders 81 sucked so bad.
I agree More Hot Rocks. 81 did suck.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-17 03:21 by More Hot Rocks.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
More Hot Rocks
()
Date: March 17, 2012 03:23
Quote
More Hot RocksQuote
More Hot RocksQuote
More Hot Rocks
In 1980 Keith and I were not communicating well. Mick says. No wonders 81 sucked so bad.
I agree More Hot Rocks. 81 did suck.
I agreee also. ER, Undercover and Dirty Work were sure signs of what can happen when things start falling apart. Terrible crap
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
More Hot Rocks
()
Date: March 17, 2012 03:27
Quote
shortfatfanny
No Keith....Mick didn't. You screwed it up again as always. How many times are you gonna f*&^ up up the intro to Brown Sugar? And quit pointing at my cymbal. I know what I'm doing.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-17 03:30 by More Hot Rocks.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
Rip This
()
Date: March 17, 2012 04:57
Quote
hot stuff
Mick is a 1st class guy...Wow what a great guy..If countries could forgive and move on like Mick we would
all be better off.. ON WITH THE SHOW!!!
....I had a similar reaction...good for them both if they have been able to forgive each other and rekindle their friendship...not easy....Mick really stepped up here... as did Keith for admitting what he did.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
Doxa
()
Date: March 17, 2012 14:04
"Sorry, pal.. hahahahha.... you can keep the money, pal... hahahha"
- Doxa
- Doxa
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: March 17, 2012 16:53
Quote
scottkeefThe fact that you don't leave room that someone may have a different opinion than your's ( or others for that matter) leaves me to believe theres is much YOU dont understand. Understand?Quote
treaclefingersQuote
scottkeefQuote
treaclefingersQuote
scottkeef
I dont see what needs to be forgiven myself.
Even Keith sees what needs to be forgiven...maybe you should read the book.
I've read the book and I thought he was pretty easy on all concerned and he was as hard on himself as anyone else. Maybe everyone could be a little less of a panty waist about it...
The fact that you've read it and don't understand, leaves me to believe you don't understand. Understand?
you've said that "I dont see what needs to be forgiven myself"...IMHO that statement is you saying that you don't understand.
Please leave room for 'other opinions' if you're going to venture that for others to consume on a message board. You have a right to your opinion of course, as I have a right to mine. In my opinion you don't seem to have a full grasp, so I suggested you read the book. A bit surprising that you say you actually have read the book.
I'm perplexed as to your lack of understanding what the issues are between them, but that is your thing.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
()
Date: March 17, 2012 17:21
Quote
shortfatfanny
Has anyone figured out just who or where Keith is looking? He's looking in two places at once.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: March 17, 2012 17:48
Quote
Doxa
"Sorry, pal.. hahahahha.... you can keep the money, pal... hahahha"
- Doxa
He's like a slightly whack old uncle...can't help but smile seeing that shot.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
TippyToe
()
Date: March 17, 2012 18:37
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
"He also triggered the “Todgergate” row – which led to Sir Elton John and Pete Townshend leaping to Sir Mick’s defence, insisting he had much to be proud of in the trouser department."
Now that's what I call going from bad to worse...
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
exhpart
()
Date: March 17, 2012 19:54
I always though that "Tiny Todger" crap was more demeaning of Keith than Mick (whether it's true or not) it was really very childish
The guys fathered 7 children by 4 beautiful women, that's man enough for me
As for Elton John and Pete Townsend leaping to Mick's defence... was this after the boy scouts camping holiday together?
The guys fathered 7 children by 4 beautiful women, that's man enough for me
As for Elton John and Pete Townsend leaping to Mick's defence... was this after the boy scouts camping holiday together?
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
Marie
()
Date: March 17, 2012 20:10
He certainly looks better without the eyeliner and whatever on his head.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
Silver Dagger
()
Date: March 17, 2012 20:22
Quote
His MajestyQuote
NaturalustQuote
His MajestyQuote
kleermaker
O, reading the thread title I thought he apologized to Mick Taylor. But perhaps he does so later. Who knows.
What does he have to apologise to Taylor about?
Besides a few public less than complimentary cuts I would think some money and songwriting credit matters could be content for such. But then again one-on-one relationships fall under a different set of rules when both people are famous. One good smile and a heartfelt hug, in front of say 300,000 people would probably do the trick. peace
Song writing credits? Lol.
No man, naturalust is right. Taylor got royally ripped off for his great input. He was more than a bit part player during his tenure. It wouldn't have broken Keith's bank to cut Taylor in on the copyright of a few songs he helped shape up.
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
riverrat
()
Date: March 17, 2012 20:30
Quote
exhpart
I always though that "Tiny Todger" crap was more demeaning of Keith than Mick (whether it's true or not) it was really very childish
The guys fathered 7 children by 4 beautiful women, that's man enough for me
As for Elton John and Pete Townsend leaping to Mick's defence... was this after the boy scouts camping holiday together?
Re: Rolling Stone: Keith Apologies to Mick
Posted by:
shortfatfanny
()
Date: March 17, 2012 23:09
Quote
WeLoveToPlayTheBluesQuote
shortfatfanny
Has anyone figured out just who or where Keith is looking? He's looking in two places at once.
wow,eagle eye...Keith could be blamed for REM at least.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
benito , DandelionPowderman , daspyknows , GJB , Justjon , kovach , SecondSet , spunky , steffialicia , Zotz
Guests:
2442
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10