For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
His MajestyQuote
Erik_Snow
Duh....if that was your point, nobody here would have disagreed with you.
Erm, in a round about way some have.
My other point that the studio version is the definitive version was already laid out nice and clear. It is the fully integrated reading of the song.
On Ya Ya's the song mostly acts as a mere vehicle to showcase and highlight some nice guitar playing, going by whitem8's last post on page 1 of this thread, successfully so. That's no definitive version of a song though IMO because on Ya Ya's the song and it's full lyrical content and meaning has been chopped up to accommodate said showcase on the LP.
Edited or not, it's a nice variation, nothing more, nothing less.
Quote
His Majesty
Brian is not really on the studio version and I don't moan about that. If the half hearted strummed acoustic part seen in One Plus One is all he had to offer they chose right in not including it. ><
Anyway, Brian made up for his absence on the following track on Beggars Banquet.
Quote
His Majesty
[...]
That's no definitive version of a song though IMO because on Ya Ya's the song and it's full lyrical content and meaning has been chopped up to accommodate said showcase on the LP.
Edited or not, it's a nice variation, nothing more, nothing less.
Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 2012-02-22 17:19 by His Majesty.
Quote
stonesdan60
This has been my favorite version of Sympathy ever since Ya Yas was released. I couldn't care less that a verse was edited out. The way they transformed the album version into a guitar driven rocker is brilliant. Keith's partial-chord licks during the intro and verses are sublime. The whole band just cooks. And the way Keith solos and the breaks it down and tosses it to Mick Taylor to finish is some of the most gripping moments of rock ever recorded. Perhaps my favorite Keith solo of all time, simple as it is. It smokes with attitude!
Quote
Erik_SnowQuote
His Majesty
[...]
That's no definitive version of a song though IMO because on Ya Ya's the song and it's full lyrical content and meaning has been chopped up to accommodate said showcase on the LP.
Edited or not, it's a nice variation, nothing more, nothing less.
Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 2012-02-22 17:19 by His Majesty.
With all respect His Majesty....you expect me to even consider a 5-times-edited and chopped up piece of writing as being "a post" ?
Quote
His MajestyQuote
Erik_Snow
With all respect His Majesty....you expect me to even consider a 5-times-edited and chopped up piece of writing as being "a post" ?
I'm on an iPad and typing on this thing is a chore and I don't expect anything from you.
Quote
His Majesty
My dislike for what followed is mostly about the style of guitar playing his replacement brought to the band and what it did to the quirky, but original sound The Rolling Stones had developed during 1962 - 1969 which set them apart from others. The introduction of a John Mayall's Bluesbreaker's school of guitar gods lead guitarist to The Rolling Stones made them sound more similar to other blues/rock acts of the time.
Quote
liddas
No discussion.
C
Quote
kleermaker
HM, you are of course entitled to dislike the Taylor era Stones and Mick Taylor's input in particular. But while he was in the Stones, he certainly didn't act like a guitar god at all. That's a far spread myth. On the studio albums his soloing is very modest. As for his live contribution: the prove is in comparing the Texas 1978 DVD with the live versions of the songs during Taylor's tenure. The funny thing is that Wood does solo on Live in Texas 1978 about as much as Taylor does on the official Brussels Affair. But no one seems to have noticed that. The cliché 'Taylor the Stones' noodling guitar god' is plain nonsense. He is no guitar god in the first place (so many guitarists are 'faster' and technically better), and secondly his licks and counterlicks are just as important as his solos. Surprise, Surprise: Ronnie Wood is soloing just as much as Mick Taylor does on those similar songs. The big difference: he did it not so good, to say it mildly. In that sense Taylor was indeed a 'guitar god'. But not in the usual sense of the word.
The Stones evolved from 1962 until 1974, GHS being their last great 'original' album, IORR being more like a status quo album. After IORR the Stones generally changed into a trendy band, following the popular musical trends of the time: punk, disco, reggae etc. That's one of the most important reasons people who got into the Stones at that time are so fond of that version of the band: they still recognize the sound of their time. Ask Doxa.
Quote
whitem8
In your opinion. But the version on GYYYO is pure bliss. The guitar dueling is in credible, and I for one don't even notice the edit. Why, because it is all just so sublime. I haven't heard a better version yet.
Quote
Erik_SnowQuote
MCDDTLC
Hey Guys,
The Maysles Bros. DO have SFTD on film!!! they have shown the complete concert
a couple of times for selected audiences and one of them said he is trying to get the Stones to allow release of the film... Keep your fingers crossed!!!
MLC
So what change have taken place since the 2008 screening ? :
In 2008, this was posted
Date: January 7, 2008 19:15
Damn!!! The folks over at Mayles org. are saying: NO plans on releasing this
extra footage they have... One shot deal from the other night.
Quote
MCDDTLCQuote
Erik_SnowQuote
MCDDTLC
Hey Guys,
The Maysles Bros. DO have SFTD on film!!! they have shown the complete concert
a couple of times for selected audiences and one of them said he is trying to get the Stones to allow release of the film... Keep your fingers crossed!!!
MLC
So what change have taken place since the 2008 screening ? :
In 2008, this was posted
Date: January 7, 2008 19:15
Damn!!! The folks over at Mayles org. are saying: NO plans on releasing this
extra footage they have... One shot deal from the other night.
Eric - I thought I remember reading a quote from the Mayles dude in a Q&A after
the screening that he want's to release the entire concert and was in discussion
with the Stones but hasn't received a go-ahead so that's why there are "No Plans"
On-hold until the Stones agree to release, whenever or if-ever..
MLC
Quote
His MajestyQuote
kleermaker
HM, you are of course entitled to dislike the Taylor era Stones and Mick Taylor's input in particular. But while he was in the Stones, he certainly didn't act like a guitar god at all. That's a far spread myth. On the studio albums his soloing is very modest. As for his live contribution: the prove is in comparing the Texas 1978 DVD with the live versions of the songs during Taylor's tenure. The funny thing is that Wood does solo on Live in Texas 1978 about as much as Taylor does on the official Brussels Affair. But no one seems to have noticed that. The cliché 'Taylor the Stones' noodling guitar god' is plain nonsense. He is no guitar god in the first place (so many guitarists are 'faster' and technically better), and secondly his licks and counterlicks are just as important as his solos. Surprise, Surprise: Ronnie Wood is soloing just as much as Mick Taylor does on those similar songs. The big difference: he did it not so good, to say it mildly. In that sense Taylor was indeed a 'guitar god'. But not in the usual sense of the word.
The Stones evolved from 1962 until 1974, GHS being their last great 'original' album, IORR being more like a status quo album. After IORR the Stones generally changed into a trendy band, following the popular musical trends of the time: punk, disco, reggae etc. That's one of the most important reasons people who got into the Stones at that time are so fond of that version of the band: they still recognize the sound of their time. Ask Doxa.
Quote
jamesfdouglas
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's the only official live version which actually has the whole song in it.
Quote
WeLoveToPlayTheBluesQuote
jamesfdouglas
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's the only official live version which actually has the whole song in it.
It's funny you say that. Isn't the Love You Live and Flashpoint versions all four verses?
Quote
jamesfdouglasQuote
WeLoveToPlayTheBluesQuote
jamesfdouglas
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's the only official live version which actually has the whole song in it.
It's funny you say that. Isn't the Love You Live and Flashpoint versions all four verses?
Nope, neither Love You Live nor Flashpoint have the 3rd verse "I watched with glee while your kings and queens...".
Quote
WeLoveToPlayTheBluesQuote
jamesfdouglasQuote
WeLoveToPlayTheBluesQuote
jamesfdouglas
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's the only official live version which actually has the whole song in it.
It's funny you say that. Isn't the Love You Live and Flashpoint versions all four verses?
Nope, neither Love You Live nor Flashpoint have the 3rd verse "I watched with glee while your kings and queens...".
REALLY! Wow. I guess I've never noticed! Not sure why I thought that. I thought it was only the Ya-Ya's version that was edited. Maybe it's from hearing the song so many times that it's just one of those things.
Quote
Erik_SnowQuote
MCDDTLCQuote
Erik_SnowQuote
MCDDTLC
Hey Guys,
The Maysles Bros. DO have SFTD on film!!! they have shown the complete concert
a couple of times for selected audiences and one of them said he is trying to get the Stones to allow release of the film... Keep your fingers crossed!!!
MLC
So what change have taken place since the 2008 screening ? :
In 2008, this was posted
Date: January 7, 2008 19:15
Damn!!! The folks over at Mayles org. are saying: NO plans on releasing this
extra footage they have... One shot deal from the other night.
Eric - I thought I remember reading a quote from the Mayles dude in a Q&A after
the screening that he want's to release the entire concert and was in discussion
with the Stones but hasn't received a go-ahead so that's why there are "No Plans"
On-hold until the Stones agree to release, whenever or if-ever..
MLC
Thanks, MLC.
Allthough the chances might have run out for SFTD footage to see the light of day, since the 40th anniversary edition of GYYYO allready been released. But...never say never
Quote
kleermakerQuote
His Majesty
My dislike for what followed is mostly about the style of guitar playing his replacement brought to the band and what it did to the quirky, but original sound The Rolling Stones had developed during 1962 - 1969 which set them apart from others. The introduction of a John Mayall's Bluesbreaker's school of guitar gods lead guitarist to The Rolling Stones made them sound more similar to other blues/rock acts of the time.
HM, you are of course entitled to dislike the Taylor era Stones and Mick Taylor's input in particular. But while he was in the Stones, he certainly didn't act like a guitar god at all. That's a far spread myth. On the studio albums his soloing is very modest. As for his live contribution: the prove is in comparing the Texas 1978 DVD with the live versions of the songs during Taylor's tenure. The funny thing is that Wood does solo on Live in Texas 1978 about as much as Taylor does on the official Brussels Affair. But no one seems to have noticed that. The cliché 'Taylor the Stones' noodling guitar god' is plain nonsense. He is no guitar god in the first place (so many guitarists are 'faster' and technically better), and secondly his licks and counterlicks are just as important as his solos. Surprise, Surprise: Ronnie Wood is soloing just as much as Mick Taylor does on those similar songs. The big difference: he did it not so good, to say it mildly. In that sense Taylor was indeed a 'guitar god'. But not in the usual sense of the word.
The Stones evolved from 1962 until 1974, GHS being their last great 'original' album, IORR being more like a status quo album. After IORR the Stones generally changed into a trendy band, following the popular musical trends of the time: punk, disco, reggae etc. That's one of the most important reasons people who got into the Stones at that time are so fond of that version of the band: they still recognize the sound of their time. Ask Doxa.